Summary

Experimental Approach for Determining Semiconductor/liquid Junction Energetics by Operando Ambient-Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Published: December 23, 2015

Summary

We present a method for the determination of the energy relations of semiconductor/liquid junctions, which are the basis for the successful operation of such renewable solar energy converting systems.

Abstract

Operando Ambient Pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (operando AP-XPS) investigation of semiconductor/liquid junctions provides quantitative understanding of the energy bands in these photoelectrochemical solar cells. Liquid junction photoelectrochemical cells allow a uniform contact between the light-absorbing semiconductor and its contacting electrolyte phase. Standard Ultra High Vacuum (UHV) based X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) has been used to analyze the electronic energy band relations in solid-state photovoltaics. We demonstrate how operando AP-XPS may be used to determine these relationships for semiconductor/liquid systems. The use of “tender” X-ray synchrotron radiation produces photoelectrons with enough energy to escape through a thin electrolyte overlayer; these photoelectrons provide information regarding the chemical and electronic nature of the top ~10 nm of the electrode as well as of the electrolyte. The data can be analyzed to determine the energy relationship between the electronic energy bands in the semiconductor electrode and the redox levels in the solution. These relationships are critical to the operation of the photoelectrochemical cell and for understanding such processes as photoelectrode corrosion or passivation. Through the approach described herein, the major conditions for semiconductor-electrolyte contacts including accumulation, depletion, and Fermi-level pinning are observed, and the so-called flat-band energy can be determined.

Introduction

Semiconductor/liquid junctions have long been investigated due to their simplicity of construction and economical possibility of fuel generation 1-4, with some such systems obtaining efficiencies over 17%.5 These systems operate based on the formation of a rectifying junction at the interface between the semiconductor electrode and the electrolyte. The energetics of semiconductor/liquid junctions are similar to those of a semiconductor/metal, Schottky, junction 3 where an electrolyte assumes the role of the metal. The semiconductor Fermi level, EF, is the electrochemical potential of the electron in the semiconductor and is analogous to the chemical potential of an electron in solution. In a liquid junction cell the difference in the chemical potential of the electron between the two phases results in the transfer of charge from one phase to another at equilibrium. Since the ions in the electrolyte are free to move while the fixed charges in the semiconductor cannot, a space-charge (or depletion) region forms within the semiconductor with an accompanying electric field. This electric field shifts the Fermi level (electrochemical potential) of the semiconductor to be equal to the chemical potential of the electron in the solution 6. The resulting electric field in the semiconductor only exists close (~ 1 µm) to the solution interface and the energy of the electron levels in this region are viewed as being "bent" by the field. The "band bending" in the semiconductor space-charge region results in a barrier to current flow in one direction while allowing conduction in the opposite direction, producing a "rectifying junction". Under illumination, this electrical field in the near-surface region of the semiconductor can separate light-generated electrons and holes, such that the device can be operated in a manner analogous to a solid-state photovoltaic device. Figure 1 demonstrates these basic concepts.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Solid/liquid junction. Illustration showing the band diagram and charge carrier density for (a) flat-band, (b) accumulation, (c) depletion and (d) inversion of an n-type semiconductor/liquid junction with ne the free electron concentration, nh the free hole concentration and ni the intrinsic carrier concentration. The width of space-charge region is show as an accumulation layer dacc, a depletion layer ddep or an inversion layer dinv. For further discussion, see 29. Abbreviations are as follows: CBM: Conduction Band Minimum; VBM: Valence Band Maximum; EF: Fermi Energy; U: the applied potential with respect to flat band; UFB the flat band potential; μ​es​- : the chemical potential in the solution as described in reference 23. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a widely-used technique for determining both chemical (i.e., oxidation) states and electronic effects such as energy band relations in solid materials. Because of the very small inelastic mean free path (IMFP) of photoelectrons in air, including IMFPs on the mm scale even at millibar pressures7, and in order to avoid changes of the probed surfaces during measurements, XPS generally has to be performed under ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions. Numerous reviews of the XPS technique have been written 8-10. In XPS, typically, electrons from core levels of the constituent elements of the sample are ejected into the vacuum by the absorption of X-rays. Upon irradiation with X-rays of an energy , electrons are ejected from the sample having a kinetic energy EKvac with respect to the vacuum level EVAC. Figure 2 shows (a) the general geometry of an XPS instrument, (b) a simulated XPS spectra of TiO2 with core levels (CL), Auger lines and a measurement of the work function, and (c) the relation of photon energy to kinetic and binding energies. The conservation of energy requires

hν = EB + EKvac + φ (1)

where EB is the binding energy of the photoelectron from the core level, and φ is the work function of the sample. EB is referenced to the Fermi level of the sample, EF. The position of EF can be determined by measurement of the valence band maximum of a noble metal (i.e. Gold or Silver) and fitting the Fermi function when the photon energy is well known (i.e. Al Kα). Otherwise this procedure is used to calibrate the photon energy, i.e. at electron synchrotrons that produce X-rays of variable energy.

