This work describes a protocol to quantify ethanol levels in a zebrafish embryo using head space gas chromatography from proper exposure methods to embryo processing and ethanol analysis.
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) describe a highly variable continuum of ethanol-induced developmental defects, including facial dysmorphologies and neurological impairments. With a complex pathology, FASD affects approximately 1 in 100 children born in the United States each year. Due to the highly variable nature of FASD, animal models have proven critical in our current mechanistic understanding of ethanol-induced development defects. An increasing number of laboratories has focused on using zebrafish to examine ethanol-induced developmental defects. Zebrafish produce large numbers of externally fertilized, genetically tractable, translucent embryos. This allows researchers to precisely control timing and dosage of ethanol exposure in multiple genetic contexts and quantify the impact of embryonic ethanol exposure through live imaging techniques. This, combined with the high degree of conservation of both genetics and development with humans, has proven zebrafish to be a powerful model in which to study the mechanistic basis of ethanol teratogenicity. However, ethanol exposure regimens have varied between different zebrafish studies, which has confounded the interpretation of zebrafish data across these studies. Here is a protocol to quantify ethanol concentrations in zebrafish embryos using head space gas chromatography.
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) describes a wide array of neurological impairments and craniofacial dysmorphologies associated with embryonic ethanol exposure1. Multiple factors, including timing and dosage of ethanol exposure and genetic background, contribute to the variation of FASD2,3. In humans, the complex relationship of these variables makes studying and understanding the etiology of FASD challenging. Animal models have proven crucial in developing our understanding of the mechanistic basis of ethanol teratogenicity. A wide variety of animal model systems has been used to study multiple aspects of FASD and results have been remarkably consistent with what is found in exposure in humans4. Rodent model systems are used to examine many aspects of FASD, with mice being the most common5,6,7. The majority of this work has focused on developmental defects to early ethanol exposure8, though later exposure to ethanol has been shown to cause developmental anomalies as well9. Moreover, the genetic capabilities of mice have greatly aided in our ability to probe the genetic underpinnings of FASD10,11. These studies in mice strongly suggest that there are gene-ethanol interactions with the sonic hedgehog pathway, retinoic acid signaling, Superoxide dismutase, Nitric oxide synthase I, Aldh2 and Fancd28,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. These studies show that animal models are critical to advancing our understanding of FASD and its underlying mechanisms.
The zebrafish has emerged as a powerful model system to examine many aspects of ethanol teratogenesis22,23. Due to their external fertilization, high fecundity, genetic tractability, and live imaging capabilities, zebrafish are ideally suited to study factors such as timing, dosage, and genetics of ethanol teratogenesis. Ethanol can be administered to precisely staged embryos and the embryos can then be imaged to examine the direct impact of ethanol during developmental processes. This work can be related directly to humans, because the genetic programs of development are highly conserved between zebrafish and humans and can therefore help guide FASD human studies24. While zebrafish have been used to examine ethanol teratogenesis, a lack of consensus in reporting embryonic ethanol concentrations makes comparison to humans difficult25. In mammalian systems, blood-alcohol levels correlate directly to tissue ethanol levels26. Many of the zebrafish studies treat embryos before complete formation of their circulatory system. With no maternal sample to examine, a process to assess ethanol concentrations is required to quantify ethanol levels within the embryo. Here we describe a process to quantify ethanol concentrations in a developing zebrafish embryo using head space gas chromatography.
All zebrafish embryos used in this procedure were raised and bred following established IACUC protocols27. These protocols were approved by the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Louisville.
NOTE: The zebrafish line Tg(fli1:EGFP)y1 was used in this study28. All water used in this procedure is sterile reverse osmosis water. All statistical analyses were performed using Graphpad Prism v8.2.1.
1. Making embryo media
2. Measuring the embryonic volume using water displacement
NOTE: In this protocol, 24 h postfertilization (hpf) embryos (Figure 1) are used. The embryos used in the volume measurements are not used in the ethanol analysis.
