A sitting platform has been developed and assembled that passively destabilizes sitting posture in humans. During the user's stabilizing task, an inertial measurement unit records the device's motion, and vibrating elements deliver performance-based feedback to the seat. The portable, versatile device may be used in rehabilitation, assessment, and training paradigms.
Postural perturbations, motion tracking, and sensory feedback are modern techniques used to challenge, assess, and train upright sitting, respectively. The goal of the developed protocol is to construct and operate a sitting platform that can be passively destabilized while an inertial measurement unit quantifies its motion and vibrating elements deliver tactile feedback to the user. Interchangeable seat attachments alter the stability level of the device to safely challenge sitting balance. A built-in microcontroller allows fine-tuning of the feedback parameters to augment sensory function. Posturographic measures, typical of balance assessment protocols, summarize the motion signals acquired during timed balance trials. No dynamic sitting protocol to date provides variable challenge, quantification, and sensory feedback free of laboratory constraints. Our results demonstrate that non-disabled users of the device exhibit significant changes in posturographic measures when balance difficulty is altered or vibrational feedback provided. The portable, versatile device has potential applications in rehabilitation (following skeletal, muscular, or neurological injury), training (for sports or spatial awareness), entertainment (via virtual or augmented reality), and research (of sitting-related disorders).
Upright sitting is a prerequisite for other human sensorimotor functions, including skilled movements (e.g., typing) and perturbed balance tasks (e.g., riding on a train). To rehabilitate and improve sitting and related functions, modern balance training techniques are used: unstable surfaces perturb sitting1,2 and motion tracking quantifies balance proficiency3,4. Balance training outcomes improve when vibration is delivered to the body using patterns that match performance5. Such sensory feedback is evidently effective as a rehabilitation and training method; yet, current sensory feedback methods are geared towards standing balance and require laboratory-based equipment6,7.
The purpose of the work presented here is to build a portable device that can be sat upon and passively destabilized to various degrees while built-in instruments record its position and deliver vibrational feedback to the sitting surface. This combination of tools integrates previous work on wobble chairs2,4 and vibrational feedback5,6,7, making the benefits of these tools more powerful and accessible. Also presented are a procedure to train upright sitting and an analysis of the quantitative outcomes, following the established literature on posturographic measures8. These methods are appropriate for studying the effects of sitting balance exercise with an unstable surface when combined with vibrational feedback. Anticipated applications include sports training, general improvement of motor coordination, assessment of balance proficiency, and rehabilitation following skeletal, muscular, or neurological injury.
All methods described here have been approved by the Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Alberta.
1. Construction and Assembly of Structural Components
2. Instrumenting the Device
3. Exemplary Assessment and Training Protocol
Table 2 shows, for each experimental condition, the posturographic measures derived from observations of the AP and ML support surface tilts, averaged over 144 balance trials performed by 12 participants (2 x 2 x 3 trials per participant).
Effect of Changing the Balance Condition: The base condition was chosen to be dependent on the eye condition (i.e., when the eyes were closed, the base was more stable). Thus, the base and eye condition together were considered one independent variable (balance condition). Observations of AP tilt were significantly different between the two balance conditions for root-mean-square, centroidal frequency, and frequency dispersion (according to F-tests of the estimated change, α = 0.05). The computed change in each of the measures (mean and standard deviation) is shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8. Consistent with other reports, these posturographic measures can discriminate between balance tasks4.
Effect of Changing the Feedback Condition: During trials when the vibrotactile feedback system was active, the centroidal frequency of AP tilt observations was significantly higher than during the control trials (according to F-tests of the estimated change, α = 0.05). The computed change in each of the posturographic measures (mean and standard deviation) is shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10. Consistent with other reports, this vibrotactile feedback protocol has a measurable effect on balance performance17.
