Stereotaxic surgery to target brain sites in mice commonly involves access through the skull bones and is guided by skull landmarks. Here we outline an alternative stereotaxic approach to target the caudal brainstem and upper cervical spinal cord via the cisterna magna that relies on direct visualization of brainstem landmarks.
Stereotaxic surgery to target brain sites in mice is commonly guided by skull landmarks. Access is then obtained via burr holes drilled through the skull. This standard approach can be challenging for targets in the caudal brainstem and upper cervical cord due to specific anatomical challenges as these sites are remote from skull landmarks, leading to imprecision. Here we outline an alternative stereotaxic approach via the cisterna magna that has been used to target discrete regions of interest in the caudal brainstem and upper cervical cord. The cisterna magna extends from the occipital bone to the atlas (i.e., the second vertebral bone), is filled with cerebrospinal fluid, and is covered by dura mater. This approach provides a reproducible route of access to select central nervous system (CNS) structures that are otherwise hard to reach due to anatomical barriers. Furthermore, it allows for direct visualization of brainstem landmarks in close proximity to the target sites, increasing accuracy when delivering small injection volumes to restricted regions of interest in the caudal brainstem and upper cervical cord. Finally, this approach provides an opportunity to avoid the cerebellum, which can be important for motor and sensorimotor studies.
Standard stereotaxic surgery to target brain sites in mice1 commonly involves fixation of the skull using a set of ear bars and a mouth bar. Coordinates are then estimated based on reference atlases2,3, and skull landmarks, namely, bregma (the point where the sutures of the frontal and parietal bones come together) or lambda (the point where the sutures of the parietal and occipital bones come together; Figure 1A,B). Through a burr hole into the skull above the estimated target, the target region can then be reached, either for delivery of microinjections or instrumentation with cannulas or optic fibers. Due to variation in the anatomy of these sutures and errors in the localization of bregma or lambda4,5, the position of zero points in relation to the brain varies from animal to animal. While small errors in targeting, that result from this variability, are not a problem for large or nearby targets, their impact is greater for smaller areas of interest that are remote from the zero points in the anteroposterior or dorsoventral planes and/or when studying animals of varying size due to age, strain and/or sex. There are several additional challenges that are unique for the medulla oblongata and the upper cervical cord. First, small changes in anteroposterior coordinates are associated with significant changes in dorsoventral coordinates relative to the dura, due to the position and shape of the cerebellum (Figure 1Bi)2,6,7. Second, the upper cervical cord is not contained within the skull2. Third, the slanting position of the occipital bone and overlying layer of neck muscles2 makes the standard stereotaxic approach even more challenging for structures located near the transition between the brainstem and spinal cord (Figure 1Bi). Finally, many targets of interest in the caudal brainstem and cervical cord are small2, requiring precise and reproducible injections8,9.
An alternative approach through the cisterna magna circumvents these problems. The cisterna magna is a large space that extends from the occipital bone to the atlas (Figure 1A, i.e., the second vertebral bone)10. It is filled with cerebrospinal fluid and covered by dura mater10. This space between the occipital bone and the atlas opens when anteroflexing the head. It can be accessed by navigating in between the overlying paired bellies of the longus capitis muscle, exposing the dorsal surface of the caudal brainstem. Regions of interest can then be targeted based upon the landmarks of these regions themselves if they are located near the dorsal surface; or by using the obex, the point where the central canal opens into the IV ventricle, as a zero point for coordinates to reach deeper structures. This approach has been successfully used in a variety of species, including the rat11, cat12, mouse8,9, and non-human primate13 to target the ventral respiratory group, medullary medial reticular formation, the nucleus of the solitary tract, area postrema, or hypoglossal nucleus. However, this approach is not widely utilized as it requires knowledge of anatomy, a specialized toolkit, and more advanced surgical skills compared to the standard stereotaxic approach.
Here we describe a step-by-step surgical approach to reach the brainstem and upper cervical cord via the cisterna magna, visualize landmarks, set the zero point (Figure 2), and estimate and optimize target coordinates for stereotaxic delivery of microinjections into the discrete brainstem and spinal cord regions of interest (Figure 3). We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages related to this approach.
