This protocol describes a reporter assay to study the regulation of mRNA translation in single oocytes during in vitro maturation.
Events associated with oocyte nuclear maturation have been well described. However, much less is known about the molecular pathways and processes that take place in the cytoplasm in preparation for fertilization and acquisition of totipotency. During oocyte maturation, changes in gene expression depend exclusively on the translation and degradation of maternal messenger RNAs (mRNAs) rather than on transcription. Execution of the translational program, therefore, plays a key role in establishing oocyte developmental competence to sustain embryo development. This paper is part of a focus on defining the program of maternal mRNA translation that takes place during meiotic maturation and at the oocyte-to-zygote transition. In this method paper, a strategy is presented to study the regulation of translation of target mRNAs during in vitro oocyte maturation. Here, a Ypet reporter is fused to the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the gene of interest and then micro-injected into oocytes together with polyadenylated mRNA encoding for mCherry to control for injected volume. By using time-lapse microscopy to measure reporter accumulation, translation rates are calculated at different transitions during oocyte meiotic maturation. Here, the protocols for oocyte isolation and injection, time-lapse recording, and data analysis have been described, using the Ypet/interleukin-7 (IL-7)-3' UTR reporter as an example.
A fully-grown mammalian oocyte undergoes rapid changes in preparation for fertilization and acquisition of totipotency. These changes are essential to sustain embryonic development after fertilization. Although the events associated with nuclear maturation are relatively well described, much less is known about the molecular processes and pathways in the oocyte cytoplasm. During the final stages of oocyte maturation, oocytes are transcriptionally silent, and gene expression is entirely dependent on mRNA translation and degradation1,2. The synthesis of proteins critical for developmental competence, therefore, relies on a program of timed translation of long-lived mRNAs that have been synthesized earlier during oocyte growth1,3. As part of a focus on defining this program of maternal mRNA translation executed during meiotic maturation and at the oocyte-to-zygote transition, this paper presents a strategy to study the activation and repression of the translation of target maternal mRNAs in single oocytes during in vitro meiotic maturation.
In this method, the YPet open reading frame is cloned upstream of the 3' UTR of the transcript of interest. Next, mRNAs encoding this reporter are micro-injected into oocytes together with polyadenylated mRNAs encoding mCherry to control for injected volume. Reporter accumulation is measured during in vitro oocyte meiotic maturation using time-lapse microscopy. The accumulation of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and mCherry is recorded in individual oocytes, and YFP signals are corrected by the plateaued level of the co-injected mCherry. After data acquisition, translation rates are calculated for different time intervals during in vitro oocyte meiotic maturation by calculating the slope of the curve obtained by curve-fitting.
This approach provides a tool to experimentally confirm changes in translation of selected endogenous mRNAs. In addition, this method facilitates the characterization of regulatory elements that control translation during oocyte meiotic maturation by manipulating cis-regulatory elements of the 3' UTR of target mRNAs4,5,6. Manipulation of the poly(A) tail length also allows insight into adenylase/deadenylase activity in oocytes5. Mutagenesis of cis-acting elements or RNA immunoprecipitation can be used to study interactions with cognate RNA binding proteins6,7. Additionally, this method can be used to identify essential components of the translation program that are critical for oocyte developmental competence by measuring target 3' UTR translation in models associated with decreased oocyte quality 8,9,10. This method paper presents a representative experiment where denuded oocytes of 21-day-old C57/BL6 mice have been micro-injected with a Ypet reporter fused to the 3' UTR of IL-7. The setup and protocol for oocyte injection, time-lapse recording, and data analysis have been described.
The experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California at San Francisco (protocol AN182026).
1. Preparation of media
2. Preparation of mRNA encoding for Ypet-3' UTR and mCherry
3. Experimental procedure
NOTE: A schematic overview of oocyte micro-injection and subsequent time-lapse microscopy is given in Figure 1.
