Summary

Embedded Bioprinting of Tissue-like Structures Using κ-Carrageenan Sub-Microgel Medium

Published: May 03, 2024
doi:

Summary

This study introduces a novel κ-carrageenan sub-microgel suspension bath, displaying remarkable reversible jamming-unjamming transition properties. These attributes contribute to the construction of biomimetic tissues and organs in embedded 3D bioprinting. The successful printing of heart/esophageal-like tissues with high resolution and cell growth demonstrates high-quality bioprinting and tissue engineering applications.

Abstract

Embedded three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting utilizing a granular hydrogel supporting bath has emerged as a critical technique for creating biomimetic scaffolds. However, engineering a suitable gel suspension medium that balances precise bioink deposition with cell viability and function presents multiple challenges, particularly in achieving the desired viscoelastic properties. Here, a novel κ-carrageenan gel supporting bath is fabricated through an easy-to-operate mechanical grinding process, producing homogeneous sub-microscale particles. These sub-microgels exhibit typical Bingham flow behavior with small yield stress and rapid shear-thinning properties, which facilitate the smooth deposition of bioinks. Moreover, the reversible gel-sol transition and self-healing capabilities of the κ-carrageenan microgel network ensure the structural integrity of printed constructs, enabling the creation of complex, multi-layered tissue structures with defined architectural features. Post-printing, the κ-carrageenan sub-microgels can be easily removed by a simple phosphate-buffered saline wash. Further bioprinting with cell-laden bioinks demonstrates that cells within the biomimetic constructs have a high viability of 92% and quickly extend pseudopodia, as well as maintain robust proliferation, indicating the potential of this bioprinting strategy for tissue and organ fabrication. In summary, this novel κ-carrageenan sub-microgel medium emerges as a promising avenue for embedded bioprinting of exceptional quality, bearing profound implications for the in vitro development of engineered tissues and organs.

Introduction

Tissue engineering scaffolds, including electro-spun fibers, porous sponges, and polymer hydrogels, play a pivotal role in the repair and reconstruction of damaged tissues and organs by providing a structural framework supporting cell growth, tissue regeneration, and the restoration of organ function1,2,3. However, traditional scaffolds encounter challenges in accurately replicating native tissue structures, leading to a mismatch between the engineered and natural tissues. This limitation hinders the efficient healing of defective tissues, emphasizing the urgent need for scaffold design advancements to achieve more accurate biomimicry. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an innovative manufacturing technique that precisely constructs complex biological tissue structures layer by layer using biomaterial inks and cells4. Among various biomaterials, polymer hydrogels emerge as ideal bioinks with their distinctive network that facilitates in situ encapsulation of cells and crucially supports their growth5,6. Nevertheless, many soft and highly hydrated hydrogels tend to induce blurring or rapid collapse of printed scaffold structures during the printing process when used as bioinks. To address this challenge, embedded 3D bioprinting technology employs a microgel bath as a support material, allowing precise soft bioink deposition. Upon gelation of the hydrogel bioinks, refined bionic scaffolds with intricate structures are obtained by removing the microgel bath. Materials like gelatin7,8, agarose9, and gellan gum10,11 have been employed to create microgel baths for embedded 3D bioprinting, significantly advancing the application of soft hydrogels in tissue engineering. However, the micron-level and non-uniform particle size of these particulate gels detrimentally impacts the resolution and fidelity of 3D printing12,13,14. There is an urgent need to fabricate a gel-like suspension float with small and uniformly dispersed particles, offering advantages in achieving high-fidelity bioprinting.

In this protocol, a novel sacrificial granulate κ-carrageenan suspension bath with a uniform sub-micron level is presented for embedded 3D printing. This innovative sub-microgel bath behavior of rapid jamming-unjamming transition facilitates the precise fabrication of biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds with high structural fidelity15. Utilizing this new suspension medium, a series of biomimetic tissue and organ constructs featuring multi-layer tissue structures are successfully printed, employing a composite bioink composed of gelatin methacrylate and silk fibro methacrylate. In this study, we chose the esophagus as the 3D bioprinting biomimetic object mainly because the esophagus not only has a multi-layered tissue structure but also its muscle layer exhibits an internal circular and external longitudinal complex layering structure. Ensuring proper alignment and organization of these layers is essential for functional tissue regeneration. Therefore, we highly desire to replicate the multilayered architecture of the esophagus. More importantly, we utilized κ-carrageenan sub-microgels as the suspension bath and GelMA/SFMA as the bioink to design and construct a biomimetic scaffold for tissue engineering. The printed esophagus can be easily released by repeated phosphate-buffered saline washing. Moreover, the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel bath is free of cytotoxic substances, ensuring high cytocompatibility15. The smooth muscle cells loaded within anisotropic scaffolds exhibit a notable spreading activity. This uniform sub-microgel suspension medium offers a new avenue for the fabrication of complex tissues and organs through embedded 3D bioprinting.