The author declares that the protocol follows the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
1. Preparation of surgical instruments and stereotaxic frame
NOTE: The surgery is performed under aseptic conditions. Sterility is maintained using the sterile tip technique.
2. Anesthesia induction and mouse preparation
3. Positioning of the mouse in the stereotaxic frame
4. Surgery to access the cisterna magna
5. Opening of the cisternal membrane
6. Identification of landmarks and zero point
7. Target coordinates
NOTE: For various targets, we have included a list of standard coordinates with anterior posterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) coordinates relative to zero-point bregma and cisterna magna coordinates with AP and ML coordinates relative to zero point obex to facilitate the transition between methodologies (Table 1). Dorsoventral (DV) coordinates are relative to the surface of the brain or cerebellum (standard approach) or the surface of the brainstem or upper cervical cord (cisterna magna approach) at the point of AP and ML entry. Planning should be done prior to surgery.
8. Injection of the target
9. Closure of the surgical field
10. Post-operative care
The cisterna magna approach makes it possible to target caudal brainstem and upper cervical cord structures that are otherwise hard to reach via standard stereotaxic approaches or are prone to inconsistent targeting. The surgery to reach the cisterna magna requires incisions of the skin, a thin layer of trapezius muscle, and opening of the dura mater and is therefore well tolerated by mice. It is especially efficient and less invasive when targeting multiple (longitudinally dispersed or bilateral) sites, as it does not require drilling of multiple burr holes as in standard stereotaxic approaches. In mice, we have routinely targeted structures such as the hypoglossal nucleus9, ventral respiratory group8, and adjacent reticular formation8 in the caudal brainstem using the cisterna magna approach, as we further illustrate for the hypoglossal nucleus and the ventromedial medulla (GiV) in Figure 3. For example, the hypoglossal nucleus is a slim but rostrocaudally elongated column of motoneurons in the dorsal medulla oblongata and its rostral pole can be targeted via a standard approach. However, as the DV coordinates (~4.5 mm) are mostly dictated by the overlying cerebellum with only 1.2-1.4 mm entering the brainstem, a relatively small difference in positioning of the head of the mouse could therefore easily result in a misplaced injection. Due to the proximity of this target to the zero-point obex, it can be more reliably targeted via the cisterna magna approach. Furthermore, the caudal end of the hypoglossal nucleus which extends until the transition between the brainstem and spinal cord can be targeted by the same cisterna magna approach, whereas the standard approach would have to be modified to reach such a caudal site by angling the AP approach and adjusting coordinates to avoid the occipital bone and overlying neck musculature.
In order to determine the accuracy of the cisterna magna approach versus the standard approach, we measured the distance between intended and actual target sites in the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and dorsoventral planes for ventral (ventromedial medulla; GiA/V; N = 10) and dorsal (NuXII; N = 16) regions. The measurements were made in transverse sections of the caudal brainstem (Figure 3). The results (Figure 4) show significantly smaller errors in the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and especially dorsoventral planes for the cisterna magna approach compared to the standard approach. These results highlight the enhanced accuracy of the cisterna magna approach for these targets. We have included standard stereotaxic coordinates (relative to bregma, derived from Paxinos and Franklin 2, but optimized for our studies) and cisterna magna coordinates (relative to the obex) in Table 1. These coordinates have all been optimized and verified as shown for the hypoglossal nucleus and ventromedial medulla in Figure 3.