Figure 2
Figure 2: XPS Schematic. Illustration of the XPS method: (a) standard XPS geometry; (b) Simulated XPS spectra of TiO2 with core levels (CL), Auger lines and work function measurement; (c) Energy band relations for TiO2 and definitions of kinetic energies EKvac, binding energies EB and work function φ. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Recently, ambient-pressure XPS, AP-XPS, experiments have been made possible due to the construction of differentially pumped electrostatic lens equipped ambient-pressure XPS analyzer systems. One approach to doing XPS at a solid/liquid interface is to separate the vacuum and the solution with a thin membrane through which XPS is carried out{Kolmakov, 2011 #176}11-13. This technique requires the use of extremely thin membranes of materials such as silicon or graphene, as opposed to allowing measurements on thicker semiconductor materials. While standard XPS is carried out under UHV (10-9– 10-11 Torr), in AP-XPS the sample is at tens of Torr pressure while the analyzer remains under HV/UHV conditions. The resulting large pressure difference is realized by multiple stages of differential pumping 7,14. As a result, measurement conditions much closer to a normal working environment can be realized. Studies on gold oxidation 15, lithium-oxygen redox reactions 16, and catalytic reactions 17 have been carried out in such systems. Further development and refinement of the technique 18 has allowed use of an electrochemical cell as the sample with the ability to apply a potential difference between the working electrode and the solution in a three-electrode electrochemical cell, which we term operando AP-XPS. The surface of the working electrode under a thin meniscus of electrolyte is analyzed by the operando AP-XPS technique. Figure 3 shows (a) a general schematic of the endstation as well as (b-d) pictures of the various parts of the endstation and (e) the materials under investigation. As a result, the solid working electrode as well as the thin (~13 nm) electrolyte layer can be investigated simultaneously, provided that the photoelectrons have a sufficient kinetic energy to penetrate through the electrolyte overlayer and escape unscattered, i.e. without energy loss, to the analyzer/detector. The use of ~ 4 keV X-rays produces photoelectrons with sufficient kinetic energy (~3.5 keV for Ti 2p and O 1s core levels) to make this possible 18.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Operando AP-XPS setup. (a) Scheme of the operando XPS setup. The working electrode and the hemispherical electron energy analyzer (HEA) were grounded together. The potential of the working electrode was changed with respect to the reference electrode. The PEC-beaker containing the electrolyte could be lowered whereas the three-electrode mount could be moved in all three directions. (b) View into the high-pressure analysis chamber. The X-ray beam enters through the window on the left, the three-electrode setup is on the top, the electrolyte beaker on the bottom, and the electron analyzer cone is in the center. (c) Three-electrode setup pulled up and in measurement position (compare to (a)). (d) Photo of the actual "tender" X-Ray operando AP-XPS analyzer and the analysis chamber that is directly connected to the analyzer. (e) The energy band relations of the p+-Si/TiO2/H2O(l.)/H2O(g.) system under applied potential U. The working electrode (Si) and analyzer are grounded. In the three-electrode configuration the Fermi energy is shifted by U with respect to the reference electrode. The definitions of kinetic energies EKvac, binding energies EB, work function φ and the ionization energy of H2O (g.) EIE are given. For p+-Si/TiO2/Ni/H2O(l.)/H2O(g.) electrodes, a thin film of Ni/NiOx would also be present at the solid/liquid interface, and would influence band bending as discussed in the text. For a further analysis of the importance of the Ni/NiOx film, please see 27. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

We have recently demonstrated that the combination of atomic-layer deposition (ALD)-grown TiO2 with a Ni catalyst can effectively stabilize a variety of semiconductors in alkaline media, including Si, GaP, GaAs 19, CdTe 20, and BiVO421 against photocorrosion. This advancement enables the use of technologically advanced semiconductors for energy converting devices such as solar fuel generators. Further investigation of the working principles of TiO2 in these systems was undertaken to evaluate the nature of the semiconductor/liquid junction in the presence or absence of Ni 22-24. Direct observation of these junctions using the operando AP-XPS approach produces data which demonstrate the working principles (accumulation, Fermi level pinning, depletion, inversion) behind these systems. Furthermore, this approach provides a tool by which a semiconductor/liquid junction or photocatalyst25,26 may be interrogated such that the fundamental operating characteristics may be understood and optimized. We describe herein the manner in which such investigations may be undertaken, the conditions that are required for these experiments to work, and the means by which the data collected may be understood. We describe, in sections 1-2, the preparation of the electrodes which were used in our experiments, before presenting more general directions (sections 3-5) regarding the collection of data using this approach.

