We describe here the latest advances in viral isolation for the characterization of new genotypes of Faustovirus, a new asfarvirus-related lineage of giant viruses. This protocol can be applied to the high throughput isolation of viruses, especially giant viruses infecting amoeba.
The isolation of giant viruses is of great interest in this new era of virology, especially since these giant viruses are related to protists. Giant viruses may be potentially pathogenic for many species of protists. They belong to the recently described order of Megavirales. The new lineage Faustovirus that has been isolated from sewage samples is distantly related to the mammalian pathogen African swine fever virus. This virus is also specific to its amoebal host, Vermamoeba vermiformis, a protist common in health care water systems. It is crucial to continue isolating new Faustovirus genotypes in order to enlarge its genotype collection and study its pan-genome. We developed new strategies for the isolation of additional strains by improving the use of antibiotic and antifungal combinations in order to avoid bacterial and fungal contaminations of the amoeba co-culture and favoring the virus multiplication. We also implemented a new starvation medium to maintain V. vermiformis in optimal conditions for viruses co-culture. Finally, we used flow cytometry rather than microscopic observation, which is time-consuming, to detect the cytopathogenic effect. We obtained two isolates from sewage samples, proving the efficiency of this method and thus widening the collection of Faustoviruses, to better understand their environment, host specificity and genetic content.
The discovery of giant viruses, especially those belonging to the Megavirales order, completely changed the world of viruses in terms of particle size and genome complexity. Viruses were previously thought to be small entities, and the Mimivirus appeared to break all the rules.1 Metagenomic data suggests the ubiquity of giant viruses not only in the environment, 2-5 but also in humans.6 Therefore, there is still a need to search for these viruses on a large scale. The diversity of these giant viruses was assessed by sampling not only a variety of aquatic environments and their associated sediments worldwide,7-11 but also by screening a variety of human samples12,13 and environmental samples.7,9 The Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus was isolated by co-culture using phagocytic protists, primarily Acanthamoeba spp.14-16 An entire collection of giant viruses were then also isolated from this specified protist host, which made the scientific community restrict its research and isolation procedure for Acanthamoeba spp. Clearly this reliance on a single host species has resulted in a large fraction of viruses being overlooked. The fact that the giant virus, CroV, was isolated with the highly motile marine protozoa Cafeteria roenbergensis,17,18 demonstrates the need to use a wider range of protozoa in order to discover new lineages or families of giant viruses. Reteno et al. managed to select other protozoa as cell hosts which had never previously been used, and isolated the new Asfar-related lineage of giant viruses (the newly named Faustovirus).19
In an attempt to isolate new Faustovirus genotypes in order to expand the members of this viral lineage, we modified our isolation procedures and used them to screen environmental samples capable of harvesting new Faustoviruses. We then described the entire protocol to characterize the new isolates. We assessed Vermamoeba vermiformis, the most common free-living protist found in human environments,20-22 which is already used in the isolation of the first Faustovirus prototype E12.19 This protist is currently still host-specific for Faustovirus. We knew that none of the known giant viruses was pathogenic for this amoeba, because no attempts to grow other giant viruses in our lab showed amoeba lysis or viral growth. For this reason, we believe that V. vermiformis is the best and most unique cell support known to isolate new Faustoviruses.
