The opsono-adherence assay is an alternative method to the opsono-phagocytic killing assay to evaluate the opsonic functions of antibodies in vaccine development.
The opsono-adherence assay is a functional assay that enumerates the attachment of bacterial pathogens to professional phagocytes. Because adherence is requisite to phagocytosis and killing, the assay is an alternative method to opsono-phagocytic killing assays. An advantage of the opsono-adherence assay is the option of using inactivated pathogens and mammalian cell lines, which allows standardization across multiple experiments. The use of an inactivated pathogen in the assay also facilitates work with biosafety level 3 infectious agents and other virulent pathogens. In our work, the opsono-adherence assay was used to assess the functional ability of antibodies, from sera of animals immunized with an anthrax capsule-based vaccine, to induce adherence of fixed Bacillus anthracis to a mouse macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7. Automated fluorescence microscopy was used to capture images of bacilli adhering to macrophages. Increased adherence was correlated with the presence of anti-capsule antibodies in the serum. Non-human primates that exhibited high serum anti-capsule antibody concentrations were protected from anthrax challenge. Thus, the opsono-adherence assay can be used to elucidate the biological functions of antigen specific antibodies in sera, to evaluate the efficacy of vaccine candidates and other therapeutics, and to serve as a possible correlate of immunity.
Recognition, adherence, internalization, and degradation of a pathogen are integral to phagocytosis1, a salient pathway in the host innate immune response first described by Ilya Metchnikoff in 18832,3. Phagocytic leukocytes, as well as other cells of the immune system, are highly discriminatory in their selection of targets; they are able to distinguish between “infectious non-self” and “non-infectious self” through pathogen associated molecular patterns by their repertoire of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs)4,5. Host recognition of a pathogen may also occur with the binding of host opsonins, such as complement and antibodies6. This process, called opsonization, coats the pathogen with these molecules, enhancing internalization upon binding to opsonic receptors (e.g., complement and Fc receptors) on phagocytic cells6. For a pathogen to adhere to a phagocyte, collective binding of multiple receptors with their cognate ligands is necessary. Only then can adherence trigger and sustain signaling cascades inside the host cell to initiate internalization6.
Due to the importance of phagocytosis in the clearance of pathogens and prevention of infection, extracellular pathogens have developed numerous ways to subvert this process to prolong their survival. One strategy of importance is the production of an anionic polymeric (e.g., polysaccharide or polyamino acid) capsule which is anti-phagocytic by virtue of its charge, is poorly immunogenic, and shields molecules on the bacterial envelope from PRRs6,7. Pathogens such as Cryptococcus neoformans and Streptococcus pneumoniae have capsules composed of saccharide polymers, whereas Staphylococcus epidermidis and some Bacillus species produce poly-ɣ-glutamic acid (PGGA)7,8. Yet other pathogens produce capsules that resemble the non-infectious self. For example, Streptococcus pyogenes and a pathogenic strain of B. cereus have a hyaluronic acid capsule that is not only anti-phagocytic but which also may not be recognized as foreign by the immune system9,10.
Conjugation of capsule to carrier proteins converts them from poor, T-independent antigens into highly immunogenic T-dependent antigens that can induce high serum anti-capsule antibody titers11,12. This strategy is employed for licensed vaccines against S. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitides11. The opsonic activities of anti-capsule antibodies have commonly been evaluated by opsono-phagocytic killing assays (OPKA)13,14,15,16. These assays test whether functional antibodies can trigger phagocytosis and killing14. However, the use of OPKA with infectious pathogens, such as Tier 1 Biological Select Agents and Toxins (BSAT), including B. anthracis17, is hazardous and presents security risks; these assays necessitate extensive handling of a select agent. Select agent handling can only be done in restricted biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) laboratories; work in these areas demands protracted operating procedures due to the numerous safety and security precautions that must be followed. BSL-3 laboratories are also typically not equipped with the specialized equipment used for OPKA work, such as microscopes and cytometers. Thus, we developed an alternative assay based on the use of inactivated bacteria18,19. We refer to this as an opsono-adherence assay (OAA) that is not dependent on internalization and killing as assay outputs; instead, adherence of opsonized inactivated pathogens is used as an index of phagocytosis. Mechanistically, OAA is a suitable substitute because adherence occurs a priori and is intimately intertwined with internalization and intracellular killing. From a biosafety perspective, OAA is preferred because it requires minimal handling of an infectious agent, is experimentally of shorter duration than OPKA, and can be performed in BSL-2 laboratories after a stock of the inactivated pathogen has been produced and transferred.
