Short session (≤10 min) high intensity interval training (HIIT) is emerging as an alternative to longer exercise modalities, yet the shorter variants are rarely modeled in animal studies. Here, we describe a 10 min, 3 day a week, uphill treadmill HIIT protocol that enhances physical performance in male and female aged mice.
High intensity interval training (HIIT) is emerging as a therapeutic approach to prevent, delay, or ameliorate frailty. In particular short session HIIT, with regimens less than or equal to 10 min is of particular interest as several human studies feature routines as short as a few minutes a couple times a week. However, there is a paucity of animal studies that model the impacts of short session HIIT. Here, we describe a methodology for an individually tailored and progressive short session HIIT regimen of 10 min given 3 days a week for aged mice using an inclined treadmill. Our methodology also includes protocols for treadmill assessment. Mice are initially acclimatized to the treadmill and then given baseline flat and uphill treadmill assessments. Exercise sessions begin with a 3 min warm-up, then three intervals of 1 min at a fast pace, followed by 1 min at an active recovery pace. Following these intervals, the mice are given a final segment that starts at the fast pace and accelerates for 1 min. The HIIT protocol is individually tailored as the speed and intensity for each mouse are determined based upon initial anaerobic assessment scores. Additionally, we detail the conditions for increasing or decreasing the intensity for individual mice depending on performance. Finally, intensity is increased for all mice every two weeks. We previously reported in this protocol enhanced physical performance in aged male mice and here show it also increases treadmill performance in aged female mice. Advantages of our protocol include low administration time (about 15 min per 6 mice, 3 days a week), strategy for individualizing for mice to better model prescribed exercise, and a modular design that allows for the addition or removal of the number and length of intervals to titrate exercise benefits.
Regular exercise is effective at preventing or delaying many age-associated diseases such as sarcopenia and frailty1,2,3,4. However, less than 15% of those 65 and older meet recommendations of 150 min a week of moderate intensity exercise plus strength
training5,6. As the lack of time and lengthy sessions are common barriers to exercise, high intensity interval training (HIIT) is emerging as an alternative to traditional regimens. HIIT features multiple short bursts of intense activity that are interspersed with brief periods of active recovery, and there has been recent interest in identifying the shortest regimens that still yield beneficial outcomes. Such studies include 3 day a week regimens featuring total session times of 4 min7, 2-3 min8, 1.5 min9, a single min10, and even 40 s11.
Likewise, there has been substantial interest in HIIT animal models. A majority of studies used mice12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 or rats22,23,24,25 and were performed using a treadmill, although a few others used swimming protocols26,27,28. A majority of these studies use VO2max to set the initial intensity of the exercise13,14,19,21,24. Additionally, although an often described benefit of HIIT is having shorter regimens, almost all of these identified studies feature regimens that last 30 min or longer11,12,13,14,15,18,19,21, with the exception of one with a slightly longer than 10 min regimen20, and another with 19 min across three different intensities16. To our knowledge, there are no reported animal studies that examine a 10 min or less HIIT regimen, or tailor the regimen to individual animals, with the exception of our published study17 that serves as the basis for this protocol.
Here, we describe a protocol for HIIT in aged mice designed to model individualized, short session (≤10 min) variants used recently in human studies7,8,9,10,11. The method includes a 10 min regimen on an inclined (25°) treadmill with a 3 min warm up, and four 1 min intervals at high intensity, interspersed with three 1 min active recovery segments. Advantages of the protocol include greater clinical relevance as it features strategies for tailoring intensity to individual animals, setting intensities that are not based on VO2max, thereby avoiding the need for metabolic treadmills, and modular design whereby the number of intervals and timings are easily adjustable. Additionally, within this protocol we provide instructions for two strategies for treadmill assessment, which include flat continuous and uphill interval, to examine endurance. Using these methods, we extend our previous findings that short session HIIT increased functional capacity in aged male mice17, and now demonstrate HIIT increases treadmill performance in aged female mice.