Figure 1: Exploded view of the chassis assembly. Structural components include: (1) lid; (2) counterweight; (3) cylindrical chassis; (4) base stud; (5) hitch for attachment of leg support attachment (Figure 3); (6) base; and (7,8) rod, and sleeve for attachment of one of five interchangeable cylinders (Figure 2). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Side view of a curved base module. Each of the five modules has a total height of 63 mm and a unique radius of curvature, which modulates the difficulty of maintaining balance on the sitting surface. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Exploded view of the leg support attachment. The leg support, consisting of a hitch, clamp, and square finishing plug, is 600 mm long and can be removed during transportation of the device or to permit the user to swing the legs freely during balance exercise. For detailed part dimensions, see Supplementary Files 1 (drawings) and 2 (3D solid models). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: A vibrotactile feedback device for seated balance assessment and training. (A) Exploded view of the device's attachments. The components shown here are: (1) the base, chassis, and lid; (2) the steel extrusion for footrest attachment; (3) two clevis pins to secure the footrest; (4) the footrest attachment of adjustable height; and (5) one of five curved base modules. These components can be separated to facilitate transportation or storage. For detailed part dimensions, see Supplementary Files 1 (drawings) and 2 (3D solid models). (B) Top view photograph of the device. The lid has been removed to reveal electronic instrumentation, including: an inertial measurement unit housed by a custom-printed enclosure (center); a microcontroller board with universal serial bus connection (left); eight electronic vibrators held in custom-printed enclosures (mid-region); and a steel bar (top) to counterbalance the footrest This figure has been modified from Williams et al.18. Republished with permission of ASME, from "Design and Evaluation of an Instrumented Wobble Board for Assessing and Training Dynamic Seated Balance" in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, AD Williams, QA Boser, AS Kumawat, K Agarwal, H Rouhani, AH Vette, vol. 140, April 2018; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Two-part mounting enclosure for vibrating tactors. A 4 mm hole in the tactor enclosure (top) fitted loosely on a 3 mm locating pin in the mounting platform (bottom) to minimize vibration dampening. For detailed part dimensions, see Supplementary Files 1 (drawings) and 2 (3D solid models). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: User interface. This user interface allows users to select vibrotactile feedback thresholds and acquire data. The length and direction of the vector on the graph are proportional to the kinematics of the device. The rectangle reflects the AP and ML thresholds for feedback. This figure has been modified from Williams et al.18. Republished with permission of ASME, from "Design and Evaluation of an Instrumented Wobble Board for Assessing and Training Dynamic Seated Balance" in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, AD Williams, QA Boser, AS Kumawat, K Agarwal, H Rouhani, AH Vette, vol. 140, April 2018; permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Results of task manipulation in time-domain. Change in time-domain posturographic measures when participants close their eyes and concurrently switch to a more stable base (mean and standard deviation; asterisk represents significant change according to F-test, α = 0.05). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Results of task manipulation in frequency domain. Change in frequency-domain posturographic measures when participants close their eyes and concurrently switch to a more stable base (mean and standard deviation; asterisks represent significant change according to F-test, α = 0.05). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9: Results of vibrotactile feedback in time-domain. Change in time-domain posturographic measures when participants are provided with performance-based vibrotactile feedback (mean and standard deviation; no changes were statistically significant according to F-test, α = 0.05). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 10: Results of vibrotactile feedback in frequency domain. Change in frequency-domain posturographic measures when participants are provided with performance-based vibrotactile feedback (mean and standard deviation; asterisk represents significant change according to F-test, α = 0.05). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Radius of curvature (cm) | ||
Most stable | 25 | Less difficult to balance |
20 | ||
15 | ||
13 | ||
Least stable | 11 | More difficult to balance |
Table 1: Geometrical properties of the interchangeable bases. The total height of each base module is 63 mm; thus, a base with a smaller radius of curvature, when attached to the device, is less stable than a base with a larger radius of curvature.
Posturographic Measure | Tilt Direction | Experimental Condition | |||
Eyes Open | Eyes Closed | ||||
Very Unstable Surface | Mildly Unstable Surface | ||||
Vibration | Vibration | Vibration | Vibration | ||
Off | On | Off | On | ||
Root-Mean-Square | Antero-Posterior | 1.60 | 1.62 | 2.01 | 1.70 |
[degrees] | Medio-Lateral | 1.53 | 1.61 | 1.80 | 1.74 |
Mean Velocity | Antero-Posterior | 2.75 | 3.01 | 2.85 | 2.94 |
[degrees/s] | Medio-Lateral | 3.04 | 3.14 | 3.38 | 3.44 |
Centroidal Frequency | Antero-Posterior | 0.418 | 0.449 | 0.370 | 0.423 |
[Hz] | Medio-Lateral | 0.462 | 0.467 | 0.465 | 0.471 |
Frequency Dispersion | Antero-Posterior | 0.659 | 0.654 | 0.685 | 0.661 |
[-] | Medio-Lateral | 0.651 | 0.651 | 0.662 | 0.669 |
Table 2: Results by balance and feedback conditions. Summary measures derived from AP and ML tilts during unstable sitting trials. Support surface stability plus eye condition as well as vibration level are the manipulated variables. Average measures were calculated across all participants.
Supplementary File 1: Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary File 2: Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary File 3: Please click here to download this file.
Methods for constructing a portable, instrumented, sitting device are presented. The device is portable and durable, building on previous studies of wobble chairs2,4 and vibrational feedback5,6,7 to make the benefits of these tools more powerful and accessible. Follow the assembly protocol in reverse to prepare the device for transportation or storage. The difficulty of the balance task can be modulated by attaching bases with different curvatures. The selection of task difficulty is critical; users should be destabilized to facilitate active training without risking injury.