Protocol

1. Preparation of Semiconductor for Analysis Clean a p+, (100)-oriented boron doped Czochralski-grown Si wafer with a resistivity of ρ < 0.005 Ωcm. First soak for 2 min in a 3:1 (by volume) "piranha" solution of concentrated H2SO4 (98%) to 30% H2O2(aq). Etch for 10 s in a 10% (by volume) solution of HF(aq). Immediately after step 1.2, etch in a 5:1:1 (by volume) solution of H2O, 36% hydrochlo…

Representative Results

Representative results are shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8. Figure 6 shows the collected O 1s and Ti 2p core level spectra for a TiO2 electrolyte in 1.0 M KOH solution, stacked with respect to the applied potential. Figure 7 shows the plotted core level water O 1s and Ti 2p peak positions, as collected from Figure 6 as well as from data in which a TiO2/Ni/electrolyte sample was investigated in the same electrolyte. Figure 8 shows a brief summary of our conclusions from …

Discussion

The most critical steps in the technique for data collection are the application of voltage and the collection of the XPS data. The semiconductor preparation is necessarily crucial but can be generalized to any system where the semiconductor/liquid junction is stable enough to be investigated. However, for the choice of electrolyte, a number of experimental parameters must be considered. First, there must be sufficient interaction (hydrophilic or hydrophobic) between the solid electrode and the electrolyte in order to fo…

Offenlegungen

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported through the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under award No. DE SC0004993 to the Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, a DOE Energy Innovation Hub. The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE AC02 05CH11231. The authors thank Dr. Philip Ross for contributions to the conceptual development of the operando AP-XPS endstation and experimental design.

Materials

p+-Si(100) Addison 3P-111 Resistivity < 0.005 Ω – cm
H2SO4 Sigma Aldrich 339741  99.999%
H2O2 Sigma Aldrich 216763 30%
HF Sigma Aldrich 339261 99.99%
millipore H2O EMDMillipore Milli-Q® Advantage A10 18.2 MΩ
HCl Sigma Aldrich 320331 ACS Reagent, 37%
Tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium(IV) (TDMAT) Sigma Aldrich 469858  99.999%
N2 Praxair NI 6.0 RS >99.9999%
Ni target AJA International 7440-02-0 >99.99%
In/Ga Sigma Aldrich 495425 >99.99%
Hysol 9460 Ellsworth Adhesives 83128 Dual cartridge
KOH Sigma Aldrich 306568 Semiconductor grade, 99.99%
Liquid Nitrogen Praxair NI 5.0
Gold foil Sigma Aldrich 326496 99.99%
HNO3 Sigma Aldrich 438073 ACS Reagent, 70%
1-sided copper tape adafruit 1128 For electrode construction
glass microscope slides VWR 48300-025 For electrode construction
Ag/AgCl reference electrode eDaq ET072-1
Platinum foil Sigma Aldrich 349348  99.99%
SP-300 Biologic Potentiostat Biologic SP-300
Scienta r4000 HiPP-2 Detector APPES Scienta HiPP-2

