Reproducable experimental animal models are needed for the testing of novel embolization materials, which have been designed to treat endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms (IA). The present study aims to develop a safe and standardized surgical technique for stent assisted embolization of saccular aneurysms in a rat animal model.
The steady progess in the armamentarium of techniques available for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms requires affordable and reproducable experimental animal models to test novel embolization materials such as stents and flow diverters. The aim of the present project was to design a safe, fast, and standardized surgical technique for stent assisted embolization of saccular aneurysms in a rat animal model.
Saccular aneurysms were created from an arterial graft from the descending aorta.The aneurysms were microsurgically transplanted through end-to-side anastomosis to the infrarenal abdominal aorta of a syngenic male Wistar rat weighing >500 g. Following aneurysm anastomosis, aneurysm embolization was performed using balloon expandable magnesium stents (2.5 mm x 6 mm). The stent system was retrograde introduced from the lower abdominal aorta using a modified Seldinger technique.
Following a pilot series of 6 animals, a total of 67 rats were operated according to established standard operating procedures. Mean surgery time, mean anastomosis time, and mean suturing time of the artery puncture site were 167 ± 22 min, 26 ± 6 min and 11 ± 5 min, respectively. The mortality rate was 6% (n=4). The morbidity rate was 7.5% (n=5), and in-stent thrombosis was found in 4 cases (n=2 early, n=2 late in stent thrombosis).
The results demonstrate the feasibility of standardized stent occlusion of saccular sidewall aneurysms in rats – with low rates of morbidity and mortality. This stent embolization procedure combines the opportunity to study novel concepts of stent or flow diverter based devices as well as the molecular aspects of healing.
Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to a ruptured intracranial aneurysm is associated with a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome in many survivors. There are currently two general approaches to occlude IA: either microsurgical clipping (which requires operative exposure of the aneurysm), or endovascular occlusion. As the less invasive endovascular coil treatment of narrow-necked IA has been shown to be associated with slightly lower morbidity (especially in the posterior circulation1,2), endovascular treatment options have become the preferred modality of many neurosurgical centers. Numerous devices have been developed in order to extend the indications of endovascular treatment and overcome the main limitation of IA recurrence after coiling. Intracranial stents are especially promising to overcome these limitations, as they serve as a scaffold for neo-endothelization and coil herniation prevention, as well as protect the parent artery and improve intraluminal intraaneurysmal thrombosis caused by reduction of blood inflow. There is a need to study novel intracranial stents in a low cost animal model; at both macroscopic and molecular levels.
The aim of this study was to design a safe, fast, and standardized surgical technique for stent application in an already established saccular aneurysm model in rats3,4,5. In the present project, we evaluated the role of a biodegradable magnesium stent.
Male Wistar rats with a mean weight of 592 g (±50 SD) and mean age of 20 weeks were housed in animal facilities at a room temperature of 22-24 °C and twelve hour light/dark cycle, with free access to tap water and a pellet diet. The animals received care from humans in accordance with institutional guidelines. The experiments were approved by the Committee for Animal Care of the Canton Bern, Switzerland (BE 102/13). We strictly followed the recommendations for Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE guidelines).
1. Laboratory equipment, consumable supplies, surgical instruments
2. Anesthesia
3. Surgical preparation and positioning of the rat
4. Aneurysm graft harvesting
5. Aneurysm creation and stent application
6. Closure
The average duration of surgery was 167 (± 22) min, 26 (± 6) min of which were needed for aneurysm creation and a further 23 (± 7) min required for stent application and reconstruction of the arteriotomy (Figure 3).
Mortality, morbidity, and macroscopic in-stent thrombosis were the primary endpoints of the study. The regular follow-up periods were 7 days (n=28), and 21 days (n=32) respectively. Mortality or eventful morbidity lead to an early termination of the study. There were no deaths during surgery. Four animals (6%) died within the first three days post-op due to early in-stent thrombosis. Five rats (7.5%) experienced postoperative complications with two caused by early in-stent thrombosis, which led to paralysis of the hind legs. These animals were euthanized due to their severe neurological deficit. In two other cases, late in-stent thrombosis was seen at day 21, after the experiment had ended. These animals had shown no neurological deficits up to that point. One rat suffered wound dehiscence of all the abdominal wall layers on the second postoperative day with consecutive loss of volume and was euthanized as a result. The combined mortality and morbidity rate was 13.4% (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Figure 1: Illustration of the three distinctive segments of the abdominal aorta.
