The article describes the methods and reagents necessary to perform hybridization chain reaction RNA whole-mount fluorescence in situ hybridization (HCR RNA WM-FISH) to reveal insights into the spatial and cellular resolution of chemosensory receptor genes in the mosquito antenna and maxillary palp.
Mosquitoes are effective vectors of deadly diseases and can navigate their chemical environment using chemosensory receptors expressed in their olfactory appendages. Understanding how chemosensory receptors are spatially organized in the peripheral olfactory appendages can offer insights into how odor is encoded in the mosquito olfactory system and inform new ways to combat the spread of mosquito-borne diseases. The emergence of third-generation hybridization chain reaction RNA whole-mount fluorescence in situ hybridization (HCR RNA WM-FISH) allows for spatial mapping and simultaneous expression profiling of multiple chemosensory genes. Here, we describe a stepwise approach for performing HCR RNA WM-FISH on the Anopheles mosquito antenna and maxillary palp. We investigated the sensitivity of this technique by examining the expression profile of ionotropic olfactory receptors. We asked if the HCR WM-FISH technique described was suitable for multiplexed studies by tethering RNA probes to three spectrally distinct fluorophores. Results provided evidence that HCR RNA WM-FISH is robustly sensitive to simultaneously detect multiple chemosensory genes in the antenna and maxillary palp olfactory appendages. Further investigations attest to the suitability of HCR WM-FISH for co-expression profiling of double and triple RNA targets. This technique, when applied with modifications, could be adaptable to localize genes of interest in the olfactory tissues of other insect species or in other appendages.
Mosquito vectors such as Anopheles gambiae rely on a rich repertoire of chemosensory genes expressed in their peripheral olfactory appendages to thrive in a complex chemical world and identify behaviorally relevant odors emanating from human hosts, detect nectar sources, and locate oviposition sites1. The mosquito antenna and the maxillary palp are enriched with chemosensory genes that drive odor detection in these olfactory appendages. Three main classes of ligand-gated ion channels drive odor detection in mosquitoes' olfactory appendages: the Odorant receptors (ORs), which function with an obligate Odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco); the Ionotropic receptors (IRs), which interact with one or more IR coreceptors (IR8a, IR25a, and IR76b); the chemosensory Gustatory receptors (GRs), which function as a complex of three proteins to detect carbon dioxide (CO2)1,2.
RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization is a powerful tool for detecting the expression of endogenous mRNA3. In general, this method utilizes a fluorophore-tagged single stranded nucleic acid probe with sequence complementary to a target mRNA. Binding of the fluorescent RNA probe to the target RNA allows identification of cells expressing a transcript of interest. Recent advancements now enable the detection of transcripts in whole-mount mosquito tissues4,5. The first generation of hybridization chain reaction (HCR) technology used an RNA-based HCR amplifier; this was improved upon in a second-generation method that instead used engineered DNA for the HCR amplifier6,7. This upgrade resulted in a 10x increase in signal, a dramatic decrease in production cost, and significant improvement in the durability of reagents6,7.
In the protocol, we describe the utilization of a third generation HCR whole-mount RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (HCR RNA WM-FISH) method designed for detecting the spatial localization and expression of any gene8,9. This two-step method first utilizes nucleic acid probes specific for the mRNA of interest, but which also contain an initiator recognition sequence; the second step utilizes fluorophore-tagged hairpins which bind to the initiator sequence to amplify the fluorescent signal (Figure 1). This method also allows for the multiplexing of two or more RNA probes and amplifying probe signals to facilitate RNA detection and quantification8. Visualizing the transcript abundance and RNA localization patterns of chemosensory genes expressed in the olfactory appendages offers the first line of insight into chemosensory gene functions and odor coding.
1. Considerations and preparation of materials
2. Tissue pre-fixation
3. Tissue dissection
4. Tissue post-fixation
5. Probe hybridization
6. Probe amplification
7. Mounting tissue sample
Robust detection of chemosensory genes in Anopheles antenna
We investigated the sensitivity of the HCR FISH method (Figure 1) to detect the expression of chemosensory receptors in mosquito olfactory tissues. Guided by the RNA transcript data reported earlier on the female Anopheles mosquito antenna, we generated probes to target a variety of IRs. The average transcript values from four independent antennal transcriptome studies revealed that Ir41t.1 (11 RPKM), Ir75d (12 RPKM), and Ir7t (13 RPKM) were less abundant in the antenna compared to co-receptors Ir25a (197 RPKM) and Ir76b (193 RPKM)5,11,12,13,14. We generated probes to target Ir41t.1, Ir75d, and Ir7t. IR64a (31 RPKM) was also targeted given its transcript level is approximately 3x more abundant than the lowest transcript value among the candidate genes of interest. It must be noted here that RPKM values from transcriptomics studies represent a bulk measurement of transcripts from the entire antenna. As such, it could be that only a few neurons highly express an IR gene transcript, or it could be that an IR gene is lowly expressed across many cells. RPKM values may therefore not necessarily correspond to the abundance level of an IR within a neuron. In addition, the signal amplification afforded by the HCR method might also make it difficult to use this method to accurately gauge neuronal transcript levels based on fluorescent signals. Our recent publication discussed these concepts in more detail5. Data suggests that HCR WM-FISH is highly sensitive to detecting mRNA transcripts from antennal tissues as shown in Figure 2.
