The presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in bone sarcomas has recently been linked to their pathogenesis. In this article, we present the isolation of CSCs from primary cell cultures obtained from human biopsies of conventional osteosarcoma (OS) using the ability of CSCs to grow under nonadherent conditions.
The current improvements in therapy against osteosarcoma (OS) have prolonged the lives of cancer patients, but the survival rate of five years remains poor when metastasis has occurred. The Cancer Stem Cell (CSC) theory holds that there is a subset of tumor cells within the tumor that have stem-like characteristics, including the capacity to maintain the tumor and to resist multidrug chemotherapy. Therefore, a better understanding of OS biology and pathogenesis is needed in order to advance the development of targeted therapies to eradicate this particular subset and to reduce morbidity and mortality among patients. Isolating CSCs, establishing cell cultures of CSCs, and studying their biology are important steps to improving our understanding of OS biology and pathogenesis. The establishment of human-derived OS-CSCs from biopsies of OS has been made possible using several methods, including the capacity to create 3-dimensional stem cell cultures under nonadherent conditions. Under these conditions, CSCs are able to create spherical floating colonies formed by daughter stem cells; these colonies are termed "cellular spheres". Here, we describe a method to establish CSC cultures from primary cell cultures of conventional OS obtained from OS biopsies. We clearly describe the several passages required to isolate and characterize CSCs.
Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare malignant connective tissue tumors originating predominantly from the embryonic mesoderm1. The different types include bone sarcomas and soft tissue sarcomas. Bone sarcomas, a group of relatively uncommon primary tumors, consist of several subtypes, including osteosarcoma (OS). OS, one of the most common primary tumors of the bone, is a mesenchymal malignancy that exhibits extensive clinical, histological, and molecular heterogeneities2, 3. Unfortunately, OS occurs predominantly in children and in young adults4, 5 and represents 60% of the common histologic subtypes of bone sarcoma in childhood6, 7. OS usually affects the skeletal areas, which are characterized by rapid bone growth (e.g., the metaphysis of long bones). Among the histologically different subtypes of OS, conventional OS, also called medullary or central OS, has a high grade of malignancy and a quota share of 80%8. This 80% is composed of 60% conventional osteoblastic OS, 10% chondroblastic OS, and 10% fibroblastic OS6, 8-10. Other OS subtypes include anaplastic, telangiectatic, giant cell-rich and small cell OS. Despite advances in combined surgery and chemotherapy in OS management, the outcome remains poor, with a long-term survival rate of 65-70% in patients without metastasis11, 12. Distant recurrences frequently occur as pulmonary metastases or, less frequently, as metastases to distant bones and local recurrences13. Metastases are often resistant to conventional treatments. This resistance is the reason why the 10-year disease-free survival is approximately 30% in patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis14, 15.
As with normal tissue, cancer tissue is composed of a heterogeneous collection of cell types. Cells within the tumor seem to correspond to different stages of development. Within any normal tissue resides a subpopulation of cells with the ability to selfrenew, thus providing progenitors and mature cells for tissue homeostasis. Similarly, cancer is composed of a similar heterogeneous population of cells at different stages of development, with different degrees of proliferation and tumorigenic potential. A subset of these cancer cells, termed Cancer stem Cells (CSCs), constitutes a reservoir of selfsustaining cells with the exclusive ability to selfrenew and maintain the malignant potential of tumors, thus generating the different cell lineages that constitute the tumor bulk16. In the 1990s, studies on acute myeloid leukaemia provided the first compelling evidence for the existence of CSC subpopulations17, 18. CSCs have since been isolated from a great number of solid tumors19, thereby becoming one of the most researched topics in cancer research. CSCs may indeed arise from normal stem cells by mutations in genes that make the normal stem cells cancerous20-23. Multiple transforming mutations and interactions with the microenvironment could also contribute to healthy progenitors and mature cells acquiring the selfrenewal capacity and immortality that typify CSCs. There are several hypotheses about this transformation. Healthy progenitors, healthy mature cells, and cancer cells, can dedifferentiate to stem cells, obtaining a stem-like phenotype by activating selfrenewal-associated genes24-28. Despite several recent studies, the origins of CSCs have yet to be discovered.
