Here, we present protocols for rearing an intermediate-germ beetle, Dermestes maculatus (D. maculatus) in the lab. We also share protocols for embryonic and parental RNAi and methods for analyzing embryonic phenotypes to study gene function in this species.
Advances in genomics have raised the possibility of probing biodiversity at an unprecedented scale. However, sequence alone will not be informative without tools to study gene function. The development and sharing of detailed protocols for the establishment of new model systems in laboratories, and for tools to carry out functional studies, is thus crucial for leveraging the power of genomics. Coleoptera (beetles) are the largest clade of insects and occupy virtually all types of habitats on the planet. In addition to providing ideal models for fundamental research, studies of beetles can have impacts on pest control as they are often pests of households, agriculture, and food industries. Detailed protocols for rearing and maintenance of D. maculatus laboratory colonies and for carrying out dsRNA-mediated interference in D. maculatus are presented. Both embryonic and parental RNAi procedures-including apparatus set up, preparation, injection, and post-injection recovery-are described. Methods are also presented for analyzing embryonic phenotypes, including viability, patterning defects in hatched larvae, and cuticle preparations for unhatched larvae. These assays, together with in situ hybridization and immunostaining for molecular markers, make D. maculatus an accessible model system for basic and applied research. They further provide useful information for establishing procedures in other emerging insect model systems.
In 1998, Fire and Mello reported that double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) can induce inhibition of gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans1. This response triggered by dsRNA was named RNA interference (RNAi), and such RNAi-mediated gene silencing was reported to be conserved in animals, plants, and fungi2-7. In plants and some animals, RNAi functions systemically, meaning that the effect can spread to other cells/tissues where dsRNA is not directly introduced (reviewed in8-10). Scientists have made use of this endogenous cellular RNAi response by designing dsRNAs to target genes of interest, thereby knocking down gene function without directly manipulating the genome (reviewed in11-14).
RNAi is a powerful tool for functional studies due to the following advantages. First, even with minimal gene sequence information, a gene can be targeted using RNAi. This is especially important for studies of non-model organisms lacking genomic or transcriptomic data. Second, in organisms where the RNAi response is robustly systemic, RNAi-mediated gene knockdown can be performed at almost any developmental stage. This feature is very useful for studying the function of pleiotropic genes. Third, in some cases, RNAi effects spread to the gonads and progeny, such that phenotypes are observed in offspring15,16. This phenomenon, known as parental RNAi (pRNAi), is especially advantageous for genes impacting embryonic development, as numerous offspring produced by a single injected parent can be examined without direct manipulation of eggs. For these reasons, pRNAi is the method of choice. However, if pRNAi is ineffective, for example for genes required for oogenesis, then embryonic RNAi (eRNAi) must be used. Fourth, RNAi can be used to generate the equivalent of an allelic series in that the amount of dsRNA delivered can be varied over a range to produce weak to strong defects. Such a gradation of phenotypes can be helpful for understanding gene function when the gene is involved in a complex process and/or complete loss of function is lethal. Fifth, delivery of dsRNA is generally easy and feasible, especially in animals showing robust systemic RNAi responses. dsRNA can be introduced by microinjection1,5, feeding/ingestion17,18, soaking,19,20 and virus/bacteria-mediated delivery21,22. Sixth, unlike some gene targeting/editing methods, there is no need to screen for organisms carrying the mutation or to carry out genetic crosses to generate homozygotes when using RNAi. Therefore, compared to many other techniques for studying gene function, RNAi is fast, inexpensive, and can be applied for large-scale screens23-25.
The broad utility of RNAi provides means to carry out functional studies in a wide range of organisms, expanding the range of species available for study beyond the traditional model systems for which genetic tools have been developed. For example, studies using non-model systems are required to give insights into the evolution of genes and gene networks by comparing the functions of orthologs from species representing different development modes or exhibiting distinct morphological features26-29. These types of studies will provide a better understanding of biological diversity, with impacts for both applied and basic research.