Figure 1: Schematic representation of key landmarks, target areas, and the plane of the stereotaxic cisterna magna approach. (A) Key anatomical landmarks and positioning in the sagittal plane. (B) Areas that can be reached through the standard stereotaxic approach versus cisterna magna stereotaxic approach and relation to their reference points. i) The standard approach makes use of bony landmarks bregma and lambda, which are distant from target regions in magenta and purple. The area in magenta (caudal medulla oblongata and upper cervical cord) is challenging to reach due to the slanting occipital bone and neck muscles. The area in purple (rostral medulla oblongata) is prone to movement and distant from traditional landmarks. ii) The cisterna magna approach is appropriate for accessing the caudal medulla oblongata and upper cervical cord and has advantages when studying brainstem structures that are organized into longitudinal columns that extend from the caudal medulla oblongata rostrally, up to the level of the caudal pons. (C) Schematic of the planes of various stereotaxic reference atlases in relation to the cisterna magna approach. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Step-by-step schematic overview of the stereotaxic cisterna magna approach. (A) Mouse adapter with ear bars evenly positioned at the highest level, the mouth bar at a lowered position, and a plastic card to secure the anteroflexed head at a 90° angle. (B) Secure the mouse into the stereotacxic frame using the ear bars and anteroflex the head at 90° and keep in position via a rigid plastic card, with the stereotaxic frame as a reference. (C) Make sure the body is elevated so it is in the same plane as the occiput. Palpate key landmarks. (D) Make a skin incision from the occiput to the rostral part of the shoulders. (E) Make an incision in the raphe of the trapezius muscle. Make sure to stay in the midline and do not cut into the underlying muscles. (F) Identify the midline between the two bellies of the longus capitis muscle, starting at the occiput, and guide the laminectomy forceps in a caudal direction. (G) Place each of the wound hooks in between the bellies of the longus capitis muscle and re-position until the cisterna magna comes in view. (H) Identify bony landmarks (occipital bone, atlas), the dura mater that extends between these bony structures, and the underlying cerebellum and brainstem. Clean the dura mater as needed to expose the target level. (I) Using spring scissors and fine forceps open the dura. (J) Identify the obex, which forms the AP and ML zero point. Move the pipette to the AP and ML coordinates of choice. Lower the pipette until it reaches the dorsal surface of the brainstem. This is the DV zero point. Lower the pipette to the desired coordinate. (K) Remove the pipette and the wound hooks and let the longus capitis muscles resume their original position. (L) Close the wound and remove the mouse from the stereotaxic frame. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Evaluation of target coordinates. Low magnification photomicrographs of the caudal brainstem. (A) Injection of retrograde tracer cholera toxin subunit b (CTb; blue) into the hypoglossal nucleus of a ChAT-cre L10 GFP (green) reporter mouse (female, 6 months old). Note that the CTb injection is restricted to the hypoglossal nucleus. (B) Transfection of glutamatergic cells of a vGluT2-ires-cre L10 GFP reporter (green) mouse (male, 2 months old) with a conditional anterograde tracer (magenta) in the ventral part of the caudal medial medulla oblongata (caudal pole of the GiV region). (C) Conditional retrograde tracing in a vGLuT2-ires-cre mouse (male, 2 months old) showing TVA (magenta) transfection of glutamatergic neurons and modified rabies infection (green) in the caudal medial medulla oblongata (caudal pole of the GiV region). Rabies virus was injected into the upper cervical spinal cord. Internal landmarks serve as a guidance. Abbreviations-cAmb: Compact Nucleus of the Ambiguus complex; Ap: Area Postrema; DMV: Dorsal Motor Nucleus of the Vagus; GiV: Gigantocellular Nucleus, ventral part; IO: Inferior Olive; IRt: Intermediate Reticular Nucleus; LRN: Lateral Reticular Nucleus; NuXII- Hypoglossal Nucleus; sol: Nucleus of the Solitary Tract; Sp5: Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus; VRG: ventral respiratory group. Scale bar: 200 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Comparison of the accuracy between the standard and cisterna magna approaches. Mean distance between the center of the intended target and the center of the actual site in the anteroposterior plane (A), mediolateral plane (B), and dorsoventral plane (C). Data was obtained from N = 13 adult mice using a standard approach and N = 13 adult mice using a cisterna magna approach. The radius of the target was set at 30 µm. The results show higher accuracy in the anteroposterior plane (t(24) = 2.08, p = 0.049; two-tailed t-test; alpha 0.05), mediolateral plane (t(24) = 2.55, p = 0.018; two-tailed t-test; alpha 0.05) and dorsoventral plane (t(24) = 4.33, p = 0.0002; two-tailed t-test; alpha 0.05). Bar graphs represent the mean with standard deviation and individual dots represent values in each mouse. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: Overview of standard and cisterna magna stereotaxic coordinates to target caudal brainstem structures. Please note that for both the standard and cisterna magna approaches, coordinates from the Paxinos and Franklin atlas2 have been adjusted until regions of interest were appropriately targeted as verified by histology (Figure 3). Also, note that areas in the reticular formation lack well-defined boundaries and are here labeled as in Paxinos and Franklin2. Abbreviations-AP: anteroposterior. ML: mediolateral. DV: dorsoventral. ChAT: Choline Acetyltransferase; F: Female; M: Male; M&F: Male and Female; NA: not applicable; Pet1: plasmacytoma expressed transcription factor 1; Sert: Serotonin transporter, vGaT: Vesicular GABA transporter; vGluT2: Vesicular Glutamate transporter 2; WT: Wild type. All coordinates are in millimeter (mm). Please click here to download this Table.
