We provide a detailed protocol for electroporation-mediated RNA interference in insects of the order Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) using the blue-tailed damselfly (Ischnura senegalensis: Coenagironidae: Zygoptera) and the pied skimmer dragonfly (Pseudothemis zonata: Libellulidae: Anisoptera).
Dragonflies and damselflies (order Odonata) represent one of the most ancestral insects with metamorphosis, in which they change their habitat, morphology, and behavior drastically from aquatic larvae to terrestrial/aerial adults without pupal stage. Odonata adults have a well-developed color vision and show a remarkable diversity in body colors and patterns across sexes, stages, and species. While many ecological and behavioral studies on Odonata have been conducted, molecular genetic studies have been scarce mainly due to the difficulty in applying gene functional analysis to Odonata. For instance, RNA interference (RNAi) is less effective in the Odonata, as reported in the Lepidoptera. To overcome this problem, we successfully established an RNAi method combined with in vivo electroporation. Here we provide a detailed protocol including a video of the electroporation-mediated RNAi method as follows: preparation of larvae, species identification, preparation of dsRNA/siRNA solution and injection needles, ice-cold anesthesia of larvae, dsRNA/siRNA injection, in vivo electroporation, and individual rearing until adult emergence. The electroporation-mediated RNAi method is applicable to both damselflies (suborder Zygoptera) and dragonflies (suborder Anisoptera). In this protocol, we present the methods for the blue-tailed damselfly Ischnura senegalensis (Coenagrionidae) as an example of damselfly species and the pied skimmer dragonfly Pseudothemis zonata (Libellulidae) as another example of dragonfly species. As representative examples, we show the results of RNAi targeting the melanin synthesis gene multicopper oxidase 2. This RNAi method will facilitate understanding of various gene functions involved in metamorphosis, morphogenesis, color pattern formation, and other biological features of Odonata. Moreover, this protocol may be generally applicable to non-model organisms in which RNAi is less effective in gene suppression due to the inefficiency and low penetrance.
Dragonflies and damselflies (the order Odonata) are among the most ancestral groups of insects that exhibit "metamorphosis"1,2. By metamorphosis, they change their habitat, morphology, and behavior drastically from aquatic larvae to terrestrial/aerial adults3. Odonata adults have a well-developed color vision and represent a remarkable diversity in body colors and patterns across sexes, stages, and species3,4,5. While many ecological and behavioral studies on Odonata have been conducted6,7, molecular genetic studies have been hindered mainly by the difficulty in applying gene functional analysis to Odonata.
The conventional RNA interference (RNAi) method, in which double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is injected to suppress the function of the gene of interest8, turned out to be ineffective in Odonata insects9, as reported in Lepidopteran insects10. On the other hand, previous reports have suggested that electroporation-mediated RNAi is effective in Lepidopteran species, especially in epidermal tissues11,12,13. We recently found that the electroporation-mediated RNAi works effectively in the tiny dragonfly Nannophya pygmaea (Libellulidae: Anisoptera)9, but N. pygmaea is a relatively rare species and therefore not suitable for molecular genetic studies.
Most Odonata species are classified into either of the two suborders, Zygoptera (damselflies) or Anisoptera (true dragonflies)3. Here we focused on the blue-tailed damselfly Ischnura senegalensis (Coenagrionidae; Figure 1A) as a representative Zygopteran species and the pied skimmer dragonfly Pseudothemis zonata (Libellulidae; Figure 1B) as a representative Anisopteran species. The two species are among the most common Odonata species in natural and urban ponds in Japan, including those in Tsukuba City, and we can collect many larvae of the two species in the field. Recently we established a laboratory rearing system for individual larvae of I. senegalensis, which enabled continuous monitoring of development and morphogenesis of the Odonata larvae in detail14.
In this report, we provide a refined method and a video protocol for the electroporation-mediated RNAi in I. senegalensis and P. zonata. In Japan, I. senegalensis and Ischnura asiatica, which are genetically close, are often found sympatrically15, and they are difficult to distinguish in larvae16. We also describe how two Ischnura species can be distinguished by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).
For evaluating the effectiveness of the electroporation-mediated RNAi, we select multicopper oxidase 2 gene (MCO2; also known as laccase2) as a representative target gene, on account of the visible phenotype of paler cuticle color upon knockdown of the gene expression9. MCO2 is known to be essential for darkening of the epidermis in a variety of insect species17,18.
NOTE: The overall scheme of the protocols is shown in Figure 1.
1. Preparation of larvae of dragonflies or damselflies.
2. Preparation of dsRNA/siRNA solution and injection needles for RNAi.
NOTE: Select either small interfering RNA (siRNA) (step 2.1) or double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) (step 2.2) as the solution for RNAi.