We demonstrate the utilization of OAA to examine the opsonic function of anti-capsule antibodies found in sera of non-human primates (NHPs) vaccinated with a capsule conjugate [i.e. PGGA from B. anthracis conjugated to the outer membrane protein complex (OMPC) of Neisseria meningitides]20. Serum opsonized bacilli were incubated with an adherent mouse macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7. After fixation, the cell monolayer and adherent bacilli were imaged by fluorescence microscopy. Bacterial adherence increased when the bacilli were incubated with serum from NHPs vaccinated with the capsule conjugate compared to control serum20. Adherence correlated with survival of the anthrax challenge20,21. Thus, the use of OAA characterized the function of anti-capsule antibodies and greatly facilitated testing of our vaccine candidate.
In compliance with the Animal Welfare Act, Public Health Service policy, and other federal statutes and regulations pertaining to animals and experiments involving animals, the research described here was conducted under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee–approved protocol. The facility where this research was conducted is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care, International and adheres to principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council, 201124.
1. Culture and maintenance of the cell line, RAW 264.7
NOTE: The following procedures must be performed with aseptic techniques.
2. Bacterial Culture and Preparations
NOTE: The bacterial species used in this protocol is an encapsulated virulent strain, B. anthracis Ames. All manipulations with this species require appropriate biosafety and security clearances and must be performed in a Class II or Class III biological safety cabinet located in a BSL-3 laboratory. Follow institutional operating procedures for BSL-3 work and for use of personal protective equipment when handling bacteria.
3. Negative staining and light microscopy to observe encapsulation and bacilli chains
4. FITC-labeling of bacteria
5. Bacterial Opsonization
6. Adherence Assay and Fluorescent Labeling of Mammalian cells
7. Microscopy
NOTE: In general, a high-throughput automated fluorescence microscope will facilitate imaging for the OAA. If an automated system is not available, fluorescent images of adherent bacilli can be taken manually21. In this study20, adherent bacilli and cell monolayers were imaged using the Zeiss 700 laser scanning microscopy system with specialized equipment; our system was composed of the Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 inverted microscope equipped with an automated stage, the Definite Focus module, 40 x NA 0.6 objective, Axio Cam HRc camera and Zen 2012 (Blue Edition) software. The images acquired are widefield images, not confocal images. The following protocol is intended as a basic microscope setup that is applicable to a variety of automated microscopy systems.
8. Data Collection and Analysis
This section shows representative micrographs collected during an OAA experiment along with results showing that the OAA can be used to examine the biological function of antibodies. Here, the assay was successfully used to evaluate the efficacy of an anthrax vaccine candidate. It is critical to verify the state of encapsulation on the bacilli as little to no encapsulation causes them to adhere to host cells, producing a high background. Figure 1 is an image of B. anthracis Ames negatively stained with India ink to examine encapsulation. OAA requires multiple adjacent fields of view to be illuminated and if confocal microscopy is used, multiple stacks or sections. Thus, it is necessary to verify that the bacilli are neither too dim nor photo-bleaches too quickly. Figure 2 is an image of the bacilli labeled with FITC. Figure 3 shows maximum projection images of B. anthracis Ames attached to the cell monolayers. These are representative fields of view that were counted and scored for the OAA. The increase in attachment of bacilli incubated with PGGA-OMPC antiserum is due to the presence of anti-capsule antibodies that opsonized the bacilli. Figure 4 shows that the serum titers of NHPs vaccinated with 10 and 50 µg PGGA-OMPC are significantly higher than the titers for OMPC and PGGA alone.
