A functional assessment of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) can provide essential information on the communication between muscle and nerve. Here we describe a protocol to comprehensively evaluate both the NMJ and muscle functionality using two different muscle-nerve preparations, i.e. soleus-sciatic and diaphragm-phrenic.
Neuromuscular junction (NMJ) functionality plays a pivotal role when studying diseases in which the communication between motor neuron and muscle is impaired, such as aging and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Here we describe an experimental protocol that can be used to measure NMJ functionality by combining two types of electrical stimulation: direct muscle membrane stimulation and the stimulation through the nerve. The comparison of the muscle response to these two different stimulations can help to define, at the functional level, potential alterations in the NMJ that lead to functional decline in muscle.
Ex vivo preparations are suited to well-controlled studies. Here we describe an intensive protocol to measure several parameters of muscle and NMJ functionality for the soleus-sciatic nerve preparation and for the diaphragm-phrenic nerve preparation. The protocol lasts approximately 60 min and is conducted uninterruptedly by means of a custom-made software that measures the twitch kinetics properties, the force-frequency relationship for both muscle and nerve stimulations, and two parameters specific to NMJ functionality, i.e. neurotransmission failure and intratetanic fatigue. This methodology was used to detect damages in soleus and diaphragm muscle-nerve preparations by using SOD1G93A transgenic mouse, an experimental model of ALS that ubiquitously overexpresses the mutant antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1).
The neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a chemical synapse formed by the connection between the motor endplate of the muscle fiber and the motor neuron axon terminal. The NMJ has been shown to play a crucial role when communication between muscle and nerve is impaired, as occurs in aging or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). As muscle and nerve communicate in a bidirectional way1,2, being able to measure NMJ defects separately from muscle defects may provide new insights into their physiopathological interplay. Indeed, this functional evaluation may help to assess whether morphological or biochemical alterations reduce neurotransmission signaling functionality.
The comparison of muscle contractile response elicited by nerve stimulation and the response of the same muscle evoked by direct stimulation of its membrane has been proposed as an indirect measurement of NMJ functionality. Indeed, since membrane stimulation by-passes neurotransmission signaling, any differences in the two contractile responses may be ascribed to changes in the NMJ. This approach has been extensively proposed for rats3,4,5,6,7, and also used to gather information on mouse models8,9,10,11,12.
Here, we describe in detail a procedure to excise and test two muscle-nerve preparations, i. e. the soleus-sciatic and diaphragm-phrenic preparations. Using a custom-made software, we designed a continuous testing protocol that combines the measurement of several parameters that characterize both NMJ and muscle functionality, thereby yielding a comprehensive evaluation of NMJ damage separately from that of muscle. In particular, the protocol measures the twitch force, the muscle kinetics, the force-frequency curve for direct and nerve stimulations, the neurotransmission failure13 for both a firing and the tetanic frequencies, and the intratetanic fatigue7.
All the animal experiments were approved by the ethics committee of Sapienza University of Rome-Unit of Histology and Medical Embryology and were performed in accordance with the current version of the Italian Law on the Protection of Animals.