All studies and experimental protocols were approved by and in compliance with guidelines of the University at Buffalo and VA Western New York Animal Care and Use Committees.
1. Experiment Setup and General Advice
NOTE: A total of twenty-four female mice on a C57BL/6J background were used in this protocol starting at 23 months of age. The mice carried a conditional SIRTloxp-exon4-loxp mutation29, however, this was not induced in this experiment.
2. Acclimatizing Mice to Treadmill Apparatus
NOTE: Initiate acclimatization of mice 1 month prior to baseline experiments.
3. Flat Continuous Treadmill Assessment
4. Uphill Interval Treadmill Assessment
5. Short session High Intensity Interval Training
A total of twenty-five female mice were bred and aged in house. The C57BL/6J background mice carried a SIRT1loxp-exon4-loxp mutation29; however, this conditional knockout was not induced and therefore all mice exhibited full length Sirtuin1 (data not shown). At 24 months of age, mice were assessed for treadmill endurance and uphill sprint capacity prior to and after the administration of two months of HIIT exercise (n = 14), or remaining cage sedentary (n = 11). Our data show all 14 mice in the HIIT group increased treadmill time on belt compared to 7 of 11 of the SED mice (Figure 4A, paired student's T-Test p < 0.0001 for HIIT and p < 0.14 for SED). In total HIIT mice exhibited greater improvement in time on belt based on the better of two trials (HIIT: 18.2 ± 10.5 min to 31.8 ± 13.7 min, delta 13.6 ± 7.5 min versus SED: 19.9 ± 10.0 min to 25.3 ± 7.3 min, delta 5.3 ± 11.4 min, unpaired student's T-test p < 0.0391).
Additionally, we detected greater increase in uphill treadmill capacity as 12 of 14 HIIT mice increased maximal speed while we observed decline in 8 of 11 SED mice (Figure 4B, paired student's T-Test p < 0.0022 for HIIT and p < 0.85 for SED). HIIT mice also demonstrated greater improvement in maximal speed compared to SED mice based on the better of two trials (HIIT: 14.6 ± 4.3 m/min to 17.6 ± 5.5 m/min, delta 3.0 ± 3.0 m/min versus SED: 16.9 ± 3.8 m/min to 16.5 ± 5.0 m/min, delta 0.5 ± 5.0 m/min, unpaired student's T-test p = 0.0441). Shock tolerance was similar between the two groups of mice (Shock to grid visit ratio baseline – SED: 1.2 ± 0.1 versus HIIT: 1.4 ± 0.4, p=0.24; endpoint – SED: 1.2 ± 0.4 versus HIIT: 1.3 ± 0.4, p=0.46).
Figure 1: Treadmill software manual mode parameters for treadmill endurance assessment. The treadmill software manual mode allows adjustment for protocols involving continuous belt acceleration. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Treadmill software profile mode program parameters for uphill sprint assessment. The treadmill software profile mode, used in conjunction with the options on the manual mode tab (Figure 1), allows the ability to create protocols with custom speed intervals. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: High Intensity Interval Training regimen schematic. Base, Sprint, and Dash speeds are indicated in Table 3. Speeds increase by 1 m/min every two weeks. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4. Impacts of HIIT on treadmill performance in aged mice. Twenty-four month old female mice were given HIIT (n=14) or remained sedentary (SED, n=11) for 2 months. Treadmill endurance (A) was assessed before and after the exercise intervention as a best of two trials given on consecutive days on a flat treadmill. Uphill sprint capacity (B) was assessed as the best of two trials administered with no less than 30 min of rest on an inclined (25°) treadmill. Lines indicate individual mice. B is baseline and E is endpoint, *** indicate a p-value < 0.001 and **** indicates p < 0.0001 as determined by a paired student's T-test comparing within group change between baseline and endpoint. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: Program parameters for treadmill endurance acclimatization and assessment.