Real-time observation and adjustment of the built-in instruments relies on serial communication between the microcontroller and the user interface; dysfunction of the device requires both software and hardware troubleshooting. Ensure that all hardware connections are secure. Monitor the serial output of the microcontroller for unexpected bytes. Probe the user interface program for errors. If a problem persists, consult an experienced mechatronics designer.
Balance proficiency is characterized by posturographic measures derived from kinematic observations of the sitting surface. Alternatively, observe the center of pressure exerted on a force plate, which correlates with the surface tilt angle2, but requires additional equipment. Posturographic measures have varying reliability between sessions2 and varying sensitivity to balance improvement or disorder19. The root-mean-square, mean velocity, centroidal frequency, and frequency dispersion are common posturographic measures that were observed to be linearly independent of each other. Consider modifying the signal analysis protocol to address particular assessment objectives.
The device delivers vibrotactile stimuli to the seat in accordance with balance task performance. The optimal configuration of haptic feedback control is the subject of continuous study and a critical step in this protocol, as certain feedback strategies may impair motor learning20. Existing vibrotactile feedback methods are proven to improve standing balance function and many other motor tasks6,7. Seat-embedded tactors make the vibrotactile feedback technique accessible for seated balance paradigms. Future applications may include sports training, spatial orientation training, virtual or augmented reality gaming, assessment of balance proficiency, research of balance disorders, and rehabilitation following skeletal, muscular, or neurological injury.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors acknowledge the design efforts of the undergraduate students Animesh Singh Kumawat, Kshitij Agarwal, Quinn Boser, Benjamin Cheung, Caroline Collins, Sarah Lojczyc, Derek Schlenker, Katherine Schoepp, and Arthur Zielinski. This study was partially funded through a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2014-04666).
Chassis | McMaster-Carr | 8657K421 | Moisture-Resistant LDPE Polyethylene Sheet 1-1/2" Thick, 24" X 24" |
Lid | McMaster-Carr | 8657K414 | Moisture-Resistant LDPE Polyethylene Sheet 1/4" Thick, 24" X 24" |
Base | McMaster-Carr | 8657K414 | Moisture-Resistant LDPE Polyethylene Sheet 1/4" Thick, 24" X 24" |
Grip-Tape | McMaster-Carr | 6243T471 | Nonabrasive Antislip Tape, Textured, 6" Wide Strip, 2' Long, Black |
Base Nut | McMaster-Carr | 90596A039 | Steel Round-Base Weld Nut, 5/8"-11 Thread Size |
Weld Plate | McMaster-Carr | 1388K142 | Low-Carbon Steel Sheet 1/16" Thick, 3" X 3", Ground Finish |
Threaded Rod | McMaster-Carr | 90322A170 | 3" 5/16"-18 Medium-Strength Alloy Steel Threaded Stud |
Sleeve | McMaster-Carr | 8745K19 | Chemical-Resistant PVC (Type I) Rod 1-1/4" Diameter |
Square Flange | McMaster-Carr | 8910K395 | Low Carbon Steel Bar, 1/8" Thick, 1" Wide |
Hitch | McMaster-Carr | 4931T123 | Bolt-Together Framing Heavy-Duty Steel, 1-1/2" Square |
Curved Base | McMaster-Carr | 8745K48 | PVC Rod, 6" Diameter |
Hitch Insert | McMaster-Carr | 6535K313 | Bolt-Together Framing Heavy-Duty Steel, 1" Square |
Extrusion | McMaster-Carr | 6545K7 | 1045 Cold Drawn Steel Square Bar Stock, 1' X 1" Wide, Unpolished |
Clamp | Vlier | TH103A | Adjustable Torque Knob |
Footrest | McMaster-Carr | 6582K431 | 4130 Steel Tubing, 1" X 1" Wide, 0.065" Wall Thickness, Unpolished Mill Finish |
Counterwieght | McMaster-Carr | 8910K67 | Low-Carbon Steel Rectangular Bar 1-1/8" Thick, 4" Width |
Clevis Pin | McMaster-Carr | 97245A616 | Zinc-Plated Steel Clevis Pin with Hairpin Cotter Pin, 3/16" Diameter, 1-9/16" Usable Length |
Microprocessor | Arduino | MEGA 2560 | Microcontroller board with 54 digital I/O pins and USB connection |
Inertial Measurement Unit | x-io Technologies Ltd. | x-IMU | Inertial Measurement Unit and Attitude Heading Reference System with enclosure |
Vibrating Tactor | Precision Microdrives | DEV-11008 | Lilypad Vibe Board, available from SparkFun Electronics |