We present simple techniques for isolating giant transcriptionally active lampbrush chromosomes from living oocytes of frogs and salamanders. We describe how to observe these chromosomes "alive" by phase contrast or differential interference contrast, and how to fix them for fluorescent in situ hybridization or immunofluorescent staining.
We describe methods for studying the giant transcriptionally active lampbrush chromosomes (LBCs) found in the oocyte, or unlaid egg, of frogs and salamanders. Individual LBCs can be up to 1 mm in length and they reside in a gigantic nucleus, itself up to 0.5 mm in diameter. The large size of the chromosomes permits unparalleled observations of active genes by light optical microscopy, but at the same time special techniques are required for isolating the nucleus, removing the nuclear envelope, and spreading the chromosomes on a microscope slide. The oocyte nucleus, also called the germinal vesicle (GV), is isolated in a medium that allows partial gelling of the nuclear actin and preserves the delicate structure of the LBCs. This step is carried out manually under a dissecting microscope using jeweler's forceps. Next, the nuclear envelope is removed, again manually with jeweler's forceps. The nuclear contents are quickly transferred to a medium that disperses the actin gel and allows the undamaged LBCs to settle onto a microscope slide. At this point the LBCs and other nuclear organelles can be viewed by phase contrast or differential interference contrast microscopy, although finer details are obscured by Brownian motion. For high resolution microscopical observation or molecular analysis, the whole preparation is centrifuged to attach the delicate LBCs firmly to the slide. A brief fixation in paraformaldehyde is then followed by immunofluorescent staining or in situ hybridization. LBCs are in a transcriptionally active state and their enormous size permits molecular analysis at the individual gene level using confocal or super-resolution microscopy.
Most vertebrates, with the notable exception of marsupials and placental mammals, produce large yolky eggs. Despite their sometimes enormous size, these eggs are single cells that reach their final dimension while still in the ovary of the female. Ovarian eggs are called oocytes and each typically contains a single giant nucleus, known since the early 19th century as the germinal vesicle or simply GV.1 Oocytes of the common laboratory frogs, Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis, reach a maximal diameter of 1.2 mm and 0.8 mm respectively (Figure 1). The GVs from mature oocytes of these two frogs are 0.3 – 0.4 mm in diameter (Figures 2, 3). Salamanders typically have even larger oocytes and GVs. Fully mature oocytes of the Mexican axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum, are more than 2 mm in diameter and the GV is about 0.5 mm. Thus, these nuclei are readily visible to the naked eye and can be manipulated in many ways that are impossible with the nuclei of typical somatic cells.
Equally remarkable is the gigantic size of the chromosomes within the GV, a fact recognized already at the end of the 19th century. Individual chromosomes of Ambystoma and other salamanders can be up to 1 mm in length (Figures 4, 5). Those of Xenopus are considerable smaller, although with lengths up to 100 µm or more, they dwarf the typical somatic chromosomes of most organisms. An important feature of oocyte chromosomes is their extraordinary transcriptional activity, which leads to one of their most characteristic morphological features — hundreds of paired lateral loops (Figure 5). Each loop consists of one or a few transcription units that actively synthesize RNA. The loops give oocyte chromosomes a fuzzy appearance, which led to the name "lampbrush" chromosome after their superficial resemblance to the brushes used in earlier times to clean kerosene lamp chimneys.2
The focus of this paper is on the use of isolated GVs to study LBCs and nuclear organelles (nucleoli, histone locus bodies, and speckles). Two rather different techniques will be described. In the first, more common technique, GVs are isolated in a saline solution using jeweler's forceps, briefly rinsed to remove adherent yolk, and the nuclear envelope is removed, again with jeweler's forceps. The gelatinous contents, containing the LBCs and nuclear organelles, are allowed to settle onto a glass microscope slide or coverslip. Such preparations can be examined directly by phase contrast or DIC microscopy. Alternatively, preparations may be centrifuged to attach the LBCs and organelles to the slide or coverslip. Such preparations can then be processed for detailed molecular analysis of nucleic acids and proteins, primarily by immunofluorescence and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).3-7
A second technique involves isolation of the GV in mineral oil.8 Oil-isolated GVs remain transcriptionally active for many hours and are potentially useful for studies where one wants the nuclear contents to be as lifelike as possible.9,10 Because the refractive index of the nuclear "sap" is close to that of the LBCs and other nuclear organelles (Figure 3), microscopical techniques can be a challenge with oil-isolated GVs.
Finally, because of their size and ease of manipulation, GVs are ideal material for studies on the nuclear envelope. The nuclear pore complex was first described from electron microscopic studies on amphibian GV envelopes11 and more recent superresolution observations have used the same material.12,13
General information about frogs and salamanders, as well as sources of animals, can be found at the following websites: Xenbase (http://www.xenbase.org) and Sal-Site (http://www.ambystoma.org). This protocol follows the animal care guidelines of the Department of Embryology of the Carnegie Institution for Science.
1. Solutions
2. Materials
3. Isolation of Oocytes
4. Isolation of a Germinal Vesicle (GV)
5. Removal of the Nuclear Envelope
6. Preliminary Observation of LBCs and Organelles
7. Centrifugation of the Nuclear Contents
8. Fixing the Nuclear Contents
9. Immunostaining of LBCs and Nuclear Organelles
10. Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) of LBCs and Nuclear Organelles
11. Isolation of a GV under Oil
To examine giant lampbrush chromosomes one begins by isolating oocytes from a frog or salamander. Figure 1 shows a group of mature oocytes in a buffered saline solution after removal from the ovary of the frog, Xenopus. Such oocytes remain in good condition for days at room temperature. The nucleus (or germinal vesicle) is then removed from an oocyte with jeweler's forceps, either in a saline solution (Figure 2) or in oil (Figure 3). The nuclear contents of an oil-isolated nucleus can be examined by gently squashing the nucleus and observing by phase contrast or differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy. To examine the contents of a nucleus that has been isolated in a saline solution, one must first remove the nuclear envelope with jeweler's forceps and allow the contents to settle onto a microscope slide. The preparation is then centrifuged to attach the chromosomes firmly to the slide, after which the chromosomes can be stained with an antibody (Figure 4) or subjected to in situ hybridization. The lampbrush chromosomes of salamanders are much larger than those of frogs (Figure 5). In both cases individual transcription units (genes) can be seen as loops of chromatin projecting laterally from the chromosome axis.
Figure 1: Mature Oocytes from the Frog X. tropicalis. The ovary of a mature female frog contains thousands of oocytes in different stages of maturation. The smallest are the size of somatic cells and have already reached prophase of the first meiotic division. As the oocyte grows, it gradually accumulates yolk, which gives the cell an opaque white appearance. The largest mature oocytes, shown here, acquire a darker cap due to accumulation of melanin pigment. The largest oocytes of X. tropicalis are about 0.8 mm in diameter, those of X. laevis about 1.4 mm, while those of the axolotl are an enormous 2.2 mm. Except for size, all three are similar in general appearance. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 2: Removal of the GV from an Oocyte of X. tropicalis. Left. A small hole was made with jeweler's forceps in the darker animal pole of an oocyte and the GV was gently extruded. In this example the GV was almost free of yolk as it came out of the oocyte. Adherent yolk can be removed by sucking the GV in and out of a pipette with a tip diameter just slightly larger than the diameter of the GV itself. Right. Three GVs of X. tropicalis. These GVs were left a few minutes in a slightly acid medium (GV isolation solution adjusted to pH 5.8), which causes the nuclear envelope to swell away from the gelled nuclear contents. GVs treated in this way will not spread for cytological examination. However, such GVs are ideal for molecular analysis: the envelope can be removed with jewelers forceps, providing a sample of nuclear contents completely free of cytoplasmic contamination.17,18 Scale bar = 0.5 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: GV of X. tropicalis Isolated in Oil. Left. After a small puncture was made in the oocyte near the dark animal pole, the GV began to extrude. In this case the GV came out with almost no adherent yolk. Middle. The GV is now completely free from the oocyte cytoplasm. Such GVs continue to transcribe RNA for hours. Right. After the GV is gently squashed in oil under a coverslip, nuclear organelles can be viewed by DIC, as shown here, or by phase contrast. The entire GV is much larger than the small area shown here. HLB = histone locus body with three speckles on its surface. Scale bar = 0.5 mm for first two panels, 10 µm for the third. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Lampbrush Chromosomes (LBCs) from the Axolotl A. mexicanum. Left. The 14 paired chromosomes from a single GV in prophase of the first meiotic division, immunostained with an antibody against phosphorylated RNA polymerase II. The tiny stained "dots" are histone locus bodies. Right. The same preparation viewed by darkfield illumination. One can now see the numerous unstained amplified nucleoli. Scale bar = 250 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: A Single LBC from the Axolotl A. mexicanum and the Frog X. tropicalis, at the Same Magnification. These images illustrate the extreme size difference between LBCs of a salamander and a frog (inset). The size difference correlates with the total DNA content of the genomes (about 30 Gbp for A. mexicanum vs 1.7 Gbp for X. tropicalis). Individual lateral loops (transcription units) are also much longer in the salamander than in the frog. Scale bar = 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The first observations of "living" LBCs from hand-isolated GVs of frogs and salamanders were made nearly 80 years ago by the American biologist William Duryee,19 before the introduction of phase contrast and DIC microscopy, before fluorescent immunostaining, and before FISH. The advantages of LBCs for investigating details of chromosome structure and transcription at the individual gene level required development of techniques to attach the LBCs to glass slides, to fix them in a lifelike manner, and to apply molecular techniques without destroying their basic morphology. Nearly every technique to accomplish these goals requires some adaptation to the species under investigation and some compromise between lifelike preservation and molecular characterization. For instance, GVs and LBCs of tailed amphibians are unusually easy to work with because of their enormous size and the ease with which the GV contents disperse in the appropriate medium. Until recently, however, very little was known about their genomics, making it difficult to correlate the wealth of cytological features with molecular details. Conversely, LBCs of Xenopus are quite small compared to those of tailed amphibians (Figure 5), but the genomes of both X. tropicalis and X. laevis have been sequenced and are reasonably well annotated.
For those first using amphibian GVs, the major challenge will be to isolate the GV and remove the nuclear envelope without damaging the LBCs. To date, no one has discovered a way to remove the envelope except by hand with jeweler's forceps. It would be a major technical advance if a way were found to "dissolve" or "digest" the envelope but leave the chromosomes and other nuclear organelles undamaged. Such a technique would be equally useful for molecular studies. In our investigations on nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA we found it essential to remove the nuclear envelope before analysis of nuclear RNA (Figure 2).17,18 If the envelope is not removed, the small amount of nuclear RNA is overwhelmed by contaminating cytoplasmic RNA that adheres to the exterior of the envelope.
Another major improvement would be discovery of some way to attach LBCs more tightly to a microscope slide. Centrifugation of the preparation is critical, but even prolonged centrifugation (1 h at 4,500 x g) does not ensure attachment. One can usually tell when LBCs are well attached by examining them with phase contrast under medium magnification. Well-attached chromosomes show no Brownian motion at all. If any Brownian motion of the loops is detectable, subsequent immunostaining or FISH protocols will lead to extensive damage or loss of material.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01 GM33397. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. J.G.G. is American Cancer Society Professor of Developmental Genetics.
Paraformaldehyde (reagent grade, crystalline) | Sigma-Aldrich | P6148-500G | Despite warnings in many protocols, a concentrated solution can be stored indefinitely at room temperature |
Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate | Sigma-Aldrich | A5040-100G | Sometimes referred to as MS-222 |
Ethicon RB-1 1/2 circle taper point 3-0 sutures | VWR | 95057-000 | |
Paraplast (paraffin wax) | Sigma-Aldrich | P3558-1KG | |
p-Phenylenediamine | Sigma-Aldrich | P6001 | |
Gelatin | Grocery Store | Commercial Knox gelatin works fine | |
ProLong Gold antifade mountant | ThermoFisher Scientific | P10144 | |
Gold Seal cover glass 22 x 22 mm #1 1/2 (0.16-0.19 mm thick) | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 63786-01 | These coverslips are the recommended thickness for superresolution microscopy |
Dumont forceps #5 | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 72700-D | http://www.emsdiasum.com/microscopy/products/tweezers/dumont_positive_action.aspx |
Paraffin oil (light) | EMD Chemicals | PX0047-1 | For isolating GVs in oil |
Adhesive in situ PCR and hybridization chambers (25 µl). | BioRad | Frame-Seal Slide Chambers #SLF0201 | http://www.bio-rad.com/en-us/sku/slf0201-frame-seal-slide-chambers |
Silicone isolators | Grace-Biolabs | select from catalog link | http://www.gracebio.com/life-science-products/microfluidics/silicone-isolators.html |
Coplin jars and staining dishes | Electron Microscopy Sciences | select from catalog link | http://www.emsdiasum.com/microscopy/products/histology/staining.aspx |