Program parameter | Acclimation | Assessment |
Interval | 1 | 0.5 |
Duration | 5 | 90 |
Enable Profile Mode | Unchecked | Unchecked |
Accel Step | 1.0 m/min | 1 m/min |
Accel Int | 60 seconds | 120 seconds |
Max Speed | 10 m/min | 35 m/min |
S_speed | 5 m/min | 5 m/min |
Shock Rep Rate | 1 hz | 1 hz |
Shock Intensity | 1 then 2 | 3 |
Table 2: Program parameters for uphill sprint acclimatization and assessment.
Program parameter | Acclimation | Assessment |
Interval | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Duration | 10 | 90 |
Enable Profile Mode | Checked | Checked |
Accel Step | N/A | N/A |
Accel Int | N/A | N/A |
Max Speed | 15 m/min | 35 m/min |
S_speed | 5 m/min | 5 m/min |
Shock Rep Rate | 1 hz | 1 hz |
Shock Intensity | 2 | 3 |
PROFILE MODE (Refer to Figures 1 and 2 to set up program parameters) | ||
Test intervals | 8, 10, 10, 10 m/min | 6, 8, 10, 11, 12 … 51, 52 m/min |
Table 3: Intensity designations for HIIT exercise mice.
Intensity Group | Baseline Uphill Sprint Score | Initial Exercise Speeds | ||
Base | Sprint | Dash | ||
0 | < 8 m/min | 5 m/min | 7 m/min | 10 m/min |
1 | 8-16 m/min | 5 m/min | 10 m/min | 15 m/min |
2 | 17-25 m/min | 8 m/min | 13 m/min | 18 m/min |
3 | >25 m/min | 11 m/min | 16 m/min | 21 m/min |
Benefits from short sessions are a key aspect of high intensity interval training that captures scientific and public interest. However, animal studies rarely investigate HIIT regimens that are 10 min or less. Here, we describe a protocol for a 10 min short session HIIT uphill treadmill exercise regimen that enhanced treadmill performance in aged female mice and which we previously have shown to increase physical performance in aged male mice17. A strength of our protocol is that in addition to the protocol being only 10 min in length, the design is modular such that the number of intervals can be added or removed to make protocols that are even one min in length. Additionally, the length of the intervals can be modified providing multiple strategies to titrate exercise and evaluate the impacts.
Another strength of this protocol is that we include a system to tailor the exercise regimen to the physical capabilities of individual mice, which to our knowledge only one other study33 aside from our report in aged male mice17 has used. Although individually tailoring an exercise intervention introduces variability into the experimental design, an important advantage of this method is that it better models the administration of prescribed exercise in human clinical settings. Furthermore, animals do not train at intensities that are too easy or difficult, which could be a significant factor in experiments where the animal population exhibits diversity in exercise capacity (i.e. during aging). One other advantage of this methodology is that it does not require the use of metabolic treadmills to determine VO2max as the exercise intensity is tailored to the performance of the animal, a concept that is further examined by Picoli et al.34.
This protocol includes two assessments for treadmill performance, in the form of a slowly accelerating flat treadmill test and an inclined treadmill incrementing interval test, respectively. There are multiple protocols that have been published for determining continuous treadmill performance in mice using treadmills16,34,35, including a JoVE article36. Multiple parameters differ across these studies and across the literature, including: inclination (usually 0° or 5° for endurance testing), shock intensity (ranging from 0.25-1.12 mA), and rules for defining exhaustion. It was also noticed that 5 consecutive shocks were commonly used to define exhaustion across multiple studies. Although this strategy may induce greater exhaustion than the rules we have used in our study and this protocol, this system also assumes all mice have similar pain thresholds, which may not be true depending on experimental conditions. Our definition of exhaustion of 10 visits or 20 total shocks provides a framework to assess if there are different pain thresholds. Ultimately, there are advantages and disadvantages to both strategies and the decision for defining the endpoint should be best aligned with the goals of the study. Additionally, some treadmill assessment protocols for mice have been designed without the use of shocks as a stimulus37. Although there are advantages to this approach37, some drawbacks to consider include the use of a determination of exhaustion that is subjective and the potential difficulty of assessing multiple mice simultaneously.