Being the largest animal group on the planet, insects provide a great opportunity to explore the mechanisms underlying diversity. Additionally, insects are generally small, have short life cycles, high fecundity, and are easy to rear in the lab. In the past two decades, RNAi has been successfully applied in insects spanning orders, including Diptera (true flies)5, Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths)30, Coleoptera (beetles)16,31, Hymenoptera (sawflies, wasps, ants and bees)32, Hemiptera (true bugs), Isoptera (termites)34, Blattodea (cockroaches)35, Orthoptera (crickets, grasshoppers, locusts, and katydids)36and Phthiraptera (lice)37. Successful application of RNAi has provided functional data for studies of patterning in early embryogenesis (anterior-posterior axis32, dorsal-ventral axis28, segmentation26,38), sex determination39,40, chitin/cuticle biosynthesis41, ecdysone signaling42, social behavior43, and more. RNAi methods developed for different insect species may be of additional benefit in that they are likely to be useful for pest control (reviewed in44-46). RNAi effects will be gene-specific as well as species-specific, as long as non-conserved regions are chosen for targeting. For beneficial insect species like honeybees and silkworms, targeting genes vital for the survival of viruses or parasites to control infection may provide a novel strategy to protect these species47,48.
Dermestes maculatus (D. maculatus), common name hide beetle, is distributed worldwide except for Antarctica. As a holometabolous insect, the D. maculatus life cycle includes embryonic, larval, pupal, and adult stages (Figure 1). Because it feeds on flesh, D. maculatus is used in museums to skeletonize dead animals and forensic entomologists can use it to estimate time of death49,50. D. maculatus feeds on animal products including carcasses, dried meat, cheese, and the pupae/cocoons of other insects and thus causes damage to households, stored food, and the silk, cheese, and meat industries 51,52. Applying RNAi in this beetle could provide an efficient and environmentally friendly way to minimize its economic impact. Our lab has used D. maculatus as a new model insect to study segmentation53. In addition to being amenable to lab rearing, D. maculatus is of interest for basic research as it is an intermediate-germ developer, making it a useful species to study the transition between short- and long-germ development.
Figure 1: Life Cycle of D. maculatus. Photographs of D. maculatus at different life stages, as indicated. The life cycle from egg to adult takes three weeks at 30 °C but longer at lower temperatures. (A, F) Freshly laid embryos are white to light yellow and oval, approximately 1.5 mm in length. Embryogenesis takes ~55 hr at 30 °C. (B, C and G) Larvae have dark pigmented stripes and are covered with setae. Larvae go through several instars depending on the environment and their length can extend up to over 1 cm. (D, H) Young pupae are light yellow. Pupation takes ~ 5 – 7 days at 30 °C. (E, I) Shortly after eclosion, dark pigmentation appears over the adult beetle body. Adults can live up to several months and one female can lay hundreds of embryos over her lifetime. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Previously, we showed that RNAi is effective in knocking down gene function in D. maculatus53. Here our experience rearing D. maculatus colonies in the laboratory is shared along with step-by-step protocols for both embryonic and parental RNAi set-up, injection, post-injection care, and phenotypic analysis. The dsRNA-mediated gene knockdown and analysis methods introduced here not only provide detailed information for addressing questions in D. maculatus, but also have potential significance for applying RNAi in other non-model beetle/insect species.
1. Rearing of D. maculatus
NOTE: A breeding colony of D. maculatus was set up in the authors' lab using adults and larvae purchased commercially. The species identity was verified using DNA barcoding53.
Figure 2: D. maculatus Lab Colony. Photograph of a typical D. maculatus insect cage is shown. Wood shavings are spread to let the beetles hide. Cat food is added in a small Petri dish or weighing boat. Styrofoam is placed into the cage as a refuge for final instar larvae to pupate. The cage shown here is 30.5 x 19 x 20.3 cm3 and houses a few hundred larvae, pupae, and adults. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Embryo Collection
3. dsRNA Preparation
4. Assembly of Microinjector and Micromanipulator
NOTE: See Figure 3.
5. Embryonic RNAi
NOTE: Figure 4 shows a flowchart of D. maculatus embryonic RNAi.
6. Parental RNAi
7. Phenotypic Analysis after RNAi
NOTE: At 30 °C, it takes ~ 55 hr for eggs to hatch50.
