The efficacy of intramuscular uptake and retrograde transport of molecules to corresponding motor neurons depends on the location of the injection sites with respect to the motor end plates (MEPs). Here, we describe how to locate MEPs on skeletal muscles to optimise retrograde transport of tracers into motor neurons.
Diseases affecting the integrity of spinal cord motor neurons are amongst the most debilitating neurological conditions. Over the last decades, the development of several animal models of these neuromuscular disorders has provided the scientific community with different therapeutic scenarios aimed at delaying or reversing the progression of these conditions. By taking advantage of the retrograde machinery of neurons, one of these approaches has been to target skeletal muscles in order to shuttle therapeutic genes into corresponding spinal cord motor neurons. Although once promising, the success of such gene delivery approach has been hampered by the sub-optimal number of transduced motor neurons it has so far shown to yield. Motor end plates (MEPs) are highly specialized regions on the skeletal musculature that are in direct synaptic contact to the spinal cord α motor neurons. In this regard, it is important to note that, so far, the efforts to retrogradely transfer genes into motor neurons were made without reference to the location of the MEP region in the targeted muscles. Here, we describe a simple protocol 1) to reveal the exact location of the MEPs on the surface of skeletal muscles and 2) to use this information to guide the intramuscular delivery and subsequent optimal retrograde transport of retrograde tracers into motor neurons. We hope to utilize the results from these tracing experiments in further studies into investigating retrograde transport of therapeutic genes to spinal cord motor neurons through the targeting of MEPs.
The loss of control of voluntary movement that results from neurological conditions such as motor neuron disease and spinal- as well as Duchenne muscular atrophy is a debilitating condition that has high and long lasting impact on the every day life of affected individuals. Over the last decade, research efforts aiming to stop or at least delay the deleterious effects of these neuromuscular diseases has been a priority for many clinicians and scientist around the world. In this regard, the recent generation of animal models that mimic these neuromuscular diseases has been instrumental in obtaining fundamental insights into the physiological mechanisms underlying the development and progression of these conditions 1-13. Treatment of these neuromuscular disease requires direct access to the spinal cord and can be achieved by spinal cord injections 14,15. Recent advances in gene therapy have also targeted the striated muscles of the upper and lower limbs to shuttle therapeutic genes to the corresponding α motor neurons that are located within the ventral horn of the spinal cord 1,9-13. However, this once promising strategy has failed to improve the outcome of these neurological conditions. While it is fair to conclude that these poor outcomes could be, at least partly, be attributable to the low efficacy of these protective genes, one cannot exclude the low efficacy of these gene delivery methods.
Motor end plates (MEPs) are specialized regions of the skeletal myofibres that are indented by the axon terminals of large peripheral motor fibres originating from α motor neurons. Together, the peripheral nerve fibre endings and the MEPs form the neuromuscular junction, i.e., the site where synaptic impulses are triggered by the anterograde release of the neurotransmitter, acetylcholine. Importantly, the relationship between peripheral nerve fibres and the MEPs is bi-directional, although different motors are responsible for the transport of molecules and organelles towards as well as away from the neuron somata 16-18. In light of these anatomical considerations, MEPs appear to be the targets of choice for the delivery and subsequent retrograde transport of genetic material to the corresponding motor neurons. In this context, it is not surprising that the success of motor neuron transduction greatly depends on the distance between the intramuscular injection of viral vectors and the muscle’s MEPs 19-20. Surprisingly, however, the exact location of the MEP zones on the myofibres of the laboratory rat and mouse, the two species of choice to model neuromuscular diseases, were not available until recently.
We have produced comprehensive maps of the MEP region for several forelimb muscles in the rat and the mouse 21-22. More recently, we have shown the details of the organization of the MEP region for several muscles of the mouse hindlimb 23 and we are currently analysing the features of the MEPs on the rat hindlimb. In our hands, intramuscular injections of retrograde tracers directed to the entire MEP zones in these muscles gave rise to more labelled motor neurons that are spanning more spinal cord segments than previously reported. Here we present the protocol that has been developed over the last few years to reveal the location of the MEPs on the external surface as well as throughout the depth of hindlimb and forelimb muscles in both the mouse and the rat.
All experimental procedures described here complied with the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of UNSW Australia and were performed in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia regulations for animal experimentation. All procedures in this protocol should be performed in accordance with the requirement of the relevant Animal Care and Ethics Committee.