Protocol

1. Preparation of the κ -carrageenan sub-microgel suspension bath

  1. Prepare 500 mL of κ-carrageenan suspension bath (0.35% wt/vol) by adding 1.75 g of κ -carrageenan powder into 500 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) solution within a 1,000 mL glass bottle.
  2. Introduce a 70 mm magnetic stirrer bar into the glass bottle to stir the aqueous mixture. Tighten the glass bottle cap and then loosen it by half a turn.
  3. Place the glass bottle in a 70 °C water bath and heat it. Turn on the magnetic stirrer at a speed of 300 rpm, place the bottle, and stir until the polymer is completely dissolved.
  4. Take another glass bottle and place it in an autoclave for sterilization, running at 121 °C for 30 min.
  5. After the high-pressure sterilizer cools to 80 °C, remove the bottle from the sterilizer and transfer it to the ultra-clean workbench for further handling.
  6. Filter the completely dissolved κ-carrageenan solution into the sterilized glass bottle using a 0.22 µm filter.
    NOTE: Perform filtration swiftly while the solution is hot to prevent the κ-carrageenan from cooling and obstructing the filter.
  7. Store the κ-carrageenan solution at 4 °C to induce a cation-crosslinked gelation for 12 h.
  8. Mechanically grind the κ-carrageenan hydrogels using a 60 mm magnetic stirrer with a stirring speed of 1200 rpm at 25 °C until it successfully transforms into a liquid state, taking approximately 60 min.
    NOTE: Store the κ-carrageenan hydrogels between 25-37 °C to avoid gelation at low temperatures or dissolution at high temperatures.

2. Preparation of gelatin methacrylate/silk fibroin methacrylate composite bioinks

  1. Prepare composite bioinks by combining 10% (wt/vol) gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and 6% (wt/vol) silk fibroin methacrylate (SFMA) in PBS solution (pH 7.4). Weigh out 2.0 g of GelMA and 1.2 g of SFMA powders separately.
  2. Slowly add the powders into two 50 mL centrifuge tubes. Add 10 mL of PBS solution separately into the 50 mL centrifuge tubes.
  3. Add a 10 mm magnetic stirrer to each and constantly stir and heat in a water bath at 45 °C. Allow the GelMA and SFMA powders to completely dissolve, taking approximately 30 min.
  4. Mix the GelMA and SFMA solutions in an equal volume under continuous stirring at 45 °C. Filter the composite bioinks using a 100 µm pore size filter.
  5. Sterilize the composite GelMA/SFMA bioinks through UV irradiation in a biosafety cabinet for 12 h.
    NOTE: Prepare and use the bioinks immediately to prevent premature gelation of the SFMA through self-assembly.

3. Rheological characterization of the κ -carrageenan sub-microgel suspension bath

  1. Start up and prepare rheology-related equipment.
    1. Switch on the air compressor for 30 min and ensure that the pressure reaches 30 psi. Remove the bearing clamp by turning the draw rod anti-clockwise. Fix the black cover below and rotate the knob axis on the top of the instrument clockwise.
    2. Power on the rheometer and allow it to initialize. Turn on the circulation water switch and allow the temperature to reach 15 °C.
    3. Open the rheometer control software to establish the online connection.
  2. Calibrate the rheometer and install the parallel plate geometry.
    1. Perform instrument calibration in the control software, which mainly involves adjusting the calibration instrument inertia path. Fit a 40 mm diameter parallel plate geometry to the end of the draw rod. Hold the Lock button for 3 s to move the motor shaft to the home position for consistent geometry placement.
    2. Select the Calibrate Manager in the control software and subsequently click the Inertia, Friction Calibration, and Rotational Mapping to calibrate the parallel plate geometry.
  3. Zero the rheometer gap height by conducting a standard gap zeroing procedure to ensure precise measurement.
  4. Set up the experimental steps, including a flow ramp ranging from 0.01 to 1000 1/s shear rate, an amplitude sweep ranging from 0.1% to 100% strain at 10 rad/s, a multi-step oscillation time sweep lasting for 60 s with alternating strains of 1% and 100% at 10 rad/s, and a multi-step Peak Hold sweep lasting for 120 s with alternating shear rate of 0.1 1/s and 10 1/s.
  5. Drop 2 mL of 0.35% κ-carrageenan suspensions onto the rheometer's Peltier plate. 
  6. Position the geometry gap to 510 μm and remove any excess overflow at the edge of the clamp device. Set the sample gap to 500 µm to allow the sample to extend slightly beyond the clamp edge.
  7. Conduct a flow experiment by selecting the Flow Ramp from the experimental design options.
    1. Choose the Flow Ramp test in the experimental design. Set the shear rates from 0.001 to 10 1/s at a temperature of 25 °C.
    2. Perform step 3.5 and the Flow Ramp experiment on the added sample.
  8. Perform a cyclic Peak Hold test to assess the material's recovery performance.
    1. Choose Peak Hold sweep in the experimental design and set 5 consecutive experiments with a time of 120 s at 25 °C.
    2. Set the shear rate to 0.01 1/s for the first, third, and fifth steps and to 10 1/s for the second and fourth steps.
    3. Add a new sample of 2 mL. Perform step 3.5 and the cyclic recovery test.
  9. Perform viscoelasticity analysis to evaluate the potential gel-sol transition of the κ-carrageenan suspension bath.
    1. Choose the Amplitude Sweep test in experimental design. Set the oscillation strain from 0.1% to 100% at a temperature of 25 °C. Click Start to perform the Amplitude Sweep experiment on the added sample.
  10. Perform alternative strain analysis to assess the material's elastic recovery performance.
    1. Choose Oscillation Time Sweep in the experimental design and set 5 consecutive experiments with a time of 60 s at 25 °C.
    2. Set the strain to 1% for the first, third, and fifth steps and to 100% for the second and fourth steps.
    3. Add a new sample of 2 mL. Perform step 3.5 and the continuous cyclic recovery test.
      NOTE: Clean the geometry plate and Peltier plate after each experiment test and add a new sample of 2 mL.