Denuded prophase I-arrested oocytes of 21-day-old C57/BL6 mice were injected with a reporter mix containing mRNA encoding the Ypet reporter fused to the 3' UTR of IL-7 and mRNA encoding mCherry. YFP and mCherry expression was recorded in 39 oocytes, of which 30 were matured, and 9 were arrested in prophase I as a negative control. Three maturing oocytes were excluded for analysis because they either had a delayed GVBD (N=2) or moved in the dish during the recording (N=1). Figure 3 shows mCherry and YFP expression in prophase I and maturing oocytes. Figure 4 shows YFP expression of maturing oocytes corrected for plateaued mCherry expression (averaged mCherry expression in the last 10 time-points) to correct for the injected volume. Translation rates of the reporter were measured by curve-fitting (linear regression) the YFP/mCherry values in prophase I and in maturing oocytes during the first 0-2 h or 8-10 h after cilostamide release (Figure 5A). The accumulation of the reporter does not follow a linear pattern, as indicated by a significant difference in translation rates between 0-2 h and 8-10 h after cilostamide release (p<0.0001; Figure 5B). Therefore, these results indicate activation of IL-7 translation during oocyte meiotic maturation.
Figure 1: Schematic overview of the experimental procedure. Oligoadenylated Ypet/3' UTR and polyadenylated mRNA encoding mCherry are micro-injected into denuded oocytes of 21-day-old C57/BL6 mice. Oocytes are pre-incubated for 16 h in cilostamide containing maturation medium to allow the mCherry signal to reach a plateau. After pre-incubation, a time-lapse recording is started where oocytes are either kept in medium with cilostamide to create a prophase I-arrested control group or released in cilostamide-free medium to mature. Abbreviations: UTR = untranslated region; YFP = yellow fluorescent protein; fw primer = forward primer; rev primer = reverse primer; Ampr = ampicillin resistance; polyA = polyadenyl; oligoA = oligoadenyl; GV = germinal vesicle. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Example of a single oocyte time-lapse recording. Brightfield, YFP, and mCherry recordings of a single oocyte injected with mRNAs encoding Ypet/Interleukin-7 3' UTR and polyadenylated mCherry at prophase I, MI (6 h after cilostamide release), and MII (15 h after cilostamide release). Scale bar = 25 µm. Abbreviations: YFP = yellow fluorescent protein; GV = germinal vesicle; MI = metaphase I; MII = metaphase II. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: YFP and mCherry signals recorded by time-lapse microscopy. YFP and mCherry signals of oocytes injected with oligoadenylated Ypet/IL7 3' UTR and polyadenylated mRNA encoding mCherry. Oocytes were either kept in medium with cilostamide to generate a prophase I-arrested control group (N=9) or released in cilostamide-free medium to allow for maturation (N=30). Data are individual oocyte measurements. Abbreviations: IL-7 = interleukin-7; YFP = yellow fluorescent protein. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: YFP signal corrected for co-injected mCherry level. YFP signals of prophase I-arrested and maturing oocytes were corrected for injected volume by dividing the YFP signal by the average mCherry signal of the last 10 time-points. Individual YFP/mCherry ratios for (A) prophase I-arrested oocytes and (B) maturing oocytes and mean ± standard error of the mean YFP/mCherry ratios of (C) prophase I-arrested and (D) maturating oocytes. Abbreviations: YFP = yellow fluorescent protein; GVBD = germinal vesicle breakdown. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Calculated translation rates at 0-2 h and 8-10 h of maturation. (A) Yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) signals of single oocytes corrected for mCherry (YFP/mCherry) at 0-2 h or 8-10 h after cilostamide release and (B) translation rates (mean ± standard error of the mean) as calculated by curve-fitting (linear regression) the YFP/mCherry values at 0-2 h and 8-10 h after cilostamide release. Data were analyzed using the unpaired two-tailed t-test. *p < 0.0001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Example of repression of translation: Oosp2. Re-analyzed data of an experiment where oocytes were injected with Ypet-Oosp2 3′ UTR and polyadenylated mRNA encoding mCherry. YFP signals of prophase I-arrested (N=63) and maturing oocytes (N=72) were corrected for injected volume by dividing the YFP signal by the average mCherry signal of the last 10 time-points. YFP and mCherry expression data were obtained using a Xenon Arc lamp, unlike the IL-7 experiment where an LED light source was used. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean of individual oocyte measurements and were previously published in Luong et al.5. Abbreviations: YFP = yellow fluorescent protein; Oosp2 = oocyte secreted protein 2; UTR = untranslated region; IL-7 = interleukin-7; LED= light-emitting diode; GVBD = germinal vesicle breakdown. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Effect of micro-injection and fluorescence exposure on timing of GVBD and PBE. Timing of GVBD and PBE of oocytes that were either micro-injected and exposed to fluorescence (injected), or not-injected and not exposed to fluorescence (not-injected). Data are individual oocyte measurements. Data were analyzed using the unpaired two-tailed t-test. *p<0.001. Abbreviations: GVBD = germinal vesicle breakdown; PBE= polar body extrusion. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Basic oocyte collection medium | ||
Component | For 500 mL | |
HEPES modified Minimum Essential Medium Eagle | 7.1 g | |
Sodium bicarbonate | 252 mg | |
Sodium pyruvate | 1.15 mL | |
Penicillin/Streptomycin 100x | 5 mL | |
Ultrapure distilled water (Invitrogen, 10977-015) | Up to 500 mL | |
Maturation medium | ||
Component | For 500 mL | |
MEM alpha 1x | Up to 500 mL | |
Sodium pyruvate | 1.15 mL | |
Penicillin/Streptomycin 100x | 5 mL |
Table 1: Preparation of media. List of components that need to be added to prepare basic oocyte collection medium and oocyte maturation medium.