1. Experimental set-up
2. Evaluations of the NMJ contractile properties of soleus and diaphragm muscles
Figure 1 – Soleus-sciatic nerve preparation. Soleus-sciatic nerve during surgical operation for the functional tests. The sciatic is exposed using a pair of forceps. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2 – Diaphragm-phrenic nerve preparation. Picture shows a phase of the diaphram-phrenic nerve preparation excision (A) and the strip to be mounted for functional tests (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Type of experiment | Frequency | Duration | Repetitions | Muscle or Nerve stimulation | Purpose |
(Hz) | (s) | ||||
Twitch | Single pulse | 1 | Muscle | Twitch force and kinetics | |
Rest | 30 | ||||
Twitch | Single pulse | 1 | Nerve | ||
Rest | 30 | ||||
Twitch | Single pulse | 1 | Muscle | ||
Rest | 30 | ||||
Twitch | Single pulse | 1 | Nerve | ||
Rest | 120 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 40 | 0.8 | 1 | Nerve | Force/frequency curves for nerve and muscle stimulations |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 60 | 0.8 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Fused tetanus | 80 | 0.8 | 1 | Nerve | |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 20 | 0.8 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 60 | 0.8 | 1 | Nerve | |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Fused tetanus | 80 | 0.8 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 20 | 0.8 | 1 | Nerve | |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 40 | 0.8 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 300 | ||||
Fatigue paradigm | 35 | 0.8 | 1 muscle stimulation followed by 14 nerve stimulations with a rest time of 1.2 s each, repeated 20 times | Neurotransmission failure (NF) | |
Rest | 900 | ||||
Fatigue paradigm | 80 | 0.8 | 1 muscle stimulation followed by 14 nerve stimulations with a rest time of 1.2 s each, repeated 20 times | Neurotransmission failure (NF) and Intratetanic fatigue (IF) |
Table 1 – Soleus-sciatic nerve stimulation protocol. The table lists the sequence of tests that form the complete protocol for testing soleus-sciatic nerve preparations.
Type of experiment | Frequency | Duration | Repetitions | Muscle or Nerve stimulation | Purpose |
(Hz) | (s) | ||||
Twitch | Single pulse | 1 | Muscle | Twitch force and kinetics | |
Rest | 30 | ||||
Twitch | Single pulse | 1 | Nerve | ||
Rest | 30 | ||||
Twitch | Single pulse | 1 | Muscle | ||
Rest | 30 | ||||
Twitch | Single pulse | 1 | Nerve | ||
Rest | 120 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 60 | 0.5 | 1 | Nerve | Force/frequency curves for nerve and muscle stimulations |
Rest | 120 | ||||
Fused tetanus | 100 | 0.5 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 40 | 0.5 | 1 | Nerve | |
Rest | 120 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 20 | 0.5 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 120 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 80 | 0.5 | 1 | Nerve | |
Rest | 150 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 80 | 0.5 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 150 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 20 | 0.5 | 1 | Nerve | |
Rest | 120 | ||||
Fused tetanus | 100 | 0.5 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 150 | ||||
Fused tetanus | 100 | 0.5 | 1 | Nerve | |
Rest | 180 | ||||
Unfused tetanus | 60 | 0.5 | 1 | Muscle | |
Rest | 300 | ||||
Fatigue paradigm | 35 | 0.33 | 1 muscle stimulation followed by 14 nerve stimulations with a rest time of 0.67 s each, repeated 20 times | Neurotransmission failure (NF) | |
Rest | 900 | ||||
Fatigue paradigm | 80 | 0.33 | 1 muscle stimulation followed by 14 nerve stimulations with a rest time of 0.67 s each, repeated 20 times | Neurotransmission failure (NF) and Intratetanic fatigue (IF) |
Table 2 – Diaphragm-phrenic nerve stimulation protocol. The table lists the sequence of tests that form the complete protocol for testing diaphragm-phrenic nerve preparations.
3. Data analysis
NOTE: At the end of the protocol compute all the desired parameters as follow.
4. Statistical analysis
NOTE: The statistical analysis models must be chosen according to whether muscle response to both nerve and membrane stimulations is compared within the same animal model or between 2 different animal models18,19.
The protocol we described provides information on functional denervation in several neuromuscular diseases or aging-sarcopenia. This protocol can be used to determine whether (and, if so, at which level) muscle alterations are due to selective changes that occur in the muscle itself or in neuromuscular transmission. The data shown below are the results of a previous work by our group18, conducted on the SOD1G93A transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis at the end-stage of the disease20. The SOD1G93A transgenic mouse ubiquitously overexpresses the mutant antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1). Figures 3 and 4 show the dF/dt and tetanic force values for the soleus-sciatic nerve (left) and for the diaphragm-phrenic nerve (right) preparations. These results demonstrate the ability of the technique proposed here to detect the functional defects in transgenic muscles that are related to NMJ as opposed to those strictly related to the muscle itself. Indeed, for both dF/dt and tetanic force, the SOD1G93A soleus muscles displayed a reduced contractile response, compared with control muscle, when directly stimulated, and displayed a further reduction when stimulated through the nerve. By contrast, mild alterations were observed in these two parameters when diaphragm muscle strips were stimulated through the membrane, whereas significant alterations were detected when the diaphragm muscle was stimulated through the nerve.