Multiplexed co-labeling of different RNA targets in chemosensory appendages
To examine the co-localization of RNA targets, we generated probes conjugated to different fluorophores. Double in situ hybridization targeting transcripts of the Odorant receptor co-receptor gene (Orco) and the most broadly expressed ionotropic receptor co-receptor gene (Ir25a) revealed colocalization of these distinct chemosensory receptor families in a subset of cell populations in the antenna (Figure 3A) and maxillary palp (Figure 3B). We also investigated the colocalization of transcripts of three IR-coreceptor genes (Ir8a, Ir25a, and Ir76b). Colocalization patterns suggest that Ir76b-positive cells express Ir25a, whereas Ir8a-positive cells partially co-localize with Ir76b and Ir25a (Figure 4). The co-expression analysis of the IR-coreceptors demonstrates the robustness of using HCR WM-FISH for multiplexed studies.
Figure 1: Schematic of the in situ hybridization chain reaction. This method works in two steps: detection and amplification. A probe set for in situ hybridization chain reaction comprises a split initiator and a nucleic acid sequence specific to the RNA target. Multiple pairs of probe sets can be designed to hybridize several regions in the RNA target; this defines the detection step. The amplification step requires fluorophore-tagged hairpins (h1 and h2) to bind specifically to the initiator conjugated to a probe set. Upon binding, the RNA signal labeled by the fluorophore is amplified by repeated binding of fluorophore-tagged hairpins. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: RNA localization of IR chemosensory genes. HCR WM-FISH of female Anopheles coluzzii antennae to target IRs. RNA probes include (A) IR41t.1, (B) IR75d, (C) IR7t, and (D) IR64a. The insets in white dashed boxes are magnified images from the tissue. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Double in situ co-localization of chemosensory genes in the antenna and maxillary palp. Confocal Z-stack images of cells expressing Ir25a (green) and Orco (magenta) in the (A) antenna and (B) maxillary palp of female Anopheles coluzzii mosquitoes. The insets in white dashed boxes are magnified images from the tissue. The scale is 10 µm. Figure 3B has been modified from15. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Mapping the spatial colocalization of multiple RNA targets. In situ images showing colocalization patterns of three IR coreceptors, IR25a (magenta), IR8a (green), and IR76b (blue) in the mosquito antenna. White arrows point to cells that express the three IR coreceptors (IR25a, IR8a, and IR76b). The scale is 20 µm. This figure has been modified from5. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: Reagents for in situ hybridization chain reaction. Reagents needed to perform hybridization chain reaction whole-mount fluorescent in situ hybridization. Please click here to download this Table.
The third generation of hybridization chain reaction (HCR) is remarkable for its sensitivity and robustness to visualize several RNA targets8. HCR WM-FISH has been successfully used on the embryos of Drosophila, chicken, mice, and zebrafish as well as the larvae of nematodes and zebrafish10,16,17. Mosquito antennae and maxillary palps are typically prone to high autofluorescence and weak probe penetration which are particularly challenging when conducting traditional whole-mount in situ methods. These drawbacks have been diminished by the signal amplification step integrated into the HCR protocol which improves the signal-to-background ratio and allows for the detection of olfactory chemoreceptor mRNA transcripts (Figure 2). The HCR protocol design ensures that the initiating probes are tethered to the amplification polymers which allows for imaging RNA targets with low signal. In the multiplexed set-up, different orthogonal HCR amplifiers were tethered to spectrally unique fluorophores. This approach was critical to avoid spectral bleed-through from a neighboring imaging channel.
To optimize the HCR method for use with mosquito appendages, we made several observations. The HCR amplifiers are light-sensitive and should always be stored in a box in a -20 ˚ C freezer. In our experience, extensive incubation of tissues in CCD buffer, proteinase K, or short fixation time in paraformaldehyde could result in breakage of antennae or palps during the wash steps. Antennae and maxillary palps should also always be grabbed by the base to avoid breakage. At the early stage of adapting this protocol, we consistently lost tissues during the series of buffer exchanges (steps 5 and 6). To minimize such losses, the number of tissues were doubled at the start of the experiment, wash steps and buffer exchanges were performed under the microscope, and gel loading tips no wider than 0.5 mm were used to remove the buffers from the tissues.