4. Printing biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds using a custom-designed micro-extrusion bioprinter

  1. Design STL-format cubes using a 3D graphics software and download tissue-like models from the 3D database (www.thingiverse.com; https://3d. nih.gov/.).​
    1. Import the STL-format models into PANGO software and input the printing parameters. Set the specific X, Y, and Z coordinates of the model in 3D space, input the expected scaling size of the model in millimeters (mm), adjust the size and scaling ratio of the object on the X, Y, and Z axes, and adjust the rotational angle of the model in space as needed.
    2. Input the estimated filament diameter (typically around 200-500 µm for most bioinks) into the layer thickness field to determine the Z-axis thickness of each layer. Set the printing speed according to the expected line thickness (approximately 10-90 mm/s) and set the fill density to 30%-80%.
    3. Export the final parameters as G-code onto an SD card.
  2. Run the bioprinter and micro-extrusion pump.
    1. Switch on the micro-extrusion pump controller, select the corresponding volume syringe (5 mL), and set the extrusion rate at 0.08 mL/min and the duration of extrusion in coordination with the desired printing time obtained by dividing the hydrogel volume by the extrusion rate.
    2. Fit the syringe with a needle featuring an inner diameter of 210 µm into the syringe slot of the bioprinter.
    3. Adjust the syringe controller to ensure that the plunger of the syringe is in close contact with the screw.
    4. Place 3 mL of suspension bath into a 35 mm cell culture dish. Position the dish on the platform based on the code settings and confirm that the printing head is 1 mm above the bottom of the dish.
      NOTE: Conduct a pre-test to ensure the accuracy of dish positions on the printing platform during printing.
    5. Insert the SD card containing the code into the 3D bioprinter, activate the code file, start the bioprinter, and click the Start button on the controller.
  3. Processing of the constructs
    1. Expose the printed construct to 405 nm blue light for 1 min to initiate photocrosslinking.
    2. Remove the κ-carrageenan gel using a 1 mL pipette, followed by the addition of 3 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) for washing and subsequent removal. Repeat this process for thorough washing.
      NOTE: Perform the washing process gently to avoid damaging the printed constructs.

5. Embedded 3D bioprinting of esophageal muscle-layer analogs

  1. Culture rabbit esophageal smooth muscle cells (eSMCs).
    1. Initiate the culture in T75 flasks with 2 x 106 cells using 15 mL of DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin.
    2. Maintain the eSMCs at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air until they reach 80% confluency.
  2. Preparation of esophageal muscle layer bioink
    1. Aspirate the medium upon reaching confluency and wash the eSMCs with 5 mL of 1x PBS.
    2. Add 2 mL of 0.2% Trypsin-EDTA to the flask and incubate for 2 min to digest the cells. Tap the flask to detach the cells from the wall.
    3. Terminate digestion by adding 2 mL of DMEM and transfer the cell suspension to a 15 mL centrifuge tube. Measure the cell density using a cell counter with 10 µL of cell-suspension.
    4. Centrifuge at 675 x g for 3 min, carefully aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in the composite GelMA/SFMA bioinks (as prepared in step 2.1). Adjust the final cell concentration to achieve a density of 10 x 106 cells/mL in the bioink, thereby optimizing conditions for subsequent 3D bioprinting applications.
  3. Preparation of the 3D bioprinter and associated materials
    1. Autoclave the essential printing instruments, including syringe needles, forceps, a magnetic stirrer, and a 1000 mL silicate glass bottle, under standard sterilization conditions (121 °C for 30 min) to ensure an aseptic environment for the printing process.
    2. Place the bioprinter inside a biosafety cabinet and sterilize it with ultraviolet (UV) light for a duration of 30 min to maintain sterility.
    3. Prepare 50 mL of sterile κ-carrageenan and 5 mL of sterile GelMA/SFMA composite bioinks, as described in step 1 and step 2, respectively.
    4. Design the model, set the desired parameters, and prepare the bioprinter as outlined in step 4.1.
  4. Initiation of the bioprinting process
    1. Perform the procedures described in steps 4.2 and 4.3 to bioprint the 3D esophageal muscle layer, followed by PBS washing and replacement.
    2. Perform cell printing with sterile techniques throughout the printing process to minimize the risk of cell contamination in the printed structure.
  5. Post-printing cell culture medium replacement
    1. Carefully aspirate the PBS and replace it with 3 mL of DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Ensure that the printed constructs are entirely submerged to provide optimal cell growth conditions.
    2. Incubate the cell culture dish containing the printed constructs in an incubator set to 37 °C with 5% CO2. Replace the cell culture medium with fresh medium daily, using 3 mL each time, and monitor the state of the cells within the constructs using light microscopy.

