Rapid Determination of Antibody-Antigen Affinity by Mass Photometry

Di Wu; Grzegorz Piszczek

doi:10.3791/61784

JoVE Journal > Biochemistry

Biochimie

Rapid Determination of Antibody-Antigen Affinity by Mass Photometry

Published: February 08, 2021

doi:

10.3791/61784

Di Wu¹, Grzegorz Piszczek¹

¹Biophysics Core Facility, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute,National Institutes of Health

Summary

We describe a single-molecule approach to antigen-antibody affinity measurements using mass photometry (MP). The MP-based protocol is fast, accurate, uses a very small amount of material, and does not require protein modification.

Abstract

Measurements of the specificity and affinity of antigen-antibody interactions are critically important for medical and research applications. In this protocol, we describe the implementation of a new single-molecule technique, mass photometry (MP), for this purpose. MP is a label- and immobilization-free technique that detects and quantifies molecular masses and populations of antibodies and antigen-antibody complexes on a single-molecule level. MP analyzes the antigen-antibody sample within minutes, allowing for the precise determination of the binding affinity and simultaneously providing information on the stoichiometry and the oligomeric state of the proteins. This is a simple and straightforward technique that requires only picomole quantities of protein and no expensive consumables. The same procedure can be used to study protein-protein binding for proteins with a molecular mass larger than 50 kDa. For multivalent protein interactions, the affinities of multiple binding sites can be obtained in a single measurement. However, the single-molecule mode of measurement and the lack of labeling imposes some experimental limitations. This method gives the best results when applied to measurements of sub-micromolar interaction affinities, antigens with a molecular mass of 20 kDa or larger, and relatively pure protein samples. We also describe the procedure for performing the required fitting and calculation steps using basic data analysis software.

Introduction

Antibodies have become ubiquitous tools of molecular biology and are used extensively in both medical and research applications. In medicine, they are critically important in diagnostics, but their therapeutic applications are also expanding and new antibody-based therapies are constantly being developed¹^,²^,³^,⁴. The scientific applications of antibodies include many indispensable laboratory techniques such as immunofluorescence⁵, immunoprecipitation⁶, flow cytometry⁷, ELISA, and western blotting. For each of these applications, obtaining accurate measurements of the antibody’s binding properties, including binding affinity and specificity, is of crucial importance.

Since the first commercial surface plasmon resonance (SPR) instrument was introduced in 1990, optical biosensors have become the “gold standard” of antibody characterization, but other techniques, including ELISA, are also routinely used to measure antibody affinities⁸^,⁹. These methods usually require immobilization or labeling of the analyzed molecules, which can potentially affect the interaction of interest. They are also relatively slow, involving multiple assay steps before the results can be collected for data analysis. A recently developed single-molecule method, mass photometry (MP), detects molecules directly in solution when they land on the surface of the microscope coverslip¹⁰^,¹¹. The light scattering-based optical detection that MP employs does not require protein labeling or modification. Individual protein molecules are recorded by the interferometric scattering microscope as dark spots appearing in the image (Figure 1D), and several thousand molecules can be detected during the one-minute data acquisition¹². The signal generated by each individual particle is quantified, and its contrast value (relative darkness) is calculated. The interferometric contrast values are proportional to the molecular masses of the proteins, which allows for the identification of bound and free species in the antigen-antibody mixture. At the same time, by counting molecular landing events, MP directly measures the species populations. This gives MP based methods a unique capability to independently quantify affinities of multiple binding sites.

Binding of the antigen (Ag) molecules to the two binding sites of the intact antibody (Ab) can be described as:

with the equilibrium association constants K_a1 and K_a2 defined as:

where c_i and f_i represent concentration and fraction of the component i, respectively. The total antigen concentration (c_Ag)_tot can be expressed as:

Since the total concentrations of the antibody (c_Ab)_tot and antigen (c_Ag)_tot are known, this equation can be used to directly fit the experimental component fractions obtained from the MP measurements and calculate the equilibrium association constants K_a1 and K_a2 (see Supplementary Information).

The MP data can also be used to estimate cooperativity between the two antibody binding sites¹¹. For two antibody paratopes with identical microscopic binding constants, the statistical factors describing the process of population of the Ab·Ag and Ab·Ag₂ complexes dictate that the apparent macroscopic equilibrium constants K_a1 and K_a2 will not be numerically equal, and K_a1 = 4K_a2. Therefore, the experimental values of K_a1 < 4K_a2 indicate positive cooperativity between the two antibody binding sites. Similarly, K_a1 > 4K_a2 indicates negative cooperativity.