The vena cava and their disposals are colored blue, while the abdominal aorta and their disposals are colored red. * Marks the distal segment, in which the abdominal aorta puncture and stent insertion is done. **Marks the middle segment, in which the aneurysm implantation and final stent positioning occur. ***Marks the proximal segment, which is used for the application of the most proximal temporary clip during the stent implantation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Magnesium stent inflated at 1 bar Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Surgical characteristics.
Each point represents one animal; mean values (long line); and standard deviation Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Flow chart.
Number of animals used in the study; mortality and morbidity Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Macroscopic and microscopic (10x magnification) overview of Mg-stent treated end-to-side implanted aneurysms following tissue harvesting at 21 days.
A: The photograph on the left shows a patent abdominal aorta. The photograph on the right shows the longitudinally opened aorta with the thin neointima covering the stent and the insinuated aneurysm ostium behind the stent. B: The photograph on the left shows an in-stent thrombosis of the abdominal aorta. The photograph on the right shows the longitudinally opened aorta with a thrombus covering the vessel lumen. The degenerated stent struts were caused by the thrombus. C: A microscopic overview (hematoxylin eosin stain) of the aneurysm shown in A. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Bioabsorbable stents and animal models
In recent years the general trend in medicine has been away from permanent implants (which remain in the patient's body for the rest of their life) to bio-absorbable materials. Magnesium stents, in particular, are already quite established in cardiology8,9. Unfortunately these stents have not yet been tested for other applications, such as cerebrovascular diseases. For this reason we decided to study the usability of a bioabsorbable stent in saccular aneurysm treatment. The study was performed with rats as they – like other small experiment animals – are suitable due to the low associated purchase and living expenses. In addition, they can be used in different areas of research thanks to the possibility of genetic modification10. The low costs, easy handling, and relatively fast surgical procedures allow studies to be performed with a large number of animals. In order to evaluate new intravascular devices, it is crucial to use a standardized aneurysm model which allows for constant interindividual conditions; especially with regard to blood flow, wall shear stress, vessel turtuosity, aneurysm location and aneurysm size. The rat sidewall aneurysm model described provides all of these advantages. Furthermore the model allows the testing of novel endovascular approaches in different wall conditions. It presents the smallest possible animal model in which biological concepts of aneurysm healing and therapeutic applications – such as stents – can be analyzed. Thanks to its dimensions, it allows similar sized devices to be tested later for clinical use in humans. Please refer to previously published work for detailed descriptions of the advantages/disadvantages, and biological differences of preclinical extracranial aneurysm models in various species4,11.
Morbidity and mortality
Previous studies have shown high rates of mortality in abdominal stent implantation. The values vary from 5.7 – 57%12,13,14,15. Most animals died of thrombosis following the intima injury during stent implantation16. Even though the mortality rate in our study was low, stent-associated thrombosis remains a significant cause of postoperative complications and fatality (7.5% early in-stent thrombosis, 3% late in-stent thrombosis). We hypothesize that the reduced contact between the stent and vessel is an important reason for the low mortality rate of 6% (5 out of 67 animals) in our study. The contact was reduced thanks to the Seldinger technique and inflation of the balloon to 1 bar prior to removing the introducer; as the balloon covers the sharp edge of the magnesium stent. Through continuous, gentle dilatation of the puncture site with a guide wire, dilatator, and sheath, the puncture site can be kept small, which in turn facilitates the reconstruction of the vessel wall and reduces the risk of iatrogenic artery constriction. The rats must weigh at least 500 g for an unproblematic Seldinger technique insertion of the 4F introducer. Antiplatelet therapy has been shown to reduce in-stent thrombosis irrespective of the mechanic intima injury caused by stent placement12,17,18,19. Furthermore, thinner-strut stent devices significantly reduce vessel stenosis following stent treatment20. Aquarius et al.12 treated sidewall aneurysms with flow diverters in rats using a similar operative technique to that described above. They reported no in-stent thrombosis in their series. The main difference to this study is that they used dual antiplatelet therapy and thinner strut stent devices compared to our magnesium stents. As our study aimed to explore the biology of aneurysm healing after stent application, we decided to conduct the experiments without drugs so as not to influence the natural intraaneurysmal coagulation and proinflammatory state. We therefore accepted the higher risk of thrombosis.