6. Evaluation of eSMCs viability within the printed constructs via Live/Dead assay staining

  1. Remove the cell culture medium after 5 h of incubation and wash the cell-laden constructs with PBS.
  2. Add 2 mL of the standard calcein-AM/propidium iodide solution (1:1000) to the printed cell-laden constructs and incubate.
  3. Wash the constructs 3x with PBS after a 45 min incubation and then add fresh cell culture medium.
  4. Observe live and dead cells and capture fluorescent images using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).

7. Observation of the eSMCs within the printed constructs via FITC-Phalloidin/DAPI staining

  1. Stain the printed constructs using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labeled phalloidin (Green) for F-actin and 4',6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole (DAPI, blue) for nuclear post 5 days of incubation.
  2. Fixation solution preparation
    1. Combine 4 mL of 1x PBS with 0.16 mL of paraformaldehyde (PFA) in a 5 mL polyethylene (PE) tube, achieving a final concentration of 4%.
    2. Place the culture dish containing the bioprinted constructs on a clean surface. Remove the medium and gently cover the constructs with the PFA solution, ensuring their full immersion. Allow the fixation to proceed at room temperature for 20 min before discarding the solution.
      NOTE: Handle liquids with care during the addition and removal processes to preserve the structural integrity of the bioprinted constructs.
    3. Introduce 2.5 mL of 1x PBS to the culture dish, fully submerging the constructs to remove any residual staining reagents.
  3. Cell membrane permeabilization
    1. Formulate a 0.5% Triton X-100 solution by adding 20 µL of Triton X-100 to 4 mL of 1x PBS in a 5 mL PE tube.
    2. Administer the Triton X-100 solution to the constructs for 30 min at room temperature to permeate cell membranes, then remove the solution.
    3. Introduce 2.5 mL of 1x PBS to the culture dish, fully submerging the constructs to remove any residual staining reagents.
  4. Blocking non-specific binding
    1. Create a 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) blocking solution in a 5 mL PE tube by adding 0.12 mL of BSA to 4 mL of 1x PBS.
    2. Introduce the BSA solution to the constructs for 30 min at room temperature to block non-specific sites, then discard the solution.
  5. Actin staining with FITC-Phalloidin
    1. Prepare 0.2% FITC-phalloidin solution in a 5 mL PE tube with 4 mL of 1x PBS and 8 µL of staining reagent.
    2. Immerse the constructs in this solution for 60 min at room temperature in the dark, then discard the solution.
    3. Add 2.5 mL of 1x PBS to the culture dish, fully submerging the constructs to remove residual staining reagents.
  6. Nuclear staining with DAPI
    1. Apply 4 mL of DAPI staining solution to the constructs, ensuring complete coverage.
    2. Incubate in the dark at room temperature for 20 min before removing the DAPI solution.
  7. Final washing and PBS submersion: Add 2.5 mL of 1x PBS to the culture dish, fully submerging the constructs to remove residual staining reagents.
    NOTE: Prepare staining solutions in advance and handle them gently. At no point should the cells undergo desiccation within the culture vessel.
  8. Observe using a confocal microscope: Inspect and image the stained constructs using confocal microscopy to evaluate cell growth, ensuring comprehensive documentation of the results.

8. Evaluation of eSMCs proliferation within the printed constructs using CCK-8 assay

  1. Remove the culture medium from the constructs on days 7 and 14. Wash the constructs with PBS to remove residual medium and detached cells.
  2. Add CCK-8 solution to each construct following the manufacturer's instructions. Ensure that the volume of the CCK-8 solution is adequate to cover each construct completely.
  3. Incubate the constructs with the CCK-8 solution at 37 °C for 2 h. Following incubation, carefully transfer the supernatant to a new 96-well plate.
  4. Measure the absorbance at 450 nm using a microplate reader.