A particular characteristic of CSCs is that their capacity to resist the multi-therapy approach, which consists of combined surgery and chemotherapy with different drugs. Recent studies have shown that CSCs may also acquire resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy agents. Possible explanations for this resistance include the overexpression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) multidrug transporter (i.e., MDR1 and BCRP1), overexpression of chemotherapy metabolizing enzymes such as aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1), and/or changes in cell cycle kinetics30-33. The direct consequence of all these concepts that have been described thus far is that a cancer therapy would be efficient only if the CSC subpopulation were completely eliminated, while local recurrence or distant metastasis could occur if even a single CSC survived.
The discovery of CSCs in human sarcomas34, particularly OS35, or in any other bone and soft tissue cancers, has great clinical importance because it offers a possible explanation as to why many treatments seem to be effective initially, but the patients later relapse. Therefore, the hope for the future battle against conventional OS is to find new and specific targeted therapies based on the development of innovative drugs directed at OS-CSCs thanks to the molecular characterization of this subpopulation and to the study of CSC biology.
In 1992, Reynolds and colleagues, who were investigating whether a subset of stem cells was present in the adult mammalian brain, developed a method to isolate cells suspected to be stem-like cells36, 37. This method is based on the particular ability of these cells to form spherical colonies when grown under nonadherent conditions. Similar techniques were employed by Gibbs and colleagues in 2005 to study a subpopulation of stem-like cells in bone sarcomas38. To isolate and characterize OS-CSCs from primary cell cultures of different types of conventional OS, we decided to adapt this technique for OS cell lines.
Here, we describe this adapted method of the sphere formation assay, termed "sarcosphere assay", which can be used to isolate OS-CSCs from finite primary cell lines derived from human biopsies of conventional OS. We also describe all the techniques used to validate the stem-like CSC phenotype of the cell lines isolated by this assay: 1) evaluation of the expression of genes that characterize pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cells (ESCs) and of the CD133 gene, which is a marker of CSCs; 2) colony-forming unit (CFU) assay; 3) evaluation of the ability of these cells to differentiate into osteoblasts and adipocytes under appropriate differentiation conditions; 4) study of the surface markers of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) (i.e., CD44, CD105 and Stro-1) by immunofluorescence staining and by flow cytometric analysis; 5) evaluation of the ALDH activity of these cells.
All experimentation using human tissues described herein was approved by the local ethical committee (Rif. N. 141/12). Informed consent for the collection of tissue samples and for the use and storage of the samples was obtained from the donors at AOUC.
1. Preparation for Culture
2. Establishing Primary OS Cell Cultures and OS Finite Cell Lines (OSA)
NOTE: Primary OS cell cultures were prepared from fresh samples of conventional OS biopsies collected at the "Unità Ortopedia Oncologica e Ricostruttiva", AOUC Careggi, Florence. All biopsies, which were obtained by needle aspiration or surgical resection of a small portion of the tumor (Figure 1A, B), were immediately placed in culture medium supplemented with 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (pH 7.4) and transported to the laboratory where they were processed. All described manipulations were conducted under aseptic conditions using a laminar flow hood.
3. Sarcosphere Assay to Isolate OS-CSCs
NOTE: This experiment is performed on OSA. The duration of this experiment is related to the capacity of the cells to form these sphere colonies (sarcospheres), and the range of time is 7, 14, 21, and 28 d.
4. OS-CSC Lines
NOTE: OS-CSCs are obtained from the sarcospheres that exhibit adherent expansion by reintroducing and reculturing these cells in a monolayer after they are plated in small 60 mm Petri dishes no longer under ultra-low attachment conditions.