3. Treating embryos with ethanol
4. Preparing workflow before processing the embryos for head space gas chromatography
5. Processing embryos for head space gas chromatography
NOTE: Both embryos in their chorions and those previously removed from their chorions are treated the same for consistency in the calculation of dilution factors.
6. Preparing media and ethanol standards
7. Preparing the head space gas chromatograph
NOTE: This setup and protocol may need to be changed depending on the gas chromatograph used. Head space gas chromatography is used to quantify ethanol levels, not for separation.
8. Sample measurements using head space gas chromatography
9. Sample ethanol peak integration and sample concentration analysis
NOTE: All values from 9.3 on were calculated in an excel file that all equations prefilled.
Blood ethanol levels cannot be determined in early embryonic zebrafish, because they lack a fully formed circulatory system. To determine the level of ethanol concentration in the zebrafish embryos, the ethanol levels are measured directly from homogenized embryonic tissue. To properly measure the embryonic ethanol concentrations, the embryonic volume has to be taken into account. The embryo (yolk attached) sits inside the chorion (eggshell) surrounded by extraembryonic fluid (Figure 1). Any volume measure of the embryo has to be made on embryos at the time of exposure, because embryonic volume will change over developmental time as the embryo increases in size. In addition, how the embryo is processed has to be taken into account as well as the embryonic volume, because both of these elements create dilution factors used to calculate embryonic ethanol levels.
Because the embryo is not a perfect sphere, especially after 10 hpf, water displacement was used to assess embryonic volume. This study used embryos at 24 hpf. The volume of embryos both in their chorion and those removed from their chorion were measured. These volumes were 1.97 (± 0.4 SD) μL for the embryo with extraembryonic fluid, and 1.1 (± 0.22 SD) μL for the embryo alone (Table 1). This difference between the embryo with extraembryonic fluid and the embryo alone is the volume of the extraembryonic fluid, which surrounds the embryo inside the chorion (Figure 1). This difference is critical in determining the ethanol concentration of the embryo alone in the samples. From the analysis, the embryo comprised 56% of the total of the volume of the embryo with extraembryonic fluid inside the chorion (Table 1). As the embryo grew, the embryonic volume increased over time, resulting in a decrease in the volume of the extraembryonic fluid25. When measuring ethanol concentrations from embryos still in their chorion, the water content in both the embryo and the extraembryonic fluid must be taken into account.
Previously published work has shown that the water fraction in the embryo alone is 73.6%29. This result was obtained using a combination of volume measures, electron spin resonance spectroscopy, and magnetic resonance microscopy. To confirm this result, embryos were weighed alone before and after baking at 70 °C, as previously described25. This process removes all water from the embryo. The change in weight represents the amount of water in the embryo. From this analysis, a 24 hpf embryo contained ~72% water while a 48 hpf embryo contained ~76%. Both of these values are extremely similar to the 73.6% embryonic water volume previously calculated29. This suggests that the water volume of the embryo changes little throughout early development.
Based on the published work using multiple approaches to calculate water volume in the embryo, 73.6% was used as the embryonic water content for all of the presented analyses. This resulted in water comprising 0.82 μL of the 1.1 μL of embryonic volume (Table 1). From this, the volume of the extraembryonic fluid was calculated as 0.86 μL. Of the total water volume of the embryo with extraembryonic fluid, 49% is contained in the embryo and 51% is in the extraembryonic fluid (Table 1).
For the gas chromatography analysis, only 24 hpf embryos still in their chorion were used (Figure 1). In this ethanol regimen, embryos were treated with 1% (171 mM) ethanol media concentration from 6–24 hpf, though different ethanol concentrations and exposure time windows can be used depending on experimental design. Two groups of 15 samples (10 embryos per sample) and the media with which they were treated over 2 different experimental days (Table 2) were analyzed. Media levels can vary from experiment to experiment. To account for this, media ethanol levels were measured 5x per experimental group. In this analysis, media levels were 143.6 (± 2.3 SD) mM for group 1 and 133.6 (± 2.7 SD) mM for group 2. These values are significantly different using an unpaired t test (p = 0.0002). The embryos with extraembryonic fluid averaged 63.5 (± 17.1 SD) mM and 53.1 (± 12.6 SD) mM for groups 1 and 2, respectively. However, the concentration was not significantly different between the 2 groups of embryos with extraembryonic fluid (unpaired t test, p = 0.07). Untreated control embryos were measured at 0 mM. Due to the variation in media levels, a ratio of embryonic ethanol concentration/media levels of ethanol for each sample was calculated. Group 1 had 44% of the media ethanol levels, while group 2 had 40% of the media ethanol levels (Figure 3 and Table 2).