Representative Results

The granular κ-carrageenan gel bath was generated by mechanically breaking up the bulk hydrogels into a particulate gel slurry. The most recent study demonstrated that the κ-carrageenan particles exhibited an average diameter of approximately 642 ± 65 nm with uniform morphologies at 1000 rpm of mechanical blending15, significantly smaller than the dimensions of microgels previously reported in the literature16,17,18. Longer breaking times and larger speeds result in smaller microparticle sizes, with a blending time of 60 min at 1200 rpm yielding sub-microparticles with an average diameter of 565 ± 86 nm in this study (Supplementary Figure 1). Such small particle size is anticipated to enhance the resolution of printing processes. These particles assemble into a granular gel via the formation of hydrogen bonding and cation interactions (Figure 1A). When subjected to stress, the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel medium exhibits characteristic behaviors such as yielding, shear-thinning, and a reversible jamming-unjamming transition, all of which are essential for successful embedded 3D bioprinting. Figure 1B shows representative yield behavior and shear thinning of granular κ-carrageenan gels upon a flow ramp test. With increasing shear rate from 0.001 to 10 s-1, the shear stresses for 0.35% (wt/vol) granular κ-carrageenan gels remain relatively unchanged at shear rates below 0.3 s-1, indicating a low yield stress of 3.5 Pa. Subsequently, it is observed that the shear stresses linearly increase with the shear rates, suggesting flow behavior resembling that of a Bingham fluid. Furthermore, strain-sweeping rheological measurements of the κ-carrageenan sub-microgels reveal a distinctive transition from gel to sol. These gels yield at strains exceeding 10% and undergo a gel-sol transition at a 35% strain (Figure 1C). The small yield strain of the sub-microparticle gels is ascribed to the physical network established through hydrogen bonds and cationic interactions. Such gel-sol transition behavior is reversible. As shown in Figure 1D, at a strain of 100%, the storage modulus of the κ-carrageenan sub-microgels plummets from 38 Pa to 6 Pa, lower than the loss modulus, indicating a sol state. Conversely, upon a sudden reduction in strain to 1%, the storage modulus swiftly reverts to approximately 38 Pa. It surpasses the loss modulus within 5 s, suggesting that the κ-carrageenan sub-microgels are capable of rapidly re-establishing the physical cross-links among the particles.

The granular κ-carrageenan gels, characterized by their small and homogeneous morphologies, exhibit shear-thinning properties, rapid self-recovery, and yield stress behavior, which is advantageous for their use in embedded 3D bioprinting applications. To assess the efficacy of the κcarrageenan sub-microgel suspension as a support bath for embedded printing, a widely used bioink comprised of 10% (wt/vol) gelatin methacrylate and 6% (wt/vol) silk fibroin methacrylate composites (GelMA/SFMA) is employed for the printing trials within the κ-carrageenan medium19,20. The GelMA was labeled with rhodamine for enhanced visualization21. As illustrated in Figure 2A, the granular κ-carrageenan gel bath is highly transparent, facilitating real-time monitoring of the printing process. The shear rates generated by the nozzle range from 0.66 to 6 s-1 when the nozzle speeds vary within the range of 10-90 mm/s. The κ-carrageenan sub-microgel bath still exhibits self-healing behavior within 20 s upon continuous cyclic shearing at alternating rates of 6 s-1 and 0.01 s-1 (Supplementary Figure 2). A grid structure measuring 15 x 15 x 2 mm3, with a layer thickness of 150 µm, was sustained within the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel bath. Notably, the grid demonstrated remarkable integrity and resolution, with individual filaments measuring approximately 200 µm in width and inter-filament spacing of about 350 µm, as verified by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images (Figure 2B,C). Moreover, the 3D grid structure featured a porous network with interconnected pores. These are vital attributes that influence printability and ultimately affect cellular behaviors, such as cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation potential.

To further confirm the suitability of the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel medium for generating complex tissue and organ structures, a human heart model and a tri-leaflet heart valve were fabricated using the GelMA/SFMA ink at a high infill density of 80%. The printed heart model accurately replicates the 3D anatomical shape, including major veins and arteries (Figure 2D), and exhibits mechanical stability post-water removal (Figure 2E). The tri-leaflet heart valve shows distinct valve leaflets and supporting structures (Figure 2F). Additionally, the filaments within the constructs are easily peeled off (Figure 2G). Furthermore, a hierarchical cyclic model like the esophagus is accurately recreated. As shown in Figure 2H and 2I, the printed esophagus exhibits clear stratification, with distinct demarcations between the individual layers to replicate the corresponding esophageal tissue layers, suggesting that the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel medium supports the structural complexity required for tissue engineering. While the current model falls short of replicating the full functionality of authentic human tissues and organs, the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel bath potentially offers a viable and promising strategy for the in vitro fabrication of intricate tissues and organs, with potential applications in research, therapy, and diagnosis.