MP measurements of the antigen-antibody binding affinity are fast and require a small amount of material. The MP mass distributions used for equilibrium constant calculations provide additional information about the sample properties and enable the assessment of the sample purity, oligomerization, and aggregation in a single experiment. The same method can be used to measure high affinity protein-protein binding, and MP is particularly useful for studies of multi-valent protein interactions. Multi-protein complexes usually have large molecular masses, optimal for MP detection, and single-molecule data can be used to measure stoichiometry and calculate affinities of multiple binding sites simultaneously. This information is usually difficult to obtain using bulk-based methods.

Without modifications, the current protocol is suitable for measurements of relatively high-affinity, sub-micromolar interactions with antigens of a molecular mass of 20 kDa or larger. For optimal results, protein stocks should be of high purity, but there are no specific buffer requirements. By using MP, the antigen-antibody binding can be assessed in less than five minutes. The data collection and analysis required for accurate K_d calculations can be performed within 30 minutes.

Protocol

1. Prepare the flow chambers

Clean the glass coverslips
1. Using wash bottles with distilled water, ethanol, and isopropanol, rinse the 24 mm x 50 mm coverslips in the following order: water, ethanol, water, isopropanol, water. Dry the coverslips with a stream of clean nitrogen. It is important to rinse the coverslips from top to bottom, holding the bottom corner with soft-tipped forceps. Dry the coverslip in the same direction to avoid transferring contamination from the forceps (Figure 2A).
2. Similarly, rinse the 24 mm x 24 mm coverslips with distilled water, ethanol, and distilled water. Dry the coverslips with a stream of clean nitrogen.
3. Identify the working side of the coverslip, place a drop of distilled water on the surface of the clean coverslip and follow steps 3.1–3.2 of the protocol. Usually only one side of the 24 mm x 50 mm coverslip has the optical quality suitable for MP measurements.
  NOTE: After focusing, no significant surface imperfections should be detectable, and the “signal” value shown in the data collection software should be less than 0.05% (Figure 1A-C). The working sides of all coverslips in the box are oriented in the same direction. The same procedure should be used to test the efficiency of the coverslip cleaning.
Assemble the flow chamber
1. Position the 24 mm x 24 mm coverslip on a piece of aluminum foil. Place strips of double-sided tape on top of the 24 mm x 24 mm coverslip as shown in Figure 2B and cut the tape along the edge of the glass. Separate the coverslip from the aluminum foil and attach it to the working side of the 24 mm x 50 mm coverslip (Figure 2C).
  NOTE: Channel size can vary, but a width of 3 mm–5 mm is recommended. Wider channels require larger sample volumes and very narrow channels may be difficult to load. Usually, two parallel channels can easily be created on the 24 mm x 24 mm coverslip. Protocol can be paused here.

2. Prepare the antibody-antigen samples for the affinity measurements

Filter at least 2 mL of the PBS buffer using 0.22 µm syringe filters to remove dust particles or aggregates. Centrifuge the protein stock for 10 minutes at the maximum speed of the tabletop centrifuge (approximately 16,000 x g).
NOTE: PBS is the recommended buffer for this protocol, but MP has no particular buffer requirements, and other biological buffers are also acceptable. However, high glycerol concentrations (>10%) and very low ionic strengths (salt concentration <10 mM) may affect the image and data quality and are not recommended.
Determine the actual concentrations of the antibody and antigen stocks by measuring their 280 nm UV absorbance.
Calculate the measurement concentrations of the antigen-antibody mixture. If the estimated value of the antibody binding affinity is not known, plan to prepare a sample with 30 nM antigen and 20 nM antibody concentration. When the approximate affinity is known, the antibody to antigen ratio and their concentrations should be optimized according to the expected K_d values. Use the total antigen concentration in the mixture equal to the sum of the expected K_d and the total antibody concentration in the equation below. Assuming K_d1= K_d2 for the two paratopes of the antibody, this will result in comparable concentrations of the free antibody and the antibody-antigen complexes in the sample.