Sequence | |||||
Ypet/Interleukin-7 3’ UTR | GAGAACCCACTGCTTACTGGCTTATCGAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGACCCAAGCTG GCTAGTTAAGCTTGGTACCGAGCTCGGATCCACCGGTCGCCACCATGGTGAGCAAAGGCGA AGAGCTGTTCACCGGCGTGGTGCCCATCCTGGTGGAGCTGGACGGCGACGTGAACGGCC ACAAGTTCAGCGTGAGCGGCGAGGGCGAGGGCGACGCCACCTACGGCAAGCTGACCCTG AAGCTGCTGTGCACCACCGGCAAGCTGCCCGTGCCCTGGCCCACCCTGGTGACCACCCTG GGCTACGGCGTGCAGTGCTTCGCCCGGTACCCCGACCACATGAAGCAGCACGACTTCTTCA AGAGCGCCATGCCCGAGGGCTACGTGCAGGAGCGGACCATCTTCTTCAAGGACGACGGCAA CTACAAGACCCGGGCCGAGGTGAAGTTCGAGGGCGACACCCTGGTGAACCGGATCGAGCTGA AGGGCATCGACTTCAAGGAGGACGGCAACATCCTGGGCCACAAGCTGGAGTACAACTACAAC AGCCACAACGTGTACATCACCGCCGACAAGCAGAAGAACGGCATCAAGGCCAACTTCAAGAT CCGGCACAACATCGAGGACGGCGGCGTGCAGCTGGCCGACCACTACCAGCAGAACACCCC CATCGGCGACGGCCCCGTGCTGCTGCCCGACAACCACTACCTGAGCTACCAGAGCGCCCTG TTCAAGGACCCCAACGAGAAGCGGGACCACATGGTGCTGCTGGAGTTCCTGACCGCCGCC GGCATCACCGAGGGCATGAACGAGCTCTATAAGAGATCTTTCGAAGGTAAGCCTATCCCTAA CCCTCTCCTCGGTCTCGATTCTACGCGTACCGGTCATCATCACCATCACCATTGAACAGGAC ATGTAGTAACAACCTCCAAGAATCTACTGGTTCATATACTTGGAGAGGTTGAAACCCTTCCAG AAGTTCCTGGATGCCTCCTGCTCAAATAAGCCAAGCAGCTGAGAAATCTACAGTGAGGTATG AGATGATGGACACAGAAATGCAGCTGACTGCTGCCGTCAGCATATACATATAAAGATATATCAA CTATACAGATTTTTGTAATGCAATCATGTCAACTGCAATGCTTTTAAAACCGTTCCAAATGTTTC TAACACTACAAAGTCTACAAAAAGCAAGGCTATGAAGATTCAGAGTCACCACTGTTTTCTTAGC AAAATGATGGTATGGTTAAACATTCATTGGTGAACCACTGGGGGAGTGGAACTGTCCTGTTTTAG ACTGGAGATACTGGAGGGCTCACGGTGATGGATAATGCTCTTGAAAACAAGAGTCTATCTTAAAGC AGCAGCAAAAAGAAGCTTAAGGCACTTAAGGCATCAACAAATGTAGTTAAATATGAATGTATAACA CATAACTTCAGTAAAGAGCATAGCAGATATTTTTAAATAAAAGTATTTTTAAAGATAGAAATGCACTTAT TCCAAAGATACTGAACCTTAGTATTCAGTCGCTTTTGACACTTGTGTATAATAAAGCTTATATAACTGAA TTTTCAATTTGAAAAGTATATTTTTAAAAGAATAATATATGCTAGACTTTTAATTAATGTATATGTTTAATTT TGGCATTCTGTCTGTCTCTCTGTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTACCTATCTATCTATATATATA ATTTTCATATACTACCAATTGCGTACTTTGGATAGTGTCTCTTTTTAACCTAAATGACCTTTATTAACAC TGTCAGGTTCCCTTACTCTCGAGAGTGTTCATTGCTGCACTGTCATTTGATCCCAGTTTTATTGAACAC ATATCCTTTAACACACTCACGTCCAGATTTAGCAGGAGACTAGGACCCTATAACTTTGTTAAGAGAGAA AACACTAATTTCTTGTTTTATAGTAGGGTCTTATTCGTATCTAAGGCAGGCTAGGATTGCAGACATGAGC CAATATGCTTAATTAGAAACATTCTTTTTATGTTAAACTCATGTCTTTTACAAGATGCCTACATATATCCTAT GTATATGCCTGTTTAAATCCTTTTTTGTAAGGTCTGCTGTCTTCCTTCAGTTGTAATGGAAAGAAACACTA