The authors' lab has used RNAi technology to study the functional evolution of genes regulating segmentation in insects53,55. While all insects are segmented, the genes regulating this process appear to have diverged during insect radiations26,38,56-63. Genetic screens in Drosophila identified a set of nine pair-rule segmentation genes that are responsible for promoting the formation of body segments64-70. Here, the ortholog of one of these genes, paired (prd), is used to document the utility of RNAi for studying gene function in D. maculatus.
eRNAi and pRNAi were each effective in demonstrating roles for Dmac–prd in segment formation in this species. 2 – 3 µg/µl of dsRNA designed to target Dmac–prd (Figures 8B, 8D and 8F) was compared to gfp dsRNA, injected as negative control (Figures 8A, 8C and 8E).
Control offspring hatched with one pigmented stripe per segment. Neighboring pigmented stripes were separated by a non-pigmented gap (Figure 8A). After prd pRNAi, affected offspring hatched with fused neighboring pigmented stripes, indicating segmental boundaries were defective (Figure 8B). Depending on phenotypic severity, one or several fusions were detected in affected larvae. Nevertheless, fusions consistently appeared at the boundary regions between T2/T3, A1/A2, A3/A4, A5/A6, A7/A8, indicating pair-rule-like defects. Cuticle phenotypes after prd knockdown showed loss of abdominal segments as well as shortened body length (Figure 8D). Engrailed (En) antibody staining was performed to examine molecular defects in early embryos after prd knockdown. While control embryos showed striped En expression with equal intensity in every segment (Figure 8E), reduced En expression was detected in alternate stripes in offspring from Dmac-prd dsRNA injected females (asterisks in Figure 8F). The pattern of reduced En expression is consistent with the defective cuticle pattern observed in affected hatched larvae. For more detailed results of phenotypes after prd knockdown in D. maculatus, see Xiang et al. 201553.
Figure 3: Injection Apparatus. Photograph of the dissection microscope and micromanipulator used to inject D. maculatus embryos is shown. Nitrogen supply is connected to the pressure input port of a pneumatic pump. Glass capillary holder is connected to the eject pressure port of the pump. Foot switch is connected to the pump. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: A Flowchart for D. maculatus Embryonic RNAi. (A-D) Collecting embryos for injection. Females lay embryos (orange) in cotton balls (grey circle). Separate embryos from cotton balls and let them drop onto a piece of black construction paper. White bars indicate tears in cotton ball. Transfer embryos to a collecting Petri dish lid, lined with black paper. (E, F) Injecting dsRNA into embryos. Align embryos on slides on double stick tape and inject them individually under a dissecting microscope. Needle with green food dye is shown. (G-J) Post-injection recovery and incubation. Place a wet cotton ball in the Petri dish to provide humidity. Cover the Petri dish and wrap it with sealing film (light blue). Place the Petri dish in an incubator and remove hatched larvae for phenotypic analysis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Good vs. Bad Embryonic Injection Examples. (A) Uninjected embryo. (B) Embryo injected with too little dsRNA. (C) Embryo injected with appropriate amount of dsRNA. (D) Broken embryo with overflowing dsRNA caused by over-injection. Food coloring was added to dsRNA for visualization. (E) Examples of pulled capillary tubes used as needles for injection. Note the taper and tip length for two examples of functional needles. Scale bars for A-D represent 200 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Male and Female Adults and Pupae. (A) Ventral view of a male pupa. (A') Magnification of posterior part of A. (A") Illustration of male pupa genitalia. (B) Ventral view of a female pupa. (B') Magnification of posterior part of B. Female pupae have two genital papillae (white arrows). (B") Illustration of female pupa genitalia. (C) Ventral view of a male adult. (C') Magnified view of posterior part of C. Note that male adults have trident-like genitalia and a circular lobe-like structure on the 4th sternite (white and black arrows, respectively). (D) Ventral view of a female adult. (D') Magnified view of posterior part of D. For all panels, scale bars indicate 1 mm. For details, see Xiang et al. 201553. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: A Female during Injection. Females are anesthetized and placed ventral side up. A needle penetrating the segmacoria between the 2nd and 3rd sternites to inject dsRNA is shown. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Representative Phenotypes after Dmac-prd pRNAi. (A) Control injection. Lateral view of a hatched wild type-like gfp pRNAi offspring with three thoracic segments and ten abdominal segments. Each segment has setae and pigmented stripes. (B) Lateral view of a hatched prd pRNAi offspring. The gap between labeled neighboring pigmented stripes is narrowed or completely missing. (C) Cuticle phenotype of an unhatched control wild type-like embryo. (D) Cuticle phenotype of an unhatched prd pRNAi offspring with fewer abdominal segments. (E,F) Dissected germband from: (E) Control, gfp pRNAi has evenly expressed En in every segment, (F) prd pRNAi, En expression is reduced in alternate segments (asterisks). For all panels, scale bars indicate 500 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