Adjust the antibody concentration to keep the total protein concentration in the sample within the 10 nM and 50 nM range. Best results are obtained using mixtures with antibody concentrations between 5 nM and 25 nM.
NOTE: MP detects proteins with a molecular mass larger than 40 kDa. Consequently, sample concentrations of antigens with a molecular mass smaller than 40 kDa can exceed the typical 50 nM limit. However, at concentrations higher than approximately 100 nM, even low molecular mass antigens might affect the image quality and accuracy of the K_d determination.
Prepare 50 µL of the antibody-antigen mixture at its final measurement concentration calculated in step 2.3.
NOTE: Only one sample of the antigen-antibody mixture is required for the K_d determination. However, preparing several samples with different antigen to antibody ratios can help optimize sample concentration. If data from several samples are collected, they can be analyzed via a global fit.
Incubate the antigen-antibody mixture(s) for approximately 10 min at room temperature to allow the binding reaction to reach chemical equilibrium. Avoid unnecessarily long incubation times.
NOTE: Incubation time may vary depending on the binding kinetics. To confirm that the chemical equilibrium has been reached, sample measurements can be repeated at different incubation times. Time-invariant K_d values indicate sufficiently long incubation. Prolonged incubation may lead to significant protein adsorption to the surface of the plastic labware and, consequently, to significant errors in the protein concentration determination. For this reason, low-adhesion labware is strongly recommended for MP sample preparation¹³.

3. Collect the Mass Photometry data

Apply a drop of microscope immersion oil on the MP instrument objective and place the assembled flow chamber on the microscope stage. Make sure the oil spans the gap between the coverslip and the objective.
Load the flow chamber and focus the mass photometer.
1. Deposit 10 µL of a clean, filtered buffer solution at one end of the flow chamber channel prepared in step 1. Liquid will enter the channel by capillary action.
2. Adjust the stage’s Z-position to focus the microscope on the working surface of the 24 x 50 mm coverslip.
  1. In the Focus Control tab of the data collection software, use the coarse stage movement Up and Down buttons to make the initial adjustments.
  2. Click the Sharpness button to show the sharpness signal readout and use the fine Up and Down adjustment buttons to maximize the Sharpness value.
  3. Click the Set Focus and Lock Focus buttons to activate the focus tracking function. A properly focused image (Figure 1A,C) should have the “signal” value below 0.05%.
    NOTE: If the “signal” value at the maximum sharpness position is above 0.05%, this may indicate impurities on the glass surface or in the buffer.
Using the same channel, load 20 µL of the antibody-antigen sample by depositing it on one side of the channel and blotting the liquid from the other end with a small piece of blotting paper (Figure 2D).
NOTE: The volume of a 3–5 mm wide channel is approximately 10 µL. The additional sample volume is recommended to completely replace the buffer present in the channel and to avoid sample dilution.
After loading the sample, immediately click the Record button to start data collection, acquiring a 100 s video (Figure 1D).
At the end of the data collection enter the file name and click OK to save the data file.
Discard the coverslips and wipe the oil from the objective lens with cotton optical swabs wet with isopropanol.
NOTE: The protocol can be paused here.

4. Analyze the MP data

Process the collected video file using the MP data processing software to identify the landing events.
1. Use the File/Open menu option to load the file for the analysis and click Analyze.
2. Click the Load button to load the calibration function and save the analyzed data using the File/Save Results As menu option.
Fit the molecular mass distribution with Gaussian functions to obtain relative concentrations of each species in the sample. This analysis can be performed using a common scientific graphing software (see Table of Materials).
1. Import the “eventsFitted.csv” file into the software and plot the molecular mass distribution (column M in the .csv file) using the Plot/Statistics/Histogram function.
2. Double click on the histogram to open the Plot Properties window. Disable automatic binning and select a bin size of 2.5 kDa. Click the Apply and the Go buttons to create the Bin Centers and Counts data.
3. Select the Bin Centers and Counts columns and use the Analysis/Peaks and Baseline/Multiple Peak Fit menu function to fit the histogram with Gaussian functions. Double click to indicate the approximate peak positions on the distribution plot and then click the Open NLFit button.
4. Check the Fixed checkboxes for the “xc” peak centers and set their values to the expected molecular masses of the free antibody and the single and double antigen-antibody complexes. Check the Diviser option for the width parameters. Click the Fit button. The fitted peak height values of the Gaussian components represent the relative concentration of each species in the sample¹¹.
  NOTE: Bin size may be adjusted to optimize the resolution of the mass distribution plot. The MP precision limit is approximately 1 kDa, and smaller bin sizes might amplify the noise of the distribution, while not revealing any additional information. Very large bin sizes will obscure the fine details of mass distributions.
Calculate the concentration fraction of each species using the following equation:

where the h_i and f_i values represent peak heights and concentration fractions of the free antibody and the single- and double-bound antibody in the sample, respectively.