5. In vitro Analysis to Characterize OS-CSCs:
OS samples obtained by needle aspiration or surgical resection of a small portion of the tumor (Figure 1A, B) permit the isolation of only one OSA if treated precisely, as described in the Protocol section (Figure 2A, B). Unfortunately, the number of cells isolated from the biopsies is low, with an output range from 30 – 50%. The output depends on the type and the dimension of biopsies (Figure 5A, B). These cells must be treated precisely. Consequently, approximately one month is necessary for the primary cultures to reach confluency in a 100 mm Petri dish. After this time, OSA are obtained from two OS samples marked OSA5 and OSA6 (Figure 6A, B). Then, it is necessary to subculture the primary cell line to obtain an adequate number of cells to perform the characterization analysis and to cryopreserve the cell lines. At the 3rd passage of subculture, when both OSA primary cell lines reach confluency, they are plated in 6-well ultra-low attachment plates for the sarcosphere assay. This type of plate is used because it permits us to maintain cells in a suspended state, to prevent the stem cells from attachment-mediated differentiation, to prevent the anchorage-dependent cells from dividing, and finally, to reduce attachment to the substrate. Hence, their use permits us to create a stressful condition for the cancer cells, which is necessary for the selection of CSCs. At 24 hr after the start of the assay, cells appear isolated from one another (Figure 7). After 7 d of monitoring the progression of the assay, small spherical colonies have started to form and are visible (Figure 8). At 28 d, several large spherical colonies that have formed in each well can be observed (Figure 9A, B). After the sarcospheres have been cultured for 28 d, these large spherical colonies can be isolated. Figure 10 shows the steps for isolating sarcospheres from 6-well ultra-low attachment plates and reculturing them under adherent conditions. Figure 11 shows the floating spherical colonies after isolation. The large spherical colonies plated in normal attachment plates show adherent expansion after isolation (Figure 12A, B). Cells that expand from the single sarcospheres are probably cancer cells with a stem cell-like phenotype. Hence, after isolation, OS-CSCs were probably obtained. These cells are named OSA5-CSCs and OSA6-CSCs (Figure 13A, B).
At this point, it is necessary to proceed with the characterization of the stem cell-like phenotype for the two OS-CSC lines obtained, as described above. The analyses for the characterization of the stem cell-like phenotype were performed on the 4th passage of subculture after the sarcospheres for each OS-CSC line were isolated. The two cell lines, OSA5-CSCs and OSA6-CSCs, showed strong positivity for the surface MSC markers (CD105 and CD44) (Figure 14A, B and Figure 15A, B), while they showed moderate positivity for the surface MSC marker Stro-1 (Figure 16A, B). Our observations have been confirmed by negative results obtained with the commercial and differentiated colon cancer cell line HCT8 (Figure 14C, Figure 15C, Figure 16C). A total lack of specific and nonspecific staining for these surface markers in the HCT8 cell line was observed.
To evaluate the MSC phenotype of the two OS-CSCs, we also performed flow cytometric analyses. Both the OS-CSC lines expressed high levels of CD44 and CD105. However, of the cells in both cell lines, only 1.14% expressed Stro-1. Therefore, this result confirmed the moderate presence of Stro-1 as demonstrated by immunofluorescence staining. In contrast, 99.62% of the OSA5-CSCs expressed CD44 and 87.38% of these cells expressed CD105; 99.88% of the OSA6-CSCs expressed CD44 in and 95.79% of these cells expressed CD105. Additionally, both cell lines are CD45-.
We assessed the expression of 3 ESC markers (Nanog, Oct 3/4, Sox2) and of the CD133 gene, another CSCs marker, by RT-PCR. We noticed that all of these genes were expressed in both OS-CSC lines (Figure 17). The adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation assays showed the capacity of both isolated OSA-CSC lines to differentiate into osteoblasts (Figure 18A – D and Figure 19A - D) and into adipocytes (Figure 20A – D).
Furthermore, the CFU assay (Figure 21) showed a good rate of clonogenic efficiency, with 13% for OSA5-CSCs and 14% for OSA6-CSC. Several recent studies have shown that high levels of ALDH activity are characteristic of various types of cancer. This parameter could be used as a cancer stem cell marker and is correlated with a poor prognosis. The ALDH activity assay showed that both OS-CSC lines have high levels of ALDH activity (Figure 22), whereas ALDH activity was observed at the lower quantifiable limit in the fibroblast line that was used as a negative control in this assay.