While a small number of sophisticated model systems (mice, flies, worms) were developed during the 20th century, the 21st century has seen a wave of new animal systems being developed in labs throughout the world. These new systems allow scientists to address comparative, evolutionary questions that cannot be probed using only the 'standard' model systems. This deployment of new models requires the rapid development of methods for lab culturing, gene identification, and functional approaches in new species. Here, procedures for rearing D. maculatus in the lab and step-by-step protocols for embryonic RNAi, parental RNAi, and phenotypic analysis in this beetle were presented. The goal is that these descriptions encourage others to use D. maculatus in their own experiments and to make use of the approaches presented here to develop additional new model species.
While D. maculatus lab colonies are incredibly easy to maintain, one limitation of rearing this species is the unpleasant odor of the wet cat food given to the beetles as their source of food. To avoid this, alternative foods such as whey/soy protein powder, cheese, ground dog food, and powdered milk, were tested with or without wet cotton to alter humidity. Ground dog food was the most effective alternative and can be used for regular colony feeding. Survival was excellent (>90%) from egg to adult in cages reared on just dry dog food in 80% relative humidity, with or without wet cotton added. However, supplementing this diet with wet cat food when collecting eggs to increase fecundity may be necessary when collecting large numbers of eggs. If dog food is used, old food should be removed regularly, as conditioned dog food was found to inhibit egg laying54. Dog food kibbles (K.R., preliminary results), cork, wood, paper, and other materials can also be used as refuges71. Interestingly, biodegradation of Styrofoam using mealworm beetle larvae has been reported72. Therefore, this was tested for D. maculatus larvae. Young D. maculatus larvae survived until adulthood with only Styrofoam or asbestos-containing materials and wet cotton (data not shown) but whether they eat and digest those materials remains to be determined.
This report is the first detailed protocol for carrying out functional genetic studies in D. maculatus. The use of RNAi here represents an expansion of this technique to a new model system. Several specific observations are worth noting with respect to RNAi knockdown experiments in D. maculatus and other non-model species. First, to guarantee that RNAi will be effective in D. maculatus, the same strain of D. maculatus used here should be employed. There is evidence from Tribolium castaneum that different strains show variation in RNAi phenotypes24,73, and mutant phenotypes often show dependence on genetic background in model species74-76. Also, there is anecdotal evidence for strain-dependence in other protocols, including in situ hybridization. Second, appropriate timing of injection is critical for successful RNAi in D. maculatus. Somewhat counterintuitively, the segmacoria is most easily penetrated after the cuticle has completely sclerotized, at least two days after eclosion. Therefore, virgin females 4 – 8 days after eclosion should be used. Older females experience lower fecundity than newly eclosed females and thus are not appropriate for injection. Third, injected dsRNA may get pushed out by the inner pressure of the female abdomen. To minimize the possibility of losing a large amount of dsRNA after injection, hold the needle in the abdomen for ~ 5 sec after injection and then remove it slowly (6.2.8). Meanwhile, avoid pressing the female's abdomen during or shortly after injection. To circumvent biased results caused by this issue, inject at least 8 females for each dsRNA to get enough offspring (~ 200 embryos daily) for phenotypic analysis. Fourth, high egg yield is important for providing unbiased data for phenotypic analysis after injection. On average, each D. maculatus female produces approximately 35-55 embryos daily. Egg yield depends on population size, female age, humidity, food availability, temperature (data not shown), and other environmental factors54. Usually, females lay more at 30 °C than 25 °C. Fifth, unhatched embryos can be cannibalized by hatched larvae. As hatched larvae are usually wild-type-like or only mildly affected, while unhatched embryos are usually more severely affected, this habit of D. maculatus larvae can cause biased results in a quantitative phenotypic analysis. Therefore, removal of hatched larvae as early as possible is strongly recommended.