Grid scaffolds with longitudinal and transverse anisotropy mimic the muscular layer of the esophagus (Figure 3A,B), consisting of a distinct inner circular muscle layer and an outer longitudinal muscle layer. To replicate this anisotropic architecture in vitro, rabbit esophageal smooth muscle cells (eSMCs) were carefully embedded within the GelMA/SFMA bioinks. By utilizing the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel medium, a biomimetic scaffold with eSMCs that closely resembled the dual-layer muscular structure of the esophagus was successfully achieved. The viability of cells encapsulated within hydrogels was assessed with the Live/Dead staining after 5 h of culture. It revealed a predominant presence of live cells (stained green) and a minimal proportion of dead cells (stained red) within the hydrogel networks, indicating high cell viability (Figure 3C). Quantitative analysis showed a remarkably high survival rate of up to 92% (Figure 3D). These results indicate the biocompatibility of the hydrogel material, as well as the efficacy of the printing and crosslinking methodologies in preserving cell integrity. To further examine the cell morphology within the GelMA/SFMA constructs, phalloidin (green)/DAPI (blue) images were captured after 3 days of cell culture. As shown in Figure 3E, a significant number of eSMCs within the biomimetic constructs have projected an abundance of pseudopodia and exhibited an alignment along the microfibers, as shown after 3 days of culture. The 3D reconstruction further confirms the precise replication of the esophageal muscle layers (Supplementary Figure 3). Additionally, eSMC proliferation was evaluated using CCK-8 assay on days 1, 7, and 14. The absorbance degree values at 450 nm markedly increased from day 1 to 7 and 14, reflecting a robust proliferative behavior (Supplementary Figure 4). These results indicate the significant potential of the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel medium in facilitating high-quality biomimetic bioprinting.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Self-assembled κ-carrageenan sub-microgel medium and its rheology analysis. (A) Schematic illustration of κ-carrageenan sub-microgel float formed through hydrogen bonding and cation interactions for embedded 3D bioprinting. (B) Flow ramp on 0.35% (wt/vol) jammed κ-carrageenan sub-microgels at 25 °C. (C) Measurements of gel-sol transition in κ-carrageenan sub-microgels through an amplitude sweep ranging from 0.1% to 100% at 25 °C. (D) Analysis of self-healing in 0.35% (wt/vol) κ-carrageenan sub-microgels upon continuous cyclic shearing at alternating 1% and 100% strains at 25 °C. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: High-fidelity embedded 3D bioprinting of rhodamine-labeled GelMA/SFMA inks using the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel suspension bath. (A) Real-time observation of embedded 3D printing within κ-carrageenan sub-microgel suspension bath. (B, C) Confocal laser scanning microscope images illustrating the (B) 3D reconstruction and (C) inner structure of the printed grids. (D, E) Photographs of 3D printed heart-like model in a water solution (D) and in its natural state (E). (F) Pictures of a tri-leaflet heart valve and (G) the filaments being peeled off from the constructs. (H) Top and (I) front-view photographs capturing an esophagus model printed with the GelMA/SFMA ink, showcasing hierarchical four-layer structures. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Embedded cell-laden bioprinting using the κ-carrageenan sub-microgel suspension bath. (A, B) Schematic diagrams of (A) the inner circular and outer longitudinal muscular structure of the esophagus and (B) an anisotropic esophageal muscular layer biomimetic scaffold produced by embedded 3D bioprinting. (C) Live/Dead staining images and (D) quantitative viability of eSMCs grown in GelMA/SFMA scaffold at 5 h. (E) Projection images of eSMCs grown in GelMA/SFMA scaffolds on day 3. From left to right: the nucleus, F-actin, and the merge view. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Supplementary Figure 1: (A) Scanning electron microscopy image showing the homogeneous morphology of κcarrageenan sub-microgels. (B) The diameter distribution of κ-carrageenan microparticles was measured by a laser nanometer particle size analyzer. Please click here to download this File.

Supplementary Figure 2: Self-recovery analysis on κcarrageenan sub-microgels of 0.35% (wt/vol) upon continually cyclic shearing at alternate 0.01 s-1 and 6 s-1 rates at 25 °C. Please click here to download this File.

Supplementary Figure 3: 3D reconstruction image of the printed grids. Please click here to download this File.

Supplementary Figure 4: The proliferation activity of eSMCs encapsulated into the GelMA/SFMA hydrogel after 1, 7, and 14 days was assessed using the CCK-8 assay (n = 3). Statistical significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post hoc analysis between three groups, **p<0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Please click here to download this File.