Figure 1. Examples of OS Biopsy Samples. (A). Biopsy sample obtained by needle aspiration. (B). Biopsy sample obtained by surgical resection of a part of the tumor. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Mechanical Disaggregation of an OS Sample. (A) Fragmentation of a sample using Perry tweezers and a lancet. (B) Fragments suspended in CM (indicated by the arrow). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Equipment and Consumables Needed to Isolate Sarcospheres. (A). All the equipment necessary for cell isolation. 1. A sterile syringe with a sterile membrane filter holder; 2. Two different media: GM and SCGM; 3. A sterile glass Pasteur pipette. (B) Detail of the syringe assembled on a support, with the membrane filter holder. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Filtration Unit. Several components needed to assemble the filtration unit (A) (the net filter is indicated by the arrow). Phase contrast observation of the 40 µm meshes (one mesh is indicated by the arrow) of the net filter (B). Original magnification: 10X. The filtration unit assembled (C – D). Filtration unit sterilized (E). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5. Primary Cell Cultures of Conventional OS. Phase contrast observation of primary cell cultures of high grade OS. In (A), several bright bone fragments are visible, while in (B), several small rounded and floating erythrocytes are present. Original magnification: 10X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6. Conventional Osteosarcoma Finite Cell Lines (OSA). (A) OSA5 and (B) OSA6. Observation in phase contrast. Original magnification: 10X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7. Sarcosphere Assay of OSA5 and OSA6. After 24 h from the start of the assay, cells were floating and isolated from each other (cells are indicated by arrows). Observation in phase contrast. Original magnification: 20X. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8. Sarcosphere Assay of OSA5 and OSA6 at 7 D. 7 d into the assay, several small spherical colonies surrounded by single cells could be observed. The sarcospheres (some of these sarcospheres are indicated by arrows) appear floating in the medium or slightly settled down into the bottom of the well. Observation in phase contrast. Original magnification: 20X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9. Sarcosphere Assay of OSA5 and OSA6 at 28 D. After 28 d, several large amber sarcospheres are observed in each well of the plates for each OSA cell line, OSA5 (A) and OSA6 (B). Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 10. Passages for the Isolation of Sarcospheres. The steps for isolating sarcospheres from 6-well ultra-low attachment plates and their reculturing under adherent conditions are shown. (A) All the equipment needed for the isolation: 1. One 6-well ultra-low plate with formed sarcospheres in each well, 2. syringe with the net filter holder, 3. pipette, 4. 1,000 µL sterile tips, 5. 2 sterile Perry tweezers, 6. 2 different culture media, 7. sterile Pasteur pipette 8. Petri dishes. (B) Collection of sarcospheres. The medium contained in each well is collected using a pipette with a sterile 1,000 µL tip. (C) Collect the suspension in the syringe. The collected suspension is transferred to the syringe to start the natural filtration process using the membrane filter holder. (D) Natural filtration. (E) Disassembling the membrane filter holder from the syringe. After all the suspension is filtered, the net filter holder is taken apart and put in a Petri dish; (F) Disassembling the membrane filter holder. Sarcospheres are contained in the pores of the net filter in the net filter holder, so they must be freed using the Perry tweezers. (G, H) Removal of sarcospheres from the membrane filter. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 11. Sarcosphere Isolation. Isolated sarcospheres float in the medium in the 60 mm Petri dish. Observation in phase-contrast. Original magnification: 40X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 12. Sarcosphere After Isolation. Sarcospheres from OSA5 (A) and OSA6 (B) cell lines at the beginning of adherent expansion following reintroduction and reculturing in a monolayer under adherent conditions at 48 h after isolation. Observation in phase-contrast. Original magnification: 20X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 13. Sarcospheres at 7 D After Isolation. Sarcospheres from OSA5 (A) and OSA6 (B) cell lines showed adherent expansion following reintroduction and reculturing in a monolayer under adherent conditions at 7 d after