Our lab has focused on D. maculatus segmentation, although many aspects of this species—including physiology, ecology, and pest control—are of great interest. For studying embryogenesis and segmentation, a series of darkly pigmented stripes on the dorsal side of D. maculatus larvae can serve as a natural marker for abnormal development. Also, characteristic setae rooted on the pigmented stripes of larvae can be used as an indication of segments. These morphological features, together with the finding that mildly or moderately affected embryos can survive to hatching, are advantages of the D. maculatus model to study the mechanisms involved in patterning the basic body plan.
Finally, the importance of carrying out highly controlled experiments—including a negative control such as gfp dsRNA and testing two non-overlapping target regions for each gene—is critical to avoid misinterpretation due to effects of injection per se and off-target effects. For D. maculatus, 4 – 6 µg (2 µl of 2 or 3 µg/µl) dsRNA were injected into each female and the dsRNA was 200-250 bp long. Amounts and other details of the protocol may need to be optimized if targeting genes functioning later in development or in different physiological/metabolic processes. Previous discoveries showed that RNAi effects can be passed on to subsequent generations beyond the F1 generation in C. elegans15. A minority of hatched D. maculatus larvae with segmentation defects due to RNAi can survive until adulthood and can reproduce. Preliminary experiments failed to reveal obvious defects in the F2 generation. Future studies may reveal transgenerational effects of RNAi in this species.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Drs. Alison Heffer and Yong Lu for setting up the microinjection apparatus and sharing their invaluable knowledge and experience with insect RNAi. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01GM113230 to L.P.).
Dermestes maculatus live beetles | Our lab or Carolina Biological Supply | #144168 | Our lab strain was verified by COI barcoding; strain variation from Carolina cannot be ruled out |
Wet cat food | Fancy Feast | Chunks of meat with gravy. Can buy at most pet food and grocery stores | |
Dry dog food | Purina Puppy Chow | Can buy at most pet food and grocery stores | |
Insect cage (size medium, 30.5x19x20.3 cm) | Exo Terra | PT2260 | For colony maintenance. Can use larger cage if needed |
Insect cage (size mini, 17.8×10.2×12.7 cm) | Exo Terra | PT2250 | For embryo collection |
Petri dish | VWR | 89038-968 | |
Cotton ball | Fisher | 22-456-883 | |
Megascript T7 transcription kit | Fisher | AM1334 | For 40 reactions |
Pneumatic pump | WPI | PV830 | |
Capillary holder | WPI | ||
Micromanipulator | NARISHIGE | MN-151 | |
Black filter paper (90 mm) | VWR | 28342-010 | |
Food coloring (green) | McCormick | ||
Borosilicate glass capillary | Hilgenberg | 1406119 | |
Needle puller (micropipette puller) | Sutter Instrument Co. | P-97 | |
Microscope glass slide | WorldWide Life Sciences Division | 41351157 | |
Sealing film (Parafilm M) | Fisher | 13-374-12 | |
Model 801 Syringe (10 µl ) | Hamilton | 7642-01 | |
Needle (32-gauge) | Hamilton | 7762-05 | |
Fixation Solution (Pampel's) | BioQuip Products, Inc. | 1184C | Toxic, needs to be handled in fume hood |
Forcep (DUMONT #5) | Fine Science Tools | 11252-30 | |
Cover slip (24X50 mm, No. 1.5) | Globe Scientific | 1415-15 | |
Eppendorf Femtotips Microloader pipette tip | Fisher | E5242956003 | |
Dissecting microscopy for embryo injection | Leica | M420 | |
Dissecting microscopy for larval phenotypic visualization | Zeiss | SteREO Discover. V12 | |
DIC microscopy | Zeiss | AXIO Imager. M1 |