This protocol describes a straightforward process that utilizes convenient plastic micro-molds for simple microembossing operations to fabricate microchannels on nanofibrillated cellulose paper, achieving a minimum width of 200 µm.
Nanopaper, derived from nanofibrillated cellulose, has generated considerable interest as a promising material for microfluidic applications. Its appeal lies in a range of excellent qualities, including an exceptionally smooth surface, outstanding optical transparency, a uniform nanofiber matrix with nanoscale porosity, and customizable chemical properties. Despite the rapid growth of nanopaper-based microfluidics, the current techniques used to create microchannels on nanopaper, such as 3D printing, spray coating, or manual cutting and assembly, which are crucial for practical applications, still possess certain limitations, notably susceptibility to contamination. Furthermore, these methods are restricted to the production of millimeter-sized channels. This study introduces a straightforward process that utilizes convenient plastic micro-molds for simple microembossing operations to fabricate microchannels on nanopaper, achieving a minimum width of 200 µm. The developed microchannel outperforms existing approaches, achieving a fourfold improvement, and can be fabricated within 45 min. Furthermore, fabrication parameters have been optimized, and a convenient quick-reference table is provided for application developers. The proof-of-concept for a laminar mixer, droplet generator, and functional nanopaper-based analytical devices (NanoPADs) designed for Rhodamine B sensing using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy was demonstrated. Notably, the NanoPADs exhibited exceptional performance with improved limits of detection. These outstanding results can be attributed to the superior optical properties of nanopaper and the recently developed accurate microembossing method, enabling the integration and fine-tuning of the NanoPADs.
Recently, nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) paper (nanopaper) has emerged as a highly promising substrate material for various applications such as flexible electronics, energy devices, and biomedicals1,2,3,4. Derived from natural plants, nanopaper is cost-effective, biocompatible, and biodegradable, making it an appealing alternative to traditional cellulose paper5,6. Its exceptional properties include an ultra-smooth surface with a surface roughness of less than 25 nm and a dense cellulose matrix structure, allowing for the creation of highly structured nanostructures7. Abundant hydroxyl groups of nanopaper contribute to its compact and tightly packed nanocellulose structure8. Nanopaper exhibits excellent optical transparency and minimal optical haze, making it well-suited for optical sensors. Additionally, its inherent hydrophilicity enables pump-free flow, even with its thick structure, providing autonomous fluid motion9,10. Nanocellulose has diverse applications in biological sensors, conductive electronic devices, cell culture platforms, supercapacitors, batteries, and more, showcasing its versatility and potential11,12. Particularly, nanocellulose is promising for paper-based analytical microfluidic devices (µPADs), offering unique advantages over conventional chromatography paper.
In the past decade, µPADs have achieved significant attention due to their affordability, biocompatibility, pump-free operation, and ease of production13,14. These devices have emerged as effective point-of-care diagnostic tools, particularly in resource-limited settings15,16,17. A significant advancement in this field was the development of wax printing, pioneered by George Whitesides18 and the Bingcheng Lin group19, enabling the creation of functional µPADs by incorporating microchannels on chromatography paper. Subsequently, µPADs rapidly evolved, and various biosensing techniques, including electrochemical methods20, chemiluminescence21, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)22,23,24, were successfully implemented for the detection of diverse biomarkers such as proteins25,26, DNAs27,28, RNAs29,30, and exosomes31. Despite these achievements, µPADs still face challenges, including slow flow speeds and solvent evaporation.
Several methods have been proposed for creating microchannels on nanopaper32,33,34. One approach involves 3D printing sacrificial ingredients into the material, but it requires a hydrophobic coating that limits pump-free operation33. Another technique involves manually stacking channel layers between nanopaper sheets using glue, which is labor-intensive32. Alternatively, spray-coating nanocellulose fibers onto pre-patterned molds can create microchannels, but it involves time-consuming and expensive mold preparation34. Notably, these methods are limited to millimeter-scale microchannels, compromising the advantages of microfluidic devices regarding reagent volume consumption and integration. Developing a simple nanopaper microchannel patterning process with micrometer-scale resolution remains a challenge.
