This protocol describes a high-throughput method of enzymatic hydrolysis that utilizes a microplate reader to measure and classify soil phosphorus as P monoesters, P diesters and inorganic P. Up to 96 samples can be measured at one time in a standard laboratory.
Many types of organic phosphorus (P) molecules exist in environmental samples1. Traditional P measurements do not detect these organic P compounds since they do not react with colorimetric reagents2,3. Enzymatic hydrolysis (EH) is an emerging method for accurately characterizing organic P forms in environmental samples4,5. This method is only trumped in accuracy by Phosphorus-31 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (31P-NMR) -a method that is expensive and requires specialized technical training6. We have adapted an enzymatic hydrolysis method capable of measuring three classes of phosphorus (monoester P, diester P and inorganic P) to a microplate reader system7. This method provides researchers with a fast, accurate, affordable and user-friendly means to measure P species in soils, sediments, manures and, if concentrated, aquatic samples. This is the only high-throughput method for measuring the forms and enzyme-lability of organic P that can be performed in a standard laboratory. The resulting data provides insight to scientists studying system nutrient content and eutrophication potential.
1. Phosphorus Extraction
2. Sample Extract pH Adjustment
3. Enzyme Stock Solution Preparation
4. P Calibration Curve and Controls
5. Sample + Enzyme Incubation
6. Colorimetric Measurement of Released and Background Inorganic P
7. Classification of P Compounds
8. Representative Results:
A quick visual inspection of the 96-well plate after the colorimetric chemistry will offer clues to whether or not the procedure was
performed correctly. The first thing to check is the level of liquid in each well by scanning the side profile of the plate. There should be exactly
275 μL of reagents in all wells. Next, visually inspect the color of triplicate sample wells and duplicate calibration wells. These technical replicate
should be the same shade of blue. Next apply the calibration curve to the two wells containing glucose-6 phosphate and verify they released all 10 nmol
of inorganic P. After total extracted P has been measured using ICP-OES or an alternative method, make sure the total P values calculated using this
protocol do not exceed the amount of P that was extracted.
Note: Careful data management in the spreadsheet will help guard against quantitative errors. You will be dealing with a lot of numbers at once, so creating a template will be time well-spent.
Figure 1. A 96-well plate showing results for 8 samples (rows A-H) and a calibration curve (columns 11 and 12). Controls are in column 10.
Color intensity increase between columns 1-3 and 4-6 is due to hydrolyzed monoester P compounds, between columns 4-6 and 7-9 is due to hydrolyzed diester
P compounds.
Figure 2. Distribution of P classes in a 0.25 M NaOH-0.05 M EDTA extract of a Vermont soil sample using high-throughput enzymatic hydrolysis. Error bars indicate standard deviation, n = 3.
By its very nature, a rapid method using small volumes requires great care. Therefore the most critical steps are those involving pipetting solutions onto the plate. Accurate, and most importantly, consistent pipette technique are essential for the success of this assay.
The NaOH-EDTA extraction will allow most of the P in many samples to be characterized into three classes: orthophosphate, monoester P and diester P. Soils, manures, sediments or any other environmental sample that contains NaOH-EDTA-extractable P can be characterized. P forms in environmental samples are not necessarily stable and this technique will ensure samples are characterized before samples are compromised without needing to employ an army of researchers.
This assay is especially suitable when a large number of samples are to be processed. The reagent needs and space requirements have been scaled down to a manageable level (e.g. 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes rather than 50 mL glass flasks). This adaptation also limits waste production.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank the USGS and the Vermont Water Resources and Lake Studies Center for providing funding.
Name of the reagent | Company | Catalogue number |
---|---|---|
NaOH | Sigma-Aldrich | S8045 |
EDTA | Sigma-Aldrich | EDS |
Glacial Acetic Acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 242853 |
Sodium Acetate | Sigma-Aldrich | S2889 |
Wheat Acid Phosphatase | Sigma-Aldrich | P3627 |
Potato Acid Phosphatase | Sigma-Aldrich | P1146 |
Nuclease P1 | Sigma-Aldrich | N8630 |
Potassium Phosphate | Sigma-Aldrich | P2222 |
Sigma-Aldrich | ||
Sigma-Aldrich | ||
Glucose-6 Phosphate | Sigma-Aldrich | G7250 |
SDS | Sigma-Aldrich | L4390 |
Ascorbic Acid | Sigma-Aldrich | A5960 |
TCA | Sigma-Aldrich | T9159 |
Ammonium Molybdate | Sigma-Aldrich | A1343 |
Sodium Citrate | Sigma-Aldrich | S1804 |
Sodium Arsenate | Sigma-Aldrich | S9663 |