Standard stereotaxic surgery commonly relies on skull landmarks to calculate the coordinates of target sites in the CNS1. Target sites are then accessed via burr holes that are drilled through the skull1. This method is not ideal for the caudal brainstem as target sites are located distant from the skull landmarks in the anteroposterior and dorsoventral planes2 and as the anatomy of the skull and overlying muscles make access challenging6 (Figure 1Bi). Our study describes an alternate stereotaxic approach for accessing target sites in the caudal brainstem and upper spinal cord called the cisterna magna approach. Key features that make this method different from a standard stereotactic approach are positioning, with anteroflexion of the head to open up the cisterna magna, and use of key brainstem landmarks at the dorsal surface of the brainstem as reference points such as the obex. Our results indicate that this approach is suitable for the delivery of small volumes (5-50 nL) of tracers or adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) into discrete brainstem structures. Furthermore, the use of a reference point that represents a CNS landmark, rather than a bony structure, and that is in close proximity to the intended target increases reproducibility and accuracy for small targets and small injection volumes, as relevant for circuit mapping and chemogenetic studies (Figure 3)14,15.
As with any protocol, the cisterna magna approach has steps that are critical in order to achieve reproducibility. As with any stereotaxic approach which is dependent on coordinates in three different planes (anteroposterior, mediolateral, and dorsoventral), positioning is critical. For the cisterna magna approach, this involves not only the position of the head, which should be anteroflexed at 90° but also that of the body, which should be elevated so that the caudal brainstem and upper cervical cord are in the same plane. Another critical step is to avoid unnecessary manipulations that cause bleeding, as this would hamper the visualization of key landmarks. There are two manipulations that carry a high risk of bleeding. Firstly, the dura mater covering the cisterna magna is covered by a relatively large muscle (longus capitis). As this is a paired muscle, with one belly on either side of the midline, the two bellies of this muscle will only need to be gently separated in the midline. Incision of these muscles is not necessary and will cause bleeding. Secondly, on the successful opening of the dura mater, a variable number of veins with a variable course will become visible on top of the dorsal surface of the caudal brainstem and upper cervical cord. These veins should be avoided by applying minor adjustments in coordinates (up to 0.1 mm) or, if the experimental paradigm allows, by selecting a different target.