Figure 3 – Contractile kinetics. Mean ± SEM of dF/dt for the soleus (A) and diaphragm (B) preparations. Soleus specimens displayed a significant slowing down when directly stimulated (-27%), and a further decrease when stimulated through the nerve (-58%). Diaphragm specimens displayed a slowing down only when stimulated through the nerve (-30%). Adapted from Rizzuto et al. 18. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4 – Tetanic force. Mean ± SEM of tetanic specific force for the soleus (A) and diaphragm (B) preparations. Soleus specimens displayed a significant slowing down when directly stimulated (-26%), and a further decrease when stimulated through the nerve (-50%). Diaphragm specimens displayed a force decrease only when stimulated through the nerve (-44%). Adapted from Rizzuto et al. 18. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The evaluation of intratetanic fatigue and of neurotransmission failure allowed NMJ specific parameters to be measured. Figure 5 shows the average values of intratetanic fatigue (IF) measured during the tetanic fatigue paradigm for soleus muscles (Figure 5A) and diaphragm strips (Figure 5B). As reported in the Protocol section, the fatigue paradigm we applied was developed in such a way to stress the NMJ though not the muscle. As a result, the IF measured for the direct muscle stimulation was never altered. Indeed, the IF computed for the nerve stimulation is the parameter that must be considered for comparisons between different mouse strains. Our results show the IF was significantly lower in both transgenic soleus and diaphragm muscles than in the control counterparts. This difference was greater in the diaphragm, in which a small muscle defect was detected, and smaller in the soleus, in which significant muscle damage had already measured. It should be borne in mind that since the transgenic soleus muscle was significantly damaged, the NMJ evaluation was only correct for up to 8 min of stimulation, which is the time it takes for transgenic muscle to return the null value of force when stimulated. Transgenic soleus IF values after 8 min of stimulation basically express noise.
Figure 5 – Intratetanic fatigue. Intratetanic fatigue for the soleus (A) and diaphragm (B) muscles displayed a significant decrease in transgenic NMJ functionality. Values are Mean ± SEM. Adapted from Rizzuto et al. 18. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6 shows the neurotransmission failure at the tetanic frequency measured in the soleus (Figure 6A) and diaphragm (Figure 6B) specimens. In keeping with the IF results, no defect in neurotransmission was detected in the soleus muscle, whereas the diaphragm muscle specimens displayed a significant increase in neuromuscular junction fatigability.
Figure 6 – Neurotransmission failure. Neurotransmission failure did not display any alterations in the soleus muscles (A), while highlighted a significant decrease in NMJ functionality in transgenic diaphragm strips (B).Values are Mean ± SEM. Adapted from Rizzuto et al. 18. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The experimental protocol described above provides an ideal way of measuring and discriminating any functional alterations that have occurred directly in the muscle or indirectly at the neuromuscular junction level. Since this technique is based on an indirect measurement of NMJ functionality, it cannot be used to establish if any defect is related to morphological changes or to biochemical changes. By contrast, it does provide an effective way of determining whether any morphological or biochemical alterations have reduced neurotransmission signaling functionality. However, after force measurements are completed, the muscle can be removed from the bath, blotted, pinned at optimum length, surrounded by embedding compound, and rapidly frozen in melting isopentane. Muscles can be stored at -80 °C for subsequent evaluation, such as for immunohistochemical and morphological analysis.
The technique we propose here is based on an experimental testing protocol that combines, for the first time, the measurement of several parameters characterizing NMJ and muscle functionality. Three crucial points ensure that this technique yields reliable results.
First, although skeletal muscle excision is now a relatively common technique, extra care must be taken when performing the surgical procedure in order to keep the nerve intact with the muscle. The operator’s ability must thus be tested on control mice before any other experimental model is attempted. In control mice, the muscle contractile responses to direct and indirect stimulations are expected to be the same, thus providing a control to operator’s surgical ability.