3. siRNA/dsRNA injection
NOTE: The procedure is slightly different for damselflies (step 3.1) and dragonflies (step 3.2).
4. in vivo electroporation
5. Site-specific phenotypic analysis
We applied the above protocol to electroporation-mediated RNAi targeting MCO2 gene and negative control genes (EGFP for siRNA and bla for dsRNA) (i) in the abdomen of I. senegalensis (Figure 4), (ii) in the thorax of I. senegalensis (Figure 5), and (iii) in the abdomen of P. zonata (Figure 6). The results of the RNAi experiments are summarized in Table 1. Because negatively charged siRNA/dsRNA is incorporated only into positively charged cells, RNAi phenotypes were observed around the region where the positive electrode was placed for electroporation.
In both I. senegalensis and P. zonata, inhibition of melanin pigmentation (i.e., black, brown, and reddish brown) appeared in patches around the region where the positive electrode was placed (white arrowheads and dotted lines in Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6) when MCO2 RNAi was performed in combination with electroporation (Table 1), as previously reported in N. pygmaea9. By contrast, no phenotypic effects were observed around the electroporation site when the control gene was injected (EGFP siRNA or bla dsRNA) (Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6, Table 1). In addition, injecting the MCO2 gene without electroporation had no effect on adult pigmentation (Figure 4, Table 1), indicating that electroporation is essential for RNAi in Odonata. It should be noted that the blue, green, and yellow colorations are not affected by the RNAi of MCO2 gene that is involved in melanin synthesis in the cuticle, which plausibly reflect the fact that these body colors are attributed to pigment granules present in the epidermal cells that are visible through the transparent cuticle26. As shown in Figure 4, no remarkable phenotypic differences were recognized between the individuals subjected to siRNA treatment and dsRNA treatment, whereas considerable variation in size and location of the RNAi phenotype was observed among different individuals subjected to the same RNAi treatment (ex. compare two examples of IsMCO2 dsRNA in Figure 4).
To determine the developmental stage most suitable for the RNAi treatment, we compared the phenotypic consequences of the RNAi treatment at five morphological stages (stage A-E) in the final larval instar of I. senegalensis (Figure 7A). Inhibition of melanin pigmentation caused by MCO2 RNAi was observed in all emerged adults when injected at the stages A and B (Figure 7C). When injected at the stages C and D, suppression of melanin pigmentation was certainly observed in some emerged adults, but other adults exhibited abnormal coloration caused by wounds (Figure 7B).
Figure 1: Electroporation-mediated RNAi methods in Odonata. A. Ischnura senegalensis (Coenagirionidae) as a representative damselfly species. B. Pseudothemis zonata (Libellulidae) as a representative dragonfly species. C. The overall scheme of the protocols. Blue and orange boxes indicate the protocols for I. senegalensis and P. zonata, respectively. The purple boxes indicate the common protocols applied to both species. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: A representative result of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)-based species identification for Ischnura species. Arrowhead indicates the I. senegalensis-specific band. 1, 2, 4: I. asiatica, 3: I. senegalensis, M: 100-base pair ladder marker. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Electroporation-mediated RNAi method in Odonata. A-C. Ice-cold anesthesia of I. senegalensis. Arrowheads indicate a larva. A. Putting a larva on crushed ice with a wet paper. B. Magnified view of a larva on ice. C. A larva covered with a wet paper on ice. D-G. RNAi method for I. senegalensis. D. Injection into the thorax. E. Electroporation on the thorax. F. Injection into the abdomen. G. Electroporation on the abdomen. H-J. RNAi method for P. zonata. H. Making a small hole on the abdomen. I. Injection into the abdomen. J. Electroporation on the abdomen. Arrows indicate the point of making a hole or injection. +, -: Positive/negative side electrodes. Numbers indicate the abdominal segment. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Dorsal views of RNAi phenotypes on the abdomen of I. senegalensis. White arrowheads indicate the regions of suppressed melanization. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Lateral and dorsal views of RNAi phenotypes on the thorax of I. senegalensis. White arrowheads and dotted lines indicate the regions of suppressed pigmentation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Ventral views of RNAi phenotypes in the abdomen of P. zonata. White arrowheads and dotted lines indicate the regions of suppressed melanization. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Stage dependent IsMCO2 RNAi effects during the final larval instar of I.senegalensis. A. Morphological changes in the compound eyes at five morphological stages (stage A-E) and the number of days to adult emergence in this study. Numbers in parentheses are from previous report14. B. Abnormal pigmentation due to wounds. Arrowhead indicates electroporation site. C. The effect of RNAi at five morphological stages on adult pigmentation in I. senegalensis. The number on the bar indicates the number of individuals. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Species | I.senegalensis | P.zonata | |||||||||
Injected region | Abdomen | Thorax | Abdomen | ||||||||
siRNA/dsRNA | siRNA | dsRNA | dsRNA | dsRNA | |||||||
Target gene | IsMCO2 | EGFP | IsMCO2 | IsMCO2 | bla | IsMCO2 | bla | PzMCO2 | PzMCO2 | bla | |
Electroporation | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | – | + | |
Injected larvae | 22 | 25 | 30 | 6 | 53 | 12 | 20 | 17 | 5 | 9 | |
Emerged adults | 7 | 6 | 13 | 4 | 40 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 5 | |
Adults with less pigmented regions (ratio) | 7 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
13 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
10 (91%) |
0 (0%) |
11 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
Table 1. The effect of RNAi on adult pigmentation in I. senegalensis and P. zonata. Results at stage A are shown in I. senegalensis. IsMCO2: multicopper oxidase 2 gene of I. senegalensis, EGFP: Enhanced green fluorescent protein gene, bla: beta lactamase gene from pGEM-T Easy Vector, PzMCO2: multicopper oxidase 2 gene of P. zonata. The results for the control genes represent the total number of experiments the authors have conducted to date.