1. Sample Collection
2. Isolation Procedure
3. Characterization of the New Isolates after Lysis Detection
4. Virus Production, Purification and Genome Sequencing
The system studied in this manuscript validated its proof of concept by isolating two new Faustoviruses. Of the 70 samples tested, two episodes of lysis were detected, in contrast to our reliable negative controls. The negative control for lysis contained an 86% amoeba population. By contrast, the positive samples (ST1 for Saint Pierre de Meyzoargues), and (LC9 for the La Ciotat Sample 9) showed a dramatic decline in gated amoebae; more than 60% of amoebae were lysed with the highest percentage of debris. These robust results of the detection stage of our method are represented in Figure 1. Eosin/blue Azur and DAPI staining confirmed the presence of virus factories inside the amoebae, shown in Figure 2. Electron microscopy revealed the typical appearance of Megavirales with an icosahedral capsid, 200 nm in size, and lacking fibrils (Figure 3). A specific PCR for giant viruses, particularly for Faustovirus, confirmed our previous findings. It must be checked by PCR in order to eliminate ambiguous results or contaminated isolations. Viruses were cloned, produced and purified for whole genome sequencing. The genomes of the newly isolated Faustoviruses are submitted under the following Bioproject: PRJEB11169. The primo-, sub-, and final-culture showed no fungal or bacterial contamination, favoring this viral multiplication. Vermamoeba vermiformis tolerated the anti-fungal and antibiotic mixture. This was clear in the negative control of amoebae where after three days, the final culture contained more than 80% living amoeba. Vermamoeba also provided a good cell host for isolation, producing a significant viral load after lysis.
Figure 1: Lysis detection by automated flow cytometry. The data represent the two samples, which harvested Faustovirus and showed amoeba lysis. A living amoeba population was used as a negative control. Two gates were designed in the FSC-SSC plot, potentially corresponding to the cells and debris. After the final co-culture, a large population of debris demonstrated the presence of a potential infection in the samples (ST1 and LC9) (B), compared to the negative control which showed no substantial changes in the gated populations (A). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Virus factories typical for some giant viruses in Eosin/blue Azur staining and DAPI staining. Negative control showing the V. vermiformis nucleus using Eosin/blue Azur staining (A), and DAPI staining (D) (arrows point to the nucleus of the amoeba). Magnification at 1,000X. (B, C): Eosin/blue Azur staining at 1,000X magnification of V. vermiformis infected with Faustovirus LC9. Arrows point to the nucleus of the circularized infected amoeba, virus factories are marked with an asterisk. (E, F) DAPI staining at 1,000X magnification of V. vermiformis infected with Faustovirus LC9. Arrows point to virus factories at 8 hr post-infection (E), and 12 hr post-infection (F). Scale bar 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Negative staining micrograph. Negative staining of the viral suspension after lysis detection, showing the newly detected Faustovirus with the typical appearance of Megavirales, with an icosahedral capsid and a total size of 200 nm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
PYG composition | quantities |
Proteose peptone | 20 g |
Yeast extract | 2 g |
MgSO4. 7H2O | 0.980 g |
CaCl2 | 0.059 g |
citrate sodium. Dihydrate | 1 g |
Fe(NH4) 2(SO4) 2 x 6 H2O | 0.02 g |
Glucose | 18 g |
distilled water for | 1 L |
Adjust pH at 6.8 with HCl or KOH. | |
Autoclave 15 min at 121 °C. | |
Starvation medium | quantities |
Yeast extract | 2 g |
Glucose | 18 g |
Fe(NH4) 2(SO4) 2 . 6 H2O | 0.02 g |
PAS (detailed below) | 1 L |
Filtered on 0.22 mm | |
PAS solution A | quantities |
KH2PO4 | 0.136 g |
Na2HPO4 | 0.142 g |
PAS solution B | quantities |
MgSO4.7H2O | 4.0 mg |
CaCl2.2H2O | 4.0 mg |
NaCl | 0.120 g |
10 ml of each solution A and B, are added into 1 L of distilled water. |
Table 1: Solution recipes.
The possibility that Faustovirus could be the first member of a new Megavirales family close to ASFV was first suggested by Reteno et al.,19 but some differences can still be distinguished. It appears unclear whether Faustovirus should join the Asfarviridae family or whether it should instead form a new putative viral family. This issue will require further investigation, in particular a more comprehensive characterization of its morphology, host range, replication cycle and gene repertoire. More Faustovirus genotypes should be isolated in order to expand the pan-genome and to better understand the origins and relatives of this viral group or family. The technique we used allowed us to continue isolating new members of this potential new family. This technique is coupled with the slightly modified co-culture technique, which acts as an enrichment step for better detection. The time required by flow cytometry for the acquisition of data for hundreds of samples does not exceed half an hour, which is a major benefit compared to the previous standard co-culture system.9 The technique is far better than the previous standard system, particularly in terms of its higher sensitivity and precise quantification.