A major advantage of the cisterna magna approach is that it provides access to the brainstem and upper cervical structures that are challenging to reach when using the standard stereotaxic plane as they are located near the caudal end of or just caudal to the occipital bone. Furthermore, for targets in the medulla oblongata the approach avoids the cerebellum and therefore cerebellar lesion effects or spurious labeling via a needle tract, which can affect study outcomes when using standard methodology are not a concern. Another advantage of the cisterna magna approach is that the dorsal surface of the brainstem becomes visible. This provides the opportunity to use a landmark on the dorsal surface as a reference point for coordinates. Furthermore, the approach is flexible and can be optimized depending on the target. For example, we used a midline landmark, the obex, as the reference point. However, when targeting dorsal structures, the structure of interest itself may dictate the landscape of the dorsal surface. For example, the external cuneate nucleus protrudes dorsally, and can thus be visualized and injected directly. For lateral targets, such as the ventral respiratory group or ambiguous complex, the cisterna magna window can be increased in a lateral direction. Likewise, for targeting of upper cervical structures, the window can be extended towards the atlas. While we used a mouse adaptor placed in a large animal stereotactic frame, the approach can easily be adapted to other frames or setups, as long as the key steps are being followed. For example, instead of a plastic card, the mouth bar can be placed against the bridge of the nose to keep the head in a stable anteroflexed position. It is worth noting that coordinates of brainstem target sites with the obex as zero point, as provided in Table 1, serve as a reference, and adjustments may be indicated based upon the mouse strain, age, sex, calibration of the stereotaxic arm, and positioning technique, similar to adjustments that one needs to make when deriving target coordinates for a standard approach from a reference atlas. This requires insight into the plane of the approach, especially for more rostral targets as illustrated in Figure 1. Testing of coordinates can be done by using different tracers, for example, fluorescent beads or fluorescent-tagged Cholera Toxin subunit b for different coordinates in the same mouse. Histological analyses of brainstem/spinal tissue sections (not covered in this protocol) then provide feedback about localization relative to objective internal landmarks8,9,11,16 or for comparison with a reference atlas. Coordinates can then be adjusted, tested again, and finalized.
The cisterna magna approach also has limitations. CNS regions that can be reached via this approach are restricted to the caudal pons, medulla oblongata, and upper cervical cord. While the caudal pons can be accessed easily via the standard approach, the cisterna magna approach has advantages when studying subdivisions of longitudinally oriented structures that extend from the medulla oblongata into the caudal pons, as is the case for subdivisions within the reticular formation. Another relative limitation occurs when using this approach for the second time in the same mouse, for example, in modified rabies tracing14. The presence of scar tissue may increase the duration of the surgery or obscure minor landmarks. However, in our hands, this method has still been superior to the standard stereotaxic approach in this case, as the site of the first injection can be documented in relation to the position of veins of other unique landmarks, making it easy to find the exact entry point back. While this approach is superior for tracing studies in the caudal medulla and upper spinal cord, it cannot be used to chronically implant hardware. Therefore, for in-vivo optogenetics and calcium imaging studies that require implantation of optic fibers17 the cisterna magna approach can be used first to deliver an AAV to the target site, followed by a second surgery using a standard approach to instrument mice with fibers or cannulas. This approach enables one to keep the target site discrete, while fiber/hardware placement is more forgiving (i.e., can be less accurate), due to the relatively large size of the hardware. Lastly, the cisterna magna approach requires more advanced surgical skills than a standard stereotaxic approach. Rather than recognition of simple bony landmarks, it requires insight into more complex brainstem and musculoskeletal landmarks. Also, as with any delicate surgery, the success and efficiency of the procedure depend on a proper toolkit that is in excellent condition. This protocol addresses the latter issues and can be used as a detailed guide by experimenters.
In conclusion, the cisterna magna approach is complementary to the standard stereotaxic approach and provides multiple advantages when targeting the caudal brainstem and upper cervical cord, which are not easily accessed via a standard stereotaxic approach. It uses reference points that are CNS rather than bony landmarks which are in close proximity to the intended targets, increasing reproducibility and accuracy. This makes the approach especially valuable when small injection volumes need to be delivered to discrete sites in the context of detailed mapping or chemogenetic studies. This approach is also relevant for functional chemogenetic, optogenetic, fiber photometry, or lesion approaches, where an AAV virus or toxin is delivered to a target with motor function or sensorimotor integration as a readout: it avoids a course through the cerebellum for targets in the medulla oblongata and therefore limits its interference in study results. From an animal welfare point of view, the procedure does not require drilling multiple burr holes to access sites bilaterally or longitudinally, reducing the duration of the surgery and invasiveness of the procedure. While we outlined the approach in detail for mice, the same principles apply to other species11,12,13.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by R01 NS079623, P01 HL149630, and P01 HL095491.