isolation. Observation in phase-contrast. Original magnification: 20X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 14. Immunofluorescence Staining for CD105. Immunofluorescence staining for CD105 in the OSA-CSC lines OSA5-CSCs (A) and OSA6-CSCs (B) and in the continuous cell line HCT8 (C), which was used as a negative control. LSCM in conventional color: green for CD105 and red for cytoskeleton. Original magnification: 10X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 15. Immunofluorescence Staining for CD44. Immunofluorescence staining for CD44 in the OSA-CSC lines OSA5-CSCs (A) and OSA6-CSCs (B) and in the continuous cell line HCT8 (C), which was used as a negative control. LSCM in conventional colors: green for CD44 and red for cytoskeleton. Original magnification: 10X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 16. Immunofluorescence staining of Stro1. Immunofluorescence staining for Stro-1 in the OSA-CSC lines OSA5-CSCs (A) and OSA6-CSCs (B) and in the continuous cell line HCT8 (C), which was used as a negative control. LSCM in conventional colors: green for Stro-1 and red for cytoskeleton. Original magnification: 10X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 17. Expression of Nuclear ESC Markers and of the CD133 Gene. RT-PCR showing the expression of Nanog, Oct 3/4, Sox2 and CD133 in OSA5-CSCs (A) and in OSA6-CSCs (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 18. Osteogenic Differentiation Assay - ALP. Osteogenic differentiation at 0 d (A, B) and after 10 d (C, D) of induction as determined by cytochemical staining for ALP using Fast Blue BB. In blue, ALP+ cells; in red, the nucleus counterstained with propidium iodide. Composite observation in brightfield and in fluorescence. Original magnification: 20X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 19. Osteogenic Differentiation Assay - HA. Osteogenic differentiation at 0 d (A, B) and after 20 d (C, D) of induction as determined by cytochemical staining for hydroxyapatite (HA) with Alizarin Red S. The cells are contrasted in blue/grey, and the grainy deposits of HA are stained in red. Observation in phase contrast. Original magnification: 40X. Bar size: 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 20. Adipogenic Differentiation Assay. Adipogenic differentiation at 0 d (A, B) and after 14 d (C, D) of induction as determined by cytochemical staining with Oil Red O. In red, the lipidic vesicles (the larger vesicles are indicated by the black/red arrows; the smaller vesicles are indicated by the white/black arrows); in blue/violet, the nuclei counterstained by haematoxylin. Observation in brightfield. Original magnification: 40X. Bar size: 100 µM. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 21. CFU Assay. CFU assay of OSA-CSC lines stained with toluidine blue. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 22. ALDH Activity Assay. The ALDH colorimetric assay detected high levels of ALDH activity in the two OS-CSC lines, OSA5-CSCs and OSA6-CSCs, whereas the assay detected the absence of this activity in the finite differentiated cell line of fibroblasts, FIB. Error bars: SD. **: p < 0.001 vs FIB; *: p < 0.01 vs FIB. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Gene | Oligonucleotides | Sequence (5¹-3¹) | Amplicon size (bp) | Tₐ (°C) | |
Nanog | Forward primer Reverse primer | CCCAGCTGTGTGTACTCAAT GGTTCAGGATGTTGGAGAGTT | 87 | 60 | |
Oct 3/2 | Forward primer Reverse primer | GGGAGGAGCTAGGGAAAGA TCCTTCCTTAGTGAATGAAGAACT | 77 | 60 | |
Sox2 | Forward primer Reverse primer | TGCAGTACAACTCCATGACC GGACTTGACCACCGAACC | 125 | 55 | |
CD133 | Forward primer Reverse primer | CCAGAAGCCGGGTCATAAAT ATTCACTCAAGGCACCATCC | 127 | 56 | |
bp, base pairs of amplicon size; Tₐ, annealing temperature |
Table 1. Detailed List of Primer Sequences for Nanog, Oct 3/4, Sox2 and CD133 with the Amplicon Size and the Annealing Temperature
CSCs have several properties that permit the identification of this particular cellular subset in the tumor bulk. On the basis of these characteristics, such as acquired resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy agents for the overexpression of ATP-binding cassette multidrug efflux transporters28, 32, 33, or for the upregulation of the expression of detoxification enzymes such as ALDH32, for the expression of a particular surface marker, such as CD133, CD44, CD34, CD90, and others30, 34, 35, 41, several different methods to isolate CSCs have been developed42-44. One of these techniques is the sphere formation assay, which is based on the capacity of CSCs to grow under non-adherent conditions.