1. Acetylcholinesterase Histochemical Staining
2. Intramuscular Injections at the Motor End Plates
3. Perfusions
4. Cervical Spinal Cord Dissection and Preparation for Histology
5. Lumbar Spinal Cord Dissection and Preparation for Histology
Acetylcholinesterase histochemical staining reveals the location of the motor end plates across the width of the muscles. Figure 1 illustrates the results of such staining performed on a whole rat forelimb. It is suggested to optimise the concentration of the ammonium sulphide solution (e.g., 5-7% instead of 10%) as well as the time the specimen is immersed in the solution if the non-specific background staining on the muscles fibres is too excessive. Figure 2 illustrates a column of labelled motor neurons in the cervical spinal cord after an injection of retrograde neuronal tracer along the length of the motor end plate region of a mouse triceps brachii muscle. The retrogradely labelled motor neurons typically form a longitudinal column that extends across multiple segments of the spinal cord. Figure 3 illustrates the different numbers of labelled spinal cord motor neurons that was obtained through selective Fluoro-Gold targeting of the motor end plate region in triceps brachii. Maximal uptake was observed following delivery into the entire span of the MEP region, as opposed to targeting specific compartments of the MEP region.
Figure 1: View of the Lateral Forelimb of the Rat after Acetylcholinesterase Histochemical Staining for the Motor End Plates before (A) and after (B) Exposure to the Ammonium Sulphide Solution. In (A), the motor end plates are apparent as white speckled dots that form a continuous line that crosses the entire width of the muscle while the muscle fibres adopt a green-blue hue. In (B), the same forelimb is presented after immersion in the ammonium sulphide solution. After development in the ammonium sulphide solution, the motor end plates turn black over the brown muscle fibres. The arrows in both parts of the figures point to the location of the motor end plates for (1) Acromiotrapezius, (2) Spinodeltoideus and (3) Triceps Brachii.
Figure 2: Photomicrographs of 50 µm Longitudinal Section through the Ventral Horn of the Spinal Cord at Cervical Levels Revealing Fluoro-Gold-labelled Motor Neurons. WM represents the white matter and GM represents the grey matter of the spinal cord. The dashed line indicates the boundary between the grey and white matter within the spinal cord section observed in the figure. The photomicrograph was taken with a 10X objective under the DAPI filter whereas the inset was taken with the 20X objective under the same filter. In both panels, Fluoro-Gold labelling can be observed in the motor neuron cytoplasm as well as proximal axon/dendritic processes. Figure as originally published in Tosolini et al. (2013) Targeting the Full Length of the Motor End Plate Regions in the Mouse Forelimb Increases the Uptake of Fluoro-Gold into Corresponding Spinal Cord Motor Neurons Front. Neurol. 4:58. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00058
Figure 3: Selective Fluoro-Gold Targeting of the Motor End Plate Region in the Triceps Brachii and the Resulting Labelling in the Spinal Cord Motor Neurons. (A) is a schematic representation of the location of the motor end plates on triceps brachii fibres. The three different sections of the MEP region that were targeted individually are represented by the green, red and blue dots. The green and red dots represent the anterior and posterior halves of the entire MEP region respectively, whilst the blue dots represent the location of the bolus injection of FG into the belly of the muscle. The double-headed arrow orientates the muscle in an anterior-posterior axis. (B) is a composite diagram illustrating the labelling obtained following selective targeting of the different sections of the MEP region of the triceps brachii, as indicated in (A). Each dot in (B) represents a single labelled motor neuron. The black column is representative of typical labelling observed following injection of FG into the entire span of the MEP region of the muscle. The red motor neuron column is obtained following FG injections into the posterior half of the muscle, whilst the green motor neuron column is obtained following FG injections into the anterior half of the muscle. Injections restricted to the “belly” of the muscle yielded motor neurons in only a small number of spinal cord segments, as demonstrated by the blue column. Figure as originally published in Tosolini et al. (2013) Targeting the Full Length of the Motor End Plate Regions in the Mouse Forelimb Increases the Uptake of Fluoro-Gold into Corresponding Spinal Cord Motor Neurons Front. Neurol. 4:58. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00058
Intramuscular targeting and subsequent retrograde transfer of therapeutic transgenes to the corresponding α motor neurons for the experimental treatment of neuromuscular condition is not a new strategy. For instance, this delivery method has been used to delay neuromuscular degeneration at different stages of the ALS progression in SOD1 mice and rats 1,9-12 as well as in mice with SMA 13. Whilst promising, the efficacy of these gene therapy scenarios has been limited. In this regard, we propose that the uptake of the transgenes by spinal cord motor neurons could be improved by the selective targeting of the motor end plates on the muscle fibres. It is important to note that, in the above-mentioned studies, the intramuscular injections of viral vectors were performed without reference to the location of the MEP region in the targeted muscles.