TGTTGTAGAGGCCAAATTTCTGAAAGTGATAAGGGTTTGCTTGTACTGAATTCTCATTCTCCTTGCTTT TTCCAGCCACGTGAGCATCTAGCTATCTATACGCTGGATGTATTTGACCGATGCCTGCTCCACTGGCAC ATTGCATGTGTGGTAGCCATGCCTTCTTGCTTCTCCTTTTCCCCAACCCCTATAATGCTCTACTCAGTGG TACAGATAGCTGGGATTATCACAATTTTGAGAGAAACACCAATTGTTTAAAGTTTGTTTCATAATCACCATTT GCCCAGAAAACAGTTCTCTCAACTTGTTTGCAACATGTAATAATTTAAGAAACTCAATTTTGTTAATGGACTT TCGATAACTTCCTTAGATATCCCACATCTCCTACGTGTCAGTCCTTTGTCCTGAGGAACTGGTAAAATGGGTA AGCCCTTAGCTAGCGAACTGAAGGCATTCGCATGTGTAAGATAATCTCTATACCTGCAAGGCTGTCTGGAT GGCTCCCTACCAATATTGAACAATATTCTGATTTTGGCAAAATAAAGGATAATATTTT |
||||
Forward primer | GAGAACCCACTGCTTAC | ||||
Reverse primer | TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAAAATATTATCCTTTATTTTG CCAAAATC |
Table 2: Example of reporter and primer sequences Sequence of YFP/IL7 3'UTR reporter and sequences of forward and reverse primers that were used to produce a linear PCR template for in vitro transcription.
Supplemental File: Yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) and mCherry time-lapse recording. YFP and mCherry time-lapse recordings of a single oocyte injected with mRNAs encoding Ypet/Interleukin-7 3' UTR and polyadenylated mCherry. YFP channel (Ex: S500/20 × 49057; Em: D535/30 m 47281), mCherry channel (Ex: 580/25 × 49829; Em: 632/60 m). The oocytes were recorded every 15 min for 16 h (7 frames/second). Please click here to download this file.
The presented method describes a strategy to study activation and repression of translation of target mRNA at different transitions during in vitro oocyte meiotic maturation. IL-7, a cytokine released by the oocyte that may be involved in oocyte-cumulus cell communication8,13, was chosen for the purpose of describing this method. IL-7 is known to be increasingly translated during oocyte maturation8 and allows for good visualization of translational activation using this method. If, however, translation occurs at a constant rate throughout the experiment, accumulation of a reporter will follow a linear pattern, and translation rates at the beginning and end of the experiment will be similar. This conclusion can be verified by goodness of fit (R) of a linear regression through the entire recording interval. A repression in reporter translation will present itself as the plateauing of the YFP signal.