Another crucial point is the need to ensure that direct pulses do not activate the muscle by stimulating intra-muscular branches of the nerve and that the pulses applied to the nerve do not activate the muscle in an artefactual way by spreading current in the bath. The first point can be tested by performing a separate set of experiments in which the muscle is stimulated directly on the membrane both before and after D-tubocurarine (25 µM) has been added to the physiological bath. Once the supramaximal current value has been fixed, the muscle response should not be altered by the addition of D-tubocurarine. The second point is related to the length of the excised nerve, and is thus more susceptible to variation. The current at the suction electrode must be evaluated before the beginning of each test, as described in the protocol section.
Lastly, since NMJ functionality is assessed by comparing the muscle response to direct and indirect stimulation, the electrical pulses must be synchronized very precisely. This point is particularly important for the two fatigue paradigms at the end of the protocol during which the muscle is stimulated once on the membrane and 14 times through the nerve. Since both the stimulation phases and the rest times are very low (0.33 s and 0.67 s for the diaphragm), even a very low lag would lead to an unbalanced stimulation of one of the two compartments.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Work in the authors’ laboratory was supported by Fondazione Roma and Telethon (grant no. GGP14066).
Dual-Mode Lever System | Aurora Scientific Inc. | 300B | actuator/transducer |
High-Power Bi-Phase Stimulator | Aurora Scientific Inc. | 701B | pulse stimulator (nerve) |
High-Power Bi-Phase Stimulator | Aurora Scientific Inc. | 701C | pulse stimulator (muscle) |
In vitro Muscle Apparatus | Aurora Scientific Inc. | 800A | |
Preparatory tissue bath | Radnoti | 158400 | |
Monopolar Suction Electrode | A-M Systems | 573000 | with a home-made reference |
Oscilloscope | Tektronix | TDS2014 | |
Stereomicroscope | Nikon | SMZ 800 | |
Cold light illuminator | Photonic Optics | PL 3000 | |
Acquisition board | National Instruments | NI PCIe-6353 | |
Connector block | National Instruments | NI 2110 | |
Personal computer | AMD Phenom II x4 970 | Processor 3.50 Ghz with Windows 7 | |
LabView 2012 software | National Instruments | ||
Krebs-Ringer Bicarbonate Buffer | Sigma-Aldrich | K4002 | physiological buffer |
Sodium bicarbonate | Sigma-Aldrich | S5761 | |
Calcium chloride CaCl2 | Sigma-Aldrich | C4901 | anhydrous, powder, ≥97% |
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate KH₂PO₄ | AnalaR | 7778-77-0 | |
Magnesium sulphate MgSO₄ | AnalaR | 7487-88-9 | |
Buffer HEPES | Sigma-Aldrich | H3375 | ≥99.5% (titration) |
Dishes 60mm x 15mm | Falcon | 353004 | Polystyrene |
Silicone | Sylgard | 184 Silicone | Elastomer Kit 0.5Kg. |
Thermostat | Dennerle | DigitalDuomat 1200 | |
Pump | Newa Mini | MN 606 | for aquarium |
Heat resistance Thermocable | Lucky Reptile | 61403-1 | 50/60Hz 50W |
Bucket | any 10 liters | Polypropylene | |
O2 + 5%CO2 | siad | Mix gas | |
#5 Forceps | Fine Science Tools | 11252-20 | 2 items |
Spring Scissors – 8 mm Blades | Fine Science Tools | 15024-10 | nerve excision |
Sharp Scissors | Fine Science Tools | 14059-11 | muscle removal |
Delicate Scissors | Wagner | 02.06.32 | external of the animal |
Student Scalpel Handle #3 | Fine Science Tools | 91003-12 | |
Scalpel Blades #10 | Fine Science Tools | 10010-00 | |
Scalpel Blades #11 | Fine Science Tools | 10011-00 | |
nylon wire Ø0.16 mm | any |