Figure 1: An image of an embryo at 24 h postfertilization (hpf) inside the chorion. The embryo and the yolk are surrounded by the extraembryonic fluid, all located inside the chorion. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Protocol to measure embryonic volume and process the embryos for analysis. (A) Ten 24 hpf embryos transferred to a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube marked at a 250 μL volume. (B) The microcentrifuge tube with embryos filled with water (water is dyed so it is easier to see at the 250 μL mark). (C) All of the water is removed from the tube and weighed. (D) Ten embryos transferred to a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. The water was removed as in (C) and replaced with 50 μL of protease cocktail. (E) After 10 min, 450 μL of 5 M NaCl was added to the tube from (D). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Box and whisker plot of the ratio of ethanol concentration of samples to media. Ethanol concentration for each group was divided by the average of the media samples of that group. Group 1 contained 44% of media levels, while group 2 contained 40%. In both groups, n = 15; 10 embryos per sample. Groups were compared using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey's post hoc analysis (****p < 0.0001). The whiskers represent minimum to maximum. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Embryo and Embryo + Extraembryo Water Volumes (µL) | ||||||
Watera | ||||||
Total Volumeb | % of Total Volume (V) | Embryonic Volume (W) | Extraembryonic Volume (X) | % Water in Embryo (Y) | % Water in Extraembryonic (Z) | |
Embryo + Extraembryonic (EE)c | 1.97 ± 0.4 | |||||
Embryo 24 hpf (E)c | 1.11 ± 0.22 | 56% | 0.82 | 0.86 | 49% | 51% |
Calculations | ||||||
VEmbryo % of Total volume = Total Volume of E ÷ Total Volume of EE | ||||||
WEmbryonic Water Volume = V × 73.6% | ||||||
XExtraembryonic Water Volume = W – Total Volume of EE | ||||||
Y% Water in Embryo = (W + X)/W × 100 | ||||||
Z% Water in Extraembryonic = 100 – Y | ||||||
aEmbryonic water volume was calculated from Hagedorn et al.29. | ||||||
bValues are reported as ± standard deviation (SD). | ||||||
cn = 13; 10 embryos per sample |
Table 1: Calculation of water volume for the embryos with extraembryonic fluid. The volume was calculated from 13 samples (10 embryos per sample) from 24 hpf embryos with extraembryonic fluid still in the chorion and embryos removed from their chorion. Values are reported as the mean ± SD.
Ethanol Concentration of embryos and media (mM)a | |||
Group 1 | Group 2 | Combined | |
Media (M)b | 143.6 ± 2.3 | 133.6 ± 2.7 | 138.6 ± 5.8 |
Embryo + Extraembryonic (EE)c | 63.5 ± 17.1 | 53.1 ± 12.6 | 58.3 ± 15.7 |
Ratio of ethanol – embryo to media (1) | 0.44 ± 0.12 | 0.40 ± 0.09 | 0.42 ± 0.11 |
Calculations | |||
1Ratio of ethanol = EE ÷ M | |||
aValues are reported as ± SD. | |||
bn = 5 | |||
cn = 15; 10 embryos per sample | |||
dValues are the average of groups 1 and 2. |
Table 2: Calculations of ethanol concentration in embryos with extraembryonic fluid and media (mM). Media samples were direct measures from the media (n = 5 per group). Embryonic ethanol concentration was calculated from 15 samples (10 embryos per sample) from 24 hpf embryos with extraembryonic fluid. The ratio of the ethanol concentrations of the embryos with extraembryonic fluid to media were calculated. Values are reported as the mean ± SD.