An example of repression of 3' UTR translation, can be found in the study of Luong et al.5, where the authors report repression of Oocyte Secreted Protein 2 (Oosp2) during oocyte meiotic maturation. These data have been re-analyzed and are shown in Figure 6. The maturing oocytes show plateauing of the YFP signal, which indicates repression of translation, while the prophase I-arrested control group follows a linear pattern of reporter accumulation, which indicates similar translation rates at the beginning and end of the experiment. When studying repression of translation, it is especially important to include a prophase I-arrested control group to ensure that the plateauing of the YPF signal is not explained by a decrease in oocyte quality due to poor culture conditions, thus confirming the viability of the oocytes. Accumulation of the reporter can be validated by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR using primers for YFP or by western blotting by taking advantage of the V5-epitope tag included in the reporter in this protocol.
Plateauing of the YFP signal may not be solely due to actively regulated repression of translation, but may also be explained by the degradation of the reporter during oocyte meiotic progression. This may mirror destabilization of the endogenous mRNA, which is essential for the transition to embryonic genome expression14,15,16. This possibility can be verified by measuring target gene transcript levels in the prophase I stage vs. metaphase II stage to confirm stability of the mRNAs. When preparing oocyte cDNA, it is preferable to use random hexamer priming over oligo-dT priming. The latter method presents apparent differences in gene transcript levels that may reflect differences in poly(A) length of these transcripts rather than actual differences in transcript levels7.
There are several methods to study genome-wide endogenous mRNA translation in mouse oocytes. These methods include polysome profiling7,17,18 and RiboTag/RNA-Seq5,19,20. Ribosome profiling is another method to study genome-wide translation that has been used in yeast, which is another model organism that is used to study meiosis21,22. However, these genome-wide analyses to study mRNA translation in the mouse require the use of 150-200 oocytes per sample while the number of oocytes available for analysis is usually limited. The single-oocyte assay described herein to assess translation of 3' UTR of target mRNAs complements genome-wide analyses of translation, as it allows the characterization of elements of the 3' UTR that regulate the translation program during oocyte meiotic maturation4,5,6. In the past, luciferase-based assays were used to assess translation of the 3' UTR of target mRNAs10,20,23 as it is a very sensitive method that requires only a few oocytes per sample; however, the oocytes need to be lysed to detect the amount of luciferase in a sample.
Others have used a 3' UTR/green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter to assess GFP accumulation in live mouse oocytes4. However, in these experiments, only two time-points were used: the beginning of incubation (prophase I) and the end of the incubation (metaphase II). This greatly diminishes the power of the measurements and increases the possibility of errors. Kinetic data provide accurate measurements based on rates (multiple points) and accurately define the time when translational activation or repression takes place. In addition, repression of translation cannot be assessed at these single time-points, which can lead to an inaccurate conclusion. Therefore, this method was adjusted by applying time-lapse microscopy to assess Ypet/3' UTR reporter accumulation throughout in vitro maturation of mouse oocytes5,6,9. By using this strategy, it is possible to study translation at different transitions during oocyte maturation.
There are several important aspects about this method to consider. First, the reporters used include an oligo(A) tail whose omission considerably reduces reporter accumulation. This may be due to both decreased translation as well reporter mRNA destabilization24,25. During the pre-incubation in prophase I, translation of an oligoadenylated probe adjusts to reflect the translation rate of the endogenous mRNA5. Second, it is important to realize that an increase in the number of recordings or duration of fluorescence exposure may potentially induce phototoxicity and thereby impair oocyte quality. Although the current experiment adopted 15-min intervals, the sampling rate can be decreased when a high fluorescence exposure must be used in case of low reporter expression.
To limit the amount of phototoxicity, a cold LED light source was used, which requires a shorter excitation26. To assess potential phototoxicity effects in the oocytes, the timing of GVBD and PBE was compared in oocytes that were either micro-injected and exposed to fluorescence or not injected and not exposed to fluorescence. The combination of micro-injection and fluorescence exposure was found to slightly delay GVBD (p<0.001), while the timing of PBE was similar (Figure 7).