5. Calculate equilibrium constant values

Fit the concentration fractions of the interaction species calculated in step 4.3 with Eq. 1 and 2 using a suitable analytical software. Here we demonstrate a method to calculate equilibrium constants using a spreadsheet program¹⁴ (see Supplementary Information).
1. Open the “Kd calculation.xlsx” worksheet. In this worksheet, the cell values in rows 1 to 10 highlighted in yellow can be modified to perform the equilibrium constants calculations.
2. Enter the estimated K_d values in nanomolar units into cells B1 and B2 in the table. Those starting values will be optimized in the fitting procedure. If the estimated K_d values are not known, leave the default values in cells B1 and B2 unchanged.
3. Enter the values of (c_Ab)_tot and (c_Ag)_tot in nanomolar units into cells D2 and E2. Enter the fraction values calculated in step 4.3 into cells F2, G2, and H2. If multiple samples at different concentration ratios were measured, additional concentration values obtained for those samples can be entered in rows 2 to 10.
4. Select the Data/Solver menu function. Enter “$B$15” in the “Set Objective” box and “$B$1:$B$2” into the “By Changing Variable Cells:” box. Select the Min radio button for the To: option. Check the Make Unconstrained Variables Non-Negative checkbox and select GRG Nonlinear as the solving method. Click the Solve button. The best fit K_d1 and K_d2 values will be shown in cell B1 and B2 and the final sum of squared errors in cell B15.
  NOTE: If the Solver function is not active, select Options under the File menu in the spreadsheet program. In the Add-ins category select the Solver Add-in under the Inactive Application Add-ins and click the Go button. Check the Solver Add-in checkbox and click OK.

Figure 1: Mass photometry images. (A) Representative native view image of the imaging buffer collected on a clean coverslip and (B) on a coverslip with surface imperfections. (C) Differential ratiometric image of the imaging buffer and (D) the AHT·HT solution. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: MP flow chamber preparation and loading. (A) Coverslip holding position for the cleaning procedure. (B) Alignment of the 24 x 24 mm coverslip (middle layer) and the double-sided tape (top layer) on the surface of aluminum foil (bottom layer, not shown). Blue dashed lines show the location of cut lines. (C) Top and side view of the assembled flow chamber with two sample channels, and a picture of the assembled flow chamber. (D) Procedure for sample loading into a flow channel previously filled with buffer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Representative Results

We have previously examined the interaction of human α-thrombin (HT) and mouse monoclonal anti-human thrombin antibody (AHT) using the MP based assay¹¹. Since the molecular mass of the HT (37 kDa) is below the 40 kDa detection limit, the maximum sample concentration can exceed the 50 nM MP concentration limitation without negatively affecting the resolution of mass distributions. The experiment was planned as a titration series with the AHT antibody at a fixed 25 nM concentration, and the HT at concentrations of 7.5 nM, 15 nM, 30 nM, 60 nM and 120 nM. Figure 3 shows the molecular mass distributions of the antigen-antibody mixtures and the antibody-only sample. Here we analyze the data using the method described in the protocol. A scientific graphing software was used to fit the mass distributions with three Gaussian components representing the free AHT, AHT·HT and AHT·HT₂. The known molecular mass values of the three components were fixed, and a single peak width parameter was fitted for the three species. Best-fit peak height parameters of the Gaussian components were normalized using Eq. 3 to obtain species concentration fractions (Table 1). Those values, together with the total antibody and antigen concentration for each sample were entered into the “Kd calculation.xlsx”. The global fit in the spreadsheet yields K_d1 = 40 nM (68.3% confidence interval: 28 nM, 68 nM) and K_d2 = 28 nM (68.3% confidence interval: 17 nM, 45 nM). The experimental concentration fractions and the fit results are plotted in Figure 4. The dissociation constant values obtained here by fitting the integrated concentration fractions are in agreement with those obtained previously by directly fitting MP distributions, and with dissociation constant values obtained by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC)¹¹.