Additionally, others have used work and power as parameters to describe treadmill performance35,38,39. The speed of the belt and rate of acceleration are also diversely represented in the literature. As most protocols feature increasing speed, the result will yield a blend of aerobic and anaerobic capacity in the mouse, with slower protocols providing more focus on the aerobic component. We therefore designed our uphill treadmill interval test to provide greater focus on the anaerobic component17. To achieve this, our protocol features short test intervals with active recovery between tests, allowing for mice to achieve higher speeds and therefore greater anaerobic utilization relative to our flat continuous treadmill endurance assessment. For our protocol we used an active recovery period of 20 s between intervals, the half time for reoxygenation of muscle tissue in human tissue40. However, we note a limitation of this method is that the specific impacts on anaerobic metabolism have yet to be elucidated, and including an examination of anaerobic parameters such as glycolytic metabolism, phosphocreatine utilization, and lactate kinetics would strengthen this method. In addition, new studies that investigate the impacts of changing stage and active rest durations, inclination, and different speed increments would also strengthen this method.
The methodology described in this protocol, including the two treadmill assessments, are designed for older animals in particular, and as such includes greater time for acclimation of mice to the protocols. Proper acclimation is a critical step to experimental design to ensure endpoints are due to exhaustion and not insufficient learning by the mouse. Improper acclimation is likely apparent in longitudinal studies – yet, importantly, may not be noticed in crosssectional studies. Although, shorter acclimation protocols might be possible for younger cohorts, in our experience older mice require greater acclimation and a published protocol for exercise training in aged rats initiates acclimation 1 month prior with 10 total days given for treadmill acclimatization41. However, we agree with Castro et al. that providing excessive acclimation may impact the behavior of and impacts on the mice35 and his recommendation of 3 to 10 days total35, for which our acclimatization protocol is in line with these recommendations. Furthermore, older animals also exhibit greater diversity in exercise performance and for this reason we include two trials per assessment time point. Younger animals display greater homogeneity in performance and therefore a single trial may be sufficient. Furthermore, the diversity of aged animals may make direct cross-sectional comparisons of an intervention difficult to interpret, and more success may be achieved by comparing the change from baseline as was done in the analysis of the aged female mice. We also indicate as a caveat that we have not tested our short session HIIT protocol in younger mice, where it is possible a ceiling effect in performance may mask the benefits of our short session HIIT protocol. The protocol was also used only in the C57BL/6J mouse strain, and therefore the impact of this exercise in other mouse strains remains to be elucidated. Additionally, the C57BL6/J mice used in this experiment carried a SIRT1loxp-exon4-loxp mutation29, that was not induced. These mice were aged in house from birth; however, insufficient numbers were available at 24 months of age to power 4 groups. We therefore focused the experiment on just HIIT and sedentary groups. We note that both the present cohort of aged female mice and our previously published cohort of aged male mice17 both improved in physical performance using this short session HIIT protocol.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We wish to thank the animal care personnel at the University at Buffalo Animal Laboratory Animal Facility. This research was supported by a Veteran Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Grant RX001066 and the Indian Trail Foundation.
Exer-3/6 Open Treadmill w/ Shock, Detection, auto-calibration and PC Interface/Software | Columbus Instruments | 1055-SDRM | The Columbus Instruments 3/6 treadmill allow up to 6 mice or 3 rats simultaneously. The device comes with controllers to allow manual control of treadmill belt speed and shock intensity, or connections to a computer and software to run and control these elements. |
Bleach | Varies | Varies | 0.25-0.5% Bleach solution (V/V) is used to clean the treadmill belt between sessions |
Ethanol | Varies | Varies | 70% ethanol solution (V/V) can alternatively be used to clean treadmill belt between runs and sesions. |
Make-up Brush (large) | Varies | Varies | A make-up brush provides a soft surface and ample length to motivate mice to continue exercise. |