Here we provide a protocol for the use of a dual-inlet system for single particle inductively coupled mass spectrometry which allows for a standard independent nanoparticle characterization.
Metal-containing nanoparticles (NP) can be characterized with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers (ICP-MS) in terms of their size and number concentration by using the single-particle mode of the instrument (spICP-MS). The accuracy of measurement depends on the setup, operational conditions of the instrument and specific parameters that are set by the user. The transport efficiency of the ICP-MS is crucial for the quantification of the NP and usually requires a reference material with homogenous size distribution and a known particle number concentration.
Currently, NP reference materials are available for only a few metals and in limited sizes. If particles are characterized without a reference standard, the results of both size and particle number may be biased. Therefore, a dual-inlet setup for characterizing nanoparticles with spICP-MS was developed to overcome this problem. This setup is based on a conventional introduction system consisting of a pneumatic nebulizer (PN) for nanoparticle solutions and a microdroplet generator (µDG) for ionic calibration solutions. A new and flexible interface was developed to facilitate the coupling of µDG, PN and the ICP-MS system. The interface consists of available laboratory components and allows for the calibration, nanoparticle (NP) characterization and cleaning of the arrangement, while the ICP-MS instrument is still running.
Three independent analysis modes are available for determining particle size and number concentration. Each mode is based on a different calibration principle. While mode I (counting) and mode III (µDG) are known from the literature, mode II (sensitivity), is used to determine the transport efficiency by inorganic ionic standard solutions only. It is independent of NP reference materials. The µDG based inlet system described here guarantees superior analyte sensitivities and, therefore, lower detection limits (LOD). The size dependent LODs achieved are less than 15 nm for all NP (Au, Ag, CeO2) investigated.
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers are extensively used to quantify size and number of NP in various samples and matrices in the so called single particle mode1,2,3. The single particle mode is an operation of the data acquisition system with a short integration or dwell time. Each NP measured produces an integrated signal in this time interval (event measured in counts per second: cps) if an adequate dilution of the NP suspension was used to avoid double events. Calibration standard, as well as the sample, are usually introduced into the ICP-MS via a conventional sample introduction system based on pneumatic nebulization (PN)4. However, as a prerequisite, the sample introduction flow rate and transport efficiency (η) must be determined to accurately quantify the metal mass per NP and to determine their number concentration in the suspension. The transport efficiency describes the ratio of the mass or particle number injected to the mass (waste collecting method)) or particle number (counting method) detected by the ICP-MS5. The transport efficiency is most frequently determined using nanoparticle-based reference materials5. However, transport properties depend on the structure of the NP, and involves properties like composition and sample dispersant. Other influencing factors are instrumental parameters, like sample uptake rate, nebulizer gas flow rate, dwell time and total measurement time.
Since only limited nanoparticulate reference materials are available, the obtained NP analysis results can be biased due to differences in elemental composition between reference and sample particles. Besides the availability of a limited range of reference materials, the detection of multiple particle events per detector dwell time represents a further challenge. This may also affect the accuracy of the transport efficiency to be determined.
To be independent of reference materials, ideally, a sample introduction system with a transport efficiency of almost 100% is preferable. At the same time when a low volume is used compared to conventional introduction systems, higher particle number concentrations can be used. Even if two particles are close to each other both can be separately detected with the µDG based system.
The µDG is able to generate monodisperse droplets with a fixed volume in the pL range and is well-suited for this purpose6,7,8,9. The µDG facilitates the injection of both ionic and particulate samples in different solvents into the ICP-MS. In case of ionic metal samples, it is assumed that the droplets generated are fully desolvated on the way to the ICP. Accordingly, the droplet loses all water and a particle is formed from the remaining salt. The diameter of this particle is directly proportional to the concentration used. Thus, homemade reference standards of the same matrix, mass, and size, with varying concentration of the ionic solution of the NP to be investigated, can be produced in-house. The volume of a droplet can be calculated easily based on the droplet diameter measured by the µDG. This is not possible with a PN which produces a wide distribution of droplets with different diameters10,11. Due to the uniform sample introduction at high transport efficiency of 100% of the µDG, high instrument-specific analyte sensitivity can be achieved. Depending on the matrix used, this leads to lower limits of detection (LOD) of particle mass and size when compared to the results of conventional introduction systems based on PN12. However, due to the design of the µDG, samples cannot be exchanged easily when the ICP-MS system is still operating. Between measurements of different samples, the µDG has to be cleaned and afterwards flushed with the sample solution for system stabilization. In addition, its tolerance to heavy matrix samples has not been tested to great extent. Moreover, due to the extremely low flow rates, the analysis time to achieve good statistics would be extremely long, which limits its practical use, if “real” samples, as for instance environmental waters, should be analyzed.
To overcome these limitations, the µDG has been previously operated in combination with a conventional pneumatic nebulizer based system, which was given the name of a dual inlet system13. By introducing the calibration standards with the µDG and the NP suspension via a pneumatic nebulizer into the ICP-MS, Ramkorun-Schmidt et al. were able to take advantage of both systems13. Highly accurate determination of the metal mass fraction of Au and Ag NP were achieved, without a need for transport efficiency determination. However, no particle number concentrations were determined with this dual inlet system. Also, cleaning and alignment of the µDG system was complicating the applicability for routine analysis.
In this paper, we propose a flexible dual inlet interface for determining NP particle size and particle number concentration and demonstrate the assembly and practical use of it. Like the system of Ramkorun-Schmidt et al. it consists of both an µDG as well as PN sample introduction system. We demonstrate that the dual-inlet system, in its present stage of development, allows the application of three independent modes of analysis to investigate and characterize metal-containing NPs. Our dual-inlet system simplifies the calibration procedure for NP determination and improves the analytical figures of merit in particular the accuracy14. The inlet systems allow convenient sample exchange and cleaning of the µDG even when the ICP-MS is still operating, thereby reducing the overall analysis time and the risk of misalignment. In order to test the system performance well characterized reference NP (60 nm AuNP – NIST 8013, 75 nm AgNP – NIST 8017) are used for method validation and comparability.
1. Assembly of the dual-inlet sample introduction setup
NOTE: Details about different parts are shown in Table 1.
Components | |||
Part 1 | Glass female spherical ball joint with approximately 10 mm shank length | ||
Glass male ball joint with approximately 10 mm shank length | |||
Metal T-piece (dimensions: 1/4 in) | |||
Glass to metal adhesive | |||
Two clamps for spherical glass joints | |||
Part 2 | ICP-MS spray chamber (suggested type: impact bead spray chamber, cyclonic spray chamber or similar) | ||
Pneumatic nebulizer (suggested type: concentric nebulizer) | |||
Clamp | |||
Part 3 | O-ring free quartz torch | ||
Gas line connector closed-end | |||
Gas line connector open-end | |||
Conductive and flexible silicone tube | |||
Part 4 | Piezoelectric Micro droplet generation unit | ||
Part 5 | Micro droplet control unit |
Table 1: List of Components used to build up the dual-inlet setup.
2. Quantification of droplet size
3. Sample preparation
4. Instrumental tuning and parameters
Parameter | Value | ||
ICP – MS: | |||
Plasma Power (W) | 1600 | ||
Sampling Depth (mm) | 4 | ||
Flow rates (L min-1): | |||
Auxiliary Gas | 0.65 | ||
Cooling Gas | 14 | ||
Times (s) | |||
Data acqusition (s) | 1200 | ||
Dwell time (s) | 0.01 | ||
Interface: | |||
PN Sample uptake rate (mL min-1) | 0.21 | ||
Nebulizer Gas (L min-1) | 0.92 | ||
µDG: | |||
Capillary diameter (µm) | 75 | ||
Drop rate (Hz) | 10 | ||
He makeup gas (L min-1) | 0.27 | ||
Operation mode | Triple pulse | ||
Set1 | Set2 | Set3 | |
Voltage (V) | 53 | 51 | 47 |
Pulse width (µs) | 20 | 25 | 12 |
Pulse delay (µs) | 4 | 2 | 1 |
Table 2: Values of instrumental parameters used.
5. Multi-mode measurement of nanoparticle samples
Figure 2: Measurement strategy for multi-mode nanomaterial quantification. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
6. Data analysis
NOTE: To simplify all calculation steps, a corresponding spreadsheet was prepared (see Supplementary File).
Figure 3: Determination of the droplet size with the CCD-camera. Calibration of the CCD-camera with a 150 µm copper wire (A) and determination of the droplet size after converting the achieved droplet pictures into a binary color picture (B). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Validation of the dual inlet-setup. Multi-point calibration of the µDG (A) and PN (B) inlet system for gold (Au), silver (Ag) and cerium (Ce). The used concentration in the range of 0.2 – 20 µg mL-1 is converted, depending on used experimental conditions in mass per detected event. The presented data are the average values of three independent replicates. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Representing measurement for the dual-inlet setup. The quantification of CeO2 NP with colored bars as done in Figure 2 for the different injection steps. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Sample | Analysis Mode / | Inlet for NP sample | Inlet for calibration standards | η | ma, p | NP size (d) | #NPs | Recovery (%) | |
ηPN determination | (%) | (fg) | (nm) | (mL-1 x103) | |||||
Au 56 nm | Mode-I / | PN | PN: Au ionic & AuNP standards | 1.8 (0.1) | 1.9 (0.5) | 57.2 (4.3) | 28.1 (0) | 100 | |
NIST 8013 | Counting Method | ||||||||
Mode-II / | PN | PN/µDG: | 1.9 (0.1) | 2 (0.4) | 58 (3.6) | 25.6 (1.6) | 91 | ||
Sensitivity Ratio | Au ionic standards | ||||||||
Mode-III / | µDG | µDG: | 100 | 1.7 (0.2) | 55 (2.4) | 394.4 (29.3) | 70 | ||
ηµDG = 1 | Au ionic standard | ||||||||
Expected size (nm) | 56.0 (0.5) | ||||||||
Ag 75 nm | Mode-I / | PN | PN: Ag ionic & AgNP standards | 2.3 (0.2) | 1.9 (0.2) | 70.2 (2.3) | 21.6 (0) | 100 | |
NIST 8017 | Counting Method | ||||||||
Mode-II / | PN | PN/µDG: | 2.5 (0.2) | 2 (0.2) | 71.5 (2.1) | 20.5 (1.9) | 95 | ||
Sensitivity Ratio | Ag ionic standards | ||||||||
Mode-III / | µDG | µDG: | 100 | 2.5 (0.2) | 76.7 (2.3) | 757.1 (68.7) | 88 | ||
ηµDG = 1 | Ag ionic standard | ||||||||
Expected size (nm) | 74.6 (3.8) | ||||||||
CeO2 JRC NM212 | Mode-I / | PN | PN: Ce ionic & AuNP standards | 1.7 (0) | 0.90 (0.09) | 61.9 (2.0) | 7.59 (0.32) | – | |
10-100 nm | Counting Method | ||||||||
Mode-II / | PN | PN/µDG: | 4.9 (1.4) | 1.36 (0.35) | 70.6 (5.9) | 5.42 (1.7) | - | ||
Sensitivity Ratio | Ce ionic standards | ||||||||
Mode-III / | µDG | µDG: | 100 | 1.63 (0.62) | 74.4 (9.2) | 590 (168) | – | ||
ηµDG = 1 | Ce ionic standard |
Table 3: Results of the dual-inlet setup. Transport efficiency, metal mass fraction, diameter and NP number concentration for Au NIST 8013, Ag NIST 8017 and CeO2 JRC NM 212 (n=3) NP materials using three analysis modes and three transport efficiency determination methods. The % recovery is defined as the ratio of the determined #NPs to the expected #NPs. The table is reprinted with permission from reference14.
The protocol presented here allows for the determination of the particle mass and number concentration. The µDG droplet formation, including the droplet size (Figure 3) was characterized beforehand (Table 3).
After the setup was assembled (Figure 1) and the droplet size determined, both injection systems were validated with ionic standards (Figure 4). An accuracy of r² > 0.99 could be achieved with both injection systems for all investigated elements. However, there are differences in both systems due to the amount of analyte introduced and transported. Since the µDG has a very high transport efficiency (up to 100%), higher analyte sensitivities compared to the PN are observed with low mass input at the same time. However, the measured concentrations introduced by the µDG have to be separated into two linear ranges. For Ag, the first linear range can be observed between 0 and 0.5 fg event-1 and the second between 0.5 and fg event-1. In contrast, the first linear range for Ce is between 0 and 0.25 fg event-1 and the second between 0.25 and 3 fg event-1. The linear range for PN for the measured concentrations appears to be higher. This is most likely related to the difference of introduced mass into the ICP-MS per detection event. The µDG injects a constant absolute quantity in a low volume per drop and detection event resulting in lower detected mass compared to the introduction of samples with the PN.
After the successful validation, experiments can be performed as described in Figure 2. A result of such experiments is exemplified in Figure 5 for the determination of the particle size and number concentration of CeO2 NP. Here the signals for the introduced ionic and NP solutions via µDG and PN can be identified. A triple determination was carried out for all investigated particles.
The evaluation of the obtained data was performed as described above and is summarized in Table 3. For the Au and Ag NP used for validation of the duel-inlet setup and the three analysis modes, the certified particle size and number concentration could be achieved with all analysis modes performed. The mean particle sizes obtained for CeO2 are between 10 and 100 nm, the range specified by the manufacturer.
Figure 1: Design of the dual-inlet interface setup. Part 1 – connector unit, Part 2- conventional introduction system, Part 3 – microdroplet transport unit, Part 4- microdroplet generation unit, Part 5- microdroplet control unit, and open configuration for droplet size measurement including a stroboscope light and a CCD camera. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The aim of the developed dual-inlet setup is the characterization and quantification of NP as accurately as possible concerning their size and number concentration by using different analysis modes, independent of the analyte to be investigated. By combining a low volume (pL) and high mass transport (up to 100%) introduction system (µDG) with a conventional introduction system (PN) this is achievable. By using the setup presented in this work, the element-specific based transport efficiency required for quantification of particle mass can be determined based on ionic standards and independently of NP reference materials. In addition, the NPs introduced into the ICP-MS with the µDG have a narrower (AuNP) or similar (AgNP) particle size distribution. Otherwise, for CeO2 a broader size distribution for the µDG was observed and can be attributed to the higher polydispersity of the analyzed sample. Due to the introduction of low volume two NPs can be detected separately from each other, which would otherwise be interpreted as one NP in the conventional setup14.
The advantages resulting from the µDG transport unit are the high degree of flexibility due to the flexible silicon tubing, which simplifies the alignment of the setup. The torch with the injector can also be adjusted during the setup while still connected to the ICP-MS. The additional applied He gas flow prevents a collision of the droplets formed by the µDG head with the tubing walls20. Furthermore, the He gas allows for the removal of µDG head during the sample exchange even when ICP-MS is still operating. Keeping the ICP in an operational state is crucial for stable and robust measurement. Since the µDG head must be cleaned and rinsed with every new sample or standard, the He flow is vital for the operation of the inlet system introduced in this work. Furthermore, all parts of the dual-inlet setup have to be correctly connected in order to prevent the penetration of oxygen into the system. In order to diminish oxygen in the presented setup, the system is flushed with the nebulizer and droplet transportation gas before the ignition of the plasma for at least 5 to 10 min.
When the formed droplets reach the connector unit, they are transported into the plasma by a nebulized liquid stream, also referred to as a wet-plasma condition. Compared to the use of dry plasma conditions this leads to an increased liquid content of the plasma. Consequently, the signal intensity decreases as well as fluctuation of the signal increase, i.e., a higher standard deviation of the mean measurement signal13. However, by using the µDG and concentrations in the range of 0.2 µg/L signals above the background can be detected. The corresponding injected mass per droplet has low metal content, which is close to the detection limits for some elements (i.e., Au, Ag, Ce). If different concentrations for calibration along this limit are used two linear regions can be observed with an overlap at approximately 0.05 µg/L for Ce and 2 µg/ L for Ag. Below the overlapping region the observed signals are close to the element specific background21. Above these limit the linear working range of the µDG can be identified. Even with the ability to measure low concentrations, it is impossible to distinguish between ions and NP of the same analyte within a droplet if they are simultaneously present. Otherwise, by using the conventional introduction system the average ionic background can be determined and subtracted from all signals to get the particle signals only.
MDG based system also have several limitations which can be partially circumvented by the application of proposed dual inlet system. However, if the droplet frequency of µDG exceeds 50 Hz it is not possible to create a consistent droplet pattern. The formed droplets might collide and, therefore, exchange of analyte occurs. The correct adjustment of gas flow rates is also important for a reliable transport of the droplet into the ICP-MS system as well as for correct operation of the PN. The proposed dual inlet system currently does not support automation of the measurement procedure as there is a requirement of manually changing the sample solutions.
In future, µDG can be used for characterizing and quantifying NPs in complex matrices and environmental samples. To prevent clogging of µDG because of the higher solution viscosity, complexity, and surface tension, an appropriate head design should be used. Depending on the µDG head design and operation of the power supply, it might be possible to generate droplets that contain particle-like systems such as cells, micelles, or lipid carriers for which standard reference materials are not available at all.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by BfR SFP 1322-642 for F.L.K and P.R., BfR SFP 1322-724 for D.R. and BfR senior scientist fellowship for S.A.P.
Au ionic (1000 mg L-1 stock) | VWR, UK | 85550.18E | |
Ag ionic (1000 mg L-1 stock) | Ultra Scientific, RI, USA | ICM-103 | |
Ag NP (75nm, NIST 8017) | NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA | no longer available | |
Au NP (60nm, NIST 8013) | NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA | no longer available | |
Ce ionic (1000 mg L-1 stock) | VWR, UK | 85557.18E | |
CeO2 (10-100nm, NM212) | EU Joint Research Centre | NM212 | |
Excel 2016 | Microsoft | ||
Fiji | ImageJ | ||
Glass female spherical ball + Glass male ball | Fisher Scientific | 12499016 | |
HCl (emprove bio) | Merck, Germany | 100317 | |
ICP-MS spray chamber with ipact bead | LabKings | LK6-45013 (OEM 3600170) | |
Metal clamps for spherical glass joint | Fisher Scientific | 11322015 | |
Metal T-Piece | Swagelok | SS-4-VCR-T | |
Microdrop Dispenser Head, non heated | microdrop Technologies | 944 | |
Microdrop Dispensing System MD-E-3000 | microdrop Technologies | ||
MilliQ water (MilliPore gradient) | Merck MilliPore, Darmstadt, Germany | ||
O-ring free quartz torch | Analytical West | 450-301 | |
PFA-ST concentric nebulizer | Elemental Scientific | ES-2042 | |
Silicone Rubber Tubing – 60° Shore – Platinum Cured – Black | Silex | ||
XIMEA Cam Tool | XIMEA |
.