This method has been used to study translational regulatory elements of the 3' UTR during in vitro oocyte meiotic maturation. Similarly, it may also be used to study functional 5' UTR elements essential for the regulation of translation or to study translation during in vitro oocyte fertilization. Although this method has been applied to human and mouse oocytes, it is also applicable to other animal species. Because this reporter assay is performed in single oocytes, it is especially suitable for use in mono-ovulatory species in which the number of oocytes available for analysis is limited. As opposed to using denuded oocytes, another application of this technique is the injection of the reporter into cumulus-enclosed oocytes, as the cumulus cells play a major role in the regulation of the translational program8,10,27. However, it should be taken into account that cumulus-enclosed oocytes are more likely to move away from the recording plane during the experiment as compared to denuded oocytes because of the movement of the cumulus cells during COC expansion. This may result in a larger proportion of oocytes that have to be excluded from analysis. In the future, cell-tracking software may be used that is able to track x, y, and z positions of the oocytes in the droplet, which may solve this issue.
In conclusion, the described single oocyte reporter assay represents a strategy to investigate the translational program executed at the oocyte-to-zygote transition. Increased knowledge of this translational program can provide important clues about the molecular regulation of oocyte developmental competence.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by NIH R01 GM097165, GM116926 and Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD National Centers for Translational Research in Reproduction and Infertility P50 HD055764 to Marco Conti. Enrico M. Daldello was supported by a fellowship from the Lalor Foundation and Natasja G. J. Costermans was supported by a Rubicon fellowship from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Preparation of media | |||
Bovine Serum Albumin Powder Bioxtra | Sigma-Aldrich | SIAL-A3311 | |
Cilostamide | EMD Millipore | 231085 | |
MEM alpha | Gibco | 12561-056 | |
Minimum Essential Medium Eagle | Sigma-Aldrich | M2645 | |
Penicillin-Streptomycin 100x Solution, Sterile Filtered | Genesee Scientific Corporation (GenClone) | 25-512 | |
Sodium Bicarbonate | JT-Baker | 3506-1 | |
Sodium Pyruvate | Gibco | 11360-070 | |
Ultrapure distilled water | Invitrogen | 10977-015 | |
Preparation of mRNA encoding YFP/3' UTR and mCherry | |||
Agarose | Apex Biomedical | 20-102QD | |
Carbenicillin disodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich | C1389-1G | |
Choo-Choo Cloning Kit | McLab | CCK-20 | |
CutSmart Buffer (10x) | New England Biolabs | B7204 | |
DNA loading dye (6x) | Thermo Scientific | R0611 | |
dNTP Solution | New England Biolabs | N0447S | |
DpnI | New England Biolabs | R0176 | |
GeneRuler 1 kb DNA ladder | Thermo Fisher | SM1333 | |
LB Agar Plates with 100 µg/mL Carbenicillin, Teknova | Teknova | L1010 | |
LB Medium (Capsules) | MP Biomedicals | 3002-021 | |
MEGAclear Transcription Clean-Up Kit | Life Technologies | AM1908 | |
MfeI-HF restriction enzyme | New England Biolabs | R3589 | |
mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 Transcription Kit | Invitrogen | AM1344 | |
Phusion High Fidelity DNA polymerase | New England Biolabs | M0530 | |
Poly(A) Tailing kit | Invitrogen | AM1350 | |
QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit | Qiagen | 27106 | |
QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit | Qiagen | 28704 | |
S.O.C. medium | Thermo Fisher | 15544034 | |
TAE buffer | Apex Biomedical | 20-193 | |
Ultrapure Ethidium Bromide Solution | Life Technologies | 15585011 | |
Oocyte collection | |||
Aspirator tube assembly for calibrated micro-pipettes | Sigma-Aldrich | A5177-5EA | |
Calibrated micro-pipettes | Drummond Scientific Company | 2-000-025 | |
PMSG- 5000 | Mybiosource | MBS142665 | |
PrecisionGlide Needle 26 G x 1/2 | BD | 305111 | |
Syringe 1 ml | BD | 309659 | |
Oocyte micro-injection | |||
35 mm Dish | No. 0 Coverslip | 20 mm Glass Diameter | Uncoated | MatTek | P35G-0-20-C | For time-lapse microscopy |
Borosilicate glass with filament | Sutter Instrument | BF100-78-10 | |
Oil for Embryo Culture | Irvine Scientific | 9305 | |
Petri Dish | Falcon | 351006 | For micro-injection |
Tissue Culture Dish | Falcon | 353001 | For oocyte incubation |
VacuTip Holding Capillary | Eppendorf | 5195000036 | |
Software | |||
Biorender | BioRender | Preparation of Figure 1S | |
MetaMorph, version 7.8.13.0 | Molecular Devices | For time-lapse microscopy, analysis of 3' UTR translation |