Alcohol pad | Med-Vet International | SKU: MDS090735Z | skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infection |
Angled forceps, Dumont #5/45 | FST | 11251-35 | only to grab dura |
Betadine pad | Med-Vet International | SKU:PVP-PAD | skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infection |
Cholera toxin subunit-b, Alexa Fluor 488/594 conjugate | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 488: C34775, 594: C22842 | Fluorescent tracer |
Clippers | Wahl | Model MC3, 28915-10 | for shaving fur at surgical site |
Electrode holder with corner clamp | Kopf | 1770 | to hold glass pipette |
Flowmeter | Gilmont instruments | model # 65 MM | to regulate flow of isoflurane and oxygen to mouse on the surgical plane |
Fluorescent microspheres, polystyrene | Thermo Fisher Scientific | F13080 | Fluorescent tracer |
Heating pad | Stoelting | 53800M | thermoregulation |
Induction chamber with port hook up kit | Midmark Inc | 93805107 92800131 | chamber providing initial anasthesia |
Insulin Syringe | Exelint International | 26028 | to administer saline and analgesic |
Isoflurane | Med-Vet International | SKU:RXISO-250 | inhalant anesthetic |
Isoflurane Matrix VIP 3000 vaporizer | Midmark Inc | 91305430 | apparatus for inhalant anesthetic delivery |
Laminectomy forceps, Dumont #2 | FST | 11223-20 | only to clean dura |
Medical air, compressed | Linde | UN 1002 | used with stimulator & PicoPump for providing air for precision solution injection |
Meloxicam SR | Zoo Pharm LLC | Lot # MSR2-211201 | analgesic |
Microhematocrit borosilicate glass pre calibrated capillary tube | Globe Scientific Inc | 51628 | for transfection of material to designated co-ordinates |
Mouse adaptor | Stoelting | 0051625 | adapting rat stereotaxic frame for mouse surgery |
Needle holder, Student Halsted- Mosquito Hemostats | FST | 91308-12 | for suturing |
Oxygen regulator | Life Support Products | S/N 909328, lot 092109 | regulate oxygen levels from oxygen tank |
Oxygen tank, compressed | Linde | USP UN 1072 | provided along with isoflurane anasthesia |
Plastic card | not applicable | not applicable | any firm plastic card, cut to fit the stereotactic frame (e.g. ID card) |
Pneumatic PicoPump ( or similar) | World Precision Instruments (WPI) | SYS-PV820 | For precision solution injection |
Saline, sterile | Mountainside Medical Equipment | H04888-10 | to replace body fluids lost during surgery |
Scalpel handle, #3 | FST | 10003-12 | to hold scalpel |
Scissors, Wagner | FST | 14070-12 | to cut polypropylene suture |
Spring scissors, Vannas 2.5mm with accompanying box | FST | 15002-08 | scissors only to open dura, box to elevate body |
Stereotactic micromanipulator | Kopf | 1760-61 | attached to electrode holder to adjust position based on co-ordinates |
Stereotactic 'U' frame assembly and intracellular base plate | Kopf | 1730-B, 1711 | frame for surgery |
Sterile cotton tipped applicators | Puritan | 25-806 10WC | absorbing blood from surgical field |
Sterile non-fenestrated drapes | Henry Schein | 9004686 | for sterile surgical field |
Sterile opthalmic ointment | Puralube | P1490 | ocular lubricant |
Stimulator & Tubing | Grass Medical Instruments | S44 | to provide controlled presurred air for precision solution injection |
Surgical Blade #10 | Med-Vet International | SKU: 10SS | for skin incision |
Surgical forceps, Extra fine Graefe | FST | 11153-10 | to hold skin |
Surgical gloves | Med-Vet International | MSG2280Z | for asceptic surgery |
Surgical microscope | Leica | Model M320/ F12 | for 5X-40X magnification of surgical site |
Suture 5-0 polypropylene | Oasis | MV-8661 | to close the skin |
Tegaderm | 3M | 3M ID 70200749250 | provides sterile barrier |
Universal Clamp and stand post | Kopf | 1725 | attached to stereotactic U frame and intracellular base plate |
Wound hook with hartman hemostats | FST | 18200-09, 13003-10 | to separate muscles and provide surgical window |