The protocol aims at providing a standard method for the vitrification of adult and juvenile sheep oocytes. It includes all the steps from the preparation of the in vitro maturation media to the post-warming culture. Oocytes are vitrified at the MII stage using Cryotop to ensure the minimum essential volume.
In livestock, in vitro embryo production systems can be developed and sustained thanks to the large number of ovaries and oocytes that can be easily obtained from a slaughterhouse. Adult ovaries always bear several antral follicles, while in pre-pubertal donors the maximal numbers of oocytes are available at 4 weeks of age, when ovaries bear peak numbers of antral follicles. Thus, 4 weeks old lambs are considered good donors, even if the developmental competence of prepubertal oocytes is lower compared to their adult counterpart.
Basic research and commercial applications would be boosted by the possibility of successfully cryopreserving vitrified oocytes obtained from both adult and prepubertal donors. The vitrification of oocyte collected from prepubertal donors would also allow shortening the generation interval and thus increasing the genetic gain in breeding programs. However, the loss of developmental potential after cryopreservation makes mammalian oocytes probably one of the most difficult cell types to cryopreserve. Among the available cryopreservation techniques, vitrification is widely applied to animal and human oocytes. Despite recent advancements in the technique, exposures to high concentrations of cryoprotective agents as well as chilling injury and osmotic stress still induce several structural and molecular alterations and reduce the developmental potential of mammalian oocytes. Here, we describe a protocol for the vitrification of sheep oocytes collected from juvenile and adult donors and matured in vitro prior to cryopreservation. The protocol includes all the procedures from oocyte in vitro maturation to vitrification, warming and post-warming incubation period. Oocytes vitrified at the MII stage can indeed be fertilized following warming, but they need extra time prior to fertilization to restore damage due to cryopreservation procedures and to increase their developmental potential. Thus, post-warming culture conditions and timing are crucial steps for the restoration of oocyte developmental potential, especially when oocyte are collected from juvenile donors.
Long-term storage of the female gametes can offer a wide range of applications, such as improving domestic animal breeding by genetic selection programs, contributing to preserve biodiversity through the ex-situ wildlife species conservation program, and boosting in vitro biotechnology research and applications thanks to the availability of stored oocytes to be incorporated in in vitro embryo production or nuclear transplantation programs1,2,3. Juvenile oocyte vitrification would also increase genetic gain by shortening the generation interval in breeding programs4. Vitrification by ultra-rapid cooling and warming of oocytes is currently considered a standard approach for livestock oocytes cryopreservation5. In ruminants, before vitrification, oocytes are usually matured in vitro, after retrieval from follicles obtained from abattoir-derived ovaries2. Adult, and especially prepubertal ovaries4,6, can indeed supply a virtually unlimited number of oocytes to be cryopreserved.
In cattle, after oocyte vitrification and warming, blastocyst yields at >10% have been commonly reported by several laboratories during the last decade3. However, in small ruminants oocyte vitrification is still considered relatively new for both juvenile and adult oocytes, and a standard method for sheep oocyte vitrification remains to be established2,5. Despite recent advancements, the vitrified and warmed oocyte indeed presents several functional and structural alterations that limit their developmental potential7,8,9. Thus, few articles have reported blastocyst development at 10% or more in vitrified/warmed sheep oocytes2. Several approaches have been investigated to reduce the above-mentioned alterations: optimizing the composition of the vitrification and thawing solutions10,11; experimenting with the use of different cryo-devices8,12,13; and applying specific treatments during in vitro maturation (IVM)4,14,15 and/or during the recovery time after warming6.
Here we describe a protocol for the vitrification of sheep oocytes collected from juvenile and adult donors and matured in vitro prior to cryopreservation. The protocol includes all the procedures from oocyte in vitro maturation to vitrification, warming and post-warming culture period.
The animal protocol and the implemented procedures described below are in accordance with the ethical guidelines in force at the University of Sassari, in compliance with the European Union Directive 86/609/EC and the recommendation of the Commission of the European Communities 2007/526/EC.
1. Preparation of media for oocyte manipulation
2. Oocyte collection and maturation
3. Semen collection, freezing and thawing procedures
4. In vitro fertilization and embryo culture
5. Oocyte vitrification and warming
NOTE: Perform vitrification following the method of minimum essential volume (MEV) using device cryotops17.
6. Assessment of oocyte quality post-warming
7. Oocyte survival assessment
8. Evaluation of mitochondrial activity and ROS intracellular levels by confocal laser scanning microscopy
9. Statistical Analyses
The cryotolerance of oocyte from juvenile donors is lower compared to adult ones. The first effect observed is a lower post-warming survival rate compared to adult oocytes (Figure 1A; χ2 test P<0.001). Juvenile oocytes showed a lower membrane integrity after warming (Figure 1B). The use of trehalose in the maturation medium was intended to verify whether this sugar could reduce cryoinjuries in juvenile oocytes. The data have demonstrated23 that oocytes matured for 24 h with trehalose supplementation showed higher survival rates after vitrification/warming compared to the non-treated group (Table 1: 85.7% vs 75.3% respectively; χ2 test P<0.05). Trehalose supplementation was indeed associated with higher membrane integrity after warming (Figure 2A). Thus, the use of trehalose during the in vitro maturation of juvenile oocytes increased the rates of survival after vitrification (85.7%) to values comparable to adult ones (90.3%). However, cleavage, fertilization and developmental rates of juvenile oocytes were not increased by trehalose supplementation (Table 1).
To improve oocyte competence after vitrification we tested in adult ovine oocytes different vitrification media with calcium concentrations ranging from 9.9 to 0.4 mg/dL10. Obtained results showed that the use of media with calcium concentration equal to 2.2 mg/dL increased post-warming survival rates, improved developmental competence and reduced parthenogenetic activation of adult oocyte10 (Table 2). We thus tested the low calcium vitrification media for the vitrification of juvenile oocytes. As shown in Table 3, juvenile oocytes vitrified with low calcium concentration evidenced higher fertilization rates compared to oocytes vitrified with high calcium concentration (44.35% vs 32.29 % respectively; P<0.05), but no differences were found in embryo production.
Vitrified/warmed oocytes need extra time prior to fertilization to restore damage due to cryopreservation procedures and to increase their developmental potential. A previous study has indeed demonstrated that ATP intracellular concentration, mitochondrial activity and in vitro developmental competence are reduced in vitrified/thawed oocytes, which also show high intracellular ROS concentrations6. These alterations are particularly marked immediately after warming. During the post-warming culture, both adult and juvenile oocytes are able to partially recover from the damages suffered during the vitrification procedures6, 24. By comparing post-warming culture of different durations (0, 2, 4, and 6 h), we showed that after 4 h of culture oocytes collected from adult ewes are able to recover the energetic balance6 and microtubular setup24 and to restore the developmental competence with higher cleavage (50.7 ± 3.9%; P< 0.01 ANOVA) and blastocyst rates (14.40 ± 1.3%; ANOVA P< 0.01) compared to other time points (0, 2 and 6 h; Table 4). Thus, 4 h of post-warming culture represents the ideal time window for fertilization of vitrified/warmed adult oocytes6.
When the same experiment was repeated with oocytes collected from juvenile donors, these results were partially confirmed. Mitochondrial activity was higher in vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes after 4 h of post-warming culture compared to other time points (0, 2, 6; Figure 3: ANOVA P<0.01). Several patterns of mitochondrial distribution are observed and classified into the following three groups (as reported by21 ): Pattern A: homogeneous FINE with small granulations spread throughout the cytoplasm; Pattern B: homogeneous GRANULAR with large granulations spread throughout the cytoplasm; Pattern C: heterogeneous CLUSTERED when particularly large granulations were present, spread all over the cytoplasm or located in specific cytoplasmic domains. The different phenotypes in the cytoplasm distribution of active mitochondrial in MII can be related to oocyte developmental competence. A FINE homogeneous distribution is an indicator of poor developmental competence while a GRANULAR and CLUSTERED distribution are related to an increased mitochondria activity and consequently higher developmental competence22. Mitochondrial distribution patterns changed during 6 h of post-warming culture. Figure 4 shows examples of juvenile oocytes having different patterns of mitochondrial distribution and their fluctuations during post-warming culture. The pattern A increase significantly during the prolonged incubation and reaches the higher value at 6 h post-warming (Figure 4Aa: χ2 P<0.05), the pattern B did not show significant changes during post-warming culture (Figure 4Bb), the pattern C was not found in any juvenile vitrified/warmed oocyte during the prolonged incubation (Figure 4Cc: χ2 P<0.05).
Moreover, ROS intracellular levels were significantly lower in juvenile oocytes at 2 h of post-warming culture compared to 0, 4 and 6 h (Figure 5: ANOVA P<0.001). However, and in contrast to what was found in adult oocytes, the rate of spontaneous parthenogenetic activation increased during the post-warming culture in juvenile oocytes (Figure 6). For this reason, the recommended time point for fertilization in juvenile oocytes would be 2 h after the post warming culture.
Figure 1. Survival rates of vitrified/warmed ovine oocyte collected from juvenile and adult donors. (A) Oocyte were vitrified after in vitro maturation. Survival rates were determined after vitrification and warming by fluorescent staining with propidium iodide (10 µg/mL) and Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/mL). N = 165 adult oocytes and 170 juvenile oocytes. Different letters indicate significant differences between adult and juvenile oocytes: χ2 test P<0.001. (B-C) Examples of vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes with intact (B) and damaged plasma membrane (C) at the morphological evaluation (inverted microscope with 100x magnification). Scale bar = 10 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Juvenile ovine oocyte survival rates and in vitro developmental competence after maturation with (TRH) and without (CTR) trehalose (100 mM in maturation medium). (A-B) Examples of juvenile oocytes vitrified after in vitro maturation in media supplemented (A) with or (B) without trehalose at the morphological evaluation (inverted microscope with 100x magnification). Scale bar = 30 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Quantification of active mitochondrial fluorescence intensity in vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes at different time points (0, 2, 4, 6) during post-warming in vitro culture. IVM oocytes were used as a control (CTR N = 77). In total 163 (0 h N = 45; 2 h N = 39; 4 h N = 40; 6 h N = 39) juvenile oocytes were vitrified and warmed in three independent experiments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA P = 0.0000). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Distribution of mitochondrial pattern in vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes during 6 hours of post-warming in vitro culture. Representative images of Fine (A), Granular (B) and Clustered (C) mitochondrial distribution in vitrified/warmed juvenile oocytes. (D) Percentage of juvenile vitrified/warmed oocytes showing a fine mitochondrial distribution; (E) Percentage of juvenile vitrified/warmed oocytes showing a granular mitochondrial distribution; (F) Percentage of juvenile vitrified/warmed oocytes showing a clustered mitochondrial distribution. IVM juvenile oocytes were used as control (CTR; N = 77). In total 163 (0 h N = 45; 2 h N = 39; 4 h N = 40; 6 h N = 39) juvenile oocytes vitrified and warmed in three independent experiments were used. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (Aa: χ2 P = 0.026; Bb: χ2 P = 0.097; Cc: χ2 P = 0.014). Scale bar = 30 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5. Quantification of intracellular ROS fluorescence intensity in vitrified juvenile oocytes during of 6 hours post-warming in vitro culture. (A-B) Representative images of ROS fluorescence intensity in in vitro matured (A) and vitrified (B) juvenile oocytes. (C) Intracellular levels of ROS as determined by quantification of fluorescence intensity in vitrified juvenile oocytes at different time points (0 h N=45; 2 h N=39; 4 h N=40; 6 h N=39) during post-warming in vitro culture. In vitro matured juvenile oocytes were used as a control (CTR N = 77). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA P = 0.0000). Scale bar = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6. Parthenogenetic activation in vitrified juvenile and adult oocytes during 6 hours of post-warming in vitro culture. (A-B) Representative images of oocyte parthenogenetic activation: (A) oocyte in metaphase II-telophase II transition and (B) pronucleus formation. (C) Percentages of parthenogenetic activated adult and juvenile oocytes at different time points (0, 2, 4, 6 h) during post-warming in vitro culture. Asterisks indicate statistical differences between juvenile and adult oocytes at each time point of incubation (ANOVA P = 0.000). This figure has been modified from Serra et al.24 Scale bar = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Oocytes (n) | Survival rate (%) | IVF (n) | Fertilizeda (%) | Cleavedb (%) | Blastocystsc (%) | |
CTR | 73 | 75.3* | 452 | 91.1 | 96.1 | 14.3 |
TRH | 77 | 85.7 | 470 | 92.5 | 95.4 | 13 |
* Chi square test p<0.5 | ||||||
a Percentages are calculated on IVF oocytes | ||||||
b Percentages are calculated on fertilized oocytes | ||||||
c Percentages are calculated on cleaved oocytes |
Table 1. Juvenile ovine oocytes survival rates and in vitro developmental competence after maturation with and without trehalose and vitrification. TRH = juvenile oocytes matured with trehalose supplementation (100 mM in maturation medium). CTR = control juvenile oocytes matured without trehalose supplementation. Survival rates were determined after fluorescent staining with propidium iodide (10 µg/mL) and Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/mL) of vitrified/warmed oocytes. Oocyte developmental competence was determined after incorporation in an in vitro production system. a Percentages are calculated on IVF oocytes. b Percentages are calculated on fertilized oocytes. c Percentages are calculated on cleaved oocytes. * χ2 test P<0.5. This table has been modified from Berlinguer et al.23
Groups | [Ca++] mg/dL | N oocyte | Spontaneous parthenogenetic activation (%) | Vitrified oocytes | Survived and IVF oocytes (%) | Cleavage (%) | Blastocysts output (%) |
TCM/FCS | 9.9 | 80 | 33 (41.2)a | 150 | 124 (82.7)a | 40 (32.5)a | 2 (1.6)a |
PBS/FCS | 4.4 | 82 | 29 (35.3)ac | 115 | 88 (76.5)a | 33 (37.5)ae | 1 (1.1)a |
PBSCaMg free/FCS | 2.2 | 86 | 11 (12.7)b | 126 | 115 (91.3)b | 74 (64.3)b | 12 (10.4)b |
PBS/BSA | 3.2 | 83 | 21 (25.3)c | 110 | 90 (81.8)a | 18 (20)c | 0 (0)a |
PBSCaMg free/BSA | 0.4 | 87 | 10 (11.5)b | 149 | 123 (82.5)a | 57 (46.3)de | 3 (2.4)b |
Table 2. Developmental competence of in vitro matured adult oocytes vitrified in vitrification media (16.5% ethylene glycol + 16.5% dimethyl sulfoxide) containing different calcium concentrations. Survival and fertilization rates are calculated on vitrified oocytes; total cleavage and blastocyst rates are calculated on survived oocytes. Values with different subscript within the same column are significantly different: χ2 test P<0.05. This table has been modified from Succu et al.10
[Ca 2++] in vitrification media | No. Oocytes | Post-vitrification survival rate (%) | Fertilization rate (%) | Cleavage (%) | Blastocyst output (%) |
High [9.9 mg/dL] | 190 | 161 (84.73) | 52/161 (32.29)a | 43/161 (26.7) | 0 |
Low [2.2 mg/dL] | 150 | 124 (82.66) | 55/124 (44.35)b | 41/124 (33.1) | 0 |
Table 3. Fertilization and developmental rates after in vitro fertilization and culture of vitrified/warmed juvenile oocyte using high ([Ca 2++] = 9.9 mg/dL) and low ([Ca 2++] = 2.2 mg/dL) calcium concentration in vitrification media. Different letters indicate statistical difference (a ≠ b P<0.05 χ2 test).
Hours of post-warming incubation | Cleavage rate (n) | Embryo output (n) |
0 | 19.2 ± 3%a (82) | 0%a (17) |
2 | 41.8 ± 3%b (100) | 6.5 ± 1.3%b (42) |
4 | 50.7 ± 3%b (92) | 14.4 ± 1.3%c (48) |
6 | 26 ± 3%a (92) | 0%a (23) |
Table 4. Cleavage rate and embryo output in vitrified/warmed adult oocytes fertilized at different time points of post-warming culture. Different letters indicate statistical difference within the same column: ANOVA P<0.01.
Oocyte cryopreservation in domestic animals can allow not only the long-term conservation of female genetic resources, but also advance the development of embryonic biotechnologies. Thus, the development of a standard method for oocyte vitrification would advantage both the livestock and the research sector. In this protocol, a complete method for adult sheep oocyte vitrification is presented and could represent a solid starting point for the development of an efficient vitrification system for juvenile oocyte.
One of the main advantages of the proposed method is that it includes all the steps from oocyte collection, in vitro maturation, vitrification, and warming. Moreover, it includes a post-warming culture period to allow oocytes to recover from the damages incurred during the vitrification procedure before being fertilized. The optimum time for fertilization should be tailored according to the method of cryopreservation, initial oocyte quality, patient age, and species, being essential to consider both aspects of time recovery and oocyte aging25,26. Thus, choosing the duration of the post-warming incubation period is challenging and it may impact the outcome of oocyte vitrification programs. Based on the results obtained in terms of cleavage rates and embryo output, and under the conditions described in the presented protocol, the optimum time for fertilization of vitrified adult sheep oocytes is after 4 hours of post-warming incubation (Table 4)6. This information is crucial when designing an oocyte vitrification program.
This protocol, however, while giving acceptable results in terms of embryo output from vitrified/warmed adult oocytes, still leads to low to zero embryos if applied to juvenile oocytes. Several structural and functional limitations impair prepubertal oocyte developmental competence, such as small size, defective coupling between cumulus cells and oocytes, decrease in amino acid uptake, reduced protein synthesis and energy metabolism 27,28,29. In a previous study we reported that prepubertal oocytes show high sensitivity to the vitrification procedure30. The low developmental competence shown after vitrification and warming is probably the result of damages to cytoplasmic factors involved in the reorganization of the cytoskeleton and (or) in the activation of maturation promoting factor30. As shown in Table 1, the supplementation of the maturation medium with trehalose, a non-permeable cryoprotectant, was able to increase survival rates after vitrification and warming to values comparable to those of adult oocytes4. In the same way, the use of vitrification solution with low calcium concentrations increases fertilization rates of juvenile oocytes after vitrification and warming, as shown in Table 3. Thus, both the optimization on culture conditions during in vitro maturation and of the vitrification media composition may help in increasing the quality of the juvenile oocyte after vitrification and warming. Juvenile oocytes show some ability to recover from the damages induced by the vitrification procedure, as shown in Figure 3, 4 and 5.
However, the high rates of spontaneous parthenogenetic activation during post-warming culture still limit their developmental potential. Ethylene glycol and DMSO, which are commonly used cryoprotective agents, may artificially activate the oocyte before the actual fertilization, thereby limiting fertilization success and embryo development. They can indeed cause a transient increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration31, thus triggering cortical granule exocytosis, pronuclei formation, and meiotic resumption32. In fact, vitrification may artificially activate the oocyte before the actual fertilization, thereby limiting fertilization success and embryo development. Calcium chelator may thus be used to further limit calcium availability during the vitrification process with the aim of limiting the rate of spontaneous activation in juvenile oocytes.
It should also be considered that, unlike slow-freezing, vitrification is an exclusively manual technique and it is thus operator dependent33,34. Thus, the availability of trained personnel is a key factor for the success of this method. First of all, the operator has to properly select the oocytes to be vitrified. After IVM, oocytes are gently denuded of cumulus cells and evaluated under a stereomicroscope to select for cryopreservation only those with a uniform cytoplasm, homogeneous distribution of lipid droplets in the cytoplasm and with the outer diameter of about 90 µm. Moreover, only oocytes showing the extrusion on the first polar body, and thus at the MII stage, must be selected.
The morphological evaluation of the oocytes must be completed in a few minutes and being operator-dependant, it is very sensitive to variations in its proper implementation. To help standardize the selection procedure, the method suggests limiting the culture time for in vitro maturation to 22 h for adult oocytes. At this time point, sheep oocytes of high quality have already completed the first meiotic division22 and can be selected for cryopreservation. This way the elimination of low-quality oocytes, which are the slowest ones in the completion of the first meiotic division, should be simpler.
The operator must also strictly respect the timing set for the vitrification procedure, from the first exposure to the cryoprotectant to the immersion in liquid nitrogen. Another critical step is the loading of the oocyte in the vitrification device used. The procedure must use minimum sample volumes to increase the cooling rate and to help cells pass through the phase transition temperature rapidly, thereby decreasing cryoinjuries35. Cryotop uses a polypropylene strip attached to a holder. In this method, the oocytes in the vitrification solution (<0.1 µL) are rapidly loaded with a glass capillary on top of the film strip. Then, the solution must be removed, leaving behind a thin layer sufficient to cover the cells to be cryopreserved. Once again, this step must be completed as fast as possible to limit the exposure of the oocytes to the high cryoprotectant concentrations of the vitrification solution, which can cause osmotic shock and are toxic to the cells.
For these reasons, a major challenge associated with this method is the need for manual handling and skilled technician. Other authors reported that the oocyte vitrification outcome appears influenced by a "learning curve" effect, as the acquisition of manual skills can significantly reduce the biological damage induce by the vitrification procedure34. Researchers should thus take into consideration the "operator effect" in the evaluation of the outcome of the vitrification procedure.
Further studies will focus both on standardizing the oocyte selection procedure and better tailoring media composition and culture conditions to the needs of the juvenile oocytes. At this regard, both the use of calcium chelator and antioxidants may offer promising opportunities. Similarly, the optimization of the protocol will allow increasing the developmental competence of vitrified/warmed adult oocytes.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors received no specific funding for this work. Professor Maria Grazia Cappai and Dr. Valeria Pasciu are gratefully acknowledged for the video voiceover and for setting up the lab during the video making.
2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescin diacetate | Sigma-Aldrich | D-6883 | |
Albumin bovine fraction V, protease free | Sigma-Aldrich | A3059 | |
Bisbenzimide H 33342 trihydrochloride (Hoechst 33342) | Sigma-Aldrich | 14533 | |
Calcium chloride (CaCl2 2H20) | Sigma-Aldrich | C8106 | |
Citric acid | Sigma-Aldrich | C2404 | |
Confocal laser scanning microscope | Leica Microsystems GmbH,Wetzlar | TCS SP5 DMI 6000CS | |
Cryotop Kitazato | Medical Biological Technologies | ||
Cysteamine | Sigma-Aldrich | M9768 | |
D- (-) Fructose | Sigma-Aldrich | F0127 | |
D(+)Trehalose dehydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | T0167 | |
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) | Sigma-Aldrich | D2438 | |
Dulbecco Phosphate Buffered Saline | Sigma-Aldrich | D8537 | |
Egg yolk | Sigma-Aldrich | P3556 | |
Ethylene glycol (EG) | Sigma-Aldrich | 324558 | |
FSH | Sigma-Aldrich | F4021 | |
Glutamic Acid | Sigma-Aldrich | G5638 | |
Glutaraldehyde | Sigma-Aldrich | G5882 | |
Glycerol | Sigma-Aldrich | G5516 | |
Glycine | Sigma-Aldrich | G8790 | |
Heparin | Sigma-Aldrich | H4149 | |
HEPES | Sigma-Aldrich | H4034 | |
Hypoutarine | Sigma-Aldrich | H1384 | |
Inverted microscope | Diaphot, Nikon | ||
L-Alanine | Sigma-Aldrich | A3534 | |
L-Arginine | Sigma-Aldrich | A3784 | |
L-Asparagine | Sigma-Aldrich | A4284 | |
L-Aspartic Acid | Sigma-Aldrich | A4534 | |
L-Cysteine | Sigma-Aldrich | C7352 | |
L-Cystine | Sigma-Aldrich | C8786 | |
L-Glutamine | Sigma-Aldrich | G3126 | |
LH | Sigma-Aldrich | L6420 | |
L-Histidine | Sigma-Aldrich | H9511 | |
L-Isoleucine | Sigma-Aldrich | I7383 | |
L-Leucine | Sigma-Aldrich | L1512 | |
L-Lysine | Sigma-Aldrich | L1137 | |
L-Methionine | Sigma-Aldrich | M2893 | |
L-Ornithine | Sigma-Aldrich | O6503 | |
L-Phenylalanine | Sigma-Aldrich | P5030 | |
L-Proline | Sigma-Aldrich | P4655 | |
L-Serine | Sigma-Aldrich | S5511 | |
L-Tyrosine | Sigma-Aldrich | T1020 | |
L-Valine | Sigma-Aldrich | V6504 | |
Magnesium chloride heptahydrate (MgSO4.7H2O) | Sigma-Aldrich | M2393 | |
Makler Counting Chamber | Sefi-Medical Instruments ltd.Biosigma S.r.l. | ||
Medium 199 | Sigma-Aldrich | M5017 | |
Mineral oil | Sigma-Aldrich | M8410 | |
MitoTracker Red CM-H2XRos | ThermoFisher | M7512 | |
New born calf serum heat inactivated (FCS) | Sigma-Aldrich | N4762 | |
Penicillin G sodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich | P3032 | |
Phenol Red | Sigma-Aldrich | P3532 | |
Polyvinyl alcohol (87-90% hydrolyzed, average mol wt 30,000-70,000) | Sigma-Aldrich | P8136 | |
Potassium Chloride (KCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | P5405 | |
Potassium phosphate monobasic (KH2PO4) | Sigma-Aldrich | P5655 | |
Propidium iodide | Sigma-Aldrich | P4170 | |
Sheep serum | Sigma-Aldrich | S2263 | |
Sodium azide | Sigma-Aldrich | S2202 | |
Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) | Sigma-Aldrich | S5761 | |
Sodium chloride (NaCl) | Sigma-Aldrich | S9888 | |
Sodium dl-lactate solution syrup | Sigma-Aldrich | L4263 | |
Sodium pyruvate | Sigma-Aldrich | P2256 | |
Sperm Class Analyzer | Microptic S.L. | S.C.A. v 3.2.0 | |
Statistical software Minitab 18.1 | 2017 Minitab | ||
Stereo microscope | Olimpus | SZ61 | |
Streptomycin sulfate | Sigma-Aldrich | S9137 | |
Taurine | Sigma-Aldrich | T7146 | |
TRIS | Sigma-Aldrich | 15,456-3 |