The ability of tissue stem cells and CSCs to form spheres was first described in studies on the identification of neural stem cells by Reynolds et al.37. Subsequently, Gibbs et al.38 used these studies to begin isolating CSCs from solid tumors, in particular, from bone sarcomas. We have decided to use the sphere formation assay method illustrated by Gibbs et al. to isolate CSCs from OSA cell lines obtained from conventional OS biopsies. We adapted the original method to improve the results of this assay and to facilitate its reproducibility for other cancer cell lines. With reference to the establishment of the sphere formation assay, we verified that plating 40,000 cells/well is a good practice for maintaining cells in isolation at the beginning of the assay. This trick is very important to avoid the possibility that the spherical colonies originate from cellular aggregation and not from the particular and exclusive capacity of a single CSC to grow under non-adherent conditions and form a spherical colony. This ability is a particularly critical point of this assay.
We also certified that to obtain a good rate of sphere formation, it is sufficient to refresh aliquots of growth factors every 3 d and not every day as described in the original method. In this study, we also established and extensively described a good method for isolating the spherical colonies that formed when cultured under non-adherent conditions. This step is critical in this assay because it is very important to try to isolate as many of the spheres as possible that are formed in each well without damaging them. It is also important to isolate only the spheres and not the single cells, which could remain in suspension for the duration of the assay. To overcome these critical points, we have developed a particular isolation method, which, as shown above, gave good results for CSC isolation. Obviously, there is the possibility that not all the spheres that formed can be recovered, but the loss percentage is very low. Indeed, we also have the possibility to use a filter with 40 µm pores to isolate spheres after they become large (formed approximately 100 – 200 cells).
This isolation stops sphere formation but allows the single cells, part of the methylcellulose residue, and the smallest spheres to be filtered. This elimination is performed by thorough filtration as described in the protocol.
Moreover, the selection of the largest spherical colonies through the 40 µm mesh with the consequent loss of the smallest spherical colonies allows one to select the CSCs with the highest capacity to form spherical colonies and with greater stemness. All of these modifications were performed to improve the assay and to help researchers studying CSCs to understand and reproduce the most critical step of the original method of the sphere formation assay.
Among the studies regarding in vitro methods for isolating CSCs, this study aimed to show how this adapted sphere formation assay could be a good method for isolating CSCs from OSA cell lines. The adaptations to the original method and the detailed isolation technique described improve its efficacy. In a short time, good number of CSCs can be obtained and used for several experiments. Therefore, it is possible to rapidly confirm the stem-like phenotypes and, in particular, to study the double stem-like phenotype that characterizes OS-CSCs. Thus, this modified assay could be a good technique for isolating CSCs and studying their biology. In the future, this method, with additional adaptations, may also be used to isolate CSCs from other finite cancer cell lines obtained by biopsies of rare solid tumors.
The possibility of isolating CSCs from rare solid tumors, such as OS, not only permits the improvement of studies about this particular cancer but also extends to studies of different types of cancer to develop better methods for their isolation and to future studies of the biology of this important cellular subset. Therefore, as we have done in this study, it is important to improve the methods of CSC isolation through the study of CSC biology, with the final goal of finding molecular targets and developing a very specific anticancer therapy directed against this particular cellular subset, which is probably responsible for the maintenance of the primary tumor, the development of its recurrence, and the origin of metastases in several organs. The study of CSC biology is also important for finding therapies that could be incisive in the cure of cancers, such as OS, for which the survival rate after neoadjuvant treatment remains very poor.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This study was supported by ITT (Istituto Toscano Tumori) Grant Proposal 2010.
Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline with Ca and Mg (DPBS) | LONZA | BE17-513F | _ |
Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline without Ca and Mg (DPBS) | LONZA | BE17-512F | _ |
Porcine Trypsin 1:250 | BD Difco | 215310 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: Powder |
Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate(EDTA) | Sigma-Aldrich | E4884 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: Powder |
Collagenase from Clostridium histolyticum | Sigma-Aldrich | C0130 | Solvent: Buffer Solution pH 7.4. Stock concentration: Powder |
Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) | BDH Chemicals-VWR | 10323 | _ |
Nutrient Mixture F-12 Ham | Sigma-Aldrich | F6636 | Solvent: Ultrapure dH2O. Stock concentration: Powder |
2-Phospho-L-ascorbic acid trisodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich | 49752 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: 5 mg/ml |
β-Glycerol phosphate disodium salt pentahydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | 50020 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: 1M |
Insulin. Human Recombinant | Sigma-Aldrich | 91077 | Solvent: NaOH 0.1M. Stock concentration: 10 mM |
3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine | Sigma-Aldrich | I5879 | Solvent: DMSO. Stock concentration: 500 mM |
Indomethacin | Sigma-Aldrich | I7378 | Solvent: DMSO. Stock concentration: 200 mM |
Dexamethasone | Sigma-Aldrich | D4902 | Solvent: DMSO. Stock concentration: 1 mM / 100 µM. Stock in nitrogen liquid to maintain the biological activity |
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Sigma-Aldrich | F7524 | _ |
Fetal Bovine Serum South America | EUROCLONE | ECS0180L | _ |
Penicillin-Streptomycin (PEN-STREP) 10,000 U/ml | LONZA | DE17-602E | _ |
Methyl cellulose | Sigma-Aldrich | 274429 | Solvent: Ultrapure dH2O. Stock concentration: 2% |
Putresceine dihydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | P5780 | Solvent: Ultrapure dH2O. Stock concentration: Powder |
apo-Transferrin | Sigma-Aldrich | T-1147 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: 25 mg/ml |
Human Epidermal Growth Factor (EFGF) | Sigma-Aldrich | E5036 | Solvent: DPBS pH 7.4. Stock concentration: 10 µg/ml |
Fibroblast Growth Factor-Basic Human | Sigma-Aldrich | F0291 | Solvent: DPBS +0.2% BSA. Stock concentration: 25 µg/ml |
Selenous Acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 211176 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: 30 mM |
Progesterone | Sigma-Aldrich | P8783 | Solvent: ETOH. Stock concentration: 10 mM |
Toluidine Blue O | Sigma-Aldrich | 198161 | Solvent: Ultrapure dH2O. Stock concentration: Powder |
Oil Red O | ICN Biochemicals | 155984 | Solvent: 2-Propanol. Stock concentration: Powder |
Naphtol AS-MX Phosphate Disodium Salt | Sigma-Aldrich | N5000 | Solvent: DMSO. Stock concentration: Powder |
Fast Blue BB Salt | Sigma-Aldrich | F3378 | Solvent: TrisHCL pH 9.0. Stock concentration: Powder |
Fast Red Violet LB Salt | Sigma-Aldrich | F3381 | Solvent: TrisHCL pH 9.1. Stock concentration: Powder |
Bovine Serum Albumin Fraction V (BSA) | Sigma-Aldrich | A-4503 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: 2% |
Alizarin Red S | ICN Biochemicals | 100375 | Solvent: Ultrapure dH2O. Stock concentration: Powder |
Formaldehyde solution | Sigma-Aldrich | 533998 | 4% |
Triton 100X | MERCK | 11869 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: 0.2%. Danger_Use only under chemical wood |