Figure 3: MP molecular mass distributions of the 25 nM AHT mixed with HT at 0, 7.5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 nM (A-F, respectively). Black dots show the experimental MP data plotted with 2.5 kDa bin size. Cyan, green, and blue lines represent the best-fit Gaussian distributions of the free antibody, single bound antibody, and double bound antibody species, respectively. Red lines show the sum of the three Gaussian components. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Fractions of the free AHT (blue), AHT·HT (red), and AHT·HT₂ (black) as a function of HT concentration. Points represent experimental values obtained from the Gaussian fitting of the MP distributions. Solid lines represent the best-fit using Eq. 1 and Eq. 2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Technical replicates of the AHT molecular mass distribution measurements. Plots shows the reproducibility of the MP measurements and the purity of the antibody preparation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Ab conc (M)	Ag conc (M)	f_Ab	f_AbAg	f_AbAg2
2.50E-08	7.50E-09	0.88	0.10	0.02
2.50E-08	1.50E-08	0.81	0.15	0.04
2.50E-08	3.00E-08	0.72	0.21	0.07
2.50E-08	6.00E-08	0.27	0.37	0.35
2.50E-08	1.20E-07	0.05	0.23	0.72

Table 1: Normalized peak heights of Gaussian components obtained by fitting the MP distributions (Figure 3).

Supplementary Information: Implementation of the equilibrium constants fitting procedure in Excel and Affinity calculation worksheet. Please click here to download this file.

Discussion

The Mass Photometry based protocol outlined here provides a fast and accurate method of measuring antigen-antibody binding affinities. MP analysis uses a very small amount of material, and additional information—including stoichiometry, oligomerization, and purity—can be assessed from the same data (Figure 5). Without modifications, this method is applicable to the measurements of dissociation constants in the approximately 5 nM to 500 nM range, and for ligand molecules with molecular mass of approximately 20 kDa or larger. The same protocol can be used not only to analyze the antigen-antibody binding, but also to measure protein-protein interaction affinities when the molecular mass of at least one of the binding partners is larger than 50 kDa. Since the MP detection is non-specific, MP measurements can’t be performed on samples containing a high concentration of carrier proteins or large molecular mass impurities.

SPR is commonly used for the characterization of the antigen-antibody binding, and direct comparison of both methods may help with the assay selection. In comparison with SPR, the MP binding assay is faster and does not require protein immobilization. For a typical binding experiment, the MP requires less material than SPR. MP data reveal the stoichiometry of the complexes which is not readily available from the SPR¹⁰^,¹¹. Kinetic parameters of binding can be obtained from the MP data¹³, but SPR measures the binding kinetics directly, and is able to measure a broader range of association and dissociation rates. The association constants of two separate binding sites can only be obtained from the SPR data when the association and dissociation rates of both sites are sufficiently different. On the other hand, the MP can precisely characterize molecular complexes with multiple binding sites¹⁰^,¹¹. SPR is able to measure binding affinity for small molecular mass ligands, and MP works best for ligands with molecular mass of approximately 20 kDa or larger.

Collecting good quality MP data is a critical step in obtaining accurate results from this protocol. Impurities in the buffer or on the surface of the coverslips will interfere with MP data collection. Improper focusing distorts the MP signal leading to errors in molecular mass estimates and equilibrium constants calculations. Both these factors should be examined when troubleshooting the protocol. An important consideration when working with low concentration protein solutions is that surface adsorption can lead to the loss of material and changes in the sample concentration. The resulting errors can be minimized by using low adsorption labware and by applying surface passivation. To obtain accurate results, it is important to allow all protein dilutions and mixtures to reach chemical equilibrium, but unnecessarily long incubation times should be avoided. For each protein system, it is recommended that the rates of the non-specific protein binding to the coverslip glass be assessed from the MP data. If significantly different rates are observed for different species, MP data can easily be corrected to avoid potential errors in the K_d calculations¹⁰^,¹¹.

Several factors should be considered when planning sample preparation. Accurate results can be obtained by measuring a single sample, but the antigen and antibody concentrations have to be adjusted to obtain a comparable concentration of the free and bound species. Analysis of a single mass distribution dominated by one of the reaction species may provide acceptable K_d values estimates but usually yields relatively large fitting errors¹¹. An alternative strategy involves a global analysis of titration data. The spreadsheet software based fitting tool provided with this protocol can be used for fitting both individual data and for global analysis. If a single experiment or data set is analyzed, the confidence intervals of best fit parameters can be estimated using the error projection method. A detailed description of the confidence intervals calculation procedure in the spreadsheet software is provided elsewhere¹⁴. When designing the assay, it is recommended to plan for replicate experiments. When data from replicate experiments are analyzed, standard deviation can be used to report errors of the K_d values.