Calculation of ethanol in the embryoa,b | |
Embryo (Y) | Ratio to media (Z) |
32.7 ± 8.8 mM | 0.24 ± 0.06 |
Calculations | |
YEmbryonic Ethanol = 58.3 mM (Table 2) × 56% (Table 1) | |
ZRatio of ethanol = Y ÷ 138.6 mM (Table 2) | |
aValues are the average of groups 1 and 2. | |
bValues are reported as ± SD. |
Table 3: Calculation of ethanol in the embryo. Embryonic ethanol concentration was calculated as 56% of the total ethanol concentration of the embryo with extraembryonic fluid. This was then reported as a ratio of embryo to media. Values are reported as the mean ± SD.
As a developmental model system, zebrafish are ideally suited to study the impact of environmental factors on development. They produce large numbers of externally fertilized embryos, which allows for precise timing and dosage paradigms in ethanol studies. This, combined with the live imaging capabilities and the genetic and developmental conservation with humans, make zebrafish a powerful model system for teratology studies. Described is a protocol for measuring embryonic ethanol concentrations in developing zebrafish embryos using head space gas chromatography.
Determining embryonic ethanol concentration is critical to understanding the impact of ethanol to the developing embryo. In rodent models, blood ethanol concentrations correlate to tissue concentrations26. However, it is not possible to assess blood ethanol levels in early embryonic development in a zebrafish. Head space gas chromatography has been used to measure ethanol levels in various experimental paradigms, including zebrafish25,30,31,32,33,34,35. However, this protocol can be used to measure many different environmental factors, even though the volatility of these various factors needs to be high enough to measure quantitatively and a gas chromatograph column needs to be chosen based on the polarity of the compounds in question. In addition, zebrafish are best suited to study the impact of water-soluble factors, because exposure to hydrophobic factors is extremely difficult to analyze in fish.
This protocol will allow researchers to directly assess ethanol concentrations in zebrafish embryos. However, several factors have to be addressed to ensure accurate measurements of embryonic ethanol concentrations. Because ethanol levels in total embryonic tissues were measured, embryonic volume had to be considered. After 10 hpf the embryo begins somitogenesis (somite formation) and is no longer a sphere (Figure 1). To assess embryonic volume, water displacement was used on 10 pooled embryos per sample. Each sample consisted of 10 embryos for two reasons: first, to reduce error from pipetting small volumes, and second, to average out small fluctuations in embryo volumes. When measuring embryonic volume, it is important to consider the precision of pipetting and weighing. Even the use of 10 embryos per sample is at the lower limit of precision for both the pipettes and the scale used to weigh the embryos. With the equipment available, using fewer than 10 embryos would have impacted the analyses. This does not limit researchers from using fewer embryos per sample as long as equipment precision is considered.
Embryonic volume is one factor impacting sample analysis. A second key factor is embryonic processing speed, because ethanol is volatile. In addition, ethanol quickly equilibrates in multiple animal studies25,36,37. Our wash protocol is designed to quickly remove any ethanol adhering to the exterior surface of the chorion. In this study this wash protocol did not impact the embryonic ethanol levels, though longer or multiple washes could impact embryonic ethanol concentrations25,38. Yet a third factor to take into account is the dilution of the embryonic volume during processing. This protocol uses a protease cocktail to degrade the chorion as well as 5 M NaCl to denature all proteins, including alcohol processing enzymes.