The HCR WM-FISH has been successful in peripheral olfactory appendages of Anopheles gambiae5,15 and Aedes aegypti4,18 mosquito vectors, and the protocol could further be optimized and adapted to other insect tissue parts or different animals. The original protocol designed by the manufacturer does not incorporate incubation in CCD buffer. This step was integrated into the protocol to digest and permeabilize the chitinous cuticle. We extended the incubation time in the probe sets for two nights to give more time for probe penetration, a modification of the manufacturer's protocol that recommends a 16 h incubation time that works well for generic samples on a slide. Optimization of this protocol for other insect tissue parts would require varying the incubation time in the CCD buffer; peripheral tissue parts with thick cuticles will likely require extended incubation time. The concentration of proteinase K must also be experimentally adjusted while adapting this protocol for different tissue or developmental stages of animals. When working with tissues thicker than 5 mm, probe penetration becomes a challenge. In such a situation, additional efforts are needed to perform tissue cryosection or further alter the protocol described in this study.
HCR WM-FISH is limited to simultaneously visualizing only a few gene targets at a time compared to spatial transcriptomics which could potentially allow the simultaneous imaging of thousands of genes19. Commercial synthesis of RNA probes is expensive; the alternative would be to produce the probes and amplifiers in the laboratory, but this can be challenging for most groups and is labor-intensive and time-consuming. This protocol is also limited by difficulties encountered by RNA probe penetration through whole-mount thick samples, which could require alternations to the protocol (e.g., step 2 tissue preparation) or sectioning of the intact tissue. If the HCR WM-FISH method described here fails to detect an RNA transcript in an olfactory appendage, the gene might be expressed in only a few cells and require extensive surveying of the tissue, is possibly not transcribed, or might be transcribed at a level below the detection limit of this method. Quantitative RT-PCR or RNA seq could be performed to validate such findings.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Margo Herre and the Leslie Vosshall lab for sharing their in-situ hybridization protocol for Aedes aegypti olfactory appendages. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health to C.J.P. (NIAID R01Al137078), a HHMI Hanna Gray fellowship to J.I.R, a Johns Hopkins Postdoctoral Accelerator Award to J.I.R, and a Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship to J.I.R. We thank the Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute and Bloomberg Philanthropies for their support.
Amplification buffer | Molecular Instruments | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | In Situ Hybridization + Immunofluorescence | 50 mL |
Calcium Chloride (CaCl2) 1M | Sigma-Aldrich | 21115-100ML | |
Chitinase | Sigma-Aldrich | C6137-50UN | |
Chymotrypsin | Sigma-Aldrich | CHY5S-10VL | |
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) | Sigma-Aldrich | 472301 | |
Eppendorf tube | VWR | 20901-551 | 1.5 mL |
Forceps | Dumont | 11251 | Number 5 |
Gel loading tip | Costar | 4853 | 1-200 µL tip |
Hairpins | Molecular Instruments | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | In Situ Hybridization + Immunofluorescence | h1 and h2 initiator splits |
HEPES (1M) | Sigma-Aldrich | H0887 | |
IR25a probe | Molecular Instruments | Probe Set ID: PRK149 | AGAP010272 |
IR41t.1 probe | Molecular Instruments | Probe Set ID: PRK978 | AGAP004432 |
IR64a probe | Molecular Instruments | Probe Set ID: PRK700 | AGAP004923 |
IR75d probe | Molecular Instruments | Probe Set ID: PRK976 | AGAP004969 |
IR76b probe | Molecular Instruments | Probe Set ID: PRI998 | AGAP011968 |
IR7t probe | Molecular Instruments | Probe Set ID: PRL355 | AGAP002763 |
IR8a probe | Molecular Instruments | Probe Set ID: PRK150 | AGAP010411 |
LoBind Tubes | VWR | 80077-236 | 0.5 mL DNA/RNA LoBind Tubes |
Magnessium Chloride (MgCl2) 1M | Thermo Fisher | AM9530G | |
Methanol | Fisher | A412-500 | |
Nuclease-free water | Thermo Fisher | 43-879-36 | |
Nutator | Denville Scientific | Model 135 | 3-D Mini rocker |
Orco probe | Molecular Instruments | Probe set ID PRD954 | AGAP002560 |
Paraformaldehyde (20% ) | Electron Microscopy Services | 15713-S | |
Phosphate Buffered Saline (10X PBS) | Thermo Fisher | AM9625 | |
Probe hybridization buffer | Molecular Instruments | https://www.molecularinstruments.com/ | 50 mL |
Probe wash buffer | Molecular Instruments | Molecular Instruments, Inc. | In Situ Hybridization + Immunofluorescence | 100 mL |
Proteinase-K | Thermo Fisher | AM2548 | |
Saline-Sodium Citrate (SSC) 20x | Thermo Fisher | 15-557-044 | |
SlowFade Diamond | Thermo Fisher | S36972 | mounting solution |
Sodium Chloride (NaCl) 5M | Invitrogen | AM9760G | |
Triton X-100 (10%) | Sigma-Aldrich | 93443 | |
Tween-20 (10% ) | Teknova | T0027 | |
Watch glass | Carolina | 742300 | 1 5/8" square; transparent |