Calcein | MERCK | 2315 | Solvent: DPBS . Stock concentration: 200 µg/ml |
2-Propanol | MERCK | 109634 | Danger_Use only under chemical wood |
Ab-CD105 (Mouse monoclonal [SN6] to CD105 (FITC) | Abcam | ab11415 | Liquid. Application: Flow Cytometry (Flow Cyt) |
Ab-CD44 (Mouse monoclonal [F10-44-2] to CD44 (PE/Cy7®) ) | Abcam | ab46793 | Liquid. Application: Flow Cytometry (Flow Cyt) |
Ab-CD45 (Mouse monoclonal [MEM-28] to CD45 (PerCP)) | Abcam | ab65952 | Liquid. Application: Flow Cytometry (Flow Cyt) |
Ab-CD105 (Human CD105 Purified Antibody) | Invitrogen | MHCD10500 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: Lyophilized. Application: Immunofluorescence staining (IF) |
Ab-CD44 (Anti-CD44 Antibody) | Abcam | EPR1013Y(ab51037) | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: Lyophilized. Application: Immunofluorescence staining (IF) |
Ab-Stro-1 (Mouse anti-STRO-1) | Invitrogen | 398401 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: Lyophilized. Application: Flow Cytometry (Flow Cyt) Immunofluorescence staining (IF) |
Alexa Fluor 488 (Anti-Rabbit IgG (Alexa Fluor 488 Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L)) | Invitrogen | A-21206 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: Lyophilized. Application: Immunofluorescence staining (IF) |
FITC Anti-Mouse IG (FITC-Rabbit Anti Mouse IgG (H+L)) | Invitrogen | 61-6511 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: Lyophilized. Application: Flow Cytometry (Flow Cyt) Immunofluorescence staining (IF) |
Alexa Fluor 635 Phalloidin | Invitrogen | A34054 | Solvent: DPBS. Stock concentration: Lyophilized. Application: Immunofluorescence staining (IF) |
AutoMACS™Running Buffer MACS Separation Buffer | Miltenyi | 130,091,221 | Liquid. Store at 4°C |
QIAzol®Lysis Reagent | QIAGEN | 79306 | Danger_Use only under chemical wood |
QUANTITECT® Reverse Transcription Kit | QIAGEN | 205314 | _ |
Chlorophorm | Sigma-Aldrich | C2432 | Liquid. Danger_Use only under chemical wood |
Laminar flow hood | GELAIRE | BSB6A | _ |
Chemical hood | ARREDI TECNICI Villa | Modello DYNAMICA | _ |
CO₂ incubator | Officine Meccaniche KW | CO2W91 | _ |
Centrifuge | EPPENDORF | 5415R | _ |
Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy LSM 5109 Meta | ZEISS | _ | _ |
iCycler PCR Thermalcycler | BIORAD | _ | _ |
CyFlow®SPACE | (PARTEC) | _ | _ |
Inverted Micrposcope Axiovert 200M | ZEISS | _ | _ |
Freezing container , | Nalgene | _ | _ |
Original Pipet-Aid | pbiBrand | _ | _ |
Micropipettes | EPPENDORF | _ | _ |
Glass Pasteur Pipette | SIGMA | _ | _ |
VICTOR3™ | PERKIN ELMER | _ | _ |
Conical tubes (15 and 50 mL) | BD FALCON | 352096 (for 15 mL) 352070 (for 50 mL) | _ |
24 Well Clear Flat Bottom TC-Treated Multiwell Cell Culture Plate | BD FALCON | 353047 | _ |
6 Well Clear Flat Bottom Ultra Low Attachment Multiple Well Plates | CORNING | 3471 | _ |
Serological pipettes (5 and 10 mL) | BD FALCON | 357543 (for 5 mL) 357551 (for 10mL) | _ |
Syringe (5mL) | B|BRAUN | 4617053V | _ |
Petri dish 100X20 mm | BD FALCON | 353003 | _ |
Röhren Tubes (3,5 ml, 55x12mm, PS) | SARSTEDT | 55,484 | _ |
Petri dish 60X15 mm | BD FALCON | 353004 | _ |
Cryovials 1.5 ml | NALGENE | 5000-1020 | _ |
Cell CultureFlasks 25 cm² | BD FALCON | 353014 | _ |
Nylon Net Filter, Hydrophilic | MERCK | NY4104700 | _ |
Swinnex Filter Holder | MERCK | SX0002500 | _ |
Perry tweezer | _ | _ | _ |
Lancet | _ | _ | _ |
Dounce | _ | _ | _ |