Discussion

The preparation of κcarrageenan sub-microgel suspension baths for use in bioprinting is a carefully orchestrated process that involves several critical steps to ensure the resulting medium exhibits the desired properties for supporting bioinks. Initially, a κcarrageenan solution is prepared by dissolving the κcarrageenan powder in deionized water at elevated temperatures, creating a homogeneous mixture. The concentration of the solution is key and must be optimized for subsequent gelation. 0.3-0.6% (wt/vol) κcarrageenan demonstrated excellent performance in embedded 3D bioprinting15. Upon cooling, this solution transitions into a bulk gel.

The bulk gel is then subjected to a mechanical grinding strategy to produce sub-microgel particles. This involves high-shear mechanical forces that break down the gel into uniformly sized particles. The grinding process parameters, including shear intensity, time, and temperature, are precisely controlled to achieve the desired particle size distribution. Following grinding, the sub-microgel particles are stored at 25-37 °C to prevent aggregation or dissolution, which is essential for maintaining a uniform suspension that supports intricate bioprinting tasks. It is recommended that the gel be prepared and used immediately.

The production of κcarrageenan sub-microgel suspension baths is easy to operate, ensuring alignment with industrial applications and the growing demand for large-scale tissue engineering and regenerative medicine endeavors. Moreover, κcarrageenan sub-microgel suspension baths employ cell-compatible PBS or culture medium as the solvent, which ensures excellent biocompatibility and makes it an ideal medium for supporting cells within bioprinted constructs. The shelf life of the granular gel is around 1 month under aseptic preparation conditions.

Characterized by its Bingham plastic flow behavior (Figure 1B), the κcarrageenan sub-microgel bath demonstrates excellent shear-thinning properties coupled with rapid self-healing abilities (Figure 1C,D), which are pivotal in enhancing the precision of printed constructs. The application of this sub-microgel bath has proven efficacious in the creation of tissues featuring multi-tiered architectures (Figure 2), ensuring the production of structures with high fidelity and resolution. It is noteworthy that the capacity for rapid pseudopodia extension in cells embedded within cell-laden bioinks (Figure 3), underscoring the bath's compatibility with cellular processes. Consequently, this κcarrageenan sub-microgel bath holds transformative promise for the field of in vitro tissue and organ fabrication. It stands to make a profound impact on tissue engineering and regenerative medicine by enabling the development of more complex, viable, and functionally integrative tissue constructs.

Despite the considerable potential of κcarrageenan sub-microgel bath for applications in bioprinting and tissue engineering, several challenges and limitations still exist. A primary concern is that its composition should closely resemble the cell culture medium, which is crucial for maintaining cell viability during the extended printing of large organs. κcarrageenan sub-microgels are predominantly produced using PBS as the solvent, which necessitates the incorporation of various cell culture media to dissolve the material. In addition to PBS, κ-carrageenan is also gelatinized using a calcium chloride solution. However, calcium chloride solution may cause toxicity to the cells or create an osmotic pressure imbalance. Therefore, the use of a cell culture medium would be ideal for κ-carrageenan solvents and cross-linking agents. Moreover, achieving high-throughput sterile production of microgels presents a significant challenge. Sterilization of κ-carrageenan solutions necessitates filtration through a 0.22 µm filter at elevated temperatures. However, the yield of sterile κ-carrageenan is often hindered by various factors, including the quality of the PBS solution and the cooling of the κ-carrageenan during the filtration process. Each filtration batch typically results in only 20-50 mL of sterile κ-carrageenan, which poses a significant barrier to the high-throughput production of κ-carrageenan microgels. Consequently, future research will focus on optimizing the biofabrication process, evaluating long-term cell viability and function, and exploring the integration of printed tissues into living systems.

Divulgaciones

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Ningbo Natural Science Foundation (2022J121, 2023J159), Key project of Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo City (2021J256), Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers (Fudan University) (K2024-35), and Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Atherosclerotic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, China (2022E10026). Thanks for the technical support by the Core Facilities, Health Science Center of Ningbo University.

Materials

3D bioprinter Custom-designed
4’,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole Solarbio Life Science C0065 Ready-to-use
405 nm UV light EFL XY-WJ01
Cell Counter Corning Cyto smart 6749
Confocal laser scanning microscope Leica STELLARIS 5
DMEM high glucose VivaCell C3113-0500 High Glucose, with Sodium Pyruvate and L-Glutamine
Dynamic rotational rheometer TA Instrument Discovery HR-20
Esophageal smooth muscle cells Supplied by the Department of Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Health Science Center, Ningbo University Primary cells from the rabbit esophagus
Fetal bovine serum UE F9070L
Fluorescein isothiocyanate labeled phalloidin Solarbio Life Science CA1610 300T
Gelatin methacrylate EFL EFL-GM-60 60% substitution
k-carrageenan Aladdin C121013-100g Reagent grade
Lithium Phenyl (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphinate Aladdin L157759-1g 365~405 nm
Live-Dead kit beyotime C2015M
Microplate reader Potenov PT-3502B
Paraformaldehyde Solarbio Life Science P1110  4%
Penicillin/streptomycin Solarbio Life Science MA0110 100 ´
Phosphate buffered saline VivaCell C3580-0500 pH 7.2-7.4
Silk fibroin methacrylate EFL EFL-SilMA-001 39% substitution
Triton X-100 Solarbio Life Science T8200
Trypsin-EDTA VivaCell C100C1 0.25%, without phenol red