Referenzen

  1. Walter, M. G., et al. Solar Water Splitting Cells. Chem. Rev. 110 (11), 6446-6473 (2010).
  2. Bard, A. J. Design of semiconductor photoelectrochemical systems for solar energy conversion. J. Phys. Chem. 86 (2), 172-177 (1982).
  3. Gerischer, H. Electrochemical photo and solar cells principles and some experiments. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 58 (1), 263-274 (1975).
  4. Heller, A., Chang, K. C., Miller, B. Spectral Response and Efficiency Relations in Semiconductor Liquid Junction Solar Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 124 (5), 697-700 (1977).
  5. Prasad, G., Srivastava, O. N. The high-efficiency (17.1%) WSe2 photo-electrochemical solar cell. J. Phys. D: Ap. Phys. 21 (6), 1028 (1988).
  6. Tan, M. X., et al. . Progress in Inorganic Chemistry. , (2007).
  7. Salmeron, M., Schlögl, R. Ambient pressure photoelectron spectroscopy: A new tool for surface science and nanotechnology. Surf. Sci. Rep. 63 (4), 169-199 (2008).
  8. Turner, N. H. Surface analysis: x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Auger electron spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 60 (12), 377R-387R (1988).
  9. Powell, C. J., Jablonski, A. Progress in quantitative surface analysis by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Current status and perspectives. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 178-179, 331-346 (2010).
  10. Fadley, C. S. Atomic-level characterization of materials with core- and valence-level photoemission: basic phenomena and future directions. Surf. Interface Anal. 40 (13), 1579-1605 (2008).
  11. Kolmakov, A., et al. Graphene oxide windows for in situ environmental cell photoelectron spectroscopy. Nat. Nano. 6 (10), 651-657 (2011).
  12. Masuda, T., et al. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for electrochemical reactions in ordinary solvents. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 (11), 111605 (2013).
  13. Kraus, J., et al. Photoelectron spectroscopy of wet and gaseous samples through graphene membranes. Nanoscale. 6 (23), 14394-14403 (2014).
  14. Ogletree, D. F., et al. A differentially pumped electrostatic lens system for photoemission studies in the millibar range. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73 (11), 3872-3877 (2002).
  15. Klyushin, A. Y., Rocha, T. C. R., Havecker, M., Knop-Gericke, A., Schlogl, R. A near ambient pressure XPS study of Au oxidation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 (17), 7881-7886 (2014).
  16. Lu, Y. -. C., et al. In Situ Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Studies of Lithium-Oxygen Redox Reactions. Sci. Rep. 2, (2012).
  17. Kaichev, V. V., Prosvirin, I. P., Bukhtiyarov, V. I. XPS for in situ study of the mechanisms of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. J. Struct. Chem. 52 (1), 90-101 (2011).
  18. Axnanda, S., et al. Using "Tender" X-ray Ambient Pressure X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy as A Direct Probe of Solid-Liquid Interface. Sci. Rep. 5, 9788 (2015).
  19. Hu, S., et al. Amorphous TiO2 coatings stabilize Si, GaAs, and GaP photoanodes for efficient water oxidation. Science. 344 (6187), 1005-1009 (2014).
  20. Lichterman, M. F., et al. Stabilization of n-cadmium telluride photoanodes for water oxidation to O2(g) in aqueous alkaline electrolytes using amorphous TiO2 films formed by atomic-layer deposition. Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (10), 3334-3337 (2014).
  21. McDowell, M. T., et al. Improved Stability of Polycrystalline Bismuth Vanadate Photoanodes by Use of Dual-Layer Thin TiO2/Ni Coatings. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118 (34), 19618-19624 (2014).
  22. Lichterman, M. F., et al. (Invited) Investigation of the Si/TiO2/Electrolyte Interface Using Operando Tender X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. ECS Trans. 66 (6), 97-103 (2015).
  23. Lichterman, M. F., et al. Direct observation of the energetics at a semiconductor/liquid junction by operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (8), 2409-2416 (2015).
  24. Richter, M. H., et al. (Invited) Measurement of the Energy-Band Relations of Stabilized Si Photoanodes Using Operando Ambient Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. ECS Trans. 66 (6), 105-113 (2015).
  25. Zhang, N., Yang, M. -. Q., Liu, S., Sun, Y., Xu, Y. -. J. Waltzing with the Versatile Platform of Graphene to Synthesize Composite Photocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 115 (18), 10307-10377 (2015).
  26. Liu, S., Tang, Z. -. R., Sun, Y., Colmenares, J. C., Xu, Y. -. J. One-dimension-based spatially ordered architectures for solar energy conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (15), 5053-5075 (2015).
  27. Lichterman, M. F., et al. An Electrochemical, Microtopographical and Ambient Pressure X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic Investigation of Si/TiO2/Ni/Electrolyte Interfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 (2), H139-H146 (2016).
  28. Bard, A. J., Bocarsly, A. B., Fan, F. R. F., Walton, E. G., Wrighton, M. S. The concept of Fermi level pinning at semiconductor/liquid junctions. Consequences for energy conversion efficiency and selection of useful solution redox couples in solar devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102 (11), 3671-3677 (1980).
  29. Li, L., Salvador, P. A., Rohrer, G. S. Photocatalysts with internal electric fields. Nanoscale. 6 (1), 24-42 (2014).
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Keep me updated:

.

Diesen Artikel zitieren
Lichterman, M. F., Richter, M. H., Hu, S., Crumlin, E. J., Axnanda, S., Favaro, M., Drisdell, W., Hussein, Z., Brunschwig, B. S., Lewis, N. S., Liu, Z., Lewerenz, H. Experimental Approach for Determining Semiconductor/liquid Junction Energetics by Operando Ambient-Pressure X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Vis. Exp. (Pending Publication), e54129, doi: (2015).

View Video