In this protocol the fabrication, setup and basic operation of a microfluidic picoliter bioreactor (PLBR) for single-cell analysis of prokaryotic microorganisms is introduced. Industrially relevant microorganisms were analyzed as proof of principle allowing insights into growth rate, morphology, and phenotypic heterogeneity over certain time periods, hardly possible with conventional methods.
In this protocol the fabrication, experimental setup and basic operation of the recently introduced microfluidic picoliter bioreactor (PLBR) is described in detail. The PLBR can be utilized for the analysis of single bacteria and microcolonies to investigate biotechnological and microbiological related questions concerning, e.g. cell growth, morphology, stress response, and metabolite or protein production on single-cell level. The device features continuous media flow enabling constant environmental conditions for perturbation studies, but in addition allows fast medium changes as well as oscillating conditions to mimic any desired environmental situation. To fabricate the single use devices, a silicon wafer containing sub micrometer sized SU-8 structures served as the replication mold for rapid polydimethylsiloxane casting. Chips were cut, assembled, connected, and set up onto a high resolution and fully automated microscope suited for time-lapse imaging, a powerful tool for spatio-temporal cell analysis. Here, the biotechnological platform organism Corynebacterium glutamicum was seeded into the PLBR and cell growth and intracellular fluorescence were followed over several hours unraveling time dependent population heterogeneity on single-cell level, not possible with conventional analysis methods such as flow cytometry. Besides insights into device fabrication, furthermore, the preparation of the preculture, loading, trapping of bacteria, and the PLBR cultivation of single cells and colonies is demonstrated. These devices will add a new dimension in microbiological research to analyze time dependent phenomena of single bacteria under tight environmental control. Due to the simple and relatively short fabrication process the technology can be easily adapted at any microfluidics lab and simply tailored towards specific needs.
Time-lapse microscopy is a powerful tool for studying living cells in vivo1. Meanwhile commercially available fully automated microscopy platforms including thermally induced focus drift compensation are commonly applied in biological research to study time-dependent phenomena, ranging from cancer and neuron cell research over tissue engineering and dynamic studies with single yeast or bacterial cells2-6.
Typically transparent well plates, agar-pads, or simply microscopy slides are applied to provide cell culture environments during time-lapse imaging7. Even though suitable for certain research, these simple systems have very limited control over environmental conditions and do not allow for more complex perturbations or well defined and fast medium changes. Disposable microfluidic chip devices produced by mass production have been introduced to the market recently but are mostly tailored towards larger eukaryotic cell types4. Although growth can be followed, well defined growth investigations concerning, e.g. precise cell trapping, colony size, growth direction, and the ability for cell removal are limited. Microfluidic habitats and reactors, in which bacteria cells are cultured in 3D environments have been developed8-10, have drawbacks when dealing with quantitative studies at the single-cell level. While overall population heterogeneity can be analyzed, many cell parameters cannot be determined accurately with single-cell resolution since growth is not restricted to monolayers.
This limitation triggered the development of microsystems enabling the cultivation of cells in well-defined channels and habitats with cells growing in flat monolayers with single cell resolution and especially tight control over media supply and environmental conditions6,11,12. Few examples of microfluidic systems for the cultivation of bacterial cells have been demonstrated12-14. Bacteria typically exhibit very fast growth rates and require microfluidic structures in the range of few micrometers and below, especially when cell monolayers are desired for microscopy. Keymer et al. demonstrated growth and spreading of E. coli strains in microfabricated landscapes15,16. Since they were interested in population dynamics they did not investigate with single-cell resolution.
We have developed the picoliter bioreactor (PLBR)13, which is currently applied to investigate various biotechnological performance indicators such as growth17 and fluorescence coupled productivity analysis on single-cell level18,19. The present microfluidic device allows environmental reactor control at a defined culture volume of approximately one picoliter and continuous single-cell observation simultaneously. In comparison to open monolayer box systems11,14, where one or two sides are open to the media supply channel, the PLBR allows for controlled trapping and culturing. The design permits long term cultivation of bacteria without the risk of several adjacent colonies forming one large population. Furthermore, the system incorporates cultivation regions of 1 µm height (in the order of the cell diameter) to restrict bacteria growth to cell monolayers. In contrast, the supply channels are 10 fold deeper to minimize hydraulic resistance.
In comparison to miniaturized batch cultivation systems20 the present system allows the cultivation with constant environmental parameters due to continuous media flow. Furthermore, environmental parameters such as medium composition, temperature, flow rates and gas exchange can be easily controlled and changed within seconds. This allows for specific investigations of cellular response to environmental changes concerning for example nutrient availability or stress stimuli. The demand for reduced media volumes, namely in the range of few microliters only, enable researchers to perform novel studies, e.g. the perturbation of cells during time-lapse imaging with supernatant of large-scale experiments unraveling cell response under these specific environmental conditions17. The picoliter bioreactor provides researchers with a robust system that tightly controls biophysical conditions and is operated using high precision syringe pumps and automated bright field and fluorescence microscopy for time-lapse imaging. Here, we report a complete protocol including device design, fabrication, and exemplary applications.
We have described the fabrication, experimental setup and related operation procedures of a microfluidic PDMS device containing several (PLBRs) for single-cell analysis of bacteria.