The protocol described here can be modified to extend its applicability beyond the typical molecular mass and affinity range limitations. The range of measurable affinities is limited by the protein concentration range accessible by MP, typically from 10 nM to 50 nM. This range can be extended and protein samples at concentrations below 10 nM can be measured by using perfused flow cells and longer data acquisition times. Protein samples at higher concentrations can potentially be measured by using passivated coverslips for the MP measurements. For antigens with a small molecular mass, the free antibody and the antigen-antibody complex peaks in the MP mass distributions will be unresolved. This will preclude the use of the Gaussian peak fitting analysis described in the protocol. In that case, the binding affinity can still be measured by titrating the antibody with the antigen and averaging the MP distributions to obtain the average molecular mass of all species for each sample. The binding equation can then be fit to this data to obtain the antigen-antibody binding affinity¹¹.

When accurate affinity information is not required, the protocol can be simplified and used for fast antibody interaction screening. In that case, the commercially available gasket wells can be used instead of sample channels to further simplify the experimental procedure.

Divulgations

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Keir Neuman for his critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the intramural program of the NHLBI, NIH.

Materials

AcquireMP	Refeyn		MP data collection software
Anti-human thrombin	Haematologic Technologies	AHT-5020	RRID: AB_2864302
Cotton-tipped applicators	Thorlabs	CTA10	cotton optical swabs for lens cleaning
Coverslips 24×24 mm	Globe Scientific	1405-10
Coverslips 24×50 mm	Fisher Scientific	12-544-EP
DiscoverMP	Refeyn		MP data processing software
Forceps	Electron Microscopy Sciences	78080-CF	soft-tipped forceps for coverslips handling
Human α-thrombin	Haematologic Technologies	HCT-0020
Immersion oil	Thorlabs	MOIL-30
Isopropanol	Alfa Aesar	36644
Microsoft Excel	Microsoft		spreadsheet
OneMP	Refeyn		Mass Photometry instrument
Origin	OriginLab		scientific graphing software
PBS	Corning	46-013-CM	10x stock
Syringe filter	Millipore	SLGSR33SS	buffer and sample filtering

References

Francis, R. J., et al. A phase I trial of antibody directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma or other CEA producing tumours. British Journal of Cancer. 87 (6), 600-607 (2002).
van Dyck, C. H. Anti-Amyloid-beta Monoclonal Antibodies for Alzheimer’s Disease: Pitfalls and Promise. Biological Psychiatry. 83 (4), 311-319 (2018).
Vennepureddy, A., Singh, P., Rastogi, R., Atallah, J. P., Terjanian, T. Evolution of ramucirumab in the treatment of cancer – A review of literature. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice. 23 (7), 525-539 (2017).
Waldmann, T. A. Immunotherapy: past, present and future. Nature Medicine. 9 (3), 269-277 (2003).
Huang, B., Bates, M., Zhuang, X. Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 78, 993-1016 (2009).
Rosenberg, M. I. . Protein Analysis and Purification. , (2005).
Picot, J., Guerin, C. L., Le Van Kim, C., Boulanger, C. M. Flow cytometry: Retrospective, fundamentals and recent instrumentation. Cytotechnology. 64 (2), 109-130 (2012).
Khan, S. H., Farkas, K., Kumar, R., Ling, J. A versatile method to measure the binding to basic proteins by surface plasmon resonance. Analytical Biochemistry. 421 (2), 385-390 (2012).
Lofgren, J. A., et al. Comparing ELISA and surface plasmon resonance for assessing clinical immunogenicity of panitumumab. The Journal of Immunology. 178 (11), 7467-7472 (2007).
Young, G., et al. Quantitative mass imaging of single biological macromolecules. Science. 360 (6387), 423-427 (2018).
Wu, D., Piszczek, G. Measuring the affinity of protein-protein interactions on a single-molecule level by mass photometry. Analytical Biochemistry. 592, 113575 (2020).
Cole, D., Young, G., Weigel, A., Sebesta, A., Kukura, P. Label-free single-molecule imaging with numerical-aperture-shaped interferometric scattering microscopy. ACS Photonics. 4 (2), 211-216 (2017).
Soltermann, F., et al. Quantifying protein-protein interactions by molecular counting with mass photometry. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 59 (27), 10774-10779 (2020).
Kemmer, G., Keller, S. Nonlinear least-squares data fitting in Excel spreadsheets. Nature Protocols. 5 (2), 267-281 (2010).

Play Video

PDF

DOI

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Citer Cet Article

Wu, D., Piszczek, G. Rapid Determination of Antibody-Antigen Affinity by Mass Photometry. J. Vis. Exp. (168), e61784, doi:10.3791/61784 (2021).