Lethality of RNAi treatment
We found that the lethality of the RNAi treatment depends strongly on the rearing history and condition of the Odonata larvae. The larvae soon after collection in the field are generally healthy and exhibit low mortality rates after the electroporation-mediated RNAi treatment. By contrast, the larvae reared in the laboratory for a long period of time (e.g., one month) tend to suffer low success rates of adult emergence. In I. senegalensis, instead of the larvae collected in the field, the larvae reared in the laboratory from eggs can be used14, but the success rates of RNAi using the laboratory-reared larvae tend to be considerably lower (many individuals died during metamorphosis) than those using the field-collected larvae. In addition, frequent larval feeding and clean water rearing are important for increasing the success rates of adult emergence and reducing the lethality of the RNAi treatment.
Efficiency of RNAi treatment
As described above, the levels of RNAi phenotype, namely size and location of the cuticle decolorization, often exhibited considerable variation between individuals subjected to the same RNAi treatment (e.g., Figure 4), but the levels of the phenotypic penetrance seem to be remarkably different between the Odonata species. The observed phenotypic regions were larger and more prominent in I. senegalensis (Figures 4-5) than in P. zonata (Figure 6) and N. pygmaea9. This difference may be due to the thickness of the cuticle on the larval surface, considering that the cuticle of I. senegalensis is thinner than the cuticle of P. zonata and N. pygmaea). As far as we examined, no clear difference was recognized between the effects of siRNA and dsRNA (Figure 4, Table 1).
Appropriate developmental stage for RNAi
It should be noted that proper larval staging is important for performing RNAi efficiently. Inhibition of adult pigmentation was caused by MCO2 RNAi before the stage D (approximately 3 days before adult emergence), which is consistent with the previous report on N. pygmaea9. The RNAi phenotypes observed when injected at the stages C and D were less conspicuous than those treated at the stages A and B, which indicate that the stages C and D may be too late to sufficiently suppress the gene expression. The appropriate timing for RNAi treatment depends on the timing of gene expression, and MCO2 gene exhibits transiently high expression during adult emergence9, as in other insects17,18. In the stinkbug Plautia stali, RNAi knockdown of MCO2 gene was observed from day 4 onwards after injection27, which is consistent with the present results.
Our previous study on I. senegalensis showed that, after the stage B, days to adult emergence exhibit relatively small variation among the majority of final instar larvae, suggesting that the stage B may correspond to the onset of the process toward adult emergence, after which the developmental processes for metamorphosis proceed in a prefixed and coordinated manner14. Morphological abnormalities caused by wounds were often observed when the larvae were RNAi-treated at the stages C and D (Figure 7B, 7C). This is likely to be associated with a dramatic progression of metamorphosis during these stages, suggesting that RNAi treatment should be avoided from the stage C and on. In summary, we recommend that final instar larvae at the stage A or B (or at the stage before the larval wings expand significantly) should be used for RNAi experiments.
Usefulness and superiority of electroporation-mediated RNAi method
The conventional RNAi is a simple and powerful experimental method, but some insect lineages like butterflies10, aphids28 and dragonflies9 exhibit low RNAi efficiency, for which establishment of gene function analysis is a major challenge. In this study, we found that electroporation-mediated RNAi can induce local gene suppression in dragonflies with almost 100% efficiency, at least in epidermis, if treated at appropriate developmental stages (Table 1). Recently, CRISPR/Cas9-based gene knockouts have been successfully applied to a variety of insects, providing a powerful molecular genetic tool for non-model organisms29. Here, however, we point out that CRISPR/Cas9 is certainly great but the electroporation-mediated RNAi method may be superior to CRISPR/Cas9 in some respects.