Transaortic stent placement
Contrary to stent insertion through the carotid artery13,15,21,22 which sacrifices the vessel, a primary reconstruction of the puncture site (and preservation of the vessel) can be achieved by inserting the stent through a large vessel such as the abdominal aorta or the iliac artery14. Another advantage of transaortic stenting is it allows the direct visual monitoring needed for accurate stent placement and prevents damage to relevant abdominal feeders. Without visual control, false placement occurs in up to 12% of cases21. Furthermore, the size of the balloon and artery can be observed to avoid overexpansion of the vessel wall. Aneurysm creation and stent application in the abdomen allows the aneurysm to grow undisturbed, which is prevailingly seen in aneurysm with decellularized walls5. The only disadvantage of this anatomical position is the possible cellular and molecular interaction between the gastrointestinal tract and the aneurysm.
Currently there are no other translational, extracranial animal models which reflect the human intracranial aneurysm in the subarachnoid space.
Operative differences
Aquarius et al.12 described a method for treating sidewall aneurysms in a rat model using flow diverters. While the time required for the stent insertion was similar to our series (24.5±6.4 vs. 26±6 minutes), they had a shorter total operating time (126±23.0 vs. 167±22 minutes) and anastomosis time (16.3±6.4 vs. 23±7 minutes). The longer surgery time in our series may be explained by the more extended abdominal aorta dissection. As we inserted the stent with the pre-extended balloon to avoid intimal injury, we were forced to place the proximal clip superior to the renal artery. A more distal application of the proximal vessel clip could lead to early impediment of the balloon, and potentially mean that the aneurysm ostium is not covered by the stent. The ischemic time was fractioned (40 versus 23 min) in the present protocol to lower the risk of hypoxic damage. The organs were reoxygenated during a reperfusion phase of at least 10 min. One single long ischemic time shortens surgery duration but may increase the risk of postoperative multi organic failure – which did not occur in any of the presented cases. After a necessary learning period, the presented procedures should be manageable even for surgeons without prior microsurgical training.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this stent application technique in a rat abdominal side-wall aneurysm model proved to be expedient, with a high grade of standardization, low rate of morbidity and mortality and low costs. These characteristics make the model suitable for future study of materials intended for stent-assisted aneurysm embolization.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Eugen Hofmann and Philine Zumstein for their excellent technical assistance and for sharing their expertise in stent application procedures. We thank Majlinda Kalanderi for the anatomical drawing.
Medetomidine | any generic | ||
Ketamin | any generic | ||
Buprenorphine | any generic | ||
Phosphate buffered saline | |||
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (0.1%) | |||
3-0 resorbable suture | Ethicon Inc., USA | VCP428G | |
5-0 non absorbable suture | Ethicon Inc., USA | 8618G | |
6-0 non-absorbable suture | B. Braun, Germany | C0766070 | |
9-0 non-absorbable suture | B. Braun, Germany | G1111140 | |
10-0 non-absorbable suture | Covidien, USA | N2530 Monosof | |
Operation microscope | Zeiss, Germany | ||
Digital microscope camera | Sony, Japan | HXR-MC1P | |
Standard surgical instruments | multiple | see protocol 7.a | |
Microsurgical instruments | multiple | see protocol 7.b | |
Vascular clip applicator | B. Braun, Germany | FT495T | |
Temporary vascular clamps | B. Braun, Germany | ||
19G Puncture needle | Angiomed GmbH, Germany | 15820010 | |
Hydrophobic guide wire | Cook Medical, USA | G00650 | |
4F sheat | Cordis Corporation, USA | 504-604A | |
Inflation syringe | |||
Laboratory shaker | Stuart | SRT6 | |
Magnesium Stent 2.5/6 AMS with Polymer coating | Biotronik, Switzerland | ||
Surgery drape | |||
Sterile cellulose swabs | |||
Syringes 1 ml and 2 ml | |||
Hollow needles 18G and 26G | |||
Isotonic sodium chloride | |||
Microtubes | |||
Eye ointment | Bausch + Lomb Inc, USA | Lacrinorm | any generic |
Small animal shaver |