Of the 70 samples launched, we isolated two further Faustoviruses from sewage, which could provide information about the environmental specificity or ecosystem of this virus. Indeed, the specificity of Faustovirus for the protist Vermamoeba vermiformis,19 as well as the new classification of HcDNAV among the Asfarviridae23 and the fact that this virus infects many strains of dinoflagellate Heterocapsa spp but is incapable of infecting other types of phytoplanktons24 suggests the presence of host-specificity among Asfarvirus or its close relatives.
These findings imply the use of new cellular supports acting as specific or non-specific hosts, which can harbor these kinds of viruses. Our technique can be adapted to other types of protists in different conditions. Our method marks progress in terms of viral isolation and culture techniques. In summary, enrichment steps with the most appropriate antibacterial and antifungal mixture are crucial for the elimination of any possible bacterial or fungal contamination. Our starvation medium was the best solution to maintaining the amoeba in the best conditions for co-culture, while the PAS medium used in routine culture appears to be inappropriate for Vermamoeba spp, because fast encystment was observed after 24 hr of incubation. This was a big step towards optimal culture conditions where previous techniques had thus far failed. In order to obtain the best results using the culture protocols described here, it is recommended to use fresh amoebae capable of phagocytosis. The antibiotic and antifungal mixture should be non-toxic for protists; hence, it is recommended to test the viability of the used protozoon on the mixture. All used materials should be sterilized. The work should be conducted in a microbiological secured post class II to avoid any likely contamination. Incubation times and the three stages of culture should be respected as described. The processing time for flow cytometry detection can be calibrated depending on the organisms studied. A small shift in the population from the original gating may be observed, but this depends on the reliable negative control used as a reference population.
Multi-resistant bacteria that can be found in culture and are pathogens for amoeba can somehow limit our viral isolation method, where we can have bacterial growth masking the viruses' multiplication. Varying the antibiotic mixture or even filtrating the culture in order to eliminate the bacteria of more than 200 nm sized should manage this limitation sometimes.
All these adapted conditions offer a new optimal isolation procedure, which supports viral multiplication. This technique presents a considerable advantage in the discovery of new viruses, particularly Megavirales, to better understand their diversity, origins, and potential pathogenicity.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors have no acknowledgements to make.
LSR FORTESSA cytometer | BD Biosciences | France | 649225B4 |
TECNAI G2 F20 | FEI | Germany | 5027/11 |
Optical inverted microscope | leica | France | 72643 |
DNA extraction | Qiagen EZ1 Advanced XL Extraction Robot | France | L106A0452 |
PCR Cycler CFX96 | Bio rad | France | 785BR06298 |
PYG medium , PAS, Starvation medium | In house laboratory production | Marseille URMITE | x |
Amoeba strain CDC-19 | ATCC | France | 50237 |
Plates | Cellstar | France | 655180 |
PCR materials, primers. | eurogentec | France | Primers cited in manuscript |
glasstic slide 10 with grids | Kova | USA | H899871441F |
Eosin/ blue Azur-Hemacolor stain | Merck milipore | France | 111955,6,57,109468 |
Vacuum driven filters | Thermo scientific | France | BPV4550 / 20170115 |
Phosphate-Buffered Saline | Thermo Fisher scientific | France | 10010-023 |
DAPI stain | Life Technologies | France | D1306 |
cytospin 4 cytocentrifuge | Thermo Fisher scientific | France | 10522013JT184-31 |
Single cytology tunnel | Biomedical polymers inc. | France | BMP-cyto-S50 |
Carbon grids | Euromedex | France | FCF400NI |
Ammonium molibdate | VWR internationanl | France | 21276185 |
Flasks | SARSTEDT | Germany | 833911 |
0.22μm filters | Milex millipor | France | SE2M229104 |
Ultracentrifuge Sorval WX 80 | Thermo scientific | France | 9102448 |
Rapid-flow filters | Nalgene | France | 450-0020 |