Firstly, in the electroporation-mediated RNAi method, the body region where RNAi phenotypes appear can be easily controlled experimentally by the position of the positive electrode upon electroporation. In addition, since the region where the gene expression is suppressed is limited around the region where the positive electrode was placed, the RNAi phenotypes can be easily compared with the control phenotypes side by side in the same individual. Secondly, compared to CRISPR/Cas9 method in which injected eggs have to be reared to adulthood to observe the knockout phenotypes, the electroporation-mediated RNAi is superior in that the gene knockdown phenotypes can usually be observed in much shorter time. For example, it takes three to four months for I. senegalensis and one to two years for P. zonata from eggs to adults14,30. However, in order to observe RNAi phenotypes within the adult epidermis, it takes less than one month from dsRNA injection into final instar larvae at the stage B to adult emergence for both I. senegalensis and P. zonata (Figure 7). Thirdly, the electroporation-mediated RNAi method entails dsRNA injection into large larvae, which is easier than microinjection into tiny eggs required for CRISPR/Cas9 method. In addition, the electroporation-mediated RNAi is applicable to insect species whose newly laid eggs are difficult to collect. For example, females of P. zonata lay eggs onto floating plants on water surface during flight, and thus it is difficult to collect their eggs both in the field and in the lab. Hence, we expect that this protocol may be generally applicable to non-model organisms in which the conventional RNAi method does not work efficiently.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Minoru Moriyama for technical advice and supports, Bin Hirota and Ryutaro Suzuki for collecting Odonata larvae, and Misa Shinya for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP18J21561 to GO and JP18H02491, JP18H04893, JP19H03287, and JP20H04936 to RF.
12-well plate | Violamo | VTC-P12 | For rearing larvae before injection |
Brine shrimp eggs | JAPAN PET DESIGN | 4975677012396 | |
Calibrated micropipette (1-5 µL) | Drummond | 2-000-001-90 | |
Deposit pestle 1.5 mL | Thermo Fisher Scientific | K749520-0090 | |
Digital high defenition microscope camera | Leica Microsystems | MC170HD | |
Disposable non-woven mesh | HAKUGEN EARTH | DSC-105A | |
DNA Ligation Kit Ver.2.1 | Takara Bio | 6022 | |
DraI | Takara Bio | 1037A | |
Electrode (1mmφ) | NEPAGENE | CUY650P1 | |
Electroporator | CellProduce | Cure-gene | |
Forceps | KOWA Forceps Industry | K-10 No1 | |
Glass needle puller | NARISHIGE | PN-3 | |
Hand mixer | AS ONE | 1-229-02 | |
Hand net | HOGA | IS33-3B | |
HEPES | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 346-01373 | For injection buffer |
Insect pin capitate No. 3 | Shiga Konchu Fukyusha | N230 | For fixing larvae |
KCl | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 163-03545 | For PBS |
KH2PO4 | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 169-04245 | For PBS |
KOAc | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 160-03175 | For injection buffer |
KOH | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 168-21815 | For injection buffer |
Laboratory Jack (150×150) | AS ONE | 1-4642-11 | For adjusting the position of the manipulator |
LOGIQLEAN Gel for Ultrasound Hard type | GE Healthcare | 2369385 | |
Manipulator | Muromachi Kikai Co., Ltd. | SJ-1 | For adjusting the position of the injector and the capillary |
MEGAscript RNAi kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | AM1626 | |
Mg(OAc)2 | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 130-00095 | For injection buffer |
Na2HPO4 | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 197-02865 | For PBS |
NaCl | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 191-01665 | For PBS |
Petri dish (5 cm diameter) | Iwaki | 1010-060 | For rearing injected larvae |
Pneumatic Injector | NARISHIGE | IM-12 | |
pT7Blue T-Vector | Novagen | 69820 | |
QIAquick PCR Purification Kit | QIAGEN | 28106 | |
RNAiso Plus | FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation | 9109 | |
RNeasy Mini Kit | QIAGEN | 74106 | |
Shiga micro insect pin with stainless headless | Shiga Konchu Fukyusha | N251 | For making a small hole |
Stereoscopic microscope | Leica Microsystems | S8APO | |
SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 18090010 | |
TaKaRa Ex Taq | Takara Bio | RR001B | For PCR-amplification from plasmid |
Tks Gflex DNA Polymerase | Takara Bio | R060B | For PCR-amplification from caudal gill |