Referencias

  1. Xu, X., et al. Biodegradable engineered fiber scaffolds fabricated by electrospinning for periodontal tissue regeneration. J Biomater Appl. 36 (1), 55-75 (2021).
  2. Amann, E., et al. A graded, porous composite of natural biopolymers and octacalcium phosphate guides osteochondral differentiation of stem cells. Adv Healthcare Mater. 10 (6), e2001692 (2021).
  3. Afjoul, H., et al. Freeze-gelled alginate/gelatin scaffolds for wound healing applications: An in vitro, in vivo study. Mater Sci Eng C. 113, 110957 (2020).
  4. Hasanzadeh, R., et al. Biocompatible tissue-engineered scaffold polymers for 3D printing and its application for 4D printing. Chem Eng J. 476, 146616 (2023).
  5. Fu, L., et al. Cartilage-like protein hydrogels engineered via entanglement. Nature. 618 (7966), 740-747 (2023).
  6. Bertsch, P., et al. Self-healing injectable hydrogels for tissue regeneration. Chem Rev. 123 (2), 834-873 (2023).
  7. Hinton, T. J., et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv. 1 (9), e1500758 (2015).
  8. Wang, S., et al. 3d bioprinting of neurovascular tissue modeling with collagen-based low-viscosity composites. Adv Healthcare Mater. 12 (25), e2300004 (2023).
  9. Sreepadmanabh, M., et al. Jammed microgel growth medium prepared by flash-solidification of agarose for 3d cell culture and 3d bioprinting. Biomed Mater. 18 (4), 045011 (2023).
  10. Zeng, J., et al. Comparative analysis of the residues of granular support bath materials on printed structures in embedded extrusion printing. Biofabrication. 15 (3), 035013 (2023).
  11. Terpstra, M. L., et al. Bioink with cartilage-derived extracellular matrix microfibers enables spatial control of vascular capillary formation in bioprinted constructs. Biofabrication. 14 (3), 034104 (2022).
  12. Compaan, A. M., et al. Gellan fluid gel as a versatile support bath material for fluid extrusion bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 11 (6), 5714-5726 (2019).
  13. Compaan, A. M., Song, K., Chai, W., Huang, Y. Cross-linkable microgel composite matrix bath for embedded bioprinting of perfusable tissue constructs and sculpting of solid objects. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 12 (7), 7855-7868 (2020).
  14. Zhang, H., et al. Direct 3D printed biomimetic scaffolds based on hydrogel microparticles for cell spheroid growth. Adv Funct Mater. 30 (13), 1910573 (2020).
  15. Zhang, H., et al. Cation-crosslinked κ-carrageenan sub-microgel medium for high-quality embedded bioprinting. Biofabrication. 16, 025009 (2024).
  16. Lee, A., et al. 3d bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science. 365 (6452), 482-487 (2019).
  17. Yao, J., et al. Slightly photo-crosslinked chitosan/silk fibroin hydrogel adhesives with hemostasis and anti-inflammation for pro-healing cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis. Mater Today Bio. 25, 100947 (2024).
  18. Senior, J. J., et al. Agarose fluid gels formed by shear processing during gelation for suspended 3d bioprinting. J Vis Exp. (195), e64458 (2023).
  19. Roche, C. D., et al. durability, contractility and vascular network formation in 3d bioprinted cardiac endothelial cells using alginate-gelatin hydrogels. Front Bioeng Biotech. 9, 63657 (2021).
  20. Wang, D., et al. Microfluidic bioprinting of tough hydrogel-based vascular conduits for functional blood vessels. Sci Adv. 8 (43), (2022).
  21. Shao, L., Hou, R. X., Zhu, Y. B., Yao, Y. D. Pre-shear bioprinting of highly oriented porous hydrogel microfibers to construct anisotropic tissues. Biomater Sci. 9 (20), 6763-6771 (2021).

Play Video

Citar este artículo
Zhang, H., Zhu, T., Luo, Y., Xu, R., Li, G., Hu, Z., Cao, X., Yao, J., Chen, Y., Zhu, Y., Wu, K. Embedded Bioprinting of Tissue-like Structures Using κ-Carrageenan Sub-Microgel Medium. J. Vis. Exp. (207), e66806, doi:10.3791/66806 (2024).

View Video