Finally, a range of analyses and reporting methods have been described in a wide variety of zebrafish studies. Due to variation within different samples of a study or comparing different studies, proper reporting of ethanol concentration is critical25,38. Methods using indirect (usually enzymatic measures) rely on analysis of a secondary metabolite. In that case, the rate of enzymatic activity can vary and impede precise analysis of ethanol concentration. This method directly measures ethanol levels, and ethanol concentrations are reported as a ratio of embryo to media concentrations. Our results are in line with a growing consensus of a 24 hpf embryo containing ~30% of media concentrations (Table 3)25,38,39,40. Surprisingly, this 30% embryonic ethanol concentration is independent of media concentration, and it is not well understood what creates this equilibrium25,38. Embryos older than 24 hpf show decreases in ethanol concentrations, with 48 hpf embryos containing nearly half of the ethanol content of a 24 hpf embryo25. However, our results do not determine the ethanol-water equilibrium. Given the speed at which ethanol equilibrates, as well as the volatility of ethanol, it is incredibly difficult to assess water volume changes in the embryo itself due to ethanol exposure. Trying to measure the volume of an ethanol treated embryo sample using water displacement will result in loss of ethanol from the embryo during the measurement. Using more precise microscopy and spectroscopy methods than those described above, it may be possible to determine the ethanol-water equilibrium in an embryo by directly measuring both at the same time.
Overall, the protocol described here is a powerful tool with which to assess embryonic ethanol concentrations in developing zebrafish embryos. This information is critical in standardizing FASD studies using zebrafish. The ability to precisely control ethanol treatment paradigms and directly quantify embryonic ethanol concentrations strengthens the functionality of the zebrafish model for human FASD studies. Ultimately, this work will greatly improve our understanding of FASD.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The research presented in this article was supported by previous grants from National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIH/NIDCR) R01DE020884 to J.K.E. and National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIH/NIAAA) F32AA021320 to C.B.L. and by the current grant from National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Alcohol Abuse (NIH/NIAAA) R00AA023560 to C.B.L. We thank Rueben Gonzales for providing and assisting with gas chromatograph analysis. We thank Tiahna Ontiveros and Dr. Gina Nobles writing assistance.
Air | Provided by contract to the university | ||
Analytical Balance | VWR | 10204-962 | |
AutoSampler, CP-8400 | Varian | Gas Chromatograph Autosampler | |
Calcium Chloride | VWR | 97062-590 | |
Ethanol | Decon Labs | 2701 | |
Gas chromatograph vial with polytetrafluoroethylene/silicone septum and plastic cap 2 mL | Agilent | 8010-0198 | Can reuse the vials after cleaning, but not the caps/septa |
Gas Chromatograph, CP-3800 | Varian | ||
Helium | Provided by contract to the university | ||
HP Innowax capillary column | Agilent | 19095N-123I | 30 m x 0.53 mm x 1.0 μm film thick |
Hyrdogen | Provided by contract to the university | ||
Magnesium Sulfate (Heptahydrate) | Fisher Scientific | M63-500 | |
Microcentrifuge tube 1.5 mL | Fisher Scientific | 2682002 | |
Micropipette tips 10 μL | Fisher Scientific | 13611106 | |
Micropipette tips 1000 μL | Fisher Scientific | 13611127 | |
Micropipette tips 200 μL | Fisher Scientific | 13611112 | |
Petri dishes 100 mm | Fisher Scientific | FB012924 | |
Pipetman L p1000L Micropipette | Gilson | FA10006M | |
Pipetman L p200L Micropipette | Gilson | FA10005M | |
Pipetman L p2L Micropipette | Gilson | FA10001M | |
Polytetrafluoroethylene/silicone septum and plastic cap | Agilent | 5190-7021 | Replacement caps/septa for gas chromatograph vials |
Potassium Chloride | Fisher Scientific | P217-500 | |
Potassium Phosphate (Dibasic) | VWR | BDH9266-500G | |
Pronase | VWR | 97062-916 | |
Silica Beads .5 mm | Biospec Products | 11079105z | |
Silica Beads 1.0 mm | Biospec Products | 11079110z | |
Sodium Bicarbonate | VWR | BDH9280-500G | |
Sodium Chloride | Fisher Scientific | S271-500 | |
Sodium Phosphate (Dibasic) | Fisher Scientific | S374-500 | |
Solid-phase microextraction fiber assembly Carboxen/Polydimethylsiloxane | Millipore Sigma | 57343-U | Replacement fibers |
Star Chromatography Workstation | Varian | Chromatography software | |
Thermogreen Low Bleed (LB-2) Septa | Millipore Sigma | 23154 | Replacement inlet septa |