This study presents a unique nanopaper microchannel patterning method based on practical microembossing. The approach offers several advantages over existing methods, as it requires no expensive or specialized equipment, is simple, cost-effective, and highly accurate. A convex microchannel mold is fabricated by laser cutting a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) film, known for its chemical inertness and nonstick properties. This mold is then used to emboss microchannels onto a nanopaper gel membrane. A second layer of nanopaper gel is applied on top to create closed hollow channels. Using this patterning technique, fundamental microfluidic devices on nanopaper are developed, including a laminar mixer and droplet generator. Additionally, the fabrication of surface-enhanced Raman microscopy (SERS) NanoPADs is demonstrated. In-situ creation of a silver nanoparticle-based SERS substrate is achieved by introducing two chemical reagents (AgNO3 and NaBH4) into the channels, resulting in a remarkable performance with low limits of detection (LODs).
1. Microembossing process for microchannel patterning on nanopaper
2. Construction of fundamental microfluidic devices
3. In-situ AgNP growth
4. SERS measurement
A unique method for creating microchannel patterns on nanopaper has been devised utilizing the practical plastic micro-molds through the convenient microembossing technique. Notably, this method accomplishes microchannel patterning at a scale as small as 200 µm, which represents a fourfold improvement compared to existing methods32,33,34. After fine-tuning the patterning parameters, the provided guidelines exhibit excellent repeatability in the fabrication process, characterized by minimal standard deviations. The highest observed variation in width is merely 2.5%, while for depth, it is 9%. Additionally, Figure 2E,F has been included to serve as a guide for application development.
To demonstrate the practical applications of the developed SERS-NanoPADs, Rhodamine B (RhB), a common environmental pollutant and low-toxicity organic chemical, was selected as an example. RhB molecules were directly mixed with ethanol. In this example, 5 µL of the analyte solution was filled into the inlet zone of NanoPADs, and the Raman signal in the reaction zone was then measured. The Raman spectra of RhB samples at various concentrations in ethanol (ranging from 0.1 pM to 10 µM) are shown in Figure 5A, with pure ethanol used as the blank control. Clear RhB bands are observed in the measured spectra, including the C-O-C stretching (1280 cm-1), xanthene ring puckering mode (1200 cm-1), C-N stretching (1384 cm-1), C-C stretching (1350 cm-1), C-H stretching (1520 cm-1), and aromatic C-C stretching (1646 cm-1)40,41. Due to the sensitivity of the 1646 cm-1 peak intensity to RhB concentration with minimal background noise, it was chosen as the reading parameter42. The calculation of the limit of detection (LOD) involved determining the RhB concentration corresponding to the intensity of the blank control plus three times the standard deviation of the Raman intensity of the blank control. This calculation yielded a LOD of 0.019 pM. Figure 5B displays the calibration curve for RhB detection.
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the microembossing process for patterning microchannels on nanopaper. (A) The microembossing process comprises six steps: mold preparations, nanopaper filtration, embossing, mold releasing, bonding, and final drying. (B) Cross-sectional view of the microembossing process. The figure is reproduced with permission from Yuan et al. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Microchannel embossing optimization. The fabrication accuracy of widths and depths is affected by (A,B) embossing pressure and (C,D) drying temperature, respectively. Design requirements for (E) channel widths and (F) depths in nanopaper microfluidic devices (n = 5). (The targeted: the widths and depths of microchannel expected; the obtained: the widths and depths of microchannels fabricated; the designed: the widths and depths of PTFE molds). The figure is reproduced with permission from Yuan et al. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Fundamentals of fluidic behavior in the nanopaper microchannel. (A) Photographs of the nanopaper microfluidic mixer and laminar flow device. Scale bars = 5 mm. (B) Flow-wicking at different distances along the hollow channel. Scale bar = 2 mm. (C) Capillary performance along the hollow channel (n=5). (D) Schematic illustration of the droplets inside the T-junction channel and the embossed device with the inlet tubes. (E) Droplet generator working at different frequencies. Scale bars = 5 mm. (F) Linear dependence on the flow rates of Q1/Q2 and L/W (n = 5). The figure is reproduced with permission from Yuan et al. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Sensitive SERS sensing of small molecules on NanoPADs. (A) Schematic of AgNP growth on the detection zone of the NanoPADs. (B) Photograph of NanoPADs after AgNPs growth and schematic of the SERS-based molecule detection. Scale bar = 1 cm. (C) SEM image of the in-situ grown AgNPs on NanoPADs shows a dense and organized AgNPs array. Scale bar = 500 nm; inset = 100 nm. The figure is reproduced with permission from Yuan et al. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: SERS-based detection of RhB. (A) Raman spectra of RhB at concentrations of 0.1 pM to 10 µM. (B) Calibration of RhB at 1646 cm-1 (n=5). The figure is reproduced with permission from Yuan et al. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The primary focus of this study is to develop a simple method for fabricating microchannels on nanopaper. An efficient embossing technique was devised using PTFE as the mold to address this challenge12. By optimizing the temperature and embossing pressure, a series of experiments were conducted to establish a reliable fabrication process for NanoPADs. Additionally, the use of a quick-reference table to adjust the applications of NanoPADs in different fields was demonstrated. Although this method is efficient and stable, some challenges were encountered. Initially, metals were used as molds due to their smoothness, but difficulties arose in removing them from the adhesive nanopaper gel. Ultimately, PTFE was chosen for its nonstick properties and ease of operation in the embossing process. Another challenge addressed was the fabrication of hollow channels. The strong hydrogen bonds in 'gel-like' nanopaper8 allowed for self-diffusion and adhesion of two layers, resulting in compact bonding without external forces.
While the developed method is straightforward, time-saving, and minimizes contamination when fabricating pump-free microchannels on nanopaper, there are still limitations. The precision of laser cutting restricts the width of PTFE molds to 200 µm, consequently limiting the achievable precision of the microchannels to 200 µm. To overcome this limitation, implementing a nano printer for 3D printing molds is planned in future endeavors, leveraging its capacity to achieve a precision of 50 µm. Another area that requires further improvement is the fabrication of 3D microchannels. While 3D microchannels33,34 have found extensive use in biomedical, chemical, and electrical detection using materials like PDMS and regular paper-based devices, the fabrication of 3D microchannels on nanopaper is still an emerging field. Resolving this challenge will significantly contribute to the advancement of NanoPADs.
This study focused on using molecules as Raman reporters for SERS detection. SERS technology42 offers numerous advantages, including minimal reagent usage, high selectivity, simple sample preparation, and excellent stability, making it a crucial method for biochemical detection. The designed NanoPADs have potential applications in SERS immunoassays. Furthermore, there is increasing interest in selective and tailored SERS plasmons. Exploring methods to generate these plasmons on NanoPADs for selective SERS detection represents an exciting avenue for future development in the field of nanopaper.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the programs of the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education (22KJB460033), and Jiangsu Science and Technology Programme – Young Scholar (BK20200251). This work is also partially supported by the XJTLU AI University Research Centre, Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Centre of Data Science and Cognitive Computation at XJTLU and SIP AI innovation platform (YZCXPT2022103). The support from State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering via the open project (SKLMS2023019) and Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering, Ministry of Education, are also acknowledged.
AgNO3 | Hushi (Shanghai, China) | 7761-88-8 | >99% |
Ethanol | Hushi (Shanghai, China) | 64-17-5 | >99% |
Hexadecane | Macklin (Shanghai, China) | 544-76-3 | >99% |
LabSpec software | Horiba (Japan) | LabSpec5 | |
Melamine | Macklin (Shanghai, China) | 108-78-1 | >99% |
NaBH4 | Aladdin (Shanghai, China) | 16940-66-2 | >99% |
Origin lab software | OriginLab (USA) | ||
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) | Myers Industries (Akron, USA) | ||
Polytetrafluoroethylene films | Shenzhen Huashenglong plastic material Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China) | Teflon film | |
PVDF filter membrane | EMD Millipore Corporation (USA) | VVLP04700 | pore size: 0.1 μm |
Raman spectrometer | Horiba (Japan) | Xplo RA | |
Rhodamine B | Macklin (Shanghai, China) | 81-88-9 | >95% |
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) | FEI(USA) | Scios 2 HiVac | |
Silicon wafer | Horiba (Japan) | diameter: 5 mm | |
TEMPO-oxidized NFC slurry | Tianjin University of Science and Technology | 1.0 wt% solid, carboxylate level 2.0 mmol/g solid, average nanofiber diameter: 10 nm |