Throughout our analyses of the distribution of the motor end plates (MEPs) of the hindlimb and the forelimb, a few principles have emerged. First, the MEP region spans across the entire width of a muscle. Moreover, the MEPs are consistently aligned orthogonally with regards to the direction of the myofibres. Notably, the MEP region is not always located within the thickest portion of the muscle, an area often referred to as the ‘belly’ and that is often the target of bolus intramuscular injections. It is worth noting that the current analyses were conducted on C57Bl6 mouse 22-23 and the Long Evans rat 21 and it was found that the distribution of the MEPs is conserved within each of these two strains of animals. However, whether or not the MEP distribution is conserved between different strains of animals within the same species remains to be documented.
Originally, we have documented the location of the MEP region for several muscles of the forelimb and hindlimb in order to guide small, multiple intramuscular injections of the retrograde neuronal tracer Fluoro-Gold. These MEP maps can be used to shuttle transgenes into motor neurons. In such instance, however, it is important to adjust the volumes of injections according to the type of virus used (e.g., adenovirus, lentivirus, etc.) its serotype as well as its titre. Keeping the fascia intact is a good way to keep the virus confined within the limits of the muscle(s) of interest. Another way to avoid spurious transfection of motor neurons innervating neighbour muscles is to wipe the surface of the muscle gently after the injections. These precautions might be irrelevant in some experimental designs where achieving high levels of transduction could be more relevant than containing it within the pool of motor neurons supplying the targeted muscle. Nevertheless, they are good practice for obvious safety reasons. If more than one isolated muscles need to be injected, it might be wise, if possible, to select a group of muscles that are close to each other to minimize the size of the skin incision. Rats and mice have very loose skin (i.e., not attached to the muscles), so it is relatively easy to target several muscles without having to perform huge skin incisions.
Effective gene therapy for ALS and other neuromuscular conditions using the retrograde machinery of neurons remains a challenge as, ideally, such therapy would transfer beneficial genes across the entire population of spinal cord motor neurons. However, it is not necessary to target all motor neurons to achieve sustainable levels of transduction if the therapeutic gene of interest is coding a secretory protein such as a neurotrophins. Indeed, non-transduced motor neurons in the vicinity of those that have been transduced have been shown to internalize exogenous molecules of neurotrophins through a paracrine mechanism 24. This ‘bystander effect’ greatly enhances the efficacy of intramuscular targeting to shuttle secretory protein-encoding genes into corresponding motor neurons. On the other hand, given the fact that the loss of respiratory control is the ultimate cause of death in ALS, intramuscular injections of therapeutic viral constructs could be performed in intercostal muscles 1 or intrapleurally 25 to protect the motor neurons involved in breathing. By describing a method to easily highlight the location and organization of the MEPs on skeletal muscles, the present protocol will prove to be a valuable tool to explore novel gene therapy strategies for neuromuscular dysfunctions. This protocol also provides a minimally invasive way to preserve the integrity of the neuromuscular junction in these lower motor neuron diseases.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by a National Health & Medical Research Centre (NHMRC) project grant to R.M.
Fluoro-Gold | Fluorochrome, LLC | Nil | Diluted to 5% |
Drummond PCR Micropipets 1-10µl | Drummond Scientific | 5-000-1001-X10 | accompanied with plungers |
Acetylthiocholine Iodide | Sigma Life Science | A5751-25G | |
Copper(II) Sulfate Anhydrous | Sigma-Aldrich | 61230-500G-F | |
Tissue-Tek O.C.T Compound | Sakura Finetek | 25608-930 | |
Glycine | Ajax Finechem | 1083-500G | |
Dextran, Tetramethylrhodamine and biotin | Life Technologies | D-3312 | Diliuted in distilled water |
Isothesia | Provet | ISOF00 | 1000mg/g Isoflurane inhalation vapour |
Autoclip 9mm Wound Clips | Texas Scientific Instruments, LLC | 205016 | |
Lethabarb Enthanasia Injection | Virbac (Australia) Pty Ltd. | LETHA450 | |
Formaldehyde Solution | Ajax Finechem | A809-2.5L PL | |
SuperFrost Plus glass slides | Menzel-Glaser | J1800AMNZ | |
Ammonium Sulphide | Sigma-Aldrich | A1952 | Diluted to 10% |
Marcain Spinal 0.5% (Bupivacaine hydrochloride) | Astrazenca | Diluted to 0.25% |