Microfabrication using soft lithography techniques allows fast adjustments of device dimensions for various sizes and bacteria morphologies. Currently we are optimizing the picoliter bioreactor regarding the cultivation of different microbial organisms and cultivation throughput. In order to increase the trapping efficiency, also the reactor geometry is under optimization. Figure 8 shows four new PLBR devices that are currently validated. In all figures the seeding channel was redesigned with regards to width and shape. In practice, this seems to have an effect on the number of cells that are trapped, but needs further investigations. Significant improvements regarding the trapping efficiency were also achieved by the incorporation of additional overflow channels leading to higher convectional flow through the reactor and more cells being trapped. However, at the same time one increases the risk to wash out cells during cultivation.
The device is an interesting alternative to macroscale cultivations that have been used for decades to investigate growth and production processes on single-cell level. However, it has some important requirements: For parallel monitoring of several picoliter bioreactors a high resolution and fully motorized microscopic setup with focus drift compensation is mandatory. In addition an incubation system is needed to maintain the desired cultivation temperature constant throughout the measurements.
We achieve a 95% success rate in device fabrication. Main problems are related to inefficient PDMS-glass bonding, PDMS roof collapse, or fluid leakage (see Table 1 for troubleshooting of most occurring problems). Although the experimental work is done partially under nonsterile conditions, we rarely see contamination during experiments, due the closed fluidic system. PDMS microfluidic devices are optically transparent, therefore, can be used for high resolution in vivo imaging. Although PDMS seems to be perfect for the application, it has a high affinity for hydrophobic molecules, making the use of solvents which are widely used in whole cell biocatalytic processes limited. However, suitable coatings are available to adapt the protocol to these kinds of applications.
The proposed PLBR is well suited for spatio-temporal analysis of cellular and even subcellular events of various kinds of bacteria. A major advantage of the present approach lies in the ability to quantify microcolony growth directly in contrast to conventional methods. Furthermore, the PLBR allows for culturing under defined and constant conditions. Because the system facilitates the use of small amounts of reagents or materials it carries the advantages of being inexpensive, customizable and amenable to high throughput. In traditional methods average values of the whole population are considered when analyzing microbial cultivation. Furthermore, existing methods need manual sampling which can lead to degradation of samples and thus to errors in the measurement. The PLBR offers new perspectives for bioprocess development and population heterogeneity analysis in microbiology. The PLBR is a promising tool for various applications within bioprocess development and could be applied in various fields of research, e.g. analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity, analysis of specific cell clusters within cell-lineages, screening of microbial production strains and real-time investigation of cell phenotypes.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors would like to thank the technician Agnes Müller-Schröer for her valuable contribution. This work was partly performed at Helmholtz Nanoelectronic Facility (HNF) at Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH. The authors are grateful for the generous help and support.
Silicon wafer 100 mm diameter, P/BOR <100> | Si-MAT, Silicon Materials, Germany | ||
Photoresist SU-8 2000.5 | Micro Resist Technology GmbH, Germany | ||
Photoresist SU-8 2010 | Micro Resist Technology GmbH, Germany | ||
SU-8 Developer mr DEV- 600 | Micro Resist Technology GmbH, Germany | ||
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Sylgard 184 Silicone Elastomer Kit | Dow Corning; Farnell GmbH, Germany | ||
Dispensing needles Precision Tips 27 G; ID = 0.2 mm, OD = 0.42 mm | Nordson EFD Deutschland, Germany | ||
Glass plates D263 T eco, 30 mm x 25 mm x 0.17 mm | Schott AG, Germany | ||
Hole puncher AKA 5130-B-90 | Harris Uni-Core | ||
Tubing Tygon S-54-HL, ID = 0.25 mm, OD = 0.76 mm | Saint Gobain; VWR International GmbH, Germany | ||
Disposable Syringes – Omnifix Spritzen BRAUN Omnifix 40 Duo, 1 ml | B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany | 552-183143 | |
Syringes, 1 ml sterile glass syringes | INNOVATIVE LABOR SYSTEME GMBH (ILS), Germany | ||
Chemicals | |||
(NH4)2SO4 | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
Urea | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
KH2PO4 | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
K2HPO4 | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
MgSO4•7H2O | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
MOPS | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
FeSO4•7H2O | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
MnSO4•H2O | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
CuSO4 | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
NiCl2•6H2O | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
CaCl2 | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
Biotin | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
Procatechuic acid | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
Glucose-Monohydrate | Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Germany | ||
BHI | Becton, Dickinson | ||
Cells | |||
Corynebacterium glutamicum ATTC 13032 | DSMZ; Leibniz-Institut DSMZ – Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Germany | ||
Escherichia coli MG 1655 | DSMZ; Leibniz-Institut DSMZ – Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Germany | ||
Equipment | |||
Wafer Cleaner SSEC 3300 | Solid State Equipment LLC | ||
Spin Coater SPIN150 -NPP | SPS Europe B.V. | ||
Mask Aligner MA-6 | Karl Suess | ||
Hot Plate HP30A – 2 | Torrey Pines Scientific | ||
Laboratory oven Memmert UN 200 | Memmert | ||
Plasma Cleaner FEMTO | Diener Electronics, Germany | ||
neMESYS syringe pumps | Cetoni GmbH, Germany | ||
Magnetic stirrer CB 162 | Stuart | VWR 442-0304 | |
Microscope Nikon Eclipse Ti | Nikon Microscopy | ||
Microscope incubuator | Pecon GmbH, Germany | ||
Centrifuge minispin plus “black line” | Eppendorf | 9776501 | |
Photometer BioPhotometer plus | Eppendorf | 6132000008 | |
Shake flask shaker/incubator 3031 | GFL – Gesellschaft für Labortechnik mbH, Germany | ||
Profilometer, Dektak 150 Stylus Profiler | Veeco |