Figure 1. An India ink image of fixed B. anthracis Ames. Note the zone of clearance surrounding the bacilli due to the presence of capsule. Bar = 10 µm. The image was taken on the EVOS FL automated microscopy system with 100 x 1.4 numerical aperture (NA) oil objective lens. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2. Images of FITC labeled fixed B. anthracis Ames. (Left) Differential interference contrast image; fluorescent image pseudo-colored in green (middle); merged (right). Bar = 10 µm. Confocal images were taken on the Zeiss 700 LSM Confocal Microscopy with 40 x 1.3 NA oil objective lens. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3. Fluorescent images of B. anthracis Ames adhered to RAW 264.7 cell monolayers. The bacilli were opsonized with test serum from NHPs vaccinated and boosted with (A) 10 µg PGGA-OMPC, (B) 50 µg PGGA-OMPC, (C) 50 µg PGGA alone, or (D) OMPC alone. Green = B. anthracis Ames, red = RAW 264.7 cells. Bar = 20 µm. Wide field images were taken on the Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 microscope with 40 x 0.6 objective lens and the Axio Cam HRc camera. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Opsono-adherence titers of NHPs vaccinated with 10 µg PGGA-OMPC, 50 µg PGGA-OMPC, 50 µg PGGA alone, or OMPC alone. The geometric means of 5 animals per group are graphed. Error bars indicate SEM. *p ≤ 0.001 compared to PGGA alone. The p values were calculated using ANOVA with LSD posthoc test. The data were originally published in Chabot, et al., 201620. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Capsule based vaccines have been shown to be efficacious against numerous bacterial pathogens, and many are licensed for use in humans25,26,27. These vaccines work by generating antibodies targeting the capsule and many of these studies use the OPKA to show the opsono-phagocytic functions of the antibodies13,14,16,28,29. Due to biosafety concerns and for ease of work, we developed an OAA to evaluate antibodies from animals vaccinated with B. anthracis capsule conjugates. The presence of capsule on B. anthracis prevents adherence and phagocytosis30, but opsonization of bacilli with sera from vaccinated animals induces attachment to macrophages20,21.
For OAA, the adherence activity, not internalization and killing, is used to quantitate opsonic activity. This afforded the OAA several advantages. We were able to utilize paraformaldehyde killed, fluorescently labeled encapsulated bacilli instead of live organisms. Changes to the bacterial surface from aldehyde fixation and fluorescent labeling did not change the bacteria’s overall adherence to the macrophages; fixed and labeled bacilli were no more adherent than live bacilli (data not shown). The degree of encapsulation can vary from culture to culture and affect overall adherence despite similar growth conditions. Thus, the use of a single inactivated bacterial stock allows standardization across experiments performed on different days and across different sets of experiments. This was valuable for comparing sera from the 20 NHPs used in this work and sera that will be generated in our upcoming studies. Last, most macrophages, including RAW 264.7 cells, are sensitive to the anthrax lethal toxin produced by the live pathogen31, making the use of live bacilli inherently problematic.
The use of RAW 264.7 cells also facilitated standardization. We initially used a commonly used cell line in OPKA, HL-60 cells. However, we found difficulties in differentiating them to granulocytes with dimethyl-formamide, as reported by others28,32. RAW 264.7 cells have the advantage that they do not need to be chemically differentiated and are adherent and thus more amenable to microscopy-based OAA. This cell line has been used in numerous phagocytosis studies with intracellular pathogens33,34, as well as B. anthracis31. The use of RAW 264.7 cells, which are derived from mouse, is also advantageous because mouse Fc receptors are promiscuous in their binding specificity for IgG derived from other species35. This allowed us to evaluate the anti-capsule antibodies from NHPs with a murine cell line.
Anthrax, although rare, is endemic in some regions of the world and the U.S. One concern is that the FBS used, sourced from the U.S., may already contain anti-capsule antibodies as a result of the animal being exposed to B. anthracis spores or other PGGA-producing microbes in the soil. To address this issue, the FBS lot we used was pre-tested. We found that the addition of heat inactivated FBS did increase adherence compared to DMEM alone (data not shown). However, it did not increase adherence compared with heat inactivated normal sera from guinea pig, monkey, mouse or human (data not shown). Thus, the FBS lot we used did not contain anti-capsule antibodies as a result of exposure. In addition, it would also not contain anti-capsule antibodies as a result of the animal being vaccinated with the unencapsulated B. anthracis Sterne, a strain which lacks the pXO2 plasmid necessary for capsule production. The tested FBS lot was used for all subsequent OAA.
A limitation of the technique is the task of counting bacilli and cells by laboratory personnel, which took an enormous amount of time and effort. This can be rectified with the use of software that has this type of analysis; this software was not available to us at the time. However, because manual counting was necessary, a critical step was the removal or washing off of extraneous and unattached bacilli to facilitate the task. It was also necessary to test reagents that led to lower background noise. OAA requires a source of complement because it enhances opsonization36. Therefore, we tested a variety of complement sources including guinea pig, human and baby rabbit complement. We chose baby rabbit complement for our assay because we found that it does not have weak, multi-specific activities against heterophilc antigens, it is commonly used in OPKA studies14,15,37, and it is readily available commercially.
We find the OAA to be quantitative and highly reproducible. We use it to complement studies involving ligand binding assays such as ELISAs, which only quantifies total IgG levels but does not distinguish between functional and non-functional antibodies. OAA can be used to complement other functional assays (e.g., serum bactericidal activity and toxin neutralization assays) to show the different functionality of vaccine generated antibodies16,38. The development of OAA has increased our repertoire of immunogenicity studies to evaluate vaccines and therapeutics.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
J. Chua, D. Chabot and A. Friedlander designed the procedures described in the manuscript. J. Chua and T. Putmon-Taylor performed the experiments. D. Chabot performed data analysis. J. Chua wrote the manuscript.
The authors thank Kyle J. Fitts for excellent technical assistance.
The work was supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency grant CBM.VAXBT.03.10.RD.015, plan number 921175.
Opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the U. S. Army. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Defense, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U. S. Government.
0.20 µm syringe filter (25mm, regenerated cellulose) | Corning, Corning, NY | 431222 | |
10 mL syringe (Luer-Lok tip) | BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ | 302995 | |
15µ 96 well black plates (plate #1 for imaging) | In Vitro Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA | P96-1-N | |
16% paraformaldehyde | Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, PA | 15710 | |
75 cm sq. tissue culture treated flask | Corning, Corning, NY | 430641 | |
Agar (powder) | Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO | A1296 | |
Baby Rabbit Complement | Cedarlane Labs, Burlington, NC | CL3441 | |
Bacto Yeast Extract | BD, Sparks, MD | 288620 | |
BBL Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) | BD, Sparks, MD | 211059 | |
Blood Agar (TSA with Sheep Blood) plates | Remel, Lenexa, KS | R01198 | |
Cell scraper | Sarstedt, Newton, NC | 83.183 | |
Costar 96 well cell culture plates (plates #2 & 3 for dilutions) | Corning, Corning, NY | 3596 | |
Cover glass | Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, PA | 72200-10 | |
Difco Nutrient Broth | BD, Sparks, MD | 234000 | |
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high glucose | Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA | 11965-092 | contains 4500 mg/L glucose, 4 mM L-glutamine, Phenol Red |
EVOS FL Auto Cell Imaging System (fluorescence microscope) | Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA | AMAFD1000 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum | Hyclone, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, South Logan, UT | SH30071.03 | not gamma irradiated, not heat inactivated |
Fluorescein isothiocyanate | Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA | F143 | |
HCS Cell Mask Orange Cell Stain | Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA | H32713 | |
hemocytometer (Improved Neubauer) | Hausser Scientific, Horsham, PA | 3900 | |
India Ink solution | BD, Sparks, MD | 261194 | |
L- glutamine (200 mM) | Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham MA | 25030081 | supplement medium with additional 2mM L-glutamine |
Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U (inverted compound microscope) | Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY | TE2000 | |
PBS without Calcium or Magnesium | Lonza, Walkersville, MD | 17-516F | |
Penicillin-Streptomycin Solution, 100x | Hyclone, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, South Logan, UT | SV30010 | |
petri dishes (100 x 15 mm) | Falcon, Corning, Durham, NC | 351029 | for agar plates |
RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line (Tib47) | ATCC, Manassas, VA | ATCC TIB-71 | |
Slides | VWR, Radnor, PA | 16004-422 | |
Sodium Bicarbonate | Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO | S5761 | |
Trypan Blue Solution (0.4%) | Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO | T8154 | |
Zeiss 700 Laser Scanning Microscopy (confocal microscope) | Